| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
The Honorable Alison J. Nathan
|
Professional judge court |
6
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-06-21 | Court order | The Court issued an order directing the Government to confirm that victims have been notified of ... | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2021-03-29 | Legal filing | The Government filed a letter with the Court to clarify a statement made in a prior letter regard... | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2021-01-15 | Court order | The Court issued an Order allowing the defendant access to a laptop computer provided by the Gove... | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2020-12-08 | Court order | The Court issued an Order (Dkt. No. 92) regarding the defendant's conditions of confinement. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2020-12-08 | Court order | The Court issued an Order (Dkt. No. 92) which prompted this update letter. | Southern District of New York | View |
This is a letter dated August 4, 2025, from the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York to Judges Richard M. Berman and Paul A. Engelmayer. The Government is responding to the Court's July 31, 2025 order, which required it to provide specific information about grand jury materials in the cases against Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter outlines the history of motions to unseal these materials and lists the specific information the Court has requested, such as presentation dates, exhibits, and the Government's position on unsealing them.
This document is the signature page of a court order from the case United States v. Jeffrey Epstein (1:19-cr-00490-RMB), filed on July 25, 2019. The order was signed by Judge Richard M. Berman of the Southern District of New York. It shows consent from both the prosecution, represented by U.S. Attorney Geoffrey S. Berman, and the defense, represented by attorneys Martin Weinberg and Reid Weingarten on behalf of Jeffrey Epstein.
This document is a formal Notice of Appeal filed on July 22, 2019, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. On behalf of defendant Jeffrey Epstein, his counsel Reid Weingarten is appealing a 'Decision & Order Remanding Defendant' that was issued by Judge Richard M. Berman on July 18, 2019. The appeal is directed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
This document is a letter dated July 17, 2019, from attorney Reid Weingarten of Steptoe & Johnson LLP to Judge Richard M. Berman of the Southern District of New York. The letter is filed in the criminal case of United States v. Jeffrey Epstein and serves to submit documents concerning Epstein's registration status in New Mexico. This submission is made at the court's request and is intended to further support Epstein's application for bail.
This is a letter dated July 16, 2019, from the U.S. Attorney's Office to Judge Richard M. Berman in the case against Jeffrey Epstein. The prosecution details two suspicious wire transfers made by Epstein in late 2018, totaling $350,000, to two redacted individuals shortly after the Miami Herald began publishing an exposé on him. One of the recipients is described as a 'potential co-conspirator' from Epstein's 2007 non-prosecution agreement, raising concerns of witness tampering.
This legal document is a letter dated July 15, 2019, from the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York to Judge Richard M. Berman regarding the case *United States v. Jeffrey Epstein*. The prosecution requests the exclusion of speedy trial time for the period of July 15-18, 2019, noting that Epstein's defense counsel consents to the request. The document is endorsed by Judge Berman, who granted the application on July 16, 2019.
This legal document is a letter dated July 15, 2019, from the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York, Geoffrey S. Berman, to Judge Richard M. Berman. The letter formally requests the exclusion of speedy trial time in the criminal case against Jeffrey Epstein for the period between July 15 and July 18, 2019. The filing notes that Epstein's defense counsel, Martin Weinberg and Reid Weingarten, have been consulted and consent to the request.
This is a letter dated July 11, 2019, from attorney Reid Weingarten of Steptoe & Johnson LLP to Judge Richard M. Berman of the Southern District of New York. The letter argues for the pretrial release of his client, Jeffrey Epstein, in the case United States v. Jeffrey Epstein, proposing strict conditions to ensure his appearance and counter any perceived danger. Weingarten contends that the government's request to remand Epstein is unjust, citing a prior nonprosecution agreement (NPA) and Epstein's history of compliance with legal requirements, including never attempting to flee the country.
This document is a formal Notice of Appeal filed on July 7, 2022, on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell. The notice, submitted by her counsel Bobbi C. Sternheim, indicates Maxwell's intent to appeal her conviction and sentence, which were officially entered on June 29, 2022, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The appeal is directed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
This document is a formal Notice of Appeal filed on July 7, 2022, on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell. Filed by her attorney, Bobbi C. Sternheim, it declares Maxwell's intent to appeal the judgment, conviction, and sentence entered on June 29, 2022, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The appeal is directed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
This document is a legal declaration by Sigrid S. McCawley, an attorney for the plaintiff Virginia L. Giuffre, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The declaration is in support of the plaintiff's response to a motion for a protective order filed by the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell. McCawley attests to the authenticity of three attached exhibits: a notice and re-notice for Maxwell's deposition, and an email from Maxwell's counsel, Laura Menninger.
This document is a letter dated January 25, 2021, from the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) in Brooklyn to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The MDC argues that inmate Ghislaine Maxwell has been provided ample resources and time to review discovery materials and communicate with her lawyers, contrary to her defense counsel's claims, and requests the court vacate a prior order from January 15, 2021. A stamped order on the document, dated February 2, 2021, shows that Judge Nathan considered the request and ultimately denied it.
This document is a letter dated January 25, 2021, from the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) in Brooklyn to Judge Alison J. Nathan, requesting that the court vacate a prior order regarding inmate Ghislaine Maxwell's access to discovery materials. The MDC argues that Maxwell has been provided with sufficient resources, including a laptop and ample time with her attorneys. A handwritten order from Judge Nathan, dated February 2, 2021, is included on the document, which denies the MDC's request.
This legal document is a letter from the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case of Ghislaine Maxwell. The government states it does not object to Maxwell's request for weekend laptop access to review discovery materials but ultimately defers to the Metropolitan Detention Center's (MDC) policies. The letter emphasizes that Maxwell has already been provided with extensive access, including a dedicated laptop and desktop computer, for more hours than any other inmate.
This legal document is a letter from the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York to Judge Alison J. Nathan, dated February 1, 2021, regarding the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The government responds to Maxwell's request for expanded laptop access to review discovery materials on weekends, stating it has no objection but ultimately defers to the Metropolitan Detention Center's (MDC) policies. The letter details the extensive access Maxwell has already been granted, including a dedicated laptop and desktop computer, arguing she has ample opportunity to review the evidence.
A legal letter dated January 25, 2021, from the law firm Cohen & Gresser LLP to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter lists 12 specific pretrial motions being filed by the defense, including motions to dismiss various counts of the indictment, suppress evidence, and separate trials. Two of the motions (items 3 and 11) contain redactions regarding the target of a government subpoena.
A formal letter from the Federal Bureau of Prisons (MDC Brooklyn) to Judge Alison Nathan requesting the vacating of a court order regarding Ghislaine Maxwell. The MDC argues that Maxwell already has significant access to discovery materials (via a dedicated laptop provided in Nov 2020) and extensive communication with her legal counsel, exceeding that of other inmates. The letter refutes defense claims that her confinement conditions are limiting her ability to prepare for trial.
A legal letter from attorney Christian R. Everdell to Judge Alison J. Nathan requesting a court order for the Bureau of Prisons to grant Ghislaine Maxwell weekend and holiday access to a discovery review laptop. The letter argues that current prison computers lack necessary software to review millions of documents before the July 12, 2021 trial, and notes that the government does not object to this request.
This document is a formal Notice of Appeal filed on January 11, 2021, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The notice, submitted by her attorney Christian Everdell, appeals an order from December 28, 2020, by Judge Alison J. Nathan that denied Maxwell's renewed motion for release on bail. The appeal is directed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
This document is a letter dated December 31, 2020, from Christian R. Everdell, an attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell, to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The attorney requests a two-week extension for filing pretrial motions in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The justification for the request is the large volume of discovery materials and the fact that Maxwell was recently placed in a 14-day COVID-related quarantine at MDC, which has suspended in-person legal visits.
This legal document is a letter dated December 18, 2020, from attorney Christian R. Everdell of Cohen & Gresser LLP to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The letter informs the court of the submission of two versions of a reply memorandum concerning their client Ghislaine Maxwell's renewed motion for bail. One version is unredacted and filed under seal, while the other is redacted for public viewing, citing privacy concerns and confidential financial information as reasons for the redactions.
This is a legal letter dated December 18, 2020, from attorneys Christian R. Everdell and Mark S. Cohen of COHEN & GRESSER LLP to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The attorneys, representing their client Ghislaine Maxwell, are requesting to file documents related to her motion for bail under seal. They seek to submit an unredacted version for the court and a redacted version for the public, citing privacy concerns and the need to protect confidential information, including financial documents, as governed by a protective order.
This legal document is a letter dated December 15, 2020, from attorney Sigrid S. McCawley to Judge Alison J. Nathan, which includes a statement from Annie Farmer. Farmer, identifying herself as a victim, vehemently opposes Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for bail, characterizing Maxwell as a manipulative psychopath and a significant flight risk who has lived a parasitic lifestyle. The statement argues that releasing Maxwell would prevent justice for her and other victims.
This document is a character reference letter dated November 2, 2020, submitted to Judge Alison J. Nathan of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The redacted author, a long-time friend of Ghislaine Maxwell, vouches for her character and integrity, arguing she is not a flight risk and should be granted bail. The author concludes by offering to provide personal financial surety to meet any bail pledge set by the court.
This document is a character reference letter dated December 1, 2020, written to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding Ghislaine Maxwell. The author, whose name is redacted, claims to have been a friend of Maxwell's for over 25 years and describes her as loyal and kind, citing a personal example where Maxwell provided them with free housing during a difficult time. The letter concludes by asserting Maxwell's right to the presumption of innocence and due process.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity