United States District Court, Southern District of New York
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
The Honorable Alison J. Nathan
|
Professional judge court |
6
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-06-21 | Court order | The Court issued an order directing the Government to confirm that victims have been notified of ... | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2021-03-29 | Legal filing | The Government filed a letter with the Court to clarify a statement made in a prior letter regard... | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2021-01-15 | Court order | The Court issued an Order allowing the defendant access to a laptop computer provided by the Gove... | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2020-12-08 | Court order | The Court issued an Order (Dkt. No. 92) regarding the defendant's conditions of confinement. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2020-12-08 | Court order | The Court issued an Order (Dkt. No. 92) which prompted this update letter. | Southern District of New York | View |
DOJ-OGR-00020097.jpg
This document is a letter dated December 15, 2020, from Annie Farmer to Judge Alison J. Nathan of the Southern District of New York. In the statement, submitted via her attorney Sigrid S. McCawley, Farmer strongly opposes Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for bail, detailing her personal experience of being sexually abused by Maxwell as a child. Farmer characterizes Maxwell as a manipulative psychopath and a significant flight risk who lacks remorse for her role in procuring girls for Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00005389.jpg
This document is a letter dated October 27, 2021, from defense attorney Jeffrey Pagliuca to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter informs the court that the defense is filing a motion under Federal Rule of Evidence 412 (regarding sexual behavior evidence) under seal. It also outlines the defense's plan to serve redacted copies of this motion to the counsel of the specific alleged victims whose behavior is discussed in the motion.
DOJ-OGR-00005378.jpg
This document is a legal letter dated October 25, 2021, from attorney Jeffrey S. Pagliuca to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Pagliuca informs the court that the defense has filed an Omnibus Response to the Government's Motions in Limine under seal to allow time to review for necessary redactions, with a public filing and justification letter to follow by October 29, 2021.
DOJ-OGR-00005377.jpg
This document is a letter motion filed on October 25, 2021, by defense attorney Christian R. Everdell to Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The defense requests a one-week extension (to November 3, 2021) to file the joint proposed jury charge and verdict sheet, citing conflicting deadlines including Rule 412 briefing. The government has consented to this extension request.
DOJ-OGR-00002877.jpg
This legal document is a letter from the law firm Boies Schiller Flexner LLP (BSF) to Judge Alison J. Nathan, dated March 22, 2021, regarding the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. BSF objects to a subpoena issued by Maxwell's defense, arguing it is overly broad and lacks clarity on which victims require notice, while clarifying that the firm represents victims Annie Farmer (Minor Victim-2) and Virginia Giuffre. The firm states its intention to notify all Epstein victims it represents about the subpoena out of an abundance of caution.
DOJ-OGR-00002874.jpg
This is a letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York to Judge Alison J. Nathan, dated March 29, 2021, regarding the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The government seeks to clarify a previous statement from October 2020 where it claimed no involvement by its prosecution team in an earlier 'Florida Investigation'. The letter now states that new information suggests the FBI's New York Office may have participated in that Florida investigation between 2005 and 2010, and the government is reviewing files to determine the extent of the interaction.
DOJ-OGR-00002867.jpg
This legal document is a letter dated March 29, 2021, from the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The letter serves to notify the court that a Grand Jury has returned a superseding indictment against the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell. The Government outlines its intent to explain the differences between the new and prior indictments and address the impact on discovery and pending motions, while also stating it does not intend to seek further indictments if the trial proceeds as scheduled on July 12, 2021.
DOJ-OGR-00002820.jpg
This legal document is a letter dated March 26, 2021, from the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York to Judge Alison J. Nathan, who is presiding over the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The prosecution informs the court of a recent ruling in a separate case, U.S. v. Schulte, where Judge Crotty denied a motion to dismiss the indictment that was 'virtually identical' to one filed by Maxwell. The government argues that this precedent supports their position that Maxwell's motion should also be denied.
DOJ-OGR-00002819.jpg
This is a legal letter dated March 26, 2021, from attorney Sigrid S. McCawley of Boies Schiller Flexner LLP to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case *United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell*. The letter informs the court that BSF, representing victims, has conferred with the defendant's counsel and agreed to redact a small piece of information from a recent filing out of caution. BSF states it will remove these redactions if the court orders it to do so.
DOJ-OGR-00005234.jpg
This document is a letter from the U.S. Government to Judge Alison J. Nathan, filed on October 15, 2021, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter responds to a court order regarding the delivery of the defendant's legal mail at the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC). The Government explains the standard procedures at the MDC, noting that mail from counsel is delivered within a business day, while mail from the Government sent via FedEx undergoes a more complex warehouse processing and logging system before reaching the inmate.
DOJ-OGR-00005226.jpg
This document is a letter dated October 14, 2021, from attorney Jeffrey Pagliuca to Judge Alison J. Nathan, confirming November 15, 2021, as the deadline for Ghislaine Maxwell to file a motion under Federal Rule of Evidence 412 concerning the admissibility of evidence of an alleged victim's sexual behavior, clarifying its distinction from a motion in limine and its specific procedural requirements.
DOJ-OGR-00005203.jpg
This legal document is a letter dated October 12, 2021, from the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. In response to a court order, the government estimates its case-in-chief will last approximately four weeks. The letter also confirms that the government has provided the defense with its exhibit list, witness list, and other required materials.
DOJ-OGR-00008829.jpg
This legal letter, dated January 25, 2022, from Nathan Siegel of Davis Wright Tremaine LLP, on behalf of ABC News and NBCUniversal News Group, is addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan of the U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York. It requests to join other news organizations in opposing the sealing of the Defendant's motion for a new trial and supporting exhibits, and specifically asks for Juror 50's motion to be unsealed, citing its relevance as a "judicial document" to the judicial process.
DOJ-OGR-00008811.jpg
This legal document is a joint letter dated January 10, 2022, from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter proposes a schedule for sentencing and the resolution of severed perjury counts as directed by the court. The Government's position is to schedule the sentencing proceeding approximately three to four months from the date of the letter to allow time for a Presentence Investigation Report and resolution of post-trial motions.
DOJ-OGR-00008804.jpg
This document is a letter dated January 5, 2022, from attorney Jeffrey S. Pagliuca to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Pagliuca argues against the government's request for a hearing concerning a juror who revealed post-trial that they were a victim of sexual assault. He contends the request is premature and that, based on publicly available information and legal precedent, the court should order a new trial without an evidentiary hearing.
DOJ-OGR-00008798.jpg
The U.S. Department of Justice submitted a letter to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the criminal case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter informs the court that a juror has given multiple press interviews, revealing that he was a victim of sexual abuse and asserted that he "flew through" the juror questionnaire. The government brings these statements to the court's attention as they may have implications for the integrity of the jury selection process.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity