| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Sanchez
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Minor Victim-1
|
Abuser victim |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Narrator
|
Abuser victim |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Malyshev
|
Business associate |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Co conspirator |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Jane
|
Predatory |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Annie's mom
|
Acquaintance |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Villafaña
|
Adversarial |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
JANE
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
USAO Managers (Acosta, Menchel, Lourie)
|
Adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Alfredo Rodriguez
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Tatum Miller
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Accomplices |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Sarah Ransome
|
Victim perpetrator |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
YL
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Co implicated |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Richard M. Berman
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Deborah Anaya
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Minor Victim-3
|
Adversarial defendant victim |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Co involved in investigation |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Kate
|
Association |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Lesley Groff
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Criminal association |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Minor Victim-1
|
Adversarial defendant victim |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
A. Farmer
|
Victim |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Provision regarding USAO's efforts to obtain Epstein's computers and the safeguarding of these co... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein's alleged sexual molestation of minor girls on a daily basis for many years, including at... | West Palm Beach mansion | View |
| N/A | N/A | Discussion about Ghislaine Maxwell's relationship with Epstein continuing and her responsibilitie... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Litigation involving Epstein where his lawyers attacked the credibility of the girls. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Discovery process blocked by Epstein and co-conspirators, leading to the need for alternative inv... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Ghislaine Maxwell began looking for real estate for her dad and Epstein asked for help finding an... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein asked Ghislaine Maxwell to continue helping him (find a house, etc.) after her father's d... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein's alleged criminal scheme and the defense's efforts to secure non-prosecution and immigra... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Agreement provisions precluding criminal charges and immigration proceedings against certain indi... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Federal investigation resolved through a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein's plea agreement and sentencing for an 18-month incarceration, reduced from a 'non-negoti... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Plaintiffs' motion to deny a protective order, which seeks to exclude Epstein from depositions, i... | Court proceedings | View |
| N/A | N/A | Minor girl (Jane Doe #5) was taken to Epstein's mansion on El Brillo Way for massages and/or sex ... | Epstein's mansion on El Bri... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein serving 12 months of house arrest at his Palm Beach home, with curfew, no unsupervised co... | Palm Beach home | View |
| N/A | N/A | District Court's findings and application of sentencing guidelines, including a four-level leader... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | 11-month investigation by Palm Beach police into Epstein paying underage girls for massages and s... | El Brillo Way home | View |
| N/A | N/A | State Attorney Barry Krischer declined to prosecute Epstein on unlawful sex acts with minors, ins... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Notification received by OPR from FBI and USAO regarding federal investigation and Epstein's plea. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein's state plea hearing. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Menchel made substantive changes to Villafaña's draft letter concerning Epstein's plea deal, incl... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein's plea deal (non-prosecution agreement) for two prostitution charges. | state court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein served 13 months in Palm Beach County jail with work release privileges. | Palm Beach County jail | View |
| N/A | N/A | FBI investigation into Epstein's international sex trafficking organization was quashed. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Relocation of victims from Palm Beach to other places in the U.S. (including Southern District of... | Palm Beach, other places in... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein's attempt to get out of the NPA after it was signed. | N/A | View |
This document is a Suicide Watch Observation Log for inmate Epstein, Reg # 76318-054, dated July 23, 2019. The log details observations of Epstein's behavior from 10:30am to 1:00pm, including pacing, eating, sitting on his bed, and washing his neck. A significant event noted is Epstein being taken to meet with his attorney at 12:40pm.
This document is a suicide watch observation log for inmate Epstein, Reg #76318-054, on July 23, 2019. The log records his behavior and statements from 8:37 AM to 10:20 AM, noting that he was pacing, sitting on his bed, complained of a swollen throat, and made multiple inquiries about speaking with his attorney. The log indicates a focus on his physical state and his desire for legal counsel.
This document is the cover sheet for a 'Suicide Watch Chronological Log' (specifically an Inmate Companions Log) for inmate Epstein at the MCC. It documents a watch period from July 23, 2019, to July 24, 2019, identifying his register number as 76318-054 and listing strict restrictions on allowed items such as suicide smocks and blankets.
This document is the header of an email dated July 24, 2019, with the subject 'Re: Epstein #76318-054'. The sender and recipient information is redacted, and the email includes an attachment named 'TEXT.htm'. The footer contains a Bates number indicating the document is from a Department of Justice (DOJ) production.
This document is an email from MCC New York Associate Warden Shirley V. Skipper-Scott to Lamine N'Diaye on July 24, 2019. The email provides a detailed definition of 'Psychological Observation' in response to a query from Regional Director J. Ray Ormond regarding inmate Epstein. It states that Epstein is on this status due to a pending self-mutilation report, will be reassessed the next day, and will be returned to the Special Housing Unit (SHU) where he is already housed under Protective Custody.
This document is an email from Ray Ormond to Shirley V. Skipper-Scott on July 24, 2019, acknowledging a forwarded update about inmate Epstein. The update from Skipper-Scott explains that Epstein is on Psychological Observation until the following day for reassessment. It also states that Epstein is being housed in the Special Housing Unit (SHU) due to a pending incident report for self-mutilation and because he requested Protective Custody due to the high-profile nature of his case.
This document is an email chain from August 23, 2019, concerning a draft report titled 'Epstein.76318-054.ReconstructionReport.draft3.docx'. The National Suicide Prevention Coordinator for the Federal Bureau of Prisons initially circulates the draft to James Wills, Michael Carvajal, and Jeffery Keller for review. Hugh Hurwitz then forwards the email, praising the report as 'outstanding' despite its creation without interviews or video, and instructs the recipient to prepare a final draft for him to give to 'the director'.
This document details prosecutor Acosta's explanation to the Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) for pursuing a state-level, pre-indictment resolution in the Epstein case. Acosta cited the novelty of trafficking prosecutions at the time, issues with witnesses and evidence, and the belief that a state resolution offered more flexibility than a federal one. The document also includes statements from other legal professionals, Menchel and Villafaña, who described the general aversion of federal judges in the Southern District of Florida to binding plea agreements like Rule 11(c) pleas.
This legal document outlines specific actions taken between 2001 and 2004 as part of a conspiracy charge. It details how Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, and other employees sent gifts (including lingerie) to a woman named Carolyn and repeatedly called her to schedule massages for Epstein. The document concludes with a legal clarification that for a conspiracy conviction, it is sufficient to prove that any member of the conspiracy committed an overt act, not necessarily the defendant (Ms. Maxwell) herself.
This legal document, filed on August 10, 2022, details overt acts from an indictment related to conspiracy charges. It alleges that between 1994 and 2002, Maxwell, along with co-conspirator Epstein, engaged in sexual abuse and trafficking of minors identified as Jane, Annie, and Carolyn. The alleged acts occurred in New York, Florida, and New Mexico.
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, showing a rebuttal by Ms. Comey. She argues against the defense's claim that their client, Maxwell, was framed by witnesses. Comey's reasoning is that before Epstein's death in 2019, he was the 'big fish' and the logical target for any fabricated stories, meaning there was no motive for witnesses to invent Maxwell's involvement years ago.
This document is a transcript of a prosecutor's (Ms. Comey's) rebuttal in a criminal trial, likely against Ghislaine Maxwell. Ms. Comey argues that the jury should rely on the powerful and consistent testimony of multiple victims, as sexual abuse crimes rarely produce documentary evidence. She highlights that three separate victims gave similar accounts of the defendant touching their breasts and using massage as a prelude to sexual abuse, which serves as strong corroboration of guilt.
This legal document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a conversation between two attorneys, Ms. Moe and Ms. Menninger, and the presiding judge. The discussion centers on redacted emails between individuals named Kate and Epstein, clarifying that while the emails were redacted, their content was introduced via testimony. Ms. Moe raises concerns about mischaracterizations and references to items not in evidence during closing arguments, and the Court assures her that the jury will receive proper instructions.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) recording the summation by defense attorney Ms. Menninger, likely in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. Menninger argues that the jury should 'hesitate' to convict based on changed stories following the opening of the Epstein Victims Compensation Fund, the credibility of witness Mr. Alessi, and the lack of physical evidence such as photographs, phone records, or proof of payments to Interlochen. She highlights the absence of corroborating testimony from the accusers' family members.
This document is a page from a court transcript of a summation given by Ms. Menninger, filed on August 10, 2022. Menninger argues that the jury should doubt the credibility of witnesses Carolyn and Jane, citing their changed stories, the passage of time, and potential financial motivation. She contrasts their testimony with that of witnesses Eva and Michelle, who she claims directly contradicted Jane's allegations of sexual orgies.
This document is a transcript of a closing argument by defense attorney Ms. Menninger in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. Menninger argues for Maxwell's acquittal on 'Count Six', which relates to an accuser named Carolyn, by attacking Carolyn's credibility and claiming she never traveled to New York as alleged. The attorney also distances Maxwell from any involvement in the travel of another individual, Annie Farmer, to undermine the government's broader conspiracy theory involving Maxwell and Epstein.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness, Mr. Visoski, by an attorney, Ms. Comey. Mr. Visoski identifies a photograph, marked as Government Exhibit 202, as the garage of Jeffrey Epstein's house in Palm Beach. Following his testimony and no objection from opposing counsel Mr. Everdell, the court admits the exhibit into evidence.
This document is page 83 (filed page 70) of a court transcript from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), featuring the opening statement by defense attorney Ms. Sternheim. She argues that the government's case relies on 'stitching together' the stories of four accusers which cannot stand on their own. Sternheim urges the jury to question the accusers' credibility, suggesting their testimony is influenced by media, lawyers, and financial payouts from the 'Epstein fund.'
This document is a court transcript of an opening statement by an attorney, Ms. Sternheim. She attempts to discredit a witness named Annie by highlighting inconsistencies in her behavior, such as not believing she was a victim until later and keeping boots allegedly bought by Epstein for 25 years. Sternheim also points to a $1.5 million settlement Annie received as a potential motive for her testimony, and argues the events in New Mexico are not relevant to the indictment.
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, containing part of an opening statement by Ms. Sternheim. The statement describes a young woman named Annie who, at age 16, met Jeffrey Epstein in New York and later traveled to Santa Fe, where she met Ghislaine for the only time. The speaker asserts that nothing criminal occurred during the Santa Fe trip and that Annie was above the age of consent in New Mexico.
This document is a page from a court transcript of an opening statement by Ms. Sternheim, likely a defense attorney. Sternheim argues that a key witness is an unreliable, professional actress who only implicated "Ghislaine" after Epstein's death in order to receive a $5 million payment from the Epstein victim's fund. The attorney urges the jury to be skeptical of the upcoming testimony, highlighting alleged financial motivations and inconsistencies.
This page from a legal filing (Document 397 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) outlines the Government's argument for admitting evidence of rape. The prosecution rebuts defense claims that such evidence is irrelevant or overly inflammatory (Rule 403), asserting that the victims' testimony is necessary to explain the complex, multi-year relationships between the defendant, Epstein, and the victims. The text clarifies that the Indictment charges conspiracies for 'sexual activity' and 'commercial sex acts,' not merely 'sexualized massages' as the defense suggested.
This legal document, filed on October 29, 2021, discusses the admissibility of expert testimony from Dr. Rocchio. The Government intends to use this testimony to provide background on victim behavior, specifically why victims might return to their abusers like the defendant and Epstein. The document also references an October 11, 2021 letter where the Government notified the defense about specific evidence and witness testimony it plans to present at trial.
This legal document is a page from a court filing, specifically Document 397 in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on October 29, 2021. The text argues for the admissibility of expert testimony from a Dr. Rocchio, who would explain the psychological dynamics of abusive relationships to help the jury understand why victims might act in counterintuitive ways, such as returning to an abuser. The document cites several other cases to support the argument that such dynamics are beyond the common knowledge of an average juror, while also noting the defendant's objection that this type of testimony is not how Rule 702 is meant to work.
This document is page 13 of a legal indictment against Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on March 29, 2021. It details specific allegations of Maxwell facilitating the sexual abuse of three unnamed minors (Victim-2, Victim-3, and Victim-4) for Jeffrey Epstein between 1994 and 2002. The alleged incidents occurred in various locations, including New Mexico, London, and Florida, and form the basis for Count Two of the indictment, 'Enticement of a Minor to Travel to Engage in Illegal Sex Acts'.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | $0.00 | Epstein paid for a lot in Ghislaine Maxwell's l... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Unspecified recip... | $0.00 | Mention of a 'donation' Epstein had made on a d... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | underprivileged g... | $200.00 | Payment for massages | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | underprivileged g... | $300.00 | Payment for massages | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Defense Attorneys | $0.00 | Cost of Epstein's defense | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | victim | $300.00 | Payment for services (massage) | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Bill Richardson (... | $0.00 | Campaign donations from Epstein that Richardson... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | [REDACTED] | $350.00 | Payment for massage | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Harvard | $30,000,000.00 | Donation for a theoretical physics research cen... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | MD | $200.00 | Payment for providing a massage (first incident). | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | MD | $200.00 | Payment for providing a massage (second incident). | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Jane Doe #5 | $200.00 | Payment for giving a massage. | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | $0.00 | Epstein paid Ghislaine Maxwell millions and mil... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | The Defendant (Gh... | $10,000,000.00 | Bequest included in defendant's assets for dete... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Edwards' clients | $0.00 | Settlement amounts Epstein voluntarily agreed t... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Ms. Maxwell | $10,000,000.00 | Bequest listed as an asset | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Ms. Maxwell | $10,000,000.00 | Bequest from estate | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Interlochen Arts ... | $0.00 | Alleged payment for 'Jane'. The document text s... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | [REDACTED] | $300.00 | Payment for massage services | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Victims (implied) | $0.00 | Reference to 'Epstein's agreement... to provide... | View |
| N/A | Received | Edwards | Epstein | $0.00 | Epstein is attempting to force Edwards to pay '... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Unknown (Construc... | $0.00 | Purchase or construction of a cabin at Interloc... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Interlochen School | $0.00 | Possible donation of the cabin to the school (w... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | the defendant | $0.00 | Receipt of funds mentioned in context of missin... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | victims | $0.00 | General reference to victims' right to seek dam... | View |
The speaker states that Epstein, not Ghislaine, called Annie's mom to arrange the trip.
Epstein called Annie's mom to invite Annie to New Mexico, falsely claiming that 20 to 25 other girls and his wife, Ghislaine, would be there.
Epstein personally met with Capt. Elmer Gudger and advised him that he no longer wished to prosecute Juan Alessi for burglary and theft.
Before the witness left, Epstein asked her to leave her phone number.
The witness, Kate, describes her communications with Epstein during her twenties and early thirties as having a 'friendly' tone. She continued communicating because she did not want to admit what had happened to her and was fearful of disengaging.
Epstein called Annie's mom to invite Annie to New Mexico, falsely claiming that 20 to 25 other girls and his wife, Ghislaine, would be there.
During the second massage, JS told Epstein she didn't want to be touched after he attempted to touch her breasts.
Epstein filed a complaint which Edwards alleges was done without probable cause for the purpose of extortion.
The witness, A. Farmer, testified that she spoke with Epstein by phone approximately two or three times after her trip to New York.
A shipment from Epstein’s address in New York to Minor Victim-4, reflected in Federal Express records.
A photograph was sent to Epstein with a note saying 'Thanks for rocking my world'.
Epstein was on the phone at the beginning of the massage session with ML.
Epstein told ML to leave her telephone number with his assistant so she could be contacted for work again.
Accusers offered to send photos to Epstein while he was in jail.
After the alleged assault, Epstein told Jane Doe to write down her name and phone number.
Message pads entered at trial show Carolyn called Epstein several times in the summer of 2004: once in late April or early May, again on July 6, and again on July 30.
Message pads entered at trial show Carolyn called Epstein several times in the summer of 2004: once in late April or early May, again on July 6, and again on July 30.
Epstein consistently notified Detective Deborah Anaya, a New Mexico official, whenever he spent time at his residence in New Mexico.
A shipment from Epstein’s address in New York to Minor Victim-4, reflected in Federal Express records.
Epstein called Annie's mom and talked to her about Ghislaine being present for a trip.
Epstein called Maria and offered her a job at his mansion in New York City.
Burt Fields or Eileen Guggenheim spoke to Epstein about Maria to help advance her artistic career.
If a girl had not been to his home before, Epstein asked for her phone number to contact her in the future.
Epstein encouraged girls to find other girls interested in performing massages for him.
A conversation between Epstein and the witness's mother is mentioned by Ms. Menninger as something that could be testified to by the mother herself.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity