Al-Qaeda
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
Al Rajhi Bank
|
Financial |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Aqeel al Aqeel
|
Material support |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
defendants
|
Financial |
6
|
2 | |
|
organization
Al Rajhi Bank
|
Alleged material support |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
defendants
|
Alleged support |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Yassin al Kadi
|
Leadership financing |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Saleh Abdullah Kamel
|
Alleged material support |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Al Rajhi Bank
|
Financial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Saleh Abdullah Kamel
|
Alleged financier |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Suleiman Abdel Aziz Al Rajhi
|
Alleged financier |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Various defendants (Harvey, Carter, Young, Little, etc.)
|
Alleged funding support |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
AMI
|
Financial |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
al Haramain
|
Front organization |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Taliban
|
Support alliance |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Khaled bin Mahfouz
|
Sponsor |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Collaborators/Sympathizers
|
Financial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
defendants
|
Material support |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
AMI
|
Protection backing |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
two other unnamed defendants
|
Alleged conspirators supporters |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Al Rajhi Bank
|
Alleged financier supporter |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
ICA
|
Alleged financier supporter |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
two other unnamed defendants
|
Material support |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Enaam Arnaout
|
Sponsor |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Saleh Abdullah Kamel
|
Financial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Osama bin Laden
|
Leader organization |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Drone attacks on Al-Qaeda base. | Tribal areas of Pakistan | View |
| N/A | N/A | Alleged support to al-Qaeda by Defendants Dallah al Baraka and Saleh Abdullah Kamel | Unspecified | View |
| N/A | N/A | Anti-Soviet jihad | Afghanistan | View |
| 2002-01-01 | N/A | Raid of an al-Qaeda front charity | Unknown | View |
| 2001-09-11 | N/A | Attack on the Pentagon and World Trade Center | New York, Arlington | View |
| 2001-09-11 | N/A | Attacks on the Pentagon and World Trade Center. | New York/Washington D.C. | View |
| 2001-09-11 | N/A | Terrorist attacks on the United States | United States | View |
| 2001-09-11 | N/A | Terrorist Attacks | United States | View |
| 2001-09-11 | N/A | Terrorist attacks resulting in nearly 3,000 deaths and billions in damages. | American soil | View |
| 2001-09-11 | N/A | Attack on the WTC. | New York, USA | View |
| 2001-01-01 | N/A | US invasion of Afghanistan | Afghanistan | View |
| 1996-01-01 | N/A | al-Qaeda's abrupt departure from Sudan to Afghanistan. | Sudan to Afghanistan | View |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023386.jpg
This document is a page from a legal opinion (2012 WL 257568) regarding litigation over the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. It discusses legal theories of primary and secondary liability under the Anti-Terrorism Act (ATA) for defendants accused of providing material support or financing to al-Qaeda. The document does not explicitly mention Jeffrey Epstein, but bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, suggesting it was included in a larger production of documents to the House Oversight Committee.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023385.jpg
This document is a page from a legal brief regarding litigation over the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks (2012 WL 257568). It argues that the District Court improperly dismissed Anti-Terrorism Act (ATA) claims against several financial defendants, including Al Rajhi Bank and Saudi American Bank, for allegedly providing material support to al-Qaeda. The text cites various legal precedents to argue that the ATA should be construed broadly to cut off funding sources to terrorist groups. Although the prompt mentions Epstein, the document text refers strictly to 9/11 litigation, though the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' suggests it may have been part of a broader congressional investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023384.jpg
This document appears to be page 24 of a legal opinion (2012 WL 257568) regarding 'In re: Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001.' It discusses the Second Circuit's review of a district court's dismissal of claims under the Anti-Terrorism Act (ATA), Alien Tort Statute (ATS), and Torture Victims Protection Act (TVPA). The text critiques the lower court for applying incorrect legal standards regarding 'material support' to al-Qaeda. While the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023384' suggests this was part of a congressional investigation (possibly included in a larger production of documents), the specific text on this page contains no mention of Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, or their specific activities.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023383.jpg
This document is a page from a 2012 legal filing titled 'In re: TERRORIST ATTACKS ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001' obtained from House Oversight records. It details the financial support network of al-Qaeda, specifically focusing on 'The Golden Chain' list of donors, which includes prominent figures such as Khalid bin Mahfouz, Suleiman al Rajhi, and the half-brothers of Osama bin Laden (Bakr, Tariq, Yeslam, and Omar). The text outlines how these individuals allegedly used charities (IIRO, SAAR, Muwafaq) and corporate entities (Saudi Binladin Group) to funnel millions of dollars to al-Qaeda operations.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023382.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing (2012 WL 257568) related to 9/11 terrorist attacks litigation, specifically detailing the financial infrastructure of al-Qaeda. It describes the interconnections between Osama bin Laden, various financial institutions (Al Shamal, Faisal Islamic Bank, Tadamon, Al Rajhi Bank), and individuals designated as terrorists or sponsors. It notably discusses the discovery of the 'Golden Chain' document in Bosnia, which identified major financial benefactors of al-Qaeda.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023381.jpg
This document is a page from a 2012 legal opinion (In re: Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001) retrieved from Westlaw, bearing a House Oversight stamp. It details the financial infrastructure supporting al-Qaeda, specifically implicating financial institutions such as Al Shamal, FIBS, Al Rajhi Bank, and National Commercial Bank (NCB) in knowingly providing services and funneling money to the terrorist organization. The text cites testimony confirming that high-ranking banking officials had direct ties to Osama bin Laden and that the banks used charity fronts to channel funds for 'financial jihad.' Note: While labeled as an Epstein-related document request, this specific page contains no mention of Jeffrey Epstein or Ghislaine Maxwell; it focuses entirely on 9/11 terrorist financing litigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023380.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a legal opinion related to the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks litigation, discussing allegations against various individuals and charities (such as Al Haramain and Muwafaq Foundation) for supporting al-Qaeda. It details designations of individuals as Specially Designated Global Terrorists and outlines how certain financial institutions, particularly Islamic banks, allegedly facilitated the transfer of resources to al-Qaeda.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023378.jpg
This document is a page from a 2012 legal opinion (In re: TERRORIST ATTACKS ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001) produced during a House Oversight investigation (Bates HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023378). It details how al-Qaeda utilized a network of ostensible charities, such as the Muslim World League and the International Islamic Relief Organization, to finance operations, launder money, and provide logistical support for terrorism. The text lists specific defendants (Charity Officials) alleged to have knowingly orchestrated this support using their positions within these organizations.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023377.jpg
This document is a page from a legal opinion (In re: TERRORIST ATTACKS ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001) detailing the origins of al-Qaeda. It describes how Osama bin Laden and Abdullah Azzam established the organization from the infrastructure of the Afghan jihad, utilizing a financial network known as the 'Golden Chain' comprised of various Islamic charities. The text also outlines specific fatwas issued by Bin Laden between 1992 and 1998 declaring war on the United States. While the document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, the content on this specific page relates entirely to terrorism financing and history, with no direct mention of Jeffrey Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023376.jpg
This document is a page from a legal brief or court opinion (specifically 2012 WL 257568) regarding the 'In re: Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001' litigation. It details procedural history concerning the dismissal of claims against numerous defendants, including Saudi banks (Al Rajhi, SAMBA), organizations (Saudi Red Crescent), and individuals (multiple members of the Bin Laden family). The text discusses the impact of the 'Doe v. Bin Laden' decision on jurisdictional arguments under the FSIA (Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act) and mentions motions to vacate previous dismissals. The document appears to be part of a House Oversight Committee production (Bates stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023376).
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023375.jpg
This document is a Westlaw printout (dated 2019) bearing a House Oversight Committee bates stamp. It details legal proceedings regarding the 'Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001' litigation, specifically summarizing Judge Daniels' 2010 dismissals of numerous defendants (including members of the Bin Laden family, Saudi banks, and other individuals) for lack of personal jurisdiction or failure to state a claim. The text focuses on the legal standards for liability under the Anti-Terrorism Act and the requirement to prove specific intent to support the 9/11 attacks.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023373.jpg
This document is a page from a 2012 legal opinion (printed via Westlaw in 2019) regarding the consolidated multi-district litigation (MDL 1570) surrounding the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. It outlines the plaintiffs' claims under the Anti-Terrorism Act against banks, charities, and states accused of funding al-Qaeda, and details the procedural history including the transfer of cases to the Southern District of New York and the succession of judges presiding over the matter. The document bears a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp but does not explicitly name Jeffrey Epstein on this specific page.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023371.jpg
This document is a preliminary statement from a legal appeal (cited 2012) concerning the 'In re: Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001' litigation. The Plaintiffs-Appellants (victims' families) are appealing a district court's dismissal of claims against five defendants, including Al Rajhi Bank, Saudi American Bank, and Saleh Abdullah Kamel, whom they allege knowingly provided material support to al-Qaeda. The text argues that the lower court applied improper pleading standards and misinterpreted statutes such as the Alien Tort Statute and the Anti-Terrorism Act. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a document production to the U.S. House Oversight Committee.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023365.jpg
This document is a page from a Table of Contents and Table of Authorities for a legal filing related to the 'In re: Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001' litigation. It outlines legal arguments regarding the Alien Tort Statute (ATS), the Torture Victim Protection Act, and negligence claims against defendants alleged to have materially supported al-Qaeda, specifically mentioning 'NCB' (National Commercial Bank) and 'Sovereign Defendants.' The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a congressional production, likely related to investigations into financial networks supporting terrorism.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023364.jpg
This document is a Table of Contents from a legal filing related to the case 'In re: TERRORIST ATTACKS ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001,' printed from Westlaw in 2019 as part of a House Oversight production. The text outlines legal arguments accusing several financial institutions and individuals (including Al Rajhi Bank, Saudi American Bank, and Saleh Abdullah Kamel) of knowingly or recklessly supporting al-Qaeda through financial means and charities. While part of the House Oversight production likely related to financial investigations, Jeffrey Epstein's name does not appear on this specific page.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023287.jpg
This document is a media monitoring clipping from The Daily Telegraph dated September 15, 2017. It features an article by Con Coughlin discussing the play 'Oslo' and reminiscing about the real historical events of the 1993 Oslo Accords, specifically mentioning key figures like Terje Rød-Larsen and Mona Juul. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' stamp, suggesting it was included in a congressional investigation, likely due to Terje Rød-Larsen's known associations with Jeffrey Epstein, though Epstein is not mentioned in this specific text.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011880.jpg
This document appears to be a page (123) from a memoir draft by Ehud Barak, contained within House Oversight Committee records. It details a tense June 2008 private meeting in Israel between Barak, Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, and US President George W. Bush, where Bush explicitly forbade Israel from launching a military strike on Iranian nuclear facilities. The text recounts Barak's retort to Bush, using an artillery metaphor to criticize US foreign policy in Afghanistan and Iraq while missing the 'real target' of Iran.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015069.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a political essay or article included in the House Oversight discovery files (stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015069). The text critically analyzes the intersection of religion and politics, specifically focusing on George W. Bush's claims that God instructed him to invade Iraq and strike Al-Qaeda. It draws a parallel between Bush's religious justifications for war and the rhetoric used by Islamic extremist Abu Bakar Bashir.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015020.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a House Oversight Committee release (indicated by the footer) containing notes or an investigative memo. It largely consists of a block quote from Peter Dale Scott's book 'The American Deep State' regarding the protection of al-Qaeda terrorists by US intelligence and the 9/11 Commission's alleged cover-up of Saudi and Qatari involvement. The document concludes with the author's own notes alleging that 'Clinton's daughter' is using global health initiatives as a cover for terrorism operations and detailing a cyber security partnership involving Steve Colo, the FBI, and South Carolina law enforcement.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015019.jpg
This document, marked as a House Oversight record, discusses allegations of government corruption and state-sponsored terrorism. It links 'Bud Horton' and 'Sue' to 'Franklin Scandal compromises' and billion-dollar contracts involving bioterrorism. The text heavily cites Peter Dale Scott's book 'The American Deep State' to argue that the Clinton administration and U.S. agencies protected terrorists (including Ali Mohamed) involved in the 1993 WTC bombing and 1998 Nairobi Embassy bombing.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015007.jpg
This document appears to be a printout of a blog post or email that compiles excerpts from Peter Dale Scott's book 'The American Deep State' alongside the author's own commentary. It presents conspiracy theories regarding the 9/11 Commission protecting al-Qaeda connections, alleges that Chelsea Clinton's work is a cover for terrorism operations, and claims US/British intelligence complicity in the 2005 London Bombings. It also mentions a 'Bud Horton' moving to South Carolina after being implicated in a child sex scandal, which may be the tangential link to the wider Epstein investigative context.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015006.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a larger manuscript or investigative file submitted to the House Oversight Committee (Bates stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015006). It extensively quotes Peter Dale Scott's book 'The American Deep State' to argue that the Clinton administration and US intelligence agencies failed to act on, or actively protected, individuals associated with Al-Qaeda, specifically linking these failures to the 1993 WTC bombing and the 1998 Nairobi Embassy bombing. The text alleges a systemic suppression of facts regarding US agency intervention that allowed terrorists like Ali Mohamed and Khalid Sheikh Mohammed to continue their activities.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024611.jpg
This document appears to be page 20 of a larger geopolitical analysis or article (likely from 2011) found within House Oversight Committee files. It critiques US foreign policy, specifically discussing the delicate balance of relations with Pakistan and the incoherent strategy toward China's rise. The author contrasts the policy recommendations of Henry Kissinger (cooperation) and Aaron Friedberg (containment), expressing a preference for Kissinger's view while criticizing the Obama administration for indecision.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024610.jpg
This document page, stamped with a House Oversight footer, contains a geopolitical analysis of U.S.-Pakistan relations following the killing of Osama bin Laden. It criticizes both the Bush and Obama administrations for prioritizing the war on terror over the stability of nuclear-armed Pakistan, specifically noting the increase in drone strikes and the humiliation caused by the Abbottabad raid. While part of a dataset likely reviewed during an investigation (potentially related to Jeffrey Epstein via larger document dumps), this specific page contains no direct references to Epstein, Maxwell, or their financial network.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025031.jpg
This document is a transcript of an interview with a subject named Siegel, who outlines the threat of "Islamic Enemy" and Jihad against the West. Siegel distinguishes between violent Jihad and "Civilization Jihad," describing the latter as an infiltration of Western society, law, and institutions by groups like the Muslim Brotherhood to establish Islamic supremacy.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity