Sarah Ransome
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Victim perpetrator |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Robert Y. Lewis
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Victim perpetrator |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Accuser defendant |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Association |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Adversarial |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Perpetrator victim |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MS. McCAWLEY
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Accused accuser |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
MARSH LAW FIRM PLLC
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
ALAN DERSHOWITZ
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
ALAN DERSHOWITZ
|
Accuser accused |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
ALAN DERSHOWITZ
|
Accused accuser |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Perpetrator victim |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Margaret E. Mabie
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Victim perpetrator |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Natalya Malyshev
|
Victim recruiter |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Robert Y. Lewis, Esq.
|
Client |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Legal proceeding | Ms. Maxwell's sentencing hearing, during which Sarah Ransome and Elizabeth Stein have requested t... | United States District Court | View |
| N/A | Legal filing | A motion and exhibits were filed by counsel for Sarah Ransome and Elizabeth Stein requesting perm... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Abuse | For seven to eight months, Sarah Ransome was sexually abused by Epstein, Maxwell, and others. | New York mansion and St. Li... | View |
| N/A | Escape attempt | Sarah Ransome attempted to escape from St. Little James by jumping off a cliff into shark-infeste... | St. Little James | View |
| N/A | Interaction | Multiple individuals allegedly interacted with Epstein and Ms. Maxwell during the period of charg... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Photograph | A photograph was taken of Ghislaine Maxwell and Sarah Ransome standing together outdoors. | Unspecified outdoor location | View |
| N/A | Hospitalization / suicide attempt | Sarah Ransome's hospitalization following her first suicide attempt. Photos of this event are pre... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Trip | Sarah Ransome and Elizabeth Stein moved to New York as young women. | New York | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | Upcoming sentencing for Maxwell for her criminal involvement in the conspiracy. | court of the United States | View |
| N/A | Sentencing | Upcoming sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell following her conviction on five sex trafficking crimina... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Sarah Ransome's second suicide attempt and subsequent hospitalization. | Hospital | View |
| N/A | Recruitment | Sarah Ransome met an Epstein/Maxwell recruiter named Natalya Malyshev in a club in New York. | New York | View |
| N/A | Introduction | Natalya Malyshev arranged for Sarah Ransome to meet "Jeffery" (Epstein). | N/A | View |
| 2022-06-28 | Sentencing | Scheduled sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell, at which Sarah Ransome and Elizabeth Stein are seeking... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2022-06-28 | Sentencing hearing | Sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell in the case USA v. Maxwell. | United States District Court | View |
| 2022-06-25 | Legal filing | Filing of a Memorandum of Law in support of a motion for crime victims to be allowed to deliver o... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2019-09-03 | Court hearing | A court proceeding where victim Sarah Ransome provides a statement regarding the case involving J... | Courtroom in the Southern D... | View |
| 2019-08-29 | Court proceeding | Sarah Ransome delivered a victim impact statement in front of Judge Berman, who then dismissed th... | United States District Court | View |
| 2019-03-02 | N/A | Dershowitz statement attacking Roberts and Sarah Ransome. | Unknown | View |
| 2018-12-19 | N/A | Settlement of federal civil lawsuit confirmed | Federal Court | View |
| 2006-10-01 | N/A | Period Sarah Ransome claims she interacted with Epstein and Ms. Maxwell. | Unknown | View |
| 2006-01-01 | N/A | Period during which Sarah Ransome claims she was trafficked. | Palm Beach / New York | View |
2022.08.01%20Brief.pdf
This document is a legal brief filed by Ghislaine Maxwell in the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. Maxwell argues that Virgin Islands public policy does not prevent her from seeking indemnification (reimbursement) for legal fees and security costs incurred due to her employment with Epstein, despite her criminal conviction in New York (SDNY). She asserts claims based on contract promises, common law joint tortfeasor indemnity, and corporate indemnity laws regarding her role at NES, LLC.
2020.07.13%20Motion%20to%20Intervene.pdf
This document is a Motion to Intervene filed by the Government of the US Virgin Islands in a civil case brought by Ghislaine Maxwell against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. The Government seeks to intervene to prevent Maxwell from using the Estate's assets to pay for her legal defense (indemnification), arguing that those assets should be preserved to satisfy a potential judgment in the Government's separate CICO (racketeering) lawsuit against the Estate. The document details Maxwell's evasion of subpoenas prior to her arrest, the Government's interest in the Estate's assets for victim restitution and penalties, and the allegation that Maxwell and the Estate are colluding rather than being true adversaries. While flight logs are mentioned as existing evidence of trafficking, no specific flight records are contained within this specific motion.
2020.03.12%20Civil%20Complaint.pdf
This document is a civil complaint filed on March 12, 2020, by Ghislaine Maxwell against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein and its executors, Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn, as well as NES, LLC. Maxwell seeks indemnification for legal fees, security costs, and safe accommodation expenses she has incurred due to her prior employment with Epstein. The complaint alleges that Epstein repeatedly promised, both verbally and in writing (specifically in a 2004 letter), to support Maxwell financially and indemnify her, a practice he reportedly maintained during previous lawsuits in 2009 and 2017.
EFTA00037163.pdf
This document is a screenshot of a Yahoo Mail inbox belonging to 'Sarah' (identified as Sarah Ransome via desktop files). It displays an email thread from February 8, 2007, containing romantic correspondence between the user and a person signing off as 'AC' (likely Adam Castellani, whose name appears on a desktop folder). The browser tabs show a Google search for 'The Harley Medical Group 2 Portman St'.
DOJ-OGR-00014750.jpg
This document is a transcript page from the sentencing hearing of Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on August 22, 2022. The Court lists various documents reviewed for sentencing, including support letters for Maxwell, a forensic psychiatric evaluation, a letter from an MDC inmate regarding Maxwell's tutoring, and numerous victim impact statements from individuals including Annie Farmer, Virginia Giuffre, and Sarah Ransome. Counsel for both sides confirm the record of submissions before the court.
DOJ-OGR-00000695.jpg
This document is a court transcript from September 3, 2019, containing a victim impact statement by Sarah Ransome. Ransome identifies herself as a victim of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell's sex trafficking ring, thanks the prosecutors of the Southern District of New York, and urges them to continue their investigation, stating that Epstein did not act alone.
DOJ-OGR-00020724.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from the Southern District of New York covering proceedings related to the sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell in late June 2022. It records Judge Nathan's orders permitting specific victims (Annie Farmer, Kate, Virginia Giuffre, Sarah Ransome, Teresa Helm, and Elizabeth Stein) to read oral statements at sentencing, noting that Giuffre's counsel would read hers due to a medical issue preventing Giuffre's physical presence. The document also records the sentencing hearing held on June 28, 2022, listing the attorneys present for both the defense and the prosecution, and grants a motion by the NY Times Company to unseal juror questionnaires.
DOJ-OGR-00020723.jpg
A page from a court docket report for the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, detailing filings and orders from June 25-26, 2022. The entries include motions regarding victim impact statements, letters from defense counsel Bobbi Sternheim and the USA, and judicial orders from Judge Alison J. Nathan concerning sentencing procedures and the defendant's access to legal materials at the MDC.
DOJ-OGR-00020577.jpg
This document is a court docket page from June 2022 detailing the final proceedings leading up to and including the sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell. It records orders permitting specific victims (including Virginia Giuffre and Annie Farmer) to present impact statements, notes Giuffre's absence due to medical issues, and confirms the sentencing hearing took place on June 28, 2022. It also includes an order granting the NY Times' motion to unseal juror questionnaires.
DOJ-OGR-00020476.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from June 2022 covering the sentencing phase of US v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It details orders permitting specific victims (including Virginia Giuffre, Annie Farmer, and 'Kate') to provide impact statements, notes Giuffre's medical inability to attend in person, records the sentencing hearing held on June 28, 2022, and grants a motion by the NY Times to unseal juror questionnaires.
DOJ-OGR-00020475.jpg
This document is a court docket log from June 24-26, 2022, relating to the sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 22-1426). It details Judge Alison J. Nathan's orders permitting victims Annie Farmer, Kate, and Virginia Giuffre to make in-person statements at sentencing. The docket also records communications regarding Maxwell's access to legal materials at the MDC, defense motions regarding victim impact statements from Sarah Ransome and Elizabeth Stein, and the denial of Maxwell's request to redact victim statements.
DOJ-OGR-00015653.jpg
This document is a photograph presented as Government Exhibit 335 in the legal case S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN), identified by the Department of Justice with the number DOJ-OGR-00015653. The image depicts Ghislaine Maxwell and Sarah Ransome posing together, serving as evidence of their association.
DOJ-OGR-00010528.jpg
This legal document is a letter dated June 14, 2022, from MARSH law firm pllc to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The firm, representing sex trafficking victims Sarah Ransome and Elizabeth Stein, formally requests that the two women be allowed to speak at the upcoming sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell on June 28, 2022. The request is supported by a citation from the Crime Victims' Rights Act, asserting their right to be heard.
DOJ-OGR-00010745.jpg
This document is a court order from the criminal case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330). The Judge rules that while the Defendant challenges whether Maria Farmer, Sarah Ransome, Teresa Helm, and Juliette Bryant meet the statutory definition of 'crime victims' under the CVRA, the Court has broad discretion under 18 U.S.C. § 3661 to consider information at sentencing. Consequently, the Court permits these four women to provide written submissions for the sentencing record but denies their requests to make in-person statements.
DOJ-OGR-00010727.jpg
This document is a letter filed on June 26, 2022, by the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The Government is responding to a court order concerning an application by Sarah Ransome and Elizabeth Stein to speak at Maxwell's sentencing. The letter references a previous order where the Court declined to allow individuals not proven at trial to be directly harmed to speak at the hearing, instead permitting them to submit written statements.
DOJ-OGR-00010725.jpg
This legal letter, dated June 25, 2022, is from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Sternheim opposes a motion filed on behalf of Sarah Ransome and Elizabeth Stein, who seek to provide oral victim impact statements at Maxwell's sentencing. The letter argues that the motion should be denied because neither Ransome nor Stein qualify as statutory crime victims under the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA).
DOJ-OGR-00010713.jpg
This document is a legal declaration by Robert Y. Lewis, the attorney for victims Sarah Ransome and Elizabeth Stein, filed in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Lewis outlines his communications with the probation office between May 9 and May 31, 2022, to arrange the submission of Victim Impact Statements for Maxwell's upcoming sentencing. The declaration supports a motion for his clients to speak at the sentencing.
DOJ-OGR-00010693.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing, argues that two of Ghislaine Maxwell's victims, Sarah Ransome and Elizabeth Stein, should be permitted to give oral victim impact statements at her upcoming sentencing. It provides factual background on the sex trafficking conspiracy Maxwell and her coconspirator, Jeffrey Epstein, ran for over a decade. The document details how they targeted young women, like Ransome and Stein, who came to New York for the fashion industry, by preying on their vulnerabilities and promising career advancement in exchange for sexual favors.
DOJ-OGR-00010692.jpg
This document is a legal memorandum filed on June 25, 2022, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. Attorneys from Marsh Law Firm PLLC, on behalf of crime victims Sarah Ransome and Elizabeth Stein, are petitioning the court to allow their clients to deliver oral victim impact statements at the upcoming sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell on June 28, 2022. The memorandum argues that the court should consider the full scope of harm caused by Maxwell's crimes, beyond the specific counts for which she was convicted.
DOJ-OGR-00010686.jpg
This document is the cover page for 'Exhibit 2' within court filing Document 674 (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on June 24, 2022. The text indicates that the exhibit contains photos of Sarah Ransome in a hospital following her second suicide attempt.
DOJ-OGR-00010681.jpg
This document is the cover page for 'Exhibit 1' from the legal case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on June 24, 2022. The exhibit consists of photographs documenting the hospitalization of Sarah Ransome after her first suicide attempt. The page is marked with the Bates number DOJ-OGR-00010681.
DOJ-OGR-00010680.jpg
This document is a page from a court filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, US v. Ghislaine Maxwell) containing a signed statement by Sarah Ransome dated May 31, 2022. In the statement, Ransome directly addresses Ghislaine, asserting that while Ghislaine harmed her significantly, she did not break her spirit. The page is stamped with Bates number DOJ-OGR-00010680.
DOJ-OGR-00010677.jpg
This document is a victim impact statement from Sarah Ransome, filed for the sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell. Ransome recounts being recruited at age 22 in New York by Natalya Malyshev and subsequently being sexually abused for months by Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, and others in New York and on Epstein's private island. She describes Maxwell as a master manipulator and the central organizer of the abuse network, calling her the 'Five Star General' of Epstein's operation.
DOJ-OGR-00010594.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing by the defense team (Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim) in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It argues that specific individuals—Maria Farmer, Sarah Ransome, Teresa Helm, and Juliette Bryant—do not qualify as 'victims' under the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) relative to the counts of conviction. The defense contends that because the federal charges specifically required the involvement of minors, and these women were either not minors or their interactions fell outside the indictment timeline, they are not statutory victims entitled to CVRA rights in this specific legal context.
DOJ-OGR-00010593.jpg
This legal document, filed by the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim, discusses the victim impact statements of seven women in a case involving Epstein and Ms. Maxwell. It argues their standing as statutory victims under the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), noting that only Annie Farmer and Virginia Giuffre were minors during the relevant period of the charged offenses. The document contends that allegations of abuse alone are insufficient and must be directly linked to the federal offense conduct, which requires the victim to have been a minor.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-12-19 | Received | Ghislaine | Sarah Ransome | $0.00 | Settlement of a federal civil lawsuit (amount u... | View |
| 2018-01-01 | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | Sarah Ransome | $0.00 | Confidential settlement. | View |
Unknown
Claims of sex with world figures and video evidence; Dershowitz claims these prove she is a 'lunatic'.
Victim Statement
A direct address to Ghislaine stating she broke the author in unfathomable ways but did not break her spirit.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity