Southern District of New York
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Lara Pomerantz
|
Employment |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
FBI
|
Professional collaborative |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
Southern District of Florida
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
Southern District of Florida
|
Jurisdictional separation |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
|
Institutional independence |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
OFF
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein's attorneys
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Subject of prosecution |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Redacted Sender
|
Employment |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jack Scarola
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
[Redacted] AUSA
|
Employment |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Efrain Reyes
|
Defendant prosecutor |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
Oath Keepers
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Investigation subject |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Judge Nathan
|
Judicial |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein Investigation (2018R01618)
|
Investigating authority |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
Southern District of Florida
|
Jurisdictional dispute |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Employee |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. EPSTEIN
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Prosecution of Ghislaine Maxwell by the Southern District of New York | New York | View |
| N/A | N/A | Ghislaine Maxwell's lawyers were in touch with the Southern District of New York. | Southern District of New York | View |
| N/A | N/A | Southern District of New York was in touch with Mr. Epstein. | N/A | View |
| 2020-06-10 | N/A | UMB received a request/subpoena regarding Ghislaine Maxwell. | UMB (Kansas City, MO) | View |
| 2019-07-17 | N/A | Filing of detention submission document for JE (Jeffrey Epstein). | New York, NY | View |
| 2019-01-01 | N/A | Miami Herald filed federal court motion seeking access to sealed documents. | Southern District of New York | View |
EFTA00025103.pdf
This document is an email chain from November and December 2019 between attorneys at Winston & Strawn LLP (Suzanne Jaffe Bloom, Johanna Rae Hudgens) and redacted Assistant United States Attorneys from the Southern District of New York. They are scheduling an in-person meeting for December 4, 2019, at the Winston & Strawn offices to discuss allegations found on page 7 of an attached complaint (referenced as 19_Civ._10788.pdf). The SDNY attorneys indicate that three of them will attend the meeting.
EFTA00025034.pdf
An internal email dated October 25, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York. The email concerns a '3500 cover letter' (referring to Jencks Act disclosures) and includes an attachment named '2021.10.25_Maxwell_Cover_Letter_v1.docx', indicating preparation for discovery production in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial.
EFTA00025032.pdf
An email dated October 25, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York to a redacted recipient. The email transmits the 'last set of MILs' (Motions in Limine) for review, including attachments related to suppressing identification ('Suppress_ID'), exhibits, and 'Forbidden_Words'. The sender notes they expect input from an expert by noon the following day to finalize the documents.
EFTA00025031.pdf
An email from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York to their legal team dated October 23, 2021. The email discusses the 'Next tranche of MILs' (Motions in Limine), attaching responses regarding exhibits and the suppression of victim MV-4's identification. It also mentions pending motions to preclude references to the terms 'victims' and 'rape'.
EFTA00024987.pdf
This document is a discovery production letter dated November 24, 2021, from U.S. Attorney Damian Williams to the defense counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell. It details the production of confidential records related to JPMC (JPMorgan Chase) and Lockheed Martin, governed by a Protective Order. The letter explains the specific confidentiality markings applied to the produced materials.
EFTA00024984.pdf
An internal email thread from the United States Attorney's Office (SDNY) dated November 2021 regarding the 'nolle memo' and application for Tova Noel and Michael Thomas. These individuals were the correctional officers charged in connection with Jeffrey Epstein's death (Case 19 Cr. 830). The email discusses the review of documents to drop the prosecution (nolle prosequi) against them.
EFTA00024983.pdf
An email dated November 22, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney (SDNY) to Brian Burns and Patrick Smith. The email attaches a defense response to motions to quash, noting it was filed under seal, and states the prosecution's intent to seek redactions to protect victims' private information.
EFTA00024952.pdf
This document is an email chain dated November 22, 2021, between personnel at the Southern District of New York (SDNY) regarding the preparation of a binder for legal proceedings. The emails discuss attaching various legal documents related to the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (case 20cr330), including responses to motions, limiting instructions from Judge Nathan, and Government Exhibit 52 (GX-52).
EFTA00024931.pdf
An email dated May 5, 2021, from Assistant US Attorney Lara [Redacted] to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Everdell, Cohen, Sternheim, Menninger, Pagliuca). The prosecutor is sharing a draft letter regarding 'flashlight checks' (as indicated by the attachment filename) pursuant to Judge Nathan's April 29 order, asking the defense to identify any necessary redactions of private medical information before the letter is publicly filed.
EFTA00024924.pdf
An internal email from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York sent on November 19, 2021. The email circulates version 5 of the 'Maxwell Opening' statement (Maxwell_Opening_v5.docx) to the legal team. The sender notes adjustments to the 'pyramid scheme' structure of the argument and requests a brief discussion the following day.
EFTA00024923.pdf
This document is an email chain from November 2021 between Assistant United States Attorneys at the Southern District of New York (SDNY). The correspondence concerns a '17(c) letter' (referring to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 17(c) regarding subpoenas) and a 'Motion to Quash' attachment. The sender mentions the urgency due to upcoming 'voir dire' (jury selection), likely related to the Ghislaine Maxwell trial which began around this time.
EFTA00024905.pdf
This document is an email chain from November 20, 2021, concerning legal instructions for Judge Nathan. An Assistant United States Attorney from the Southern District of New York discusses providing views on proposed limiting instructions and mentions preparing two responsive letters following an order on MV-3. The chain also includes a draft response to be used as a starting point.
EFTA00024904.pdf
An email dated November 20, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York to their team. The email concerns a response due to Judge Nathan regarding limiting instructions related to an order on 'MV-3' (likely referencing a minor victim in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial, case 20cr330). The sender has drafted two potential responses and requests a call to discuss.
EFTA00024899.pdf
An internal email from November 19, 2021, sent by an Assistant US Attorney for the Southern District of New York to a contractor. The email concerns the organization of evidence for trial, specifically requesting that embedded emails labeled 'travel' be added to '3500' (witness statement) folders and checked for 'Rule 16' discovery production. The sender notes uncertainty about whether the attachments were previously received from 'Interlochen'.
EFTA00024896.pdf
This document is an email from an Assistant United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York concerning the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. It provides details about the courtrooms, timing of proceedings, and expresses a strong belief in justice for the victims of Maxwell's alleged sexual exploitation of underage girls. Redactions are present for the sender and recipient.
EFTA00024891.pdf
An email sent on Thanksgiving Day 2021 by an Assistant United States Attorney regarding the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. The email includes an attachment titled 'Maxwell_Opening_v7.docx', containing a revised draft of the opening statement, and schedules a practice session ('re-moot') for the following day.
EFTA00024817.pdf
This document is an internal email dated November 6, 2020, from the Deputy Chief of the Public Corruption Unit at the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The email is addressed to other USANYS staff and contains an attachment titled 'PC_Unit_--_Short_Form_Update.11.6.20.docx', providing a monthly update for the unit.
EFTA00024811.pdf
An internal email from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York dated May 21, 2021. The email circulates a draft joint letter regarding the pretrial schedule for 'GM' (Ghislaine Maxwell) for review before it is sent to the defense team.
EFTA00024805.pdf
An internal email from an Assistant United States Attorney at the Southern District of New York dated May 19, 2021. The sender is coordinating the drafting of legal motions, specifically referencing an 'NPA point draft' (likely referring to the Non-Prosecution Agreement relevant to the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) and setting a deadline for submission to supervisors ('chiefs') by the end of the day.
EFTA00024758.pdf
This document is an email thread between Dr. Dawn Hughes, a clinical and forensic psychologist, and federal prosecutors from the Southern District of New York. The prosecutors are contacting Dr. Hughes to discuss her availability to serve as an expert witness in the upcoming trial of *United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell*, scheduled for July 12, 2021. The thread confirms a conference call scheduled for the following Wednesday at 2:00 PM.
EFTA00024742.pdf
An email chain from October 2020 between the SDNY and the NYPD/FBI Child Exploitation Human Trafficking Task Force regarding an attempt to interview a former Epstein employee living on Long Island. Investigators visited the subject's home, where his daughter translated due to his poor English; they acknowledged the inquiry was about Epstein but referred investigators to their attorney, Aitan Gohlman. The emails also mention that Gohlman represents another witness of interest.
EFTA00024739.pdf
This document is an email chain spanning from January 2019 to October 2020 regarding the 'Epstein investigation.' The correspondence involves an Assistant U.S. Attorney from the Southern District of New York coordinating with another party regarding the transfer, scanning, and indexing of a massive volume of records (between 16,000 and 29,000 pages) and specific inquiries about CDs found in boxes of materials from Florida.
EFTA00024731.pdf
This document is an email chain from October 19, 2020, between the Southern District of New York (USAO) and likely the FBI. The emails discuss the distribution of a review protocol for image and video files retrieved from Jeffrey Epstein's electronic devices. Ten specific device identification numbers (starting with NYC) are listed for immediate FBI review. The correspondence also mentions the attachment of the Maxwell indictment and plans for a conference call once document copies are processed.
EFTA00024711.pdf
An internal email from the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York dated May 17, 2021. An Assistant US Attorney circulates a renewed motion for pretrial release for Ghislaine Maxwell ('GM') that was filed by attorney David Markus earlier that afternoon.
EFTA00024671.pdf
This document is an email from an Assistant United States Attorney (SDNY) documenting a call with attorney Katya Jestin on May 12, 2021. Jestin represents a wealthy, anonymous client seeking to provide financial assistance to Jeffrey Epstein's victims and requested the SDNY's help in connecting with victim attorneys. The AUSA explicitly refused to facilitate this connection or provide any information to avoid involvement in conveying funding to potential witnesses in the case.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity