MS. POMERANTZ
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Dr. Rocchio
|
Legal representative |
13
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Ms. Sternheim
|
Opposing counsel |
12
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
MR. PAGLIUCA
|
Opposing counsel |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
A. Farmer
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
A. Farmer
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
13 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Ms. Sternheim
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
61 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Representative |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Dr. Rocchio
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
MS. MENNINGER
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
23 | |
|
person
MR. PAGLIUCA
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Mr. Flatley
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Mr. Everdell
|
Professional |
9
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Mr. Flatley
|
Legal representative |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Kate
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
MS. MENNINGER
|
Professional adversarial |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Mr. Everdell
|
Opposing counsel |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Flatley
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
MS. MENNINGER
|
Opposing counsel |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Rocchio
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Kate
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
MR. ROHRBACH
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Ms. Drescher
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
DAVID JAMES MULLIGAN
|
Professional |
7
|
2 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | A court session where a witness, Ms. Espinosa, is temporarily dismissed for a break. The court co... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court hearing | Testimony of witness A. Farmer regarding Government Exhibit 604, a diary entry. | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Legal proceeding | Cross-examination of witness Rocchio in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | Court in the Southern District | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Court proceeding where witness Espinosa is questioned about headshots and an envelope. | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Defense moves to admit exhibits CE3 through CE8 under seal to protect witness privacy. | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Direct examination of Dr. Loftus in court case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | Courtroom (Southern Distric... | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Court Testimony - Redirect Examination of Mr. Mulligan | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Court testimony in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (likely US v. Ghislaine Maxwell or related proceedings ... | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Court filing of transcript regarding evidentiary dispute. | Courtroom (implied SDNY) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Admission of Government Exhibit 418B into evidence | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Direct examination of witness Flatley regarding forensic review | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Identification/Presentation of Government Exhibits 420, 421, and 422 | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Conclusion of testimony by witness Aznaran regarding CBP records. | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Court testimony/Cross-examination | Southern District of New Yo... | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Direct examination of Professor Loftus in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Courtroom identification of Ghislaine Maxwell via Government Exhibit 115. | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Court Testimony Filing | Southern District Court | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Court testimony of witness Espinosa in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | Courtroom (Southern District) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Introduction of Government's Exhibit 327 | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Document filing date for Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. | Courtroom (SDNY) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Procedural argument regarding cross-examination scope | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Conclusion of recross-examination of witness Flatley. | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Redirect examination of witness Annie Farmer in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (US v. Maxwell) | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Court testimony filing date for United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Court testimony regarding Government Exhibit 103 | Courtroom | View |
DOJ-OGR-00013664.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, from a case identified as 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It features the direct examination of a witness named A. Farmer, who is questioned about a past settlement received from a fund, the dismissal of a lawsuit against Maxwell and Epstein, and whether their civil case is concluded. A. Farmer confirms the civil case is over, they do not expect more money, and have no financial stake in the outcome of the current trial.
DOJ-OGR-00013659.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, featuring testimony from a witness identified as A. Farmer, also referred to as Annie. Annie discusses events from 1996, including a trip to Thailand and Vietnam, a conversation with her mother about not being raped, and her relationship with Dave Mulligan, to whom she also disclosed incidents involving Maxwell and Epstein at 'the ranch.'
DOJ-OGR-00013658.jpg
This court transcript from August 10, 2022, details a legal discussion during the direct examination of witness A. Farmer. Attorney Ms. Menninger objects to a line of questioning involving the word 'rape', arguing it is beyond the scope of their challenge to the witness's memory. The judge overrules the objection, permitting the question on the grounds that it relates to a prior consistent statement and that the general credibility of witnesses has been attacked.
DOJ-OGR-00013657.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a legal argument among attorneys Ms. Pomerantz, Ms. Menninger, and Ms. Sternheim before a judge. The core issue is the potential use of the word "rape" in relation to a witness's prior statement, with the defense arguing it is inflammatory and prejudicial. The judge ultimately overrules the objection, stating that a witness's denial of being raped is not suggestive of the opposite and is relevant to the witness's credibility.
DOJ-OGR-00013656.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing a sidebar discussion in a legal case. Attorneys Ms. Pomerantz and Ms. Menninger, along with 'The Court,' debate the nature and admissibility of a 'prior consistent statement' and its implications for impeaching a witness. The discussion centers on a statement made by an unnamed individual to her mother, 'I wasn't raped,' and whether its elicitation would pose further legal problems.
DOJ-OGR-00013654.jpg
This document is a transcript page from the direct examination of Annie Farmer (A. Farmer) in the case US v. Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The testimony confirms that in the summer of 1996, when Farmer was 17 years old, Jeffrey Epstein paid for her trip to Thailand and Vietnam. Government Exhibit 103, a photo of Farmer in Thailand, was admitted into evidence without objection.
DOJ-OGR-00013653.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, featuring the testimony of a witness identified as A. Farmer (Annie). The witness recounts being interviewed by agents in late 2006 or early 2007 about a pair of boots and describes a six-week service trip to Thailand and Vietnam in the summer of 1996. The transcript concludes with an attorney, Ms. Pomerantz, requesting that 'Government Exhibit 103' be shown to the witness.
DOJ-OGR-00013641.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of witness A. Farmer by attorney Ms. Pomerantz. The witness testifies about her observations of Epstein and Maxwell during a weekend at a ranch, stating her belief that they were 'romantic partners' based on their intimate behavior. Farmer confirms that she, Epstein, and Maxwell were the only individuals staying in a small residence on the property.
DOJ-OGR-00013632.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022, featuring the direct examination of witness Annie Farmer. Farmer testifies that she spoke to Jeffrey Epstein by phone 2-3 times after a trip to New York and subsequently met him in person in New Mexico in April 1996. The prosecution introduces Government Exhibit 102, a photo of Farmer getting ready for prom, to establish her physical appearance during the spring of 1996.
DOJ-OGR-00013631.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the testimony of witness A. Farmer (Annie). She describes her internal conflict after an uncomfortable incident in a movie theater involving a man she perceived as generous, and she is then questioned by counsel Ms. Pomerantz about meeting and staying in touch with someone named Epstein in New York.
DOJ-OGR-00013629.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, where a witness named A. Farmer (Annie) is questioned by attorney Ms. Pomerantz. The witness reads a diary entry from January 25, 1996, which describes her activities in New York, including seeing plays and attending a New Year's Eve party at Jeffrey Epstein's mansion. The diary entry is admitted into evidence as Government Exhibit 604 over an objection from Ms. Menninger.
DOJ-OGR-00013628.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, showing the direct examination of a witness named Annie Farmer. The questioning focuses on a journal entry, presented as Government Exhibit 604, in which Farmer describes a trip to New York with her friend Maria. The entry details a positive experience, including visiting Jeff Epstein's house for champagne and finding him 'down-to-earth' before seeing the play 'Phantom of the Opera'.
DOJ-OGR-00013627.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022. An attorney, Ms. Pomerantz, questions a witness named Annie about a diary entry from January 7, 1996, which is part of Government's Exhibit 603. Annie reads the entry aloud, describing her feelings of change and isolation after returning from a life-altering trip to New York, and compares it to a previous trip to Mexico.
DOJ-OGR-00013625.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the questioning of a witness named Annie Farmer. She testifies about visiting someone named Epstein when she was 16, her hopes at the time for an international trip, and her practice of keeping a journal. The witness identifies a notebook, marked as Government Exhibit 601, as the journal she used during that period.
DOJ-OGR-00013623.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022, featuring the direct examination of witness 'A. Farmer' by Ms. Pomerantz. The testimony details a trip to New York where the witness and her sister, Maria, were taken to see 'The Phantom of the Opera' by Epstein's driver, and later attended a movie ('Five Monkeys') with Epstein himself. The witness describes Epstein sitting between her and her sister at the movie theater and initiating unwanted physical contact by caressing and holding her hand.
DOJ-OGR-00013620.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the testimony of a witness named A. Farmer (Annie). She testifies that she was 16 years old when she first met Jeffrey Epstein at his home, accompanied by her sister. Epstein had purchased tickets for them to see 'Phantom of the Opera'.
DOJ-OGR-00013619.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, showing the direct examination of witness A. Farmer by attorney Ms. Pomerantz. The witness testifies about a trip to New York after Christmas 1995, where she stayed with her sister for about a week and met Jeffrey Epstein twice. The witness is also asked to identify 'Government Exhibit 101', which she confirms is her high school photo from her junior year.
DOJ-OGR-00013618.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It features the direct examination of witness Ms. Farmer by Ms. Pomerantz regarding her travel to New York. Ms. Farmer testifies that she flew commercially and alone to New York, did not pay for her own ticket, and begins to mention meeting Epstein before being interrupted by a hearsay objection from Ms. Menninger.
DOJ-OGR-00013617.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the direct examination of witness Annie Farmer by Ms. Pomerantz. The witness testifies that her sister, Maria, told her about a trip to New York where Jeffrey Epstein was interested in helping Annie with her education and was purchasing her travel ticket. The defense attorney, Ms. Menninger, objects on hearsay grounds, but the objection is overruled by the Court.
DOJ-OGR-00013614.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022. In it, a witness named Annie Farmer identifies the defendant, Maxwell, in the courtroom and testifies that Maxwell gave her a massage when she was 16 years old. At that time, Farmer was living in Arizona with her mother and sister, Ashley.
DOJ-OGR-00013613.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. It features the direct examination of a witness identified as 'A. Farmer' (Annie Farmer), conducted by Ms. Pomerantz. The testimony covers the witness's background, including her birth in Missouri, upbringing in Arizona, and education at the University of Pennsylvania and the University of Texas at Austin, culminating in her current profession as a psychologist.
DOJ-OGR-00013612.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It captures the direct examination of witness A. Farmer (age 42) by Ms. Pomerantz. The text includes judicial instructions regarding the relevance of testimony concerning 'illegal sexual activity' relative to Mr. Epstein and Ms. Maxwell, and the introduction of Government Exhibit 13, which is noted as being under seal.
DOJ-OGR-00010264.jpg
This is page 49 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on March 11, 2022. The Judge sets a schedule for simultaneous briefing due on the 15th (limited to 15 pages) and rules on the docketing of materials. The Court explicitly orders that identifying information for 'Juror 50' be redacted from submitted questions before they are docketed, while stating a previous judicial opinion will be docketed without redactions.
DOJ-OGR-00010261.jpg
This document is a court transcript from March 11, 2022, in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It captures a dialogue between the judge, Ms. Sternheim, and Ms. Pomerantz regarding an individual's understanding of the case based on a questionnaire they completed. The judge reads aloud a portion of the case summary from the questionnaire, which states the defendant is charged with conspiring with and aiding and abetting Jeffrey Epstein to entice minors to travel between 1994 and 2004.
DOJ-OGR-00010260.jpg
This document is page 45 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on March 11, 2022. It details an inquiry by the Court into a witness or potential juror's interactions with reporters regarding their personal history of sexual abuse. Following the questioning, a sidebar conference occurs where defense attorney Ms. Sternheim requests the Judge ask the individual about their knowledge of the case summary, noting the individual admitted to knowing the case was about sexual abuse.
Displaying Government Exhibit 604
Ms. Pomerantz asks Ms. Drescher to pull up Government Exhibit 604 for the witness, parties, and the Court.
Scheduling concerns
Asking if there are concerns regarding the Friday morning session plan.
A peer-reviewed article from October 2020
Ms. Pomerantz questions Dr. Rocchio about an article he provided to the government, confirming its publication date, peer-review status, and the conclusions of the study regarding perpetrator behaviors.
Conferring
(Counsel confer) noted in transcript.
Grooming by proxy
Ms. Pomerantz questions Dr. Rocchio about their knowledge of the term 'grooming by proxy' in scientific or clinical literature.
Agreement with an article's conclusions
Ms. Pomerantz questions Dr. Rocchio about an article, focusing on a specific passage. Dr. Rocchio states that he does not agree with the article's conclusions and finds the specified text to be incomplete.
Professional Capacity
Questioning regarding duties as president-elect of the division of trauma psychology.
A peer-reviewed article from October 2020
Ms. Pomerantz questions Dr. Rocchio about an article he provided to the government, confirming its publication date, peer-review status, and the conclusions of the study regarding perpetrator behaviors.
Reliability and validity of psychological judgments on gr...
Rocchio answers questions about the concepts of validity and reliability in psychological science, specifically in the context of identifying grooming behaviors. Validity is measured by the overlap between victim and offender accounts, while reliability is measured by the agreement among professionals. Ms. Pomerantz then directs Rocchio to a specific page and section of a document.
Witness's professional qualifications in psychology
Ms. Pomerantz questions the witness, Rocchio, about their specialization in trauma psychology, leadership roles in professional organizations like the Rhode Island and American psychological associations, and how they maintain their expertise.
Exhibit management
Discussion regarding providing binders and locating Tab 6 for the witness and judge.
Audio volume
Instruction to speak into the microphone.
Identification of Government Exhibits 418 and 418R
Ms. Pomerantz questions the witness, Mr. Flatley, to establish his recognition and the authenticity of Government Exhibits 418 and 418R. Mr. Flatley confirms he recognizes them, that they were printed from 'Government 54', and that they are a true and accurate copy.
Request for a lunch break
Ms. Pomerantz requests that the proceedings break for lunch and resume afterward.
Calling next witness
Ms. Pomerantz calls the witness 'Kate' on behalf of the government.
Cross-examination
Ms. Pomerantz begins her cross-examination of the witness, Ms. Espinosa.
Allegations of sexual abuse against Epstein and the defen...
Ms. Pomerantz outlines the facts of the case, detailing the sexual abuse committed by Epstein against teenage girls and the defendant's alleged role as an essential accomplice who recruited, groomed, and facilitated the abuse.
First meeting with Jeffrey Epstein
Ms. Pomerantz questions the witness, Annie, about her age during a trip to New York and asks her to identify Jeffrey Epstein in a photograph. She then asks Annie to describe her first meeting with Epstein.
Explanation of a forensic practice
Ms. Pomerantz questions Dr. Rocchio, asking him to explain to the jury what a forensic practice entails. Dr. Rocchio describes being hired by attorneys to conduct psychological evaluations for various legal matters.
Direct examination of Dr. Lisa Rocchio's professional qua...
Ms. Pomerantz questions Dr. Rocchio about her profession as a clinical and forensic psychologist, the definitions of those fields, and her educational background from Emory University and the University of Rhode Island.
Clarification on questioning a witness
Ms. Pomerantz asked for clarification about a planned line of questioning for a witness, initially believing it concerned an unsigned declaration involving the witness's ex-husband.
Allegations of sexual abuse and recruitment against the d...
Ms. Pomerantz outlines the prosecution's case, alleging the defendant recruited multiple underage girls for Jeffrey Epstein and facilitated their sexual abuse at various locations, including New York, Florida, and New Mexico.
Relationship between Epstein and Maxwell; events at a ranch
Ms. Pomerantz questions the witness, A. Farmer, about her observations of the relationship between Epstein and Maxwell during a weekend at a ranch, and who was staying at the residence.
Basis of witness testimony and knowledge of the case
Ms. Pomerantz questions Dr. Rocchio, who confirms he has not interviewed witnesses, has no personal knowledge of the case facts, and that his testimony will not be based on information from this specific case. He also states he is being paid hourly for his time.
Relationship between Epstein and Maxwell; events at a ranch
Ms. Pomerantz questions the witness, A. Farmer, about her observations of the relationship between Epstein and Maxwell during a weekend at a ranch, and who was staying at the residence.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity