Goldberger
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Client |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Client |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Villafaña
|
Professional adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Villafaña
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Krisher
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Villafaña
|
Adversarial professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Villafaña
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
LANNA BELOHLAVEK
|
Opposing counsel cooperative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Villafaña
|
Professional adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Roy Black
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Black
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Villafaña
|
Acquaintance |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. EPSTEIN
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Villafaña
|
Correspondent |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Villafaña
|
Communicated requested |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. TEIN (Questioner)
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Conversation where Goldberger and Roy assured AUSA that Epstein would not get work release. | Unknown | View |
| 2008-07-18 | N/A | Letter sent to Tein and Goldberger (Friday prior to July 21, 2008). | West Palm Beach, FL (Sender... | View |
| 2008-07-10 | Communication | Villafaña sent Goldberger a “Final Notification of Identified Victims.” | N/A | View |
| 2008-07-08 | Communication | Villafaña provided Goldberger with an updated victim list for 18 U.S.C. § 2255 purposes. | N/A | View |
| 2008-06-30 | N/A | Anticipated plea agreement finalization/proceeding | Unknown (likely Florida) | View |
| 2008-06-30 | N/A | Epstein's sentencing hearing | Court | View |
| 2008-06-29 | Legal negotiation | Villafaña and Goldberger negotiated changes to Epstein's plea agreement, specifically regarding t... | N/A | View |
| 2008-06-27 | N/A | Villafaña renews requests to Goldberger and Black for a copy of the state plea agreement. | N/A | View |
| 2008-06-27 | Legal negotiation | Villafaña requested the state plea agreement from Epstein's attorneys, received it, and then sent... | N/A | View |
| 2008-06-27 | Legal dispute | Villafaña requested the state plea agreement and, upon review, objected to its sentencing provisi... | N/A | View |
| 2008-06-27 | N/A | Villafaña sends letter to Goldberger and Black stating proposed sentencing provision does not com... | N/A | View |
| 2007-09-12 | N/A | Joint meeting with Krischer / Belohlavek re state plea provision of NPA | Unknown | View |
| 2007-09-12 | N/A | Meeting between USAO, Defense Counsel, and State Attorney | Likely West Palm Beach (imp... | View |
079.pdf
This document is a court minute sheet from the Circuit Court of Palm Beach County, dated November 30, 2009, for case 2008 CF 9381 AXX (State of Florida vs. Jeffrey Epstein). The charge listed is procuring a person under the age of 18 for prostitution. The document records a hearing for a 'Motion for Travel' attended by the defendant (Epstein), his attorney (Goldberger), and the prosecutor (BBurns) before Judge Colbath; the motion was 'Granted in part & Denied in part' with a written order to follow.
EFTA00014175.pdf
An Assistant U.S. Attorney emails colleagues to report rumors that Epstein is falsely claiming cooperation in the Bernie Madoff case to secure a reduced sentence from the State Attorney's Office. The email also flags a suspicious court docket change removing 'Special Conditions' from Epstein's sentence and discusses the potential to investigate new allegations involving New York victims, noting interest from Madoff prosecutors in using evidence against Epstein.
EFTA00014166.pdf
An email dated June 29, 2008, from an Assistant U.S. Attorney (USAFLS) to an FBI agent. The sender discusses working on a presentation outline and notably mentions in a postscript that 'Goldberger' has accepted a change to the plea agreement, anticipating the plea to go forward the following day unless Jeffrey Epstein changes his mind.
EFTA00014044.pdf
This document is an email chain between Assistant U.S. Attorneys dated November 20, 2008, reacting with surprise and anger to the news that Jeffrey Epstein was granted work release. The prosecutors discuss how Epstein's lawyers (Goldberger and Roy) had previously assured them this would not happen. The emails allege that the 'Florida Science Foundation' exists solely to employ Epstein, allowing him to spend his days at his lawyer's office rather than in confinement.
EFTA00014007.pdf
Internal email from an Assistant U.S. Attorney (Ccing Alex Acosta) discussing a victims' lawyer's request to void Epstein's plea deal due to additional victims. The AUSA confirms they are bound by the agreement. The email also details a meeting with the Sheriff's Office where it was revealed Epstein's legal team (Goldberger, Starr) threatened to sue over unfavorable treatment, and that Epstein would be granted work release despite prior contradictions.
EFTA00013909.pdf
An internal email from June 2008, likely between officials at the US Attorney's Office (USAFLS), discussing a recent court docket check. The email confirms a scheduled 'status conference' at 8:30 and notes that a 'procurement of minors charge' has been filed. It includes an attachment referencing attorneys Goldberger and Black.
EFTA00013665.pdf
This document is an internal email thread from July 21, 2008, between staff at the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida (USAFLS). The discussion centers on a New York Post article titled 'Bid to Burn Epstein Plea' and confirms that a letter was sent to attorneys Tein and Goldberger on the previous Friday. The emails include an attachment titled '080717_Tein_Goldberger_Ltr.pdf'.
DOJ-OGR-00023153.tif
This document details events in November 2008 concerning Jeffrey Epstein's work release, which USAO official Villafaña believed breached his non-prosecution agreement (NPA). Villafaña communicated her concerns to defense attorney Black and other officials, leading to a notice of NPA violation and the recusal of Acosta from the case. The document highlights the ongoing dispute regarding the terms of Epstein's incarceration and the perceived special treatment he received.
DOJ-OGR-00023148.tif
This document details events surrounding Jeffrey Epstein's plea and sentencing from June 2008 to June 2009, including communications between various officials regarding the handling of his case and concerns about the terms of his plea agreement. It highlights discrepancies and objections raised by Villafaña regarding Epstein's proposed custody arrangements, suggesting a potential violation of the agreement's spirit.
DOJ-OGR-00023276.tif
This document details the process of victim notification following Jeffrey Epstein's plea agreement in July-August 2008. AUSA Villafaña played a central role, sending letters to victims, coordinating with the FBI, and proposing language for victim contact, while also addressing disputes over the final victim list with the defense counsel and her supervisors.
DOJ-OGR-00023273.tif
This document details events surrounding Epstein's state plea, focusing on victim notification failures and the actions of various legal and investigative parties. It highlights Villafaña's efforts to identify victims and contact their attorneys, and statements from victims (Wild, Jane Doe #2) expressing their lack of awareness regarding the plea's implications for their cases. The document also notes discrepancies in the State Attorney's Office's communication about the case closure and Epstein's sentence.
DOJ-OGR-00030457.jpg
This document is a scanned envelope sent by the law firm Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. (known for representing Jeffrey Epstein) to Lanna Belohlavek at the State Attorney's Office in West Palm Beach, Florida. The envelope bears a postage meter stamp dated January 2, but a vertical received/processed stamp dated December 3, 2008. The document was part of a public records request processed in 2017.
DOJ-OGR-00021440.jpg
This document details the FBI and USAO's process for notifying victims of the resolution of the Jeffrey Epstein investigation in July and August 2008. It includes a script used by FBI agents to inform victims of Epstein's plea deal (18 months imprisonment, sex offender registration, restitution) and documents the transmission of letters to victims both within and outside the US. A footnote highlights internal DOJ discussions involving Acosta and Villafaña regarding the finalization of the victim list and the exclusion of new victims identified after the Non-Prosecution Agreement.
DOJ-OGR-00021439.jpg
This legal document details the actions of government representative Villafaña in July 2008 regarding the implementation of Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). It describes Villafaña's communications with Epstein's defense team, including Goldberger and Sanchez, to provide an updated victim list and send notification letters to victims. The document highlights the specific legal language used to ensure victims retained their rights to pursue civil damages as if Epstein had been federally convicted.
DOJ-OGR-00021356.jpg
This document is a page from a DOJ OPR report detailing a chronology of meetings between the US Attorney's Office (USAO) and Jeffrey Epstein's defense team regarding the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). It includes a table listing specific dates between February 2007 and January 2008, participants from both sides (including Acosta, Dershowitz, Starr, and Black), and the purpose of each meeting, such as discussing investigation improprieties, the NPA term sheet, and state plea provisions. The text specifically notes Alex Acosta's limited attendance at pre-NPA meetings and mentions a breakfast meeting between Acosta and defense attorney Jay Lefkowitz.
DOJ-OGR-00021316.jpg
This legal document details concerns from the U.S. Attorney's Office (USAO), voiced by an individual named Villafaña, regarding Jeffrey Epstein's work release arrangement in Palm Beach County. Villafaña alleges that Epstein's lawyers schemed to make him eligible and that his application contained significant inaccuracies, such as listing a foundation with his lawyer's phone number as his employer. The document also notes a potential conflict of interest where Epstein paid thousands of dollars per week to off-duty sheriff's deputies for protection, seemingly in violation of work release rules.
DOJ-OGR-00021315.jpg
This document details internal DOJ conflicts in November 2008 regarding Jeffrey Epstein's work release. Prosecutor Villafaña argued Epstein's 12-hour-a-day release to the 'Florida Science Foundation' breached his Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) requiring 24-hour confinement, prompting her to ask superiors if she could indict him. Concurrently, USAO official Alex Acosta recused himself from the case due to employment discussions with Epstein's defense firm, Kirkland & Ellis.
DOJ-OGR-00021311.jpg
This document details Jeffrey Epstein's guilty plea in a Palm Beach County state court on June 30, 2008. It outlines last-minute negotiations and changes to his plea agreement regarding the wording of his sentence and clarifies the detention facility. The document also includes the specific criminal charges read in court and a colloquy where the prosecutor, Ms. Belohlavek, confirmed to the judge that there were 'several' victims.
DOJ-OGR-00021310.jpg
This document details events in late June 2008 concerning Jeffrey Epstein's case, where federal authorities concluded their review and declined to intervene further. Subsequently, federal prosecutor Villafaña discovered the proposed state plea agreement's sentencing terms appeared to violate the federal Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) by not requiring Epstein to be confined in the county jail, leading her to suspect foul play.
DOJ-OGR-00021301.jpg
This DOJ OPR report excerpt details the breakdown of plea negotiations in early January 2008. Epstein's defense team (Sanchez, Starr, Lefkowitz) pressed US Attorney Acosta and Sloman for a 'watered-down resolution' that involved no jail time and no sex offender registration, threatening 'ugliness in DC' regarding alleged leaks. Prosecutor Villafaña prepared contingency plans to restart the investigation, including interviewing victims in New York and abroad, while Criminal Division Chief Robert Senior conducted a full review of the evidence.
DOJ-OGR-00003312.jpg
This document details communications from late June 2008 concerning Jeffrey Epstein's plea agreement. It begins with a letter from Roth to Epstein's counsel, Starr and Lefkowitz, confirming that federal prosecution is appropriate, and then shifts to prosecutor Villafaña's efforts to enforce the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). Villafaña expresses strong suspicion that Epstein's attorneys are misrepresenting the terms of his confinement, telling her he would be in a jail 24/7 while planning for him to be at a less restrictive 'stockade', which she reports to a colleague, Sloman, as a violation of their agreement.
DOJ-OGR-00003303.jpg
This document details events in early January 2008 concerning the Jeffrey Epstein case, starting with the postponement of a plea hearing due to issues with the state charge. It describes a meeting where defense attorney Sanchez alleged a media leak by the U.S. Attorney's Office (USAO) and pushed for a lenient plea deal, followed by a phone call where Epstein's full legal team reiterated their desire for a 'watered-down resolution'. Amid these negotiations, USAO personnel expressed concern about delays and initiated a full internal review of the investigation.
DOJ-OGR-00003266.jpg
This document details the plea negotiations in September 2007 between the USAO (represented by Villafaña, Acosta, and others) and Epstein's defense team. It outlines the drafting of a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) proposing a 20-month jail sentence (reducible to 17 months with 'gain time') and notes a critical meeting on September 12 involving the State Attorney's Office to discuss state charges. The text also reveals internal USAO strategy, including preparing a revised indictment in case negotiations failed.
DOJ-OGR-00033130.jpg
This document is page 142 of an index for a legal transcript prepared by Gensor & Associates on July 26, 2017. It lists keywords from 'finally' to 'Goldberger' and their corresponding page and line numbers in the transcript, indicating that a person named Goldberger is mentioned frequently. The document includes the transcription company's contact information and a public records request number.
DOJ-OGR-00023194.jpg
This document is a page from a DOJ OPR report detailing a timeline of meetings between the USAO (including Alexander Acosta) and Jeffrey Epstein's defense team (including Dershowitz, Starr, and Lefkowitz). It covers the period from February 2007 to January 2008, categorizing meetings as 'Pre-NPA' and 'Post-NPA'. The table logs specific participants and topics, including the presentation of the NPA term sheet, discussions of investigation improprieties, and the negotiation of state plea provisions.
Defense statement
Claiming police gave a distorted view of the case.
Police conduct
Accusing police of giving media a distorted view
Final Notification of Identified Victims
A final notification sent to Goldberger highlighting the defendant's obligations under the NPA regarding victim lawsuits.
List of victims
Villafaña met with Goldberger and provided a list of 31 individuals identified as victims to whom the § 2255 provision applied.
Victim list
A letter from Villafaña to Goldberger which inadvertently left off one individual from the victim list.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity