United States District Court, Southern District of New York
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
The Honorable Alison J. Nathan
|
Professional judge court |
6
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-06-21 | Court order | The Court issued an order directing the Government to confirm that victims have been notified of ... | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2021-03-29 | Legal filing | The Government filed a letter with the Court to clarify a statement made in a prior letter regard... | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2021-01-15 | Court order | The Court issued an Order allowing the defendant access to a laptop computer provided by the Gove... | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2020-12-08 | Court order | The Court issued an Order (Dkt. No. 92) regarding the defendant's conditions of confinement. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2020-12-08 | Court order | The Court issued an Order (Dkt. No. 92) which prompted this update letter. | Southern District of New York | View |
DOJ-OGR-00002051.jpg
This document is a letter dated November 25, 2020, to Judge Alison J. Nathan from a redacted individual in support of Ghislaine Maxwell's request for bail. The author expresses grave concern for Maxwell's physical and mental health in custody, argues she should not be made a scapegoat for Jeffrey Epstein's death, and asserts she is not a flight risk. To demonstrate their faith, the author pledges $25,000 cash towards her bond.
DOJ-OGR-00002048.jpg
A character reference letter filed on December 14, 2020, in support of Ghislaine Maxwell's bail application. The redacted author describes knowing Maxwell since age 6, being entrusted to her care at ages 12, 15, and 19, and interning for her in New York in 2009. The letter attempts to refute negative media portrayals by highlighting Maxwell's support, integrity, and work with an 'Oceans charity'.
DOJ-OGR-00002033.jpg
This document is a letter of support dated December 1, 2020, addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's bail application. The anonymous author, a close friend of Maxwell since at least 1991, attests to Maxwell's character, mentions staying with her in New York after her father's death, and defends the operations of the TerraMar charity. The author asserts they have never witnessed unlawful or inappropriate behavior by Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00001784.jpg
This legal document is a letter dated October 6, 2020, from the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The prosecution requests permission to delay the disclosure of sensitive evidence—photographs and documents of Jeffrey Epstein's sexual abuse victims—to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team until eight weeks before trial. The government argues this is necessary to protect an ongoing investigation and sensitive victim information, while noting the defense objects to this request.
DOJ-OGR-00022150.jpg
This document is a legal letter dated January 5, 2022, from attorney Jason E. Foy to Judge Analisa Torres, requesting a court order for the release of Tova Noel's firearm and other property. The letter explains that Noel's criminal charges were dismissed on January 3, 2022, and although she surrendered her firearm to the NYPD in 2019 as a condition of release, the NYPD property clerk refused to return it without a court order on January 4, 2022. The Government has expressed no objection to the proposed order.
DOJ-OGR-00022122.jpg
This legal filing from the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York, dated May 21, 2021, informs Judge Analisa Torres about deferred prosecution agreements reached with defendants Noel and Thomas. The defendants, employees of the Bureau of Prisons, have admitted to falsifying records at the Metropolitan Correctional Center in August 2019 and, in exchange for deferred prosecution, will cooperate with an OIG investigation and complete 100 hours of community service. The government requests a court hearing for May 25, 2021, to finalize these agreements.
DOJ-OGR-00019574.jpg
This document is a legal reply from Ghislaine Maxwell's attorney, Jeffrey Pagliuca, to Judge Alison J. Nathan, dated August 24, 2020. It supports a request to modify a protective order to allow Maxwell to disclose to an adversary in a separate civil litigation that said adversary has already provided materials to the U.S. Attorney's Office via subpoena. The document argues against the government's stance that the civil litigation is unrelated and that disclosure would jeopardize the criminal investigation.
DOJ-OGR-00019563.jpg
This document is a letter motion filed on September 2, 2020 (dated August 17), from Ghislaine Maxwell's attorney, Jeffrey Pagliuca, to Judge Alison J. Nathan. Maxwell requests permission to use specific discovery materials produced by the government in early August 2020 in redacted 'Other Matters' (likely separate legal proceedings). The document contains significant redactions concealing the specific nature of these other matters and the content of the discovery materials.
DOJ-OGR-00019554.jpg
This is a letter from the U.S. Department of Justice (SDNY) to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The Government requests that exhibits attached to a Defense Letter from August 17, 2020, be filed under seal and that the letter itself be redacted because the materials pertain to an ongoing grand jury investigation. The Government cites Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6(e)(6) and a Protective Order to support the confidentiality of these documents.
DOJ-OGR-00019490.jpg
This document is a letter dated July 21, 2020, from attorney Jeffrey Pagliuca to Judge Alison J. Nathan of the Southern District of New York. On behalf of his client, Ghislaine Maxwell, Pagliuca requests a court order to prohibit the government and its agents from making extrajudicial statements about her case. The letter argues that such statements are prejudicial and violate Maxwell's Sixth Amendment right to a fair trial by an impartial jury, citing legal precedents to support the court's authority to issue such an order.
DOJ-OGR-00019321.jpg
This is a letter dated August 10, 2020, from Ghislaine Maxwell's attorney, Laura A. Menninger, to Judge Loretta A. Preska. The letter informs the court about newly discovered information that is critical to both Maxwell's civil case (Giuffre v. Maxwell) and her separate criminal case. Counsel explains they are currently barred from disclosing this information due to a protective order in the criminal case but intend to seek a modification of that order to share the details with the court.
DOJ-OGR-00010534.jpg
This legal document is a letter from the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York to Judge Alison J. Nathan, dated June 22, 2022. The letter confirms that the government has complied with a court order by notifying the six victims in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (identified as Jane, Annie, Kate, Carolyn, Virginia, and Melissa) of their rights to be heard at the upcoming sentencing on June 28, 2022, as stipulated by the Crime Victims' Rights Act.
DOJ-OGR-00008918.jpg
This document is a letter dated February 9, 2022, from the law firm Winston & Strawn LLP to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case United States v. Maxwell. Writing on behalf of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers (NACDL), the firm requests permission to file an amicus curiae brief addressing post-trial revelations about Juror # 50 and the potential impact on the defendant's right to a fair trial. The letter outlines the specific legal issues NACDL intends to address, including voir dire in high-profile cases and juror bias.
DOJ-OGR-00019796.jpg
This document is a Notice of Appeal filed on March 24, 2021, on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (20-CR-00330-AJN). The appeal is directed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit and challenges the District Court's order from March 22, 2021, which denied her third motion for release on bail. The document lists Maxwell's counsel as David Oscar Markus and the Assistant U.S. Attorneys as Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, and Lara Pomerantz.
DOJ-OGR-00010753.jpg
This document is a letter dated June 27, 2022, from attorney Sigrid S. McCawley to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. McCawley explains that her client, victim Virginia Giuffre, cannot physically attend a court hearing due to a medical issue and requests permission to read Giuffre's statement on her behalf. A handwritten note on the document, signed by Judge Nathan, grants this request, ordering that counsel will be permitted to read a shortened version of the statement.
DOJ-OGR-00010736.jpg
This legal document is a letter dated June 26, 2022, from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The letter serves as a court filing in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. In it, the government submits a motion filed by the attorney for an individual named 'Kate', which was attached to her victim impact statement, in response to a court order issued that same day.
DOJ-OGR-00010674.jpg
This document is a letter filed on June 24, 2022, from attorney Sigrid S. McCawley to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell. It serves to submit a written victim impact statement from Teresa Helm, who identifies herself as a victim trafficked by Maxwell in 2002 at the age of 22. Helm's statement directly addresses Maxwell, describing the grooming process, the psychological trauma endured, and the devastating long-term effects on her self-worth and life trajectory.
DOJ-OGR-00010670.jpg
This legal document is a letter dated June 22, 2022, from attorney Sigrid S. McCawley to Judge Nathan regarding the sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter submits the victim impact statement of Virginia Giuffre, who details being trafficked and abused by Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein from the age of 16. Giuffre's statement directly blames Maxwell for spotting her at Mar-a-Lago in 2000 and introducing her to Epstein, thereby 'opening the door to hell'.
DOJ-OGR-00010660.jpg
This legal document is a letter from the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York to Judge Alison J. Nathan, dated June 24, 2022, regarding the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter responds to a court order about the defendant's objections to victim statements, identifying six victims by their first names (Jane, Annie, Kate, Carolyn, Virginia, and Melissa). It also notes that two of the victims, Kate and Annie, plan to attend the upcoming sentencing hearing.
DOJ-OGR-00010490.jpg
This document is a character reference letter submitted to Judge Alison J. Nathan by James 'Jamie' Martin Hollomon, a psychotherapist and lawyer, on May 2, 2022, regarding the sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell. Hollomon details a long-standing family friendship between the Hollomons and the Maxwells dating back to the 1950s through their fathers, Dr. Herbert Hollomon and Robert Maxwell. The author recounts staying with the Maxwell family in Oxford in 1966 when Ghislaine was five years old and returning for work experience in 1980.
DOJ-OGR-00010416.jpg
The U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York submitted a letter motion to Judge Alison J. Nathan in the criminal case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The motion, dated May 11, 2022, requests the exclusion of time under the Speedy Trial Act for two counts until Maxwell's scheduled sentencing on June 28, 2022. The government intends to dismiss these counts but seeks the exclusion as a precaution, noting that the defense counsel consents to the request, which was granted by the judge.
DOJ-OGR-00009617.jpg
This legal document is a letter dated March 2, 2022, from attorney Jeffrey S. Pagliuca to Judge Alison J. Nathan. Pagliuca, on behalf of his client Ghislaine Maxwell, requests an adjournment of a hearing on a Motion for New Trial, originally scheduled for March 8. The reason for the request is the unavailability of Maxwell's legal counsel, including Pagliuca, Ms. Menninger, and Ms. Sternheim, due to their mandatory participation in other lengthy trials in Colorado and New York.
DOJ-OGR-00004784.jpg
This legal document is a letter dated June 30, 2021, from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The letter, submitted on behalf of both the prosecution and the defense in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, confirms that neither party requests any redactions to the Court's recent order denying Maxwell's suppression motion. Consequently, the parties have no objection to the public filing of the unredacted order and its accompanying exhibits.
DOJ-OGR-00004777.jpg
This legal document is a letter dated June 7, 2021, from the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The letter provides an update on the confinement conditions for defendant Ghislaine Maxwell at the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC), stating that she receives more time and resources for discovery review than any other inmate. Specifically, it details her 13-hour daily access to computers, her ability to communicate with attorneys, and her extended time outside her cell.
DOJ-OGR-00004734.jpg
A legal letter dated May 28, 2021, from attorney Christian R. Everdell of Cohen & Gresser LLP to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter informs the court that the defense is filing an Omnibus Reply Memorandum under seal because it contains confidential discovery information governed by a protective order, allowing the government time to propose redactions before public filing.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity