United States District Court, Southern District of New York
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
The Honorable Alison J. Nathan
|
Professional judge court |
6
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-06-21 | Court order | The Court issued an order directing the Government to confirm that victims have been notified of ... | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2021-03-29 | Legal filing | The Government filed a letter with the Court to clarify a statement made in a prior letter regard... | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2021-01-15 | Court order | The Court issued an Order allowing the defendant access to a laptop computer provided by the Gove... | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2020-12-08 | Court order | The Court issued an Order (Dkt. No. 92) regarding the defendant's conditions of confinement. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2020-12-08 | Court order | The Court issued an Order (Dkt. No. 92) which prompted this update letter. | Southern District of New York | View |
DOJ-OGR-00008431.jpg
This legal document is a letter dated December 15, 2021, from defense attorney Jeffrey S. Pagliuca to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter is a response to the government's motion to prevent a witness, Alexander Hamilton, from testifying about four specific topics related to an individual named 'Kate'. The defense argues that providing Hamilton's declaration to the government under Rule 26.2 does not obligate them to introduce all of its contents as evidence.
DOJ-OGR-00008364.jpg
A letter dated December 13, 2021, from defense attorney Jeffrey S. Pagliuca to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter informs the court of the defense's intention to question attorneys Jack Scarola, Brad Edwards, and Robert Glassman and argues that these questions do not violate attorney-client privilege. The document cites legal precedents regarding the burden of proof for privilege claims.
DOJ-OGR-00008357.jpg
This legal document is a letter dated December 12, 2021, from the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The prosecution requests that the court order the defense in the Ghislaine Maxwell case to provide a list of their witnesses for the upcoming week by 10:00 a.m. the next day. The letter also notes that the defense recently made an untimely production of other materials, and the Government intends to file a motion to preclude them.
DOJ-OGR-00008355.jpg
This legal document is a letter dated December 9, 2021, from the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The letter is a filing in the criminal case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It presents a jointly proposed limiting instruction for the jury regarding Government Exhibit 52, specifying that the exhibit is only to be considered for showing a potential link between Maxwell and listed contacts, not for the truth of the information itself.
DOJ-OGR-00008225.jpg
This document is a legal letter dated December 5, 2021, from defense attorney Jeffrey S. Pagliuca to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The defense objects to the government's attempt to introduce the '900 series' of photographs of Jeffrey Epstein's New York apartment taken in 2019, arguing they have not been authenticated as accurately representing the apartment during the relevant timeframe of 1994-1996. The letter urges the court to reaffirm its previous ruling from December 3 excluding the photos based on Rules 401 and 403.
DOJ-OGR-00008223.jpg
This is a letter from the U.S. Department of Justice to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, dated December 5, 2021. The prosecution outlines its plan to question 'Witness-3' about sexual activity with Epstein, adhering to the court's order to avoid explicit details. The government expresses concern that this limited questioning could be misinterpreted by the jury as a lack of witness credibility, especially in light of the defense's opening argument.
DOJ-OGR-00008214.jpg
This is a legal filing from the U.S. Department of Justice to Judge Alison J. Nathan, dated December 4, 2021, in the criminal case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The prosecution is moving to admit photographs from inside Jeffrey Epstein's New York residence as evidence. The government argues that these photographs are relevant to the case because they serve to corroborate the testimony of a witness identified by the pseudonym 'Jane'.
DOJ-OGR-00001862.jpg
This is a letter dated November 25, 2020, from Ghislaine Maxwell's attorneys at Cohen & Gresser LLP to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The attorneys state their intention to file a renewed motion for bail for Ms. Maxwell and request an 'in camera' conference to discuss filing portions of the motion and supporting materials under seal. They argue for sealing to protect sensitive and private information concerning Ms. Maxwell and the third-party sureties (family and friends) supporting her bail application.
DOJ-OGR-00001832.jpg
This legal document is a letter from the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York to Judge Alison J. Nathan, dated October 6, 2020, regarding the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The prosecution requests permission to delay the disclosure of sensitive evidence, specifically photographs and documents related to victims of Jeffrey Epstein, to the defense until eight weeks before trial. The government argues this delay is necessary to protect an ongoing investigation and prevent the premature release of sensitive victim information, citing Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 16(d)(1) as legal justification.
DOJ-OGR-00001805.jpg
This document is a legal letter filed on October 23, 2020, by attorney Jeffrey Pagliuca on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell, addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The defense argues that the Government has failed to meet discovery deadlines promised during the July 14, 2020, initial conference, particularly regarding investigative files from the Southern District of Florida. The letter criticizes the Government's recent production as lacking substance, noting it consists largely of civil litigation documents and old records related to Jeffrey Epstein rather than the charged conspiracy.
DOJ-OGR-00001795.jpg
A legal letter dated October 14, 2020, from Ghislaine Maxwell's attorney, Christian R. Everdell, to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The defense opposes the government's request to delay the disclosure of evidence (photographs and documents) related to alleged victims of Jeffrey Epstein. The defense argues that these materials are exculpatory under Brady v. Maryland because the witnesses allege abuse by Epstein but do not accuse Maxwell of participation.
DOJ-OGR-00001752.jpg
This document is a letter motion dated August 17, 2020, from attorney Jeffrey Pagliuca on behalf of his client, defendant Ghislaine Maxwell, to Judge Alison J. Nathan of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The motion requests a modification of the existing protective order to allow Maxwell's defense to refer to and file under seal certain discovery materials provided by the government on August 5 and August 13, 2020. The defense argues this is necessary for the fair determination of issues in what is referred to as the "Other Matters".
DOJ-OGR-00001741.jpg
This document is a letter motion dated August 24, 2020, from attorney Laura A. Menninger to Judge Alison J. Nathan of the Southern District of New York. The attorney requests permission to file documents under seal on behalf of her client, Ghislaine Maxwell, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The justification for the request is that the documents contain information designated as confidential by the Government under the terms of the existing Protective Order in the case.
DOJ-OGR-00001719.jpg
This legal document is a letter dated August 13, 2020, from the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The prosecution is opposing recent requests from the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell, for an early disclosure of government witnesses and for the court to intervene with the Bureau of Prisons. The government argues these requests are premature and meritless, citing the early stage of discovery and previous denials of similar applications by the court.
DOJ-OGR-00001662.jpg
This legal document is a letter dated July 27, 2020, from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The prosecution requests an opportunity to respond to a motion for a protective order filed that morning by the defense counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter notes that the defense's filing was a surprise, as the Government believed discussions to jointly propose a protective order were still ongoing.
DOJ-OGR-00001635.jpg
This is a legal letter dated July 21, 2020, from Jeffrey Pagliuca of Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C., to Judge Alison J. Nathan of the Southern District of New York. The attorney, representing defendant Ghislaine Maxwell, requests that the court issue an order prohibiting the U.S. Government and its affiliates from making extrajudicial statements about the case, arguing such statements are prejudicial and violate Maxwell's Sixth Amendment right to a fair trial.
DOJ-OGR-00001538.jpg
This legal document is a letter dated July 7, 2020, from the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the criminal case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The prosecution proposes a briefing schedule for Maxwell's detention hearing following her arrest on July 2, 2020, and renews its request to exclude time under the Speedy Trial Act. The letter confirms the parties are available for a remote hearing on July 14, 2020.
DOJ-OGR-00001536.jpg
This document is a letter dated July 6, 2020, from attorneys Mark S. Cohen and Christian R. Everdell (Cohen & Gresser LLP) to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The defense informs the court that they finally made contact with Maxwell at the Metropolitan Detention Center that evening and she has waived her physical presence for upcoming proceedings. The defense and prosecution have agreed to schedule the remote arraignment and bail hearing for the morning of July 14, 2020.
DOJ-OGR-00001357.jpg
This legal document is a letter from the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York to Judge Alison J. Nathan, dated February 4, 2021. The letter provides an update on the conditions of confinement for the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell, at the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC). The Government reports that Maxwell has more time to review discovery materials than any other inmate (13 hours daily via computer) and has regular, private communication with her attorneys through video and phone calls, despite the suspension of in-person visits due to COVID-19.
DOJ-OGR-00001353.jpg
This legal document is a letter dated January 25, 2021, from the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) in Brooklyn to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The MDC requests the court to vacate a January 15, 2021 order concerning inmate Ghislaine Maxwell, arguing that her access to discovery materials and legal counsel is already extensive and sufficient. A stamped court order dated February 2, 2021, shows that Judge Nathan considered the request and responses from the Government and Defendant, and ultimately denied the MDC's request.
DOJ-OGR-00001351.jpg
A letter from defense attorney Christian R. Everdell to Judge Alison J. Nathan requesting a court order for the Bureau of Prisons to allow Ghislaine Maxwell access to a government-provided laptop on weekends and holidays. The letter argues that current restrictions hinder her ability to review voluminous discovery before her July 2021 trial, noting that the government does not object to the request and that she previously had full access during a COVID quarantine period.
DOJ-OGR-00001345.jpg
This legal document is a joint letter dated December 1, 2020, from the prosecution and defense to Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter details a disagreement between the two parties regarding how to address the defendant's concerns about her conditions of confinement at the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC). The Government proposes a written response from MDC's legal counsel, while the defense insists on a personal court appearance by the warden, Heriberto Tellez.
DOJ-OGR-00001343.jpg
This letter, dated November 23, 2020, is from the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York to Judge Alison J. Nathan. It provides an update on the confinement conditions of defendant Ghislaine Maxwell at the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC). The letter details that Maxwell was placed in quarantine after a potential COVID-19 exposure from a staff member, outlines the quarantine protocols, and confirms that she has been provided with a laptop to review discovery materials and can still make private legal calls.
DOJ-OGR-00000840.jpg
This document is a Notice of Appeal filed on March 24, 2021, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York on behalf of defendant Ghislaine Maxwell. The appeal challenges a court order from March 22, 2021, which denied her 'Third Motion for Release on Bail'. The document identifies Maxwell's attorney, David Oscar Markus, and the prosecuting Assistant U.S. Attorneys.
DOJ-OGR-00000765.jpg
A legal letter dated August 5, 2025, from Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP (representing the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein) to Judge Richard M. Berman. The letter states that the Epstein Estate takes no position regarding the Government's motion to unseal grand jury transcripts, provided that victim identities are protected via redaction.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity