MS. POMERANTZ
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Dr. Rocchio
|
Legal representative |
13
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Ms. Sternheim
|
Opposing counsel |
12
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
MR. PAGLIUCA
|
Opposing counsel |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
A. Farmer
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
A. Farmer
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
13 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Ms. Sternheim
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
61 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Representative |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Dr. Rocchio
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
MS. MENNINGER
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
23 | |
|
person
MR. PAGLIUCA
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Mr. Flatley
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Mr. Everdell
|
Professional |
9
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Mr. Flatley
|
Legal representative |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Kate
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
MS. MENNINGER
|
Professional adversarial |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Mr. Everdell
|
Opposing counsel |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Flatley
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
MS. MENNINGER
|
Opposing counsel |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Rocchio
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Kate
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
MR. ROHRBACH
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Ms. Drescher
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
DAVID JAMES MULLIGAN
|
Professional |
7
|
2 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Court proceeding | Examination of witness KATE, including direct, cross, redirect, and recross. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal hearing | A Daubert hearing, which the Court references when asking Ms. Pomerantz if the disputed question ... | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | Court testimony | Direct examination of witness Espinosa regarding Ghislaine's residences. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | Court testimony | Cross-examination of witness A. Farmer regarding her memory of what she was wearing during a mass... | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | Court proceeding/hearing | Discussion at sidebar regarding a prior consistent statement, potential impeachment of a witness,... | Southern District (implied) | View |
| N/A | Testimony | A witness, Mulligan, testifies about what Annie told her regarding an incident with Jeffrey Epstein. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | Legal examination | Redirect examination of Stephen Flatley by Ms. Pomerantz. | Southern District | View |
| N/A | Legal examination | Direct examination of Stephen Flatley by Ms. Pomerantz. | Southern District | View |
| 2025-11-11 | Meeting | Proposed final pretrial conference. | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2025-01-15 | Direct examination | Ms. Pomerantz questions Dr. Rocchio about his employment at Brown University, his title, responsi... | Court proceeding (location ... | View |
| 2025-01-15 | Court proceeding | Cross-examination of Dr. Rocchio by Mr. Pagliuca in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | Courtroom | View |
| 2025-01-15 | Testimony | A witness provides testimony regarding a study on grooming behaviors, discussing the stages and a... | N/A | View |
| 2025-01-15 | Direct examination | A witness named Rocchio is questioned by Ms. Pomerantz about the scientific basis for determining... | N/A | View |
| 2025-01-15 | Court proceeding | A court proceeding where logistical matters are discussed, including a party's absence from a fut... | N/A | View |
| 2025-01-15 | Court testimony | Direct examination of Dr. Rocchio by Ms. Pomerantz regarding his opinion on a published article. | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2025-01-15 | Daubert hearing | The court proceeds to a Daubert hearing regarding the government's proposed expert, Dr. Lisa Rocc... | N/A | View |
| 2025-01-15 | Court testimony | Direct examination of witness Dr. Rocchio by Ms. Pomerantz regarding grooming, risky sexual behav... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2025-01-15 | Court testimony | Direct examination of witness Rocchio by Ms. Pomerantz regarding professional qualifications in p... | N/A | View |
| 2025-01-15 | Court testimony | Dr. Rocchio provides direct testimony about the strategies and tactics of grooming for the purpos... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2025-01-15 | Court testimony | The beginning of the direct examination of witness Lisa Rocchio by Ms. Pomerantz. | Courtroom | View |
| 2025-01-15 | Court hearing | A court hearing where Government Exhibit 3 was admitted into evidence and a witness, Dr. Rocchio,... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2025-01-15 | Court testimony | Direct examination of Dr. Rocchio in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, where he is questioned about Governm... | Court in the Southern District | View |
| 2025-01-15 | Court hearing | A cross-examination of a witness named Rocchio in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | Courtroom | View |
| 2025-01-15 | Admission of evidence | Defendant's Exhibit A was admitted to the hearing record. | Courtroom | View |
| 2025-01-15 | N/A | Court hearing involving cross-examination of Dr. Rocchio. | Southern District Court | View |
DOJ-OGR-00013917.jpg
This court transcript details the direct examination of a witness named Espinosa. She testifies about her first trip to Europe three years prior, during which she stayed at a residence after contacting Ghislaine for permission. The questioning then pivots to her knowledge, from her "work in the office," of whether Epstein made charitable donations, which she confirms he did.
DOJ-OGR-00013916.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Espinosa. Espinosa testifies about their knowledge of Ghislaine's residences, confirming she had a townhouse on 65th Street in New York and another residence at 44 Kinnerton Street in London. The witness also states that, to their knowledge, Ghislaine never lived with Jeffrey Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00013906.jpg
This document is a court transcript of the direct examination of a witness named Espinosa. Espinosa testifies about properties owned by Jeffrey Epstein, stating that when she began working for him, he owned Zorro Ranch in New Mexico, 9 East 71st Street in New York, and El Brillo in Florida. She also states that during her employment, Epstein acquired a Paris apartment and an island in St. Thomas, which was originally named Little Saint James but was later renamed Little Saint Jeffs.
DOJ-OGR-00013885.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It records a legal argument between Ms. Pomerantz (prosecution) and Mr. Everdell (defense) before the Judge regarding the admissibility of photographs intended to prove a 'continuing relationship' between a witness (pseudonym 'Jane') and the defendant. The Court rules to allow the evidence, citing that it is not prejudicial under Rule 403, while emphasizing the need to maintain the witness's anonymity.
DOJ-OGR-00013884.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (implied by context and LCGVMAX1 code). Defense attorney Mr. Everdell argues that photographs sent by a witness ('Jane') to Ms. Espinosa, an employee who worked in Epstein's office daily, should be admitted as evidence to show 'Jane' maintained relationships with Epstein's circle after claiming to flee. Prosecutor Ms. Pomerantz counters that the evidence is irrelevant because the witness already acknowledged maintaining such relationships during direct examination.
DOJ-OGR-00013883.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a discussion about evidence. An attorney, Mr. Everdell, requests to admit photographs into evidence that were provided by Ms. Espinosa, a fan of a soap opera star named Jane who sent them to her. The government's attorney, Ms. Pomerantz, objects, stating that the government does not understand the relevance of these photographs to the case.
DOJ-OGR-00013857.jpg
This document is an index of examinations from a legal proceeding, Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on August 10, 2022. It lists the direct, cross, and redirect examinations of witnesses WILLIAM BROWN, ANNIE FARMER, DAVID JAMES MULLIGAN, and JANICE SWAIN by various attorneys, including Mr. Rohrbach, Ms. Pomerantz, Ms. Menninger, and Ms. Sternheim, referencing the corresponding page numbers in the full transcript.
DOJ-OGR-00013826.jpg
This document is a court transcript page from a case filed on August 10, 2022. It captures the conclusion of a witness's testimony, where counsel (Ms. Menninger) confirms the witness was in Germany at the same time a person named Annie was in Thailand. After the witness is excused, another counsel (Ms. Moe) informs the court that the government rests its case.
DOJ-OGR-00013824.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the cross-examination of a witness named Swain by Ms. Menninger. The questioning focuses on Swain's phone conversations with Jeffrey Epstein, specifically whether they discussed Ghislaine Maxwell or Epstein's dating life, and details regarding a trip to New Mexico involving individuals named Annie and Maria. Swain explicitly testifies that they never spoke with Ghislaine Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00013821.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the testimony of a witness named Swain. Swain describes attempting to question a person named Annie about a trip she took to New Mexico, which occurred sometime before her return from Thailand and Vietnam in the summer of 1996. Annie was consistently evasive, refused to discuss the trip, and repeatedly stated, "I'm not going to let it ruin my life."
DOJ-OGR-00013820.jpg
This is page 229 of a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Swain by Ms. Pomerantz. The testimony focuses on a woman named Annie, specifically inquiring about who paid for her trips to Thailand and Vietnam, and noting her 'tired and withdrawn' demeanor following a trip to New Mexico. Defense attorney Ms. Menninger successfully objects to questions about the payment source on hearsay grounds.
DOJ-OGR-00013818.jpg
This document is a court transcript page from the direct examination of a witness named Swain. The testimony concerns a trip taken by an individual named Annie to New Mexico in the spring of 1996, which the witness confirms was paid for by Epstein. The witness denies any contact or meeting with Ghislaine Maxwell but confirms speaking with Epstein shortly before the trip and driving Annie to the airport.
DOJ-OGR-00013817.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript where a witness recounts a phone call with Jeffrey Epstein. During the call, Epstein offered to fund a trip to New Mexico for 20-25 students, including a girl named Annie. The witness states they felt comfortable with the offer after Epstein claimed his "wife," Ghislaine, would chaperone the girls and that he was funding the entire trip, which the witness perceived as a "generous offer."
DOJ-OGR-00013814.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the testimony of a witness named Swain. Swain states that she first spoke with Jeffrey Epstein by phone in 1995, when he called to invite a person named Maria on a work trip to Florida via his plane. Swain confirms they spoke more than once, and that during these initial calls, Epstein discussed Maria's art career and talent.
DOJ-OGR-00013811.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness, Ms. Swain, by an attorney, Ms. Pomerantz. The testimony establishes that Annie Farmer is the middle child of Maria Farmer (born in 1969) and introduces Annie Farmer's birth certificate into evidence as Government Exhibit 13.
DOJ-OGR-00013810.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) dated August 10, 2022. It records the swearing-in and initial direct examination of witness Janice Swain by attorney Ms. Pomerantz. Ms. Swain identifies herself as a 71-year-old sales representative with a high school education and three children.
DOJ-OGR-00013809.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022. It captures the end of a witness's, Mr. Mulligan's, testimony where he describes conversations with someone named Annie about New Mexico as 'memorable' and 'emotional.' After Mr. Mulligan is excused, the government calls its next witness, Janice Swain.
DOJ-OGR-00013808.jpg
This is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022. Ms. Sternheim concludes her questioning of witness Mr. Mulligan, establishing that he spoke to the New York Times to corroborate a story and that Annie Farmer attended his recent wedding. Ms. Pomerantz then begins a redirect examination regarding Mulligan's memory of conversations with Annie.
DOJ-OGR-00013806.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Mulligan. The questioning attorney probes Mulligan about conversations with a woman named Annie, focusing on Annie's media involvement, her alleged contact with other victims of Jeffrey Epstein, and whether she expressed a desire to make money from the case. The witness denies recalling Annie mentioning contact with other victims.
DOJ-OGR-00013794.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the beginning of the direct examination of David James Mulligan. After being sworn in as a witness for the Government, Mulligan states his name for the record. Attorney Ms. Pomerantz then begins her questioning, establishing basic background information about Mulligan, including his age (42), his state of origin (Arizona), and his level of education (master's degree).
DOJ-OGR-00013788.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, associated with the Ghislaine Maxwell trial). It records the conclusion of testimony by witness A. Farmer (Annie Farmer), with both Ms. Pomerantz and Ms. Menninger stating they have no further questions. The government then attempts to call David Mulligan as the next witness, but Ms. Sternheim interrupts to request a sidebar/conference with the judge.
DOJ-OGR-00013786.jpg
This document is a page from the court transcript of the trial United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on August 10, 2022. It features the redirect examination of witness Annie Farmer by prosecutor Ms. Pomerantz. The testimony focuses on clarifying details regarding Jeffrey Epstein's anatomy and specific actions he took while in bed with the witness, amidst procedural objections from defense attorney Ms. Menninger.
DOJ-OGR-00013785.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022. It features the redirect examination of witness Annie Farmer by Ms. Pomerantz. Farmer testifies that she does not need a journal or paper to remember Ghislaine Maxwell touching her breasts during a massage because it was a 'very distressing event.'
DOJ-OGR-00013784.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the redirect examination of a witness, A. Farmer. The witness confirms she first spoke with the FBI in 2006 without a lawyer present and acknowledges receiving a significant financial award from the Epstein Victim Compensation Fund. Farmer states the money provides security for her family and explicitly denies having any financial stake in the outcome of the current trial.
DOJ-OGR-00013781.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the redirect examination of a witness named A. Farmer (Annie) by attorney Ms. Pomerantz. The witness recounts what she told the FBI in 2006 about a massage given to her by someone named Maxwell, describing being asked to undress and being touched. Attorney Ms. Menninger objects to the testimony on the grounds that it is narrative.
Scheduling concerns
Asking if there are concerns regarding the Friday morning session plan.
Displaying Government Exhibit 604
Ms. Pomerantz asks Ms. Drescher to pull up Government Exhibit 604 for the witness, parties, and the Court.
Conferring
(Counsel confer) noted in transcript.
Witness's professional qualifications in psychology
Ms. Pomerantz questions the witness, Rocchio, about their specialization in trauma psychology, leadership roles in professional organizations like the Rhode Island and American psychological associations, and how they maintain their expertise.
A peer-reviewed article from October 2020
Ms. Pomerantz questions Dr. Rocchio about an article he provided to the government, confirming its publication date, peer-review status, and the conclusions of the study regarding perpetrator behaviors.
A peer-reviewed article from October 2020
Ms. Pomerantz questions Dr. Rocchio about an article he provided to the government, confirming its publication date, peer-review status, and the conclusions of the study regarding perpetrator behaviors.
Reliability and validity of psychological judgments on gr...
Rocchio answers questions about the concepts of validity and reliability in psychological science, specifically in the context of identifying grooming behaviors. Validity is measured by the overlap between victim and offender accounts, while reliability is measured by the agreement among professionals. Ms. Pomerantz then directs Rocchio to a specific page and section of a document.
Professional Capacity
Questioning regarding duties as president-elect of the division of trauma psychology.
Exhibit management
Discussion regarding providing binders and locating Tab 6 for the witness and judge.
Grooming by proxy
Ms. Pomerantz questions Dr. Rocchio about their knowledge of the term 'grooming by proxy' in scientific or clinical literature.
Audio volume
Instruction to speak into the microphone.
Agreement with an article's conclusions
Ms. Pomerantz questions Dr. Rocchio about an article, focusing on a specific passage. Dr. Rocchio states that he does not agree with the article's conclusions and finds the specified text to be incomplete.
Diary entry from January 25, 1996
Ms. Pomerantz questions the witness, Annie (A. Farmer), about a diary entry dated January 25, 1996, and asks her to read it to the jury. The entry details the witness's activities in New York.
Clarification on questioning a witness
Ms. Pomerantz asked for clarification about a planned line of questioning for a witness, initially believing it concerned an unsigned declaration involving the witness's ex-husband.
Questioning about a diary entry from January 25, 1996
MS. POMERANTZ questions the witness, Annie Farmer, about an entry in what appears to be a diary or journal. The entry, dated January 25, 1996, is admitted as Government's Exhibit 604, and the witness is asked to read it to the jury.
Relationship between Epstein and Maxwell; events at a ranch
Ms. Pomerantz questions the witness, A. Farmer, about her observations of the relationship between Epstein and Maxwell during a weekend at a ranch, and who was staying at the residence.
Direct examination regarding a written entry
Ms. Pomerantz questions the witness, Annie, about an entry she wrote, asking her to state its date and read it to the jury.
Cross-examination
Ms. Pomerantz begins her cross-examination of the witness, Ms. Espinosa.
Evidence Request
Requesting jurors view Government Exhibit 16.
Direct Examination
Establishing that 'Kate' is a pseudonym and directing her to the evidence binder.
Direct Examination
Questioning regarding Government Exhibits 16 and 18.
Relationship between Epstein and Maxwell; events at a ranch
Ms. Pomerantz questions the witness, A. Farmer, about her observations of the relationship between Epstein and Maxwell during a weekend at a ranch, and who was staying at the residence.
Redirect Examination
Questioning regarding Epstein's actions in bed and previous cross-examination questions about his penis.
Direct Examination
Questioning regarding metadata dates and titles of Government Exhibits 420, 418R, and 418B.
Redirect Examination
Questioning regarding memory of abuse and reliance on documentation.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity