Ms. Sternheim

Person

Mentions

877

Relationships

Events

390

Documents

429

Relationship Network

Network Depth

Loading... nodes

Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.

86 total relationships

Sort by:

Connected Entity	Relationship Type	Strength (mentions)	Documents	Actions
organization The Court	Legal representative	19 Very Strong	25	View
person Mr. Everdell	Co counsel	13 Very Strong	11	View
person Ms. Maxwell	Client	13 Very Strong	11	View
person Ms. Comey	Opposing counsel	12 Very Strong	10	View
person MS. POMERANTZ	Opposing counsel	12 Very Strong	11	View
person Kate	Professional	10 Very Strong	6	View
person MR. ROHRBACH	Professional	10 Very Strong	14	View
person Judge	Professional	10 Very Strong	13	View
organization The Court	Professional	10 Very Strong	116	View
person MS. POMERANTZ	Professional	10 Very Strong	7	View
person Ms. Maxwell	Professional	10 Very Strong	8	View
person Ms. Moe	Professional	10 Very Strong	13	View
person Mr. Everdell	Professional	10 Very Strong	6	View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL	Professional	10 Very Strong	6	View
person MR. PAGLIUCA	Professional	10 Very Strong	5	View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL	Client	9 Strong	5	View
person Ms. Moe	Professional adversarial	9 Strong	5	View
person Ms. Comey	Professional	9 Strong	5	View
person Loftus	Legal representative	8 Strong	4	View
person MR. ROHRBACH	Opposing counsel	8 Strong	4	View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL	Legal representative	8 Strong	4	View
person MS. MENNINGER	Professional	8 Strong	4	View
person Gill Velez	Professional	7	3	View
person MR. PAGLIUCA	Co counsel	7	3	View
person Ms. Conrad	Professional	7	2	View

Date	Event Type	Description	Location	Actions
2022-08-10	N/A	Court proceedings regarding finalization of the verdict sheet and jury charges in Case 1:20-cr-00...	Courtroom	View
2022-08-10	N/A	Filing of court document 761 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE	Court	View
2022-08-10	N/A	Court proceeding regarding Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). Discussio...	Courtroom	View
2022-08-10	N/A	Ghislaine Maxwell formally waives her right to testify in her own defense.	Courtroom	View
2022-08-10	N/A	Court testimony in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell).	Courtroom	View
2022-08-10	N/A	Sidebar conference during Opening Statements	Courtroom Sidebar	View
2022-08-10	N/A	Jury dismissal scheduling	Courtroom	View
2022-08-10	Legal proceeding	A sidebar conversation during a court case (1:20-cr-00330-PAE) to discuss the admissibility of te...	Courtroom	View
2022-08-10	N/A	Court proceedings in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). Discussion rega...	Courtroom (Southern Distric...	View
2022-08-10	N/A	Court proceeding sidebar conference	Courtroom Sidebar	View
2022-08-10	N/A	Medical Request	Courtroom - Request for COV...	View
2022-08-10	Court proceeding	An opening statement by Ms. Sternheim in the trial of Ghislaine, where she argues that her client...	Courtroom	View
2022-08-10	N/A	Court testimony of witness Loftus regarding memory science.	Courtroom	View
2022-08-10	N/A	Court hearing regarding Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell context implie...	Southern District of New Yo...	View
2022-08-10	N/A	Court proceedings in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN	Courtroom	View
2022-08-10	N/A	Conclusion of Professor Loftus's testimony	Courtroom	View
2022-08-10	N/A	Court hearing regarding Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (Ghislaine Maxwell trial)	Southern District Court	View
2022-08-10	N/A	Sidebar conference in United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE).	Courtroom (Sidebar)	View
2022-08-10	N/A	Court proceedings in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (USA v. Maxwell).	Courtroom	View
2022-08-10	N/A	Court proceedings in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). Discussion cent...	Southern District Court	View
2022-08-10	N/A	Sidebar conference during opening statements in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN.	Courtroom Sidebar	View
2022-08-10	N/A	Courtroom discussion regarding logistics of presenting evidence on screens.	Courtroom (Southern District)	View
2022-08-10	N/A	Court testimony in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). Expert witness Lo...	Courtroom	View
2022-08-10	N/A	Court proceedings regarding jury instructions and upcoming witness testimony.	Courtroom (Southern Distric...	View
2022-08-10	N/A	Filing of Document 741 (Transcript of Opening Statement)	Court (Southern District)	View

DOJ-OGR-00011600.jpg

This document is a court transcript from July 22, 2022, capturing a defense attorney's argument during a sentencing hearing. The attorney, Ms. Sternheim, asks the Court for a sentence below the recommended guidelines, arguing the government's request is disproportionate and that the more culpable Jeffrey Epstein would have faced the same sentencing guidelines as her client, Ghislaine Maxwell.

Legal document

2025-11-20

Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00011598.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript filed on July 22, 2022, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. A victim, Ms. Stein, delivers a powerful impact statement describing how Maxwell's actions affected her for 25 years and calls for Maxwell to be imprisoned. Following the statement, another individual, Ms. Sternheim, addresses the court to speak to the victims.

Legal document

2025-11-20

Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00011574.jpg

This is a court transcript from July 22, 2022, detailing a procedural discussion about the order of statements. Counsel Ms. Moe asks the judge if victims should speak before or after the main parties. The judge clarifies the intended sequence is government, victims, defense counsel, and then Ms. Maxwell, to which all parties present agree before the court takes a luncheon recess.

Court transcript

2025-11-20

Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00011523.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated July 22, 2022, involving Ms. Sternheim (defense) and Ms. Moe (government). The proceedings cover administrative confirmations of filings on ECF and a substantive discussion regarding the government's compliance with the 'Justice For All Act.' Specifically, Ms. Moe confirms that the government has notified six victims, proven at trial to be impacted, about the upcoming sentencing and their right to be heard.

Court transcript

2025-11-20

Analysis Source

Total Received

$0.00

0 transactions

Total Paid

$0.00

0 transactions

Net Flow

$0.00

0 total transactions

No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.

As Sender

As Recipient

Total

Request for a sidebar

From: Ms. Sternheim

To: ["The Court"]

Ms. Sternheim requests a sidebar to discuss matters related to a witness with anonymity status.

Court proceeding dialogue

2022-08-10

Communication Source

Cross-examination of Gill Velez

From: Ms. Sternheim

To: ["Gill Velez"]

Ms. Sternheim questions Gill Velez about her employment history with a property management company and her lack of personal knowledge regarding a document dated 2000, as she only started working there in 2007.

Court testimony

2022-08-10

Communication Source

Relationship between Ghislaine and Epstein, and Epstein's...

From: Ms. Sternheim

To: Court/Jury (implied)

Ms. Sternheim describes Epstein's charisma and his relationship with Ghislaine, which evolved from friendship to her becoming his employee managing his real estate portfolio. She details his various properties and travel habits, and mentions that Epstein spent time with other women without Ghislaine.

Opening statement

2022-08-10

Communication Source

Request for a sidebar

From: Ms. Sternheim

To: ["Judge"]

Ms. Sternheim requests to raise an issue at sidebar with the Judge, and the Judge agrees.

Courtroom dialogue

2022-08-10

Communication Source

Pending redaction issues

From: Ms. Moe

To: Ms. Sternheim

Ms. Moe informed the court that she had spoken with Ms. Sternheim that morning about the redaction issues being discussed.

Spoken conversation

2022-08-10

Communication Source

Defense opening statement in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell

From: Ms. Sternheim

To: Jury/Court

The defense lawyer argues that the case is about Epstein's conduct, not Maxwell's, and that the government's case relies on four accusers whose memories are corrupted and motivated by money.

Opening statement

2022-08-10

Communication Source

Testimony of next witness, Matt

From: Ms. Sternheim

To: ["The Court"]

Ms. Sternheim raises a concern about the upcoming testimony of Matt, requesting that the government provide a proffer to ensure his testimony is compliant with the Federal Rules of Evidence and does not introduce improper statements.

Court dialogue

2022-08-10

Communication Source