MR. TEIN (Questioner)
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Arthur "Kiyama" Lewis
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Goldberger
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Assistant U.S. Attorney
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Alex Acosta
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Involved in civil litigation |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Attorneys Lewis and Tein visit Epstein in jail. | Jail attorney room | View |
| N/A | N/A | A deposition where Mr. Tein questions a witness about a MySpace message. The witness's counsel, M... | Not specified | View |
| N/A | N/A | Attorneys high-five in the hallway regarding fees. | Jail hallway | View |
| 2010-09-29 | N/A | A legal deposition where a witness is questioned about their connection to Jeffrey Epstein. | null | View |
| 2008-08-12 | N/A | Clerk's office unsealed Tein's reply brief in the Epstein civil litigation. | Court | View |
| 2008-07-18 | N/A | Letter sent to Tein and Goldberger (Friday prior to July 21, 2008). | West Palm Beach, FL (Sender... | View |
| 2004-09-29 | N/A | A deposition is taking place, as indicated by the Q&A format, presence of counsel, and the witnes... | Unknown | View |
028-02.pdf
This document is a formal legal letter dated May 15, 2009, from Robert C. Josefsberg of Podhurst Orseck to Jeffrey Epstein's attorneys (Robert Critton and Jack Goldberger). The letter demands the immediate preservation of all evidence, particularly electronically stored information (ESI), relevant to pending civil actions by victims of Epstein's sexual exploitation. It specifically references the Non-Prosecution Agreement, the 2005 FBI raid, and warns that failure to preserve data could result in sanctions for spoliation.
EFTA00013949.pdf
A letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SD FL) to Jeffrey Epstein's legal team (Lefkowitz and Black) dated August 20, 2008. The letter addresses the implementation of the Non-Prosecution Agreement, specifically the payment of fees to Special Master representative Robert Josefsberg and disputes regarding victim notification lists. The U.S. Attorney offers an ultimatum: stick to the September 2007 victim list (leaving Epstein open to prosecution for later-identified victims) or include victims known as of June 30, 2008, which would require Epstein to compensate them.
EFTA00013674.pdf
This document is an automated email read receipt generated by Alex Acosta (USAFLS) on August 12, 2008. It confirms that Acosta read an email with the subject 'Tein's Reply Brief in the Epstein civil litigation'. The recipient of this receipt is redacted.
EFTA00013665.pdf
This document is an internal email thread from July 21, 2008, between staff at the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida (USAFLS). The discussion centers on a New York Post article titled 'Bid to Burn Epstein Plea' and confirms that a letter was sent to attorneys Tein and Goldberger on the previous Friday. The emails include an attachment titled '080717_Tein_Goldberger_Ltr.pdf'.
EFTA00013586.pdf
This email from an Assistant U.S. Attorney to Alex Acosta on August 12, 2008, discusses the unsealing of Tein's reply brief in the Epstein civil litigation, highlighting Tein's extensive quoting from a "highly unusual and unprecedented deferred-prosecution agreement." The sender also notes they have not received an update from Roy Black regarding a defense agreement filed with the state court.
DOJ-OGR-00033140.jpg
This document is a concordance (index) page from a legal transcript produced by Consor & Associates. It lists words starting with 'S' through 'T'—including 'Tein', 'Ted', 'testimony', and 'Swiss'—along with the specific page and line numbers where they appear in the full transcript. The document bears a Department of Justice Office of Government Relations (DOJ-OGR) stamp and a Public Records Request number.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025545.jpg
This document appears to be a personal narrative or draft written by Jeffrey Epstein reflecting on his legal representation and crimes. He criticizes his lawyers, Lewis and Tein, accusing them of celebrating his ongoing legal troubles for the sake of fees, and explicitly admits to being a 'john' who paid for sex while attempting to minimize the severity of his crimes by comparing them to jaywalking and claiming state attorneys found 'no real victims.' He discusses the age of consent in New York versus Florida and argues that the women involved were knowing participants.
No Subject
Verbal exchange during a legal deposition where Mr. Tein questions the witness, and Mr. Leopold objects and provides instructions.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity