Southern District of New York
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Lara Pomerantz
|
Employment |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
FBI
|
Professional collaborative |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
Southern District of Florida
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
Southern District of Florida
|
Jurisdictional separation |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
|
Institutional independence |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
OFF
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein's attorneys
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Subject of prosecution |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Redacted Sender
|
Employment |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jack Scarola
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
[Redacted] AUSA
|
Employment |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Efrain Reyes
|
Defendant prosecutor |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
Oath Keepers
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Investigation subject |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Judge Nathan
|
Judicial |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein Investigation (2018R01618)
|
Investigating authority |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
Southern District of Florida
|
Jurisdictional dispute |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Employee |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. EPSTEIN
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Prosecution of Ghislaine Maxwell by the Southern District of New York | New York | View |
| N/A | N/A | Ghislaine Maxwell's lawyers were in touch with the Southern District of New York. | Southern District of New York | View |
| N/A | N/A | Southern District of New York was in touch with Mr. Epstein. | N/A | View |
| 2020-06-10 | N/A | UMB received a request/subpoena regarding Ghislaine Maxwell. | UMB (Kansas City, MO) | View |
| 2019-07-17 | N/A | Filing of detention submission document for JE (Jeffrey Epstein). | New York, NY | View |
| 2019-01-01 | N/A | Miami Herald filed federal court motion seeking access to sealed documents. | Southern District of New York | View |
EFTA00020925.pdf
An email dated January 26, 2021, sent by an Assistant U.S. Attorney from the Southern District of New York to an unknown recipient. The email contains the subject line 'this is quite the story' and shares a link to a Miami New Times article detailing a dispute between Julie Brown and Mike Fisten over an Epstein-related book deal.
EFTA00020906.pdf
This document is an email chain from November 14, 2019, involving a Victim Witness Coordinator at the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York. The subject line asks, 'any of you have vouchers for Epstein victims,' to which the respondent replies via iPhone, 'I don't.'
EFTA00020897.pdf
This document is an email chain from October 2020 involving the Southern District of New York (SDNY) and the United States District Court. It concerns the circulation of signed warrant materials and affidavits related to an 'EPSTEIN' matter (likely related to the estate or ongoing investigation given the date). The chain includes file attachments referencing case number '20 MAG 11668'.
EFTA00020878.pdf
This document is an email chain from October 2020 between Dr. Kimberly Mehlman-Orozco and prosecutors from the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The prosecutors initially contacted Dr. Mehlman-Orozco to vet her as a potential expert witness for the trial of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. After reviewing her CV and materials, the prosecutors canceled the scheduled meeting, stating they needed an expert with different expertise.
EFTA00020870.pdf
This document is an email chain from September 2020 between Marc Weinstein (Hughes Hubbard & Reed) and an Assistant US Attorney from the SDNY. The correspondence concerns the SDNY's request for a 2009 deposition transcript of a plaintiff represented by attorney Jack Scarola in a lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein. Weinstein coordinates with the SDNY and Scarola to ensure no protective orders prevent the disclosure before ultimately providing the transcripts.
EFTA00020852.pdf
This document is a series of emails between Glen McGorty (Crowell & Moring LLP) and the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) regarding scheduling and preparation for WebEx interviews/proffers with a client (name redacted). The emails discuss logistics, executed proffer agreements, and specific topics the FBI intends to cover, including interactions with CBP employees in the Virgin Islands and Jeffrey Epstein. Key dates mentioned range from October to November 2020.
EFTA00020825.pdf
This document is an email chain from October and November 2020 between Crowell & Moring LLP attorneys (representing a redacted witness) and the SDNY US Attorney's Office. The correspondence coordinates a second proffer interview for the witness, scheduled for November 12, 2020, which will include FBI agents. The focus of the interview is specifically on the witness's knowledge of Jeffrey Epstein's interactions with US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) in the Virgin Islands, including whether CBP employees helped Epstein avoid standard entry processing and if Epstein provided favors (such as trips to his island) to CBP staff. A specific CBP employee in St. Thomas is mentioned as having the witness listed in their phone contacts.
EFTA00020810.pdf
This document is an email chain between Assistant United States Attorneys (SDNY) dated October 12-13, 2021. The correspondence concerns legal preparations, specifically drafting Motions in Limine (MIL) regarding 'pseudonyms' (likely for victim anonymity) and 'sympathy'. The emails mention attachments including 'Anonymity_v.1' and a 2019 Govt MIL document. One participant is noted to be traveling to California.
EFTA00020787.pdf
This document is an email dated August 23, 2019, circulated within the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS), containing the full text of a New York Times article by Katie Benner. The article details Attorney General William Barr's reaction to Jeffrey Epstein's death in federal custody, describing his anger at the Bureau of Prisons' incompetence and his subsequent actions to overhaul BOP leadership, including transferring the warden and appointing Kathleen Hawk Sawyer. It highlights the political pressure on Barr, conspiracy theories surrounding the death, and the unresolved questions regarding the failure of prison protocols such as regular checks and cellmate assignment.
EFTA00020785.pdf
An email dated April 27, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York to a redacted recipient. The sender is inquiring about the metadata of an attached document (USGME01088996.doc), specifically asking to identify the device the document originated from.
EFTA00020781.pdf
This document is an internal Department of Justice email chain from March 2019 regarding the technical processing of evidence for the case 'US v. Epstein' (Case #2018R01618). An Assistant U.S. Attorney (SDNY) requests the uploading of subpoena returns from the law firm Boies Schiller (BSF) into the Relativity review platform. The technical staff discusses issues with DVD-formatted video files (VIDEO_TS folders) and specific interviews/walkthrough videos that require conversion or exclusion from the database.
EFTA00020780.pdf
An email dated March 25, 2019, from an Assistant U.S. Attorney in the Southern District of New York requesting the upload of subpoena response documents from the law firm Boies Schiller (BSF) into the Relativity database for the case US v. Epstein (2018R01618). The email specifies a network file path on the DOJ cloud server containing the documents and outlines the desired folder structure for the upload relative to the 'FBI Case File'.
EFTA00020774.pdf
This document is an email chain from July 2020 between Jill Greenfield of the law firm Fieldfisher and an Assistant U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York (SDNY). The correspondence concerns the scheduling of a call and the preparation for an interview with a client of Greenfield's who is a potential witness/victim in the investigation of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. The SDNY attorney provides a specific list of seven question categories to guide Greenfield's discussion with her client, covering topics such as the client's background, recruitment, employment duties, travel, specific instances of sexual abuse by Epstein or Maxwell, knowledge of other underage victims, and any contact from the accused during federal investigations.
EFTA00020773.pdf
An email from an Assistant U.S. Attorney (SDNY) to Marc Weinstein and Andrew Tomback regarding the investigation into the Epstein estate. The email outlines protocols for producing evidence found at the New York residence, specifically photographs and discs, and raises the issue of whether the estate will waive attorney-client privilege for the purpose of the United States v. Maxwell case.
EFTA00020769.pdf
This document is an email chain from March and April 2019 between the Southern District of New York (SDNY) Assistant U.S. Attorney's office and technical support staff regarding the 'US v. Epstein' case (USAO # 2018R01618). The correspondence details the process of loading subpoena returns from the law firm Boies Schiller (referred to as BSF) into the Relativity e-discovery database. The emails specifically reference file paths containing video interviews with individuals identified only by initials (H.R., J.H., S.V., A.D., A.T.) and discuss the technical handling of DVD file structures.
EFTA00020766.pdf
This document is an email chain from July 12-13, 2019, between defense attorneys Martin Weinberg and Reid Weingarten, and an Assistant U.S. Attorney (name redacted) regarding the U.S. v. Epstein case. The correspondence concerns discovery requests, specifically regarding financial records from 'Institution 1' and details about 'two wires' that the defense wished to review prior to a hearing scheduled for the following Monday. The chain also includes a submission from the Government to Judge Berman's chambers attaching a reply in support of the detention memo and opposition to bail.
EFTA00020701.pdf
An email dated April 24, 2019, from an Assistant United States Attorney named Abby in the SDNY Human Trafficking and Money Laundering Unit. The email transmits an updated forfeiture document related to the TVPA (Trafficking Victims Protection Act) to redacted recipients and references an event happening that evening.
EFTA00020699.pdf
This document is an email thread from April 2019 involving Boies Schiller Flexner LLP regarding a Grand Jury Subpoena. The correspondence discusses a sealed order from the Southern District of New York granting BSF permission to produce confidential discovery materials from the case '[Redacted] v. Maxwell' (likely Giuffre v. Maxwell) in response to the subpoena. It explicitly notes that the order does not apply to other litigation such as 'In re Jane Doe 43 v. Epstein'.
EFTA00020697.pdf
This document is an email chain from April 15, 2019, between Peter Skinner (likely representing Boies Schiller Flexner) and a redacted sender (likely a federal prosecutor). The correspondence concerns a Grand Jury subpoena served on BSF regarding the 'Guiffre v. Maxwell' civil case. The redacted sender provides a sealed order granting BSF permission to turn over 'CONFIDENTIAL' discovery materials to the Grand Jury, while explicitly noting this order does not apply to the 'Jane Doe 43 v. Epstein' litigation.
EFTA00020696.pdf
This document is an email dated April 29, 2019, sent by an Assistant United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York. The email discusses a 'status memo' attachment, with the filename suggesting it relates to 'JE' (likely Jeffrey Epstein). The sender notes that a colleague made edits to the document during a meeting in their office, implying the attached version is not the final cut.
EFTA00020674.pdf
This document is a chain of emails between Miami defense attorney Joe Nascimento and an Assistant U.S. Attorney from the Southern District of New York (SDNY) regarding the Epstein investigation. The correspondence begins on July 6, 2019, immediately after a client (previously represented by Nascimento's deceased partner Alan Ross) was served with a grand jury subpoena. The emails discuss scheduling meetings in West Palm Beach, including a meeting on July 12 and a proposed 'proffer' session for the client on September 4, 2019, showing active investigation and cooperation negotiations continuing after Epstein's death.
EFTA00020672.pdf
This document is an email chain from September 2019 between Anjan Sahni (likely representing subpoenaed entities) and an Assistant U.S. Attorney from the Southern District of New York. They are scheduling a conference call to discuss subpoenas issued to redacted entities 'in connection with the Epstein investigation.' The AUSA references previous contact with Steve D'Allessandro regarding the matter.
EFTA00020670.pdf
This document contains an email chain from July 27, 2020, between the prosecution (Southern District of New York) and the defense team in the case United States v. Maxwell. The correspondence concerns scheduling a 'meet and confer' regarding a protective order, specifically addressing the Government's concerns about the defendant potentially naming victims of Jeffrey Epstein or Ghislaine Maxwell in public filings. The Government also requests a 1 terabyte hard drive from the defense to facilitate the production of discovery materials.
EFTA00020662.pdf
This document is an email chain from an Assistant U.S. Attorney in the SDNY. The primary email, dated August 10, 2019 (the day of Epstein's death), reports that Epstein made a phone call the previous night (August 9) around 7:00 PM to his girlfriend, Kristina Schuliak. The email notes that Schuliak's lawyer indicated she is willing to disclose the content of the call in exchange for certain protections.
EFTA00020437.pdf
This document is an email correspondence between attorney David Oscar Markus and Assistant United States Attorneys regarding United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Markus informs the government of his representation of Maxwell in her bail appeal and requests access to specific unredacted docket entries, while the government responds regarding document availability and existing protective orders.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity