| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Client
|
Client |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
the client
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
the client
|
Unknown |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Associated Attorney
|
Professional association |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
the client
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Clients
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Paid | the firm | Brad | $0.00 | Salary offer to Brad (amount recall failed by w... | View |
| N/A | Received | Client | the firm | $0.00 | Obligation to pay Expenses incurred prior to wi... | View |
The text notes the prosecutor omitted mention of 'previous meetings with the firm'.
Explanation of advantages (cost sharing, efficiency) and disadvantages (conflicts of interest, settlement funds, confidentiality) of joint representation.
A 'government note' is discussed in the context of what the firm knew prior to its receipt.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity