| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Business associate |
26
Very Strong
|
25 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Business associate |
13
Very Strong
|
30 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Business associate |
13
Very Strong
|
23 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
13
Very Strong
|
15 | |
|
location
United States
|
Legal representative |
13
Very Strong
|
19 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Business associate |
12
Very Strong
|
9 | |
|
person
Lefkowitz
|
Client |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
organization
SDNY
|
Legal representative |
11
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
Jack Goldberger
|
Client |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Abuser victim |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Co conspirators |
11
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Co conspirators |
11
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
Edwards
|
Legal representative |
11
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Friend |
11
Very Strong
|
19 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Co conspirators |
11
Very Strong
|
56 | |
|
person
Juan Alessi
|
Employee |
11
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Co conspirator |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Acosta
|
Prosecutor defendant |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Lefcourt
|
Client |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Friend |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
JANE
|
Abuser victim |
10
Very Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Co conspirators |
10
Very Strong
|
14 | |
|
location
Palm Beach residence
|
Ownership |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
USAO-SDFL
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
5 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Provision regarding USAO's efforts to obtain Epstein's computers and the safeguarding of these co... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein's alleged sexual molestation of minor girls on a daily basis for many years, including at... | West Palm Beach mansion | View |
| N/A | N/A | Discussion about Ghislaine Maxwell's relationship with Epstein continuing and her responsibilitie... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Litigation involving Epstein where his lawyers attacked the credibility of the girls. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Discovery process blocked by Epstein and co-conspirators, leading to the need for alternative inv... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Ghislaine Maxwell began looking for real estate for her dad and Epstein asked for help finding an... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein asked Ghislaine Maxwell to continue helping him (find a house, etc.) after her father's d... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein's alleged criminal scheme and the defense's efforts to secure non-prosecution and immigra... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Agreement provisions precluding criminal charges and immigration proceedings against certain indi... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Federal investigation resolved through a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein's plea agreement and sentencing for an 18-month incarceration, reduced from a 'non-negoti... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Plaintiffs' motion to deny a protective order, which seeks to exclude Epstein from depositions, i... | Court proceedings | View |
| N/A | N/A | Minor girl (Jane Doe #5) was taken to Epstein's mansion on El Brillo Way for massages and/or sex ... | Epstein's mansion on El Bri... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein serving 12 months of house arrest at his Palm Beach home, with curfew, no unsupervised co... | Palm Beach home | View |
| N/A | N/A | District Court's findings and application of sentencing guidelines, including a four-level leader... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | 11-month investigation by Palm Beach police into Epstein paying underage girls for massages and s... | El Brillo Way home | View |
| N/A | N/A | State Attorney Barry Krischer declined to prosecute Epstein on unlawful sex acts with minors, ins... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Notification received by OPR from FBI and USAO regarding federal investigation and Epstein's plea. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein's state plea hearing. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Menchel made substantive changes to Villafaña's draft letter concerning Epstein's plea deal, incl... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein's plea deal (non-prosecution agreement) for two prostitution charges. | state court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein served 13 months in Palm Beach County jail with work release privileges. | Palm Beach County jail | View |
| N/A | N/A | FBI investigation into Epstein's international sex trafficking organization was quashed. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Relocation of victims from Palm Beach to other places in the U.S. (including Southern District of... | Palm Beach, other places in... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein's attempt to get out of the NPA after it was signed. | N/A | View |
This page is from a legal filing arguing for summary judgment in favor of a defendant named Edwards against allegations made by Epstein. The text argues that Epstein's claim of negligence—specifically that Edwards 'should have known' about a Ponzi scheme run by his law partner Scott Rothstein—is legally deficient and lacks necessary elements like duty and causation. The document cites Florida case law to support the argument that Edwards cannot be held liable for failing to anticipate Rothstein's criminal deception.
This document is page 5 of a legal filing, specifically the 'Argument' section regarding a summary judgment motion. It argues that Edwards is entitled to judgment against Epstein's claim because there are no disputed material facts under Florida law (Rule 1.510(c)). The text cites various legal precedents (Snyder v. Cheezem, Holl v. Talcott, etc.) to establish that Epstein cannot rely on bare assertions to avoid summary judgment.
This document is a cover sheet for 'Exhibit N' attached to Defendant Bradley J. Edwards's Statement of Undisputed Facts in the legal case Epstein v. Edwards (Case No. 50 2009 CA 040800XXXXMBAG). It indicates the document is part of a larger legal filing and bears a House Oversight production stamp.
This document details multiple instances of sexual assault by Epstein against minor females, L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe, who were 13 or 14 years old at the time. It highlights Epstein's repeated invocation of the Fifth Amendment during depositions when questioned about these activities, and notes that the victims were brought to his home by another underage victim. The United States Attorney's Office recognized L.M. as a victim.
This is page 10 of a legal filing titled 'Edwards' Opposition to Epstein's Motion for Summary Judgment.' It argues that Epstein committed an 'abuse of process' by using his vast financial resources to file baseless lawsuits intended solely to extort and intimidate his molestation victims and Edwards into settling for less than their claims are worth. The document lists specific damages suffered by Edwards, including injury to reputation and fear of physical injury to himself and his family.
Page 9 of 15 from a legal filing in the case of Edwards vs. Epstein (Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG). The document argues that the 'litigation privilege' should not protect Epstein from claims of malicious prosecution and abuse of process because his actions were malicious, unfounded, and targeted the Plaintiff's counsel without a legitimate judicial goal. It distinguishes Epstein's actions as an individual party from legal precedents involving attorneys.
Page 8 of a legal filing in the case Edwards v. Epstein (Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG). The document is a legal argument opposing a summary judgment motion, specifically arguing that 'litigation privilege' does not protect a defendant from claims of 'malicious prosecution.' The text cites numerous Florida case precedents (Wright v. Yurko, Olson v. Johnson, etc.) to support the claim that malicious prosecution is a viable tort even in the context of judicial proceedings.
This document details allegations made by Epstein and counter-arguments regarding improper discovery and deposition notices in civil cases. It highlights Epstein's connections with prominent figures like Clinton, Ghislaine Maxwell, David Copperfield, and Bill Richardson, often in the context of alleged child exploitation, sexual abuse, and flight logs. The document also mentions the return of campaign donations by Bill Richardson from Epstein, suggesting a desire to distance himself.
This document is a statement or response addressing allegations related to a Ponzi scheme run by Scott Rothstein and lawsuits against Epstein. The speaker denies knowledge of Rothstein's fraudulent activities and asserts their actions in representing clients against Epstein were legitimate, uncovering evidence of Epstein's sexual molestation and the obstruction of justice by Epstein and his associates.
This document is a page from a legal journal (2014) analyzing Crime Victims' Rights (CVRA) and is part of a House Oversight Committee production. It specifically critiques the Department of Justice's handling of the Epstein case, noting that while the FBI and U.S. Attorney's Office initially notified victims (Jane Doe #1 and #2) of their rights in June 2007, the Department later 'reversed course' regarding the applicability of the CVRA during litigation. The text highlights a specific letter from Assistant U.S. Attorney A. Marie Villafaña to a victim sent months before the nonprosecution agreement was signed.
This document is page 87 of a 2014 legal academic article discussing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). It critiques the Office of Legal Counsel's (OLC) position that victims' rights only apply after charges are filed, citing the 'Epstein case' (Does v. United States, S.D. Fla. 2011) as a precedent where the court concluded the CVRA contemplates pre-charge application. The text argues that limiting rights to the prosecution phase renders the statutory words 'detection' and 'investigation' meaningless.
This document is page 84 of a law review article (Vol. 104) by Cassell et al., criticizing the Office of Legal Counsel's (OLC) interpretation of the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). The authors argue that the OLC's interpretation effectively nullifies victims' rights in non-prosecution agreements, explicitly citing the 'Epstein case' as a notable example where this occurred. The footnotes highlight that the OLC opinion was released on May 20, 2011, shortly before the Government filed its response in the Epstein case.
This document is page 71 of a 2014 legal analysis (likely a law review article) discussing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). It uses the Epstein case as a primary example of why victims need rights before formal charges are filed, specifically citing how Jane Doe Number One and Two were not informed that prosecutors had secretly bargained away sex offense charges. The text argues that the CVRA's plain language supports extending rights to victims throughout the criminal justice process, even before charges are filed.
This document is page 83 of a rough draft deposition transcript. A witness testifies that pilot Dave Rogers produced flight logs during sex abuse litigation against Epstein. The witness notes that when these logs were compared to logs provided by Mr. Dershowitz to the Palm Beach Police Department, inconsistencies were found, arousing suspicion. The testimony is briefly interrupted by Mr. Scott, who reports receiving a call from Epstein's lawyer, Darrin Indyke, regarding technical phone issues.
This page of a transcript features a speaker detailing the factual basis for believing that regular house guests at properties in New York, London, and Florida would have been aware of sexual abuse occurring there. The speaker cites the brazen and repetitive nature of the activity discovered by the Palm Beach Police Department involving underage girls.
This document is a printout of a Daily Mail news article page, marked as page 5 of 17, featuring a photograph of a woman identified as 'Virgina'. The text mentions Prince Andrew, Jeffrey Epstein, and a woman named Jane, referencing a meeting in New York and the subject's new life in Australia.
This document is a page from an FBI interview report describing interactions with Jeffrey Epstein. The interviewee recounts visiting Epstein's residence, observing other girls, receiving an uncomfortable massage where she felt violated, and noting Epstein's sexual comments and behavior.
This is page 4 of an FBI FD-302a continuation report dated February 2, 2007. The majority of the page is redacted, but the visible text describes a witness stating that Epstein was last at the Palm Beach residence prior to the execution of a State search warrant. The witness also notes that an individual with an unknown last name (LNU) visited the residence approximately three weeks before that warrant was executed.
A single page from an address book containing a list of contacts with names, addresses, phone numbers, and email addresses. The contacts are arranged in columns and include individuals such as Andrew Edwards, Johan Eliasch, Charlie Ellingworth, and Christina Estrada Juffali. The document is marked with page number 22 and case reference numbers at the bottom.
This document excerpt describes the author's encounters with Jeffrey Epstein, including meeting him on a flight to TED and being invited to his New York home. It details Epstein's past travels with Bill Clinton, his attempts to understand and influence media coverage, and his unsuccessful bid to acquire New York Magazine in 2004. The text also mentions media profiles on Epstein by Vicki Ward and Landon Thomas, focusing on his wealth and influence despite lacking conventional credentials.
This document excerpt describes Jeffrey Epstein's rise, his strategic relationships with wealthy individuals, and his acquisitions, including a Manhattan house from Les Wexner, airplanes, and a Caribbean island. It details a warning from 'Carter' about Epstein's potential for blackmail and highlights Epstein's association with Bill Clinton, referring to it as a 'fatal pairing'.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | A. Farmer | $0.00 | Potential college tuition payment (witness hope... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Ms. Maxwell | $23,000,000.00 | Transfer of funds confirmed by bank statements. | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | victims | $0.00 | Agreement to a means for victims to obtain mone... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Travel Provider (... | $0.00 | Payment for Annie's trip to New Mexico | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | victims | $0.00 | Mention of a 'damages provision' and 'money iss... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Palm Beach Atlant... | $0.00 | Tuition payment for Sjoberg | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Rental Car Agency | $0.00 | Rental car for Sjoberg for a week | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Sjoberg | $0.00 | Payment for massages ('paid well') | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Women / People wh... | $0.00 | Moving money for the payment of women. | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Unknown | $0.00 | Structured transactions to avoid SARs (Suspicio... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Jane Doe No. 4 | $0.00 | Claims being pursued by Jane Doe No. 4 against ... | View |
| 2025-11-25 | Paid | Epstein | The store (for A.... | $0.00 | Purchase of cowboy boots for the witness. | View |
| 2025-09-01 | Paid | Epstein | Police | $0.00 | Epstein offered to provide funds for a firearms... | View |
| 2025-01-01 | Paid | Epstein | Voice Lesson Prov... | $0.00 | Paid for voice lessons for Jane. | View |
| 2025-01-01 | Paid | Epstein | JANE | $0.00 | Regularly gave Jane hundreds of dollars. | View |
| 2016-01-29 | Received | Client | Epstein | $20,000,000.00 | Amount the client (via Brad Karp) stated would ... | View |
| 2016-01-29 | Received | Client | Epstein | $50,000,000.00 | Proposed discounted agreement range (50-60 mill... | View |
| 2016-01-29 | Received | Client | Epstein | $30,000,000.00 | Outstanding fee amount mentioned. | View |
| 2014-01-01 | Received | Client | Epstein | $0.00 | Payment for tax year 2014 closing Oct 2015, dis... | View |
| 2011-12-23 | Paid | Epstein | Laurel, Inc | $0.00 | Real property deed transfer implied by attachme... | View |
| 2008-01-01 | Received | Epstein's clients... | Epstein | $50,000,000.00 | Civil suit filed against Epstein | View |
| 2005-09-04 | Paid | Epstein | Amazon.com | $0.00 | Purchase of books: SM101, SlaveCraft, and Train... | View |
Epstein was on the phone at the beginning of the massage session with ML.
Message pads entered at trial show Carolyn called Epstein several times in the summer of 2004: once in late April or early May, again on July 6, and again on July 30.
A shipment from Epstein’s address in New York to Minor Victim-4, reflected in Federal Express records.
Complaint styled 'Jane Doe 102 versus Epstein'.
After the alleged assault, Epstein told Jane Doe to write down her name and phone number.
A photograph was sent to Epstein with a note saying 'Thanks for rocking my world'.
Notice to be provided if a FOIA request or compulsory process commands disclosure of the agreement.
United States will provide notice to Epstein before disclosing agreement under FOIA.
Discussion regarding Annie's trip to New Mexico
Narrator told Epstein she wasn't coming back because she had fallen in love.
Epstein told ML to leave her telephone number with his assistant so she could be contacted for work again.
Questions regarding allegations Epstein contends Edwards 'ginned up' or 'fabricated'.
The speaker notes the absence of these records as evidence
A shipment from Epstein’s address in New York to Minor Victim-4, reflected in Federal Express records.
Update on rapid Bitcoin price swings
Notice to be provided if the US receives a FOIA request for this agreement.
Epstein told Dobbs 'You can bring girls.'
Email communication regarding Eva being in Paris and flying back, suggesting a close relationship with Epstein.
A message from 'Epstein' for Vanessa Grigoriadis of NY Magazine, to be delivered at 5:10 P.M. The message itself is simply 'Epstein'.
Copperfield called Epstein frequently and left messages indicating they socialized together.
Epstein called Carter to say he was having second thoughts about being a public figure.
The witness, Kate, describes her communications with Epstein during her twenties and early thirties as having a 'friendly' tone. She continued communicating because she did not want to admit what had happened to her and was fearful of disengaging.
During the second massage, JS told Epstein she didn't want to be touched after he attempted to touch her breasts.
Allegations that Edwards 'should have known' about the Ponzi scheme.
Message pads entered at trial show Carolyn called Epstein several times in the summer of 2004: once in late April or early May, again on July 6, and again on July 30.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity