FBI
OrganizationRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
CIA
|
Intelligence sharing |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Trent Martin
|
Law enforcement subject |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Flatley
|
Employment |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
NSA
|
Cooperative data sharing |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Operational |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Redacted Source
|
Informant service provider |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Unnamed Witness
|
Person of interest interviewee |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Loftus
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Scott
|
Unknown |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
victims
|
Official |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Robert Maheu
|
Informant operative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
U.S.
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Wild
|
Investigative law enforcement victim witness |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
paul krassner
|
Surveillance target |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
The victims
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
NSA
|
Jurisdictional investigative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
James A. Baker
|
Employment |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
A. Farmer
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jane, Kate, Carolyn, and Annie
|
Investigator witness |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
[REDACTED]
|
Professional collaboration |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
NSA
|
Inter agency communication |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
STEPHEN FLATLEY
|
Employment |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Pro-PRC organizations
|
Surveillance adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Requester agency |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | OPR working with FBI Palm Beach Office, including case agents and Victim Witness Specialist, to o... | Palm Beach | View |
| N/A | N/A | FBI search of Automated Case Support system and documentation of victim notification system. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | FBI Meeting | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Notification received by OPR from FBI and USAO regarding federal investigation and Epstein's plea. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | FBI investigation into Epstein's international sex trafficking organization was quashed. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Federal investigation began, contemporaneous with news reports of Epstein's arrest. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Victims provided OPR with information regarding their contacts with the FBI and USAO. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Rothstein's firm was raided. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | FBI produced a criminal complaint related to Alfredo Rodriguez. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Potential arrest of Ghislaine Maxwell ('green lighting ab arrest'). | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Launch of counterintelligence investigation into Trump campaign | USA | View |
| N/A | N/A | Defense counsel review of nude images | FBI | View |
| N/A | N/A | FBI interview of a victim pursuant to a federal investigation regarding the sexual exploitation o... | Unknown | View |
| N/A | Investigation | Epstein investigation | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Transfer of evidence | New York Office (NYO) | View |
| N/A | N/A | Criminal Investigation / Agency Interviews | MCC New York | View |
| N/A | N/A | Search of Epstein's island | Little St. James | View |
| N/A | N/A | Seizure of images from Jeffrey Epstein's residences pursuant to search warrants. | New York and Virgin Islands | View |
| N/A | N/A | Planned Arrest upon return to US | Unspecified Airport | View |
| N/A | N/A | Closure of federal investigations by FBI and U.S. Attorney | Federal jurisdiction | View |
| N/A | N/A | FBI Raid / Evidence Collection | Epstein Residence | View |
| N/A | N/A | Identification of new victims | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Government interviews with accusers | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Opening of the case/Investigation | New York | View |
| N/A | N/A | Referral of case to FBI | Palm Beach | View |
DOJ-OGR-00002928.jpg
This document is page 4 of a legal filing by the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim, dated April 15, 2021, regarding the defense of Ghislaine Maxwell. The text argues that the defense needs significant time to review discovery material due to the immense volume (214,000 photos, 250,000 non-searchable documents) and the filing of a superseding indictment adding 'Accuser-4' and expanding the timeframe to the 2000s. It also notes technical difficulties experienced with an FBI-supplied laptop while attempting to review 2,100 'Highly Confidential' photographs with Ms. Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00025197.jpg
This document is a detailed event log for Saturday, August 10, 2019, chronicling the immediate aftermath of inmate Epstein's death. It records the timeline of notifications to officials like the AUSA and Judge Berman, the arrival of investigative bodies such as the FBI and OIG, and key actions including processing the body at Beekman Hospital and securing evidence like computer hard drives from the Special Housing Unit (SHU).
DOJ-OGR-00025180.jpg
This document is an email chain from November 5, 2019, initiated by a U.S. Marshal's request for reports on the investigation into Jeffrey Epstein's death. The request is forwarded by MCC New York Associate Warden Charisma Edge to other Bureau of Prisons (BOP) staff, including James Petrucci. The response from Petrucci and a drafted official reply both state that no report can be released because the investigation is active and ongoing, directing any inquiries to the BOP's Office of General Counsel, the OIG, or the FBI.
DOJ-OGR-00025174.jpg
This document is a comprehensive legal preservation and production request sent by attorneys representing Jeffrey Epstein's family (based out of Boston) to federal authorities including the MCC, FBI, and USAO. It demands the preservation of all physical, electronic, and video evidence regarding Epstein's detention, the July 23rd suicide attempt, and his death on August 10, 2019, specifically targeting logs, cell videos, and staff identities from the 9th floor SHU unit.
DOJ-OGR-00020085.jpg
This legal document argues for the defendant's detention by highlighting her evasive behavior and lack of trustworthiness. It cites an instance where she fled from FBI agents and suggests her actions, like wrapping a phone in tin foil, were meant to evade law enforcement. Furthermore, it claims the defendant was deceptive about her wealth, reporting only $3.8 million to Pretrial Services when evidence suggests she has access to far more, indicating a willingness to deceive the Court.
DOJ-OGR-00020084.jpg
This document is page 24 of a court filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) arguing against a renewed bail application for the defendant (Ghislaine Maxwell). It details her evasion of law enforcement, noting that despite communications between her counsel and the government from July 2019 to March 2020, her location was never disclosed. It further highlights that upon arrest, she ignored FBI directives and fled from agents who were clearly identified, countering defense claims that she was simply following security protocols.
DOJ-OGR-00020044.jpg
This legal filing argues against the prosecution's characterization of Ghislaine Maxwell as a 'master spy' evading arrest. The defense claims Maxwell retreated to a safe room during the FBI raid because her security guard mistook the agents for the press. Additionally, it argues that wrapping her phone in tin foil was to prevent press hacking after her number was leaked by the court, noting the phone was registered to her charity (Terramar Project) and she openly used another phone registered to 'G Max'.
DOJ-OGR-00017363.jpg
This document is the title page of a court transcript for the jury trial of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 20 CR 330), dated November 30, 2021. It lists the presiding judge, Hon. Alison J. Nathan, and details the appearances of the prosecution team (U.S. Attorney's Office) and the defense team (Haddon Morgan and Foreman, plus others). It also notes the presence of FBI and NYPD representatives.
DOJ-OGR-00005587.jpg
This legal document is a portion of a motion filed by the prosecution ('Government') arguing against the defense's desire to introduce evidence related to a past charging decision from a Florida investigation. The prosecution contends this evidence is irrelevant, cumulative, and would invite the jury to speculate, creating a 'bizarre spectacle' that distracts from the actual evidence of the current trial. The document cites case law to support its position that the jury should only consider the evidence presented in this specific case, not the prosecutorial decisions made in other jurisdictions.
DOJ-OGR-00005586.jpg
This legal document is a filing by the prosecution in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, arguing against the defense's attempts to introduce certain evidence. The prosecution contends that a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) involving Epstein is irrelevant to the current case and that the fact the defendant was not charged by the USAO-SDFL after a Florida investigation is not admissible to challenge the credibility of Minor Victim-4. The document suggests that introducing these elements would mislead the jury and open the door to rebuttal from the government about the circumstances of the prior investigation.
DOJ-OGR-00005550.jpg
This document summarizes the recollections of 'AK,' a Human Trafficking Coordinator, regarding potential investigations into Epstein at SDNY. AK denies that attorneys urged an investigation into Epstein and Maxwell as a 'duo,' stating the focus was on Epstein and Maxwell was only mentioned in passing. AK also denies ever meeting or speaking with attorney David Boies and has no memory of a second meeting on the subject in the summer of 2016.
DOJ-OGR-00005549.jpg
This legal document details the recollections of an individual identified as "AK" regarding meetings about the Epstein case after February 29, 2016. AK describes meeting with attorneys who provided information on Epstein's conduct beyond Virginia Roberts, and a subsequent meeting with Dan Stein, Chief of the Criminal Division, where they decided on an action plan. This plan involved AK contacting Sean Watson of the FBI to have him inquire with Miami agents about their dissatisfaction with the resolution of the original Florida case.
DOJ-OGR-00005546.jpg
This document summarizes a conference call held on February 11, 2021, with Amanda Kramer (AK) regarding her recollections of a meeting on February 29, 2016. During the 2016 meeting, attorneys Pete Skinner, Brad Edwards, and Stan Pottinger presented information to AK, who was then a prosecutor, advocating for the SDNY to open a criminal investigation into Jeffrey Epstein. The memo details AK's limited memory of the meeting, the roles of the attorneys, and the mention of civil lawsuits, including the 'Guiffre v. Maxwell' case.
DOJ-OGR-00005368.jpg
This document is page 11 of a legal filing from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, dated October 22, 2021. It contains a series of voir dire questions for potential jurors, designed to uncover biases related to past experiences with crime, legal disputes with government entities like the U.S. Attorney's Office, FBI, or NYPD, and preconceived notions about law enforcement witnesses. The document also informs jurors that they will hear testimony about evidence obtained from searches that the Court has deemed legal.
DOJ-OGR-00005365.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated October 22, 2021, containing proposed voir dire questions (21-25) for the jury selection in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. It lists the specific legal teams for both the defense (led by Everdell, Menninger, Pagliuca, Sternheim) and the prosecution (led by US Attorney Damian Williams and AUSAs Comey, Moe, Pomerantz, Rohrbach). The document includes margin comments highlighting a dispute between the prosecution and defense regarding whether to refer to Maxwell as 'the defendant' or 'the accused'.
DOJ-OGR-00005349.jpg
This document is page 27 of a jury questionnaire (Document 367) filed on October 22, 2021, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It contains questions 26 through 28, asking potential jurors to disclose any bias against federal law enforcement (DOJ, FBI), the NYPD, or U.S. Attorney Damian Williams, as well as general opinions on prosecutors and defense attorneys.
DOJ-OGR-00005314.jpg
This document is page 38 of 40 from a court filing (Document 365) in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on October 22, 2021. It contains proposed voir dire questions (15-20) designed to screen potential jurors for bias regarding the government (DOJ, FBI, NYPD), the legal system, and wealthy individuals. The questions specifically ask if jurors have opinions on 'people who are wealthy or have luxurious lifestyles' that would affect their impartiality.
DOJ-OGR-00005292.jpg
This document is page 16 of a juror questionnaire from a federal criminal case, filed on October 22, 2021. It poses questions to a potential juror to determine if they have any personal or professional associations with the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York or the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). The questionnaire also seeks to understand if any such relationships would impact their ability to serve as a fair and impartial juror.
DOJ-OGR-00005741.jpg
This document is a page from a defense motion filed on October 29, 2021, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The defense argues to prohibit testimony from 'Accuser 4' identifying Maxwell as a perpetrator, claiming that in 2007 FBI interviews and subsequent civil lawsuits against Epstein, the accuser never identified Maxwell and instead identified another individual as the one who took nude photographs. The defense asserts that any current identification is the result of suggestive government procedures.
DOJ-OGR-00005718.jpg
This document is Page 6 of a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) arguing against the admissibility of a specific document compilation. The text details how former Epstein employee Alfredo Rodriguez attempted to sell 97 pages of evidence to lawyer Brad Edwards in 2009, leading to an FBI sting operation where Rodriguez sold the documents to an undercover officer for $50,000. The filing argues these documents are unauthenticated hearsay, lack relevance to the current indictment, and should be excluded.
DOJ-OGR-00033033.jpg
This document is page 45 of a legal transcript from Consor & Associates. An unidentified individual (A) is being questioned about a visit to their house by federal prosecutors or FBI agents, which they estimate occurred in 2006 or 2007. The individual recalls about four agents visiting but cannot remember receiving business cards or cell phone numbers, suggesting their parents might have more information.
DOJ-OGR-00033032.jpg
This document is a page from a legal deposition transcript where an attorney, Mr. Tein, questions an unnamed witness. The witness denies being told by federal prosecutors about reimbursement or entitlement to money from a Mr. Epstein. However, the witness confirms having met with federal prosecutors, who they believe were from the FBI, at their home around the year 2008.
DOJ-OGR-00014485.jpg
This document is a page from the defense summation (closing argument) by Ms. Menninger in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The defense argues that the testimonies of accusers 'Carolyn' and 'Jane' are unreliable because their stories changed over time to implicate Maxwell after pressure from lawyers and the FBI. Specifically, it notes that Carolyn's 2008 lawsuit against Epstein and Sarah Kellen never mentioned Maxwell, and alleges that Jane was coached to identify Maxwell as the woman with the 'foreign accent' present during the abuse.
DOJ-OGR-00014484.jpg
This document is a page from the defense summation by Ms. Menninger in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The defense argues that the witnesses (specifically naming Jane and Annie) were motivated by financial gain, noting they hired lawyers like Robert Glassman and communicated with firms like Boies Schiller to file civil suits and claims with the Epstein Victims Compensation Fund. Menninger emphasizes that cooperation with the government was advised as a way to help their civil cases, resulting in them receiving millions of dollars.
DOJ-OGR-00014483.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a court summation by Ms. Menninger on August 10, 2022. It discusses the burden of proof, the importance of lack of evidence, and argues that the jury should find the defendant not guilty. The summation claims that accusers initially focused on Jeffrey Epstein, later adding Ghislaine Maxwell to their stories, and that accusers sought legal counsel and engaged with the FBI, potentially motivated by financial gain.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity