MS. POMERANTZ
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Dr. Rocchio
|
Legal representative |
13
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Ms. Sternheim
|
Opposing counsel |
12
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
MR. PAGLIUCA
|
Opposing counsel |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
A. Farmer
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
A. Farmer
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
13 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Ms. Sternheim
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
61 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Representative |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Dr. Rocchio
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
MS. MENNINGER
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
23 | |
|
person
MR. PAGLIUCA
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Mr. Flatley
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Mr. Everdell
|
Professional |
9
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Mr. Flatley
|
Legal representative |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Kate
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
MS. MENNINGER
|
Professional adversarial |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Mr. Everdell
|
Opposing counsel |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Flatley
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
MS. MENNINGER
|
Opposing counsel |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Rocchio
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Kate
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
MR. ROHRBACH
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Ms. Drescher
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
DAVID JAMES MULLIGAN
|
Professional |
7
|
2 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | A court session where a witness, Ms. Espinosa, is temporarily dismissed for a break. The court co... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court hearing | Testimony of witness A. Farmer regarding Government Exhibit 604, a diary entry. | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Legal proceeding | Cross-examination of witness Rocchio in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | Court in the Southern District | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Court proceeding where witness Espinosa is questioned about headshots and an envelope. | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Defense moves to admit exhibits CE3 through CE8 under seal to protect witness privacy. | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Direct examination of Dr. Loftus in court case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | Courtroom (Southern Distric... | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Court Testimony - Redirect Examination of Mr. Mulligan | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Court testimony in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (likely US v. Ghislaine Maxwell or related proceedings ... | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Court filing of transcript regarding evidentiary dispute. | Courtroom (implied SDNY) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Admission of Government Exhibit 418B into evidence | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Direct examination of witness Flatley regarding forensic review | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Identification/Presentation of Government Exhibits 420, 421, and 422 | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Conclusion of testimony by witness Aznaran regarding CBP records. | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Court testimony/Cross-examination | Southern District of New Yo... | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Direct examination of Professor Loftus in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Courtroom identification of Ghislaine Maxwell via Government Exhibit 115. | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Court Testimony Filing | Southern District Court | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Court testimony of witness Espinosa in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | Courtroom (Southern District) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Introduction of Government's Exhibit 327 | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Document filing date for Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. | Courtroom (SDNY) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Procedural argument regarding cross-examination scope | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Conclusion of recross-examination of witness Flatley. | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Redirect examination of witness Annie Farmer in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (US v. Maxwell) | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Court testimony filing date for United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Court testimony regarding Government Exhibit 103 | Courtroom | View |
DOJ-OGR-00016561.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, featuring the direct examination of a witness named Ms. Espinosa. Espinosa testifies about her observations of Jeffrey Epstein's relationships, stating she believed he and Celina Midelfart were a couple. She also states that Ghislaine Maxwell was unaware that Espinosa was buying flowers for Midelfart on Epstein's behalf, possibly during a time when Maxwell and Epstein were also in a romantic relationship.
DOJ-OGR-00016560.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Espinosa. The witness testifies about guests visiting Jeffrey Epstein's office, noting that visits occurred behind closed doors. The questioning specifically focuses on Celina Midelfart, revealing the witness was tasked with sending her flowers (specifically orchids) on Epstein's behalf. The page ends with an overruled objection regarding whether the witness perceived a romantic relationship between Epstein and Midelfart.
DOJ-OGR-00016548.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Espinosa. The witness is questioned about their observations of the relationship between individuals named Jane and Mr. Epstein. Espinosa testifies to seeing them interact in an office three or four times and describes their impression of the relationship as "loving."
DOJ-OGR-00016547.jpg
This document is a partial court transcript from the direct examination of Ms. Espinosa on August 10, 2022. The testimony focuses on an individual named Jane, her relationship as Jeffrey's goddaughter, and how this status influenced her treatment in 'the office' where her mother also worked. The examination also inquires about Jane's siblings and the extent of contact between Jane's mother and Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00016541.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing testimony from Espinosa. The testimony covers her trip to Europe three years prior, where she stayed at a residence after contacting Ghislaine, and questions about the residence's features. It also includes questions and answers regarding Epstein's charitable donations.
DOJ-OGR-00016540.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the testimony of a witness named Espinosa. Espinosa confirms knowledge of two of Ghislaine's residences: a townhouse on 65th Street in New York and a property at 44 Kinnerton Street in London, which Espinosa states they visited three years prior. The witness also testifies that to their knowledge, Ghislaine never resided with Jeffrey Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00016530.jpg
This document is page 47 of a court transcript featuring the direct examination of a witness named Espinosa. Espinosa testifies about the properties owned by Jeffrey Epstein at the start of their employment (Zorro Ranch, 9 East 71st St, El Brillo) and subsequent acquisitions, specifically a Paris apartment and Little Saint James island. The witness notes that the island's name was changed to 'Little Saint Jeffs' and describes the preparation of the island as a 'humongous project' involving themselves and Ghislaine.
DOJ-OGR-00016507.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a legal argument over evidence. An attorney, Mr. Everdell, seeks to admit photographs given to him by Ms. Espinosa, which were sent to her by a soap opera star named Jane. The government's attorney, Ms. Pomerantz, objects to the admission of these photographs, questioning their relevance to the case.
DOJ-OGR-00016482.jpg
This document is an index page (Page 266 of 267) from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, for Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (the Ghislaine Maxwell trial). It lists the examination of four witnesses: William Brown, Annie Farmer, David James Mulligan, and Janice Swain. The index details which attorneys conducted the direct, cross, and redirect examinations for each witness, referencing specific page numbers in the full transcript.
DOJ-OGR-00016451.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It details the conclusion of testimony by a witness named Ms. Swain, who confirms she was in Germany while a person named Annie was in Thailand. Following her excusal, attorney Ms. Moe formally announces that the government rests its case.
DOJ-OGR-00016449.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (cross-examination of witness Swain) filed on August 10, 2022. The witness testifies that while they had phone calls with Jeffrey Epstein, they never discussed Ghislaine Maxwell and have never spoken to Maxwell personally. The questioning also covers discussions with Epstein regarding a trip to New Mexico involving individuals named Annie and Maria.
DOJ-OGR-00016447.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022, featuring the cross-examination of a witness named Swain by defense attorney Ms. Menninger. The witness testifies that they never met, spoke to, or received calls from Ghislaine Maxwell, but did have a phone call with Jeffrey Epstein wherein Epstein referenced the witness's wife. The defense attempts to ask if Epstein admitted to keeping secrets from Maxwell or dating other women, drawing an objection from the prosecution.
DOJ-OGR-00016446.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the testimony of a witness named Swain. Swain recounts multiple attempts to ask a person named Annie about a trip she took to New Mexico, specifically after Annie's return from Thailand and Vietnam in the summer of 1996. Annie was consistently evasive and refused to discuss the trip, repeatedly stating, "I'm not going to let it ruin my life."
DOJ-OGR-00016445.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Swain by an attorney, Ms. Pomerantz. The questioning focuses on what another individual, Annie, may have told the witness about who paid for her trips to Thailand, Vietnam, and New Mexico. The testimony is heavily contested, with opposing counsel, Ms. Menninger, successfully objecting on grounds of hearsay, preventing the witness from revealing who paid for the trips.
DOJ-OGR-00016443.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, where a witness named Swain is questioned by Ms. Pomerantz. Swain testifies that a person named Annie took a weekend trip to New Mexico in the spring of 1996, that Epstein paid for the trip, and that Swain personally drove Annie to the airport. The witness denies ever having spoken to or met a person named Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00016442.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Swain - direct examination) filed on August 10, 2022. The witness describes a phone call with Jeffrey Epstein regarding a trip to New Mexico for 'academically gifted' students, including a girl named Annie. During the call, Epstein falsely claimed that Ghislaine Maxwell was his wife and that she would be chaperoning the girls to reassure the witness.
DOJ-OGR-00016439.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the testimony of a witness named Swain. Swain recounts her first phone conversations with Jeffrey Epstein in 1995, stating that he called her to invite a woman named Maria on a work trip to Florida and subsequently discussed Maria's art career and talent with her over several calls.
DOJ-OGR-00016438.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (filed Aug 10, 2022) featuring the direct testimony of a witness named Swain. The witness identifies a girl named Annie from a photograph (Government Exhibit 101) and discusses college plans. The testimony also establishes that a woman named Maria lived in New York in 1995 working as an artist, and concludes with the witness confirming they spoke with Jeffrey Epstein on the phone.
DOJ-OGR-00016437.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a direct examination dated August 10, 2022. An unnamed witness, Annie's mother, testifies about Annie's background, stating she was born in Missouri and grew up there, in Florida, and in Arizona. The testimony focuses on the year 1995, during which the witness was a divorced single mother with a 'very limited income', working as a sales representative and living with Annie and a younger daughter.
DOJ-OGR-00016436.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, from the case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It captures the direct examination of a witness, Ms. Swain, by attorney Ms. Pomerantz, where the witness identifies Maria Farmer's middle child as Annie Farmer. The questioning then leads to the identification of Government Exhibit 13 as Annie Farmer's birth certificate.
DOJ-OGR-00016435.jpg
This document is page 219 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (filed Aug 10, 2022). It depicts the swearing-in and start of the direct examination of witness Janice Swain by attorney Ms. Pomerantz. Swain identifies herself, states she is 71 years old, a high school graduate, and currently works as a sales representative with three children.
DOJ-OGR-00016434.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It captures the end of the testimony of a witness named Mulligan, who speaks briefly about a memorable conversation with someone named Annie regarding New Mexico. After Mulligan is excused, the government's attorney, Ms. Pomerantz, calls the next witness, Janice Swain.
DOJ-OGR-00016433.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the redirect examination of a witness named Mr. Mulligan. The questioning establishes that Mulligan had spoken to The New York Times about the case and that an individual named Annie Farmer attended his recent wedding. The transcript concludes with attorney Ms. Pomerantz beginning her redirect examination by referencing a previous question from defense counsel about Mulligan's conversations with 'Annie'.
DOJ-OGR-00016431.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the cross-examination of a witness named Mulligan. The questioning focuses on conversations Mulligan had with an individual named Annie, specifically regarding Annie's media appearances, alleged contact with other Epstein victims, and a withdrawn question about Annie's potential financial motivation ('make a lot of money off of this case'). Ms. Pomerantz raises hearsay objections during the proceeding.
DOJ-OGR-00016428.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, in which a witness named Mulligan provides testimony. The witness recounts what a person named Annie told her about an experience with Jeffrey Epstein in New Mexico while they were in high school. According to the testimony, Annie was afraid to speak up about the incident because she feared jeopardizing her sister Maria's opportunities with Epstein. The witness states that Annie told her that after a massage, Epstein followed her into her bedroom and climbed into bed with her.
Displaying Government Exhibit 604
Ms. Pomerantz asks Ms. Drescher to pull up Government Exhibit 604 for the witness, parties, and the Court.
Scheduling concerns
Asking if there are concerns regarding the Friday morning session plan.
A peer-reviewed article from October 2020
Ms. Pomerantz questions Dr. Rocchio about an article he provided to the government, confirming its publication date, peer-review status, and the conclusions of the study regarding perpetrator behaviors.
Conferring
(Counsel confer) noted in transcript.
Grooming by proxy
Ms. Pomerantz questions Dr. Rocchio about their knowledge of the term 'grooming by proxy' in scientific or clinical literature.
Agreement with an article's conclusions
Ms. Pomerantz questions Dr. Rocchio about an article, focusing on a specific passage. Dr. Rocchio states that he does not agree with the article's conclusions and finds the specified text to be incomplete.
Professional Capacity
Questioning regarding duties as president-elect of the division of trauma psychology.
A peer-reviewed article from October 2020
Ms. Pomerantz questions Dr. Rocchio about an article he provided to the government, confirming its publication date, peer-review status, and the conclusions of the study regarding perpetrator behaviors.
Reliability and validity of psychological judgments on gr...
Rocchio answers questions about the concepts of validity and reliability in psychological science, specifically in the context of identifying grooming behaviors. Validity is measured by the overlap between victim and offender accounts, while reliability is measured by the agreement among professionals. Ms. Pomerantz then directs Rocchio to a specific page and section of a document.
Witness's professional qualifications in psychology
Ms. Pomerantz questions the witness, Rocchio, about their specialization in trauma psychology, leadership roles in professional organizations like the Rhode Island and American psychological associations, and how they maintain their expertise.
Exhibit management
Discussion regarding providing binders and locating Tab 6 for the witness and judge.
Audio volume
Instruction to speak into the microphone.
Identification of Government Exhibits 418 and 418R
Ms. Pomerantz questions the witness, Mr. Flatley, to establish his recognition and the authenticity of Government Exhibits 418 and 418R. Mr. Flatley confirms he recognizes them, that they were printed from 'Government 54', and that they are a true and accurate copy.
Request for a lunch break
Ms. Pomerantz requests that the proceedings break for lunch and resume afterward.
Calling next witness
Ms. Pomerantz calls the witness 'Kate' on behalf of the government.
Cross-examination
Ms. Pomerantz begins her cross-examination of the witness, Ms. Espinosa.
Allegations of sexual abuse against Epstein and the defen...
Ms. Pomerantz outlines the facts of the case, detailing the sexual abuse committed by Epstein against teenage girls and the defendant's alleged role as an essential accomplice who recruited, groomed, and facilitated the abuse.
First meeting with Jeffrey Epstein
Ms. Pomerantz questions the witness, Annie, about her age during a trip to New York and asks her to identify Jeffrey Epstein in a photograph. She then asks Annie to describe her first meeting with Epstein.
Explanation of a forensic practice
Ms. Pomerantz questions Dr. Rocchio, asking him to explain to the jury what a forensic practice entails. Dr. Rocchio describes being hired by attorneys to conduct psychological evaluations for various legal matters.
Direct examination of Dr. Lisa Rocchio's professional qua...
Ms. Pomerantz questions Dr. Rocchio about her profession as a clinical and forensic psychologist, the definitions of those fields, and her educational background from Emory University and the University of Rhode Island.
Clarification on questioning a witness
Ms. Pomerantz asked for clarification about a planned line of questioning for a witness, initially believing it concerned an unsigned declaration involving the witness's ex-husband.
Allegations of sexual abuse and recruitment against the d...
Ms. Pomerantz outlines the prosecution's case, alleging the defendant recruited multiple underage girls for Jeffrey Epstein and facilitated their sexual abuse at various locations, including New York, Florida, and New Mexico.
Relationship between Epstein and Maxwell; events at a ranch
Ms. Pomerantz questions the witness, A. Farmer, about her observations of the relationship between Epstein and Maxwell during a weekend at a ranch, and who was staying at the residence.
Basis of witness testimony and knowledge of the case
Ms. Pomerantz questions Dr. Rocchio, who confirms he has not interviewed witnesses, has no personal knowledge of the case facts, and that his testimony will not be based on information from this specific case. He also states he is being paid hourly for his time.
Relationship between Epstein and Maxwell; events at a ranch
Ms. Pomerantz questions the witness, A. Farmer, about her observations of the relationship between Epstein and Maxwell during a weekend at a ranch, and who was staying at the residence.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity