SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
LocationRelationship Network
DOJ-OGR-00000683.jpg
This document is page 45 of a court transcript filed on September 3, 2019, in the case against Jeffrey Epstein. It contains a victim impact statement from an unidentified woman describing the profound negative effects of Epstein's abuse on her career, relationships, and mental health, and expressing frustration that his death allowed him to escape justice. The speaker also mentions having written a 350-page book about her experiences.
DOJ-OGR-00000672.jpg
This document is page 34 of a court transcript from September 3, 2019, in the case against Jeffrey Epstein (Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB). An attorney representing victims addresses the court, thanking the Judge and the U.S. Attorney's office for their treatment of the victims. The attorney introduces Courtney Wild, a client who sought help in 2008, to speak to the court; Ms. Wild then spells her name for the record.
DOJ-OGR-00000663.jpg
This court transcript from a hearing on September 3, 2019, details an argument by Ms. Comey against the court conducting its own investigation into the death of Mr. Epstein. She informs the court that an active and separate investigation is already being conducted by a grand jury, Assistant U.S. Attorneys from the Southern District of New York, and the FBI. Ms. Comey asserts that such an investigation is the proper function of these entities, not the court, especially concerning uncharged matters.
DOJ-OGR-00000648.jpg
This document is page 10 of a court transcript from September 3, 2019, regarding Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB. Prosecutor Ms. Comey addresses the court to support the dismissal of the indictment against Jeffrey Epstein following his death, citing Second Circuit law requiring abatement. Crucially, she states that this dismissal does not stop the government's ongoing investigation into potential coconspirators or future prosecutions of new defendants.
DOJ-OGR-00000646.jpg
This document is page 8 of a court transcript filed on September 3, 2019. It discusses the legal concept of 'abatement' following the death of a defendant, citing the Second Circuit case *U.S. v. Wright*. The text explains that upon a defendant's death during a pending appeal, the conviction, indictment, restitution, and forfeiture orders are typically vacated.
DOJ-OGR-00000638.jpg
This legal document is a court order from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, filed on August 29, 2019, which formally dismisses the criminal case against defendant Jeffrey Epstein. The order, signed by Judge Richard M. Berman, follows a recommendation and directive from the U.S. Attorney's office to file a nolle prosequi. The judge's order also references a hearing held on August 27, 2019, and the Crime Victims' Rights Act.
DOJ-OGR-00000637.jpg
This document is a nolle prosequi filed on August 29, 2019, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The filing formally states the intention of the prosecution (United States of America) to abandon the criminal case (19 Cr. 490) against Jeffrey Epstein. The reason provided is Epstein's death on August 10, 2019, which, under the rule of abatement, requires the dismissal of the indictment before a final judgment is reached.
DOJ-OGR-00000633.jpg
This document is a 'Motion to Intervene' filed by David A. Golden (alias Jeremy Thundercloud) in the criminal case against Jeffrey Epstein on August 27, 2019. Golden argued that Epstein's case shared common issues of law (fraud and conspiracy) with a separate False Claims Act complaint Golden filed in Western Washington in 2018. Judge Richard M. Berman hand-wrote 'Application respectfully denied' on the motion and signed it the same day.
DOJ-OGR-00000630.jpg
A court order issued by Judge Richard M. Berman on August 21, 2019, scheduling a hearing for August 27, 2019, regarding the dismissal (*nolle prosequi*) of the indictment against Jeffrey Epstein following his death. The order explicitly states that victims and their counsel will be given the opportunity to be heard at this proceeding, citing the public's informational interest in the process.
DOJ-OGR-00000622.jpg
This legal document is a "Notice of Filing of Official Transcript" from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, filed on August 6, 2019. It announces that the court reporter, Kristen Carannate, has filed the official transcript of a conference held on July 31, 2019, in the case of United States of America v. Jeffrey Epstein (Case No. 19CR490). The notice also outlines the procedure and timeline for the parties to request redactions of personal information from the transcript before it is made publicly available.
DOJ-OGR-00000620.jpg
This is page 9 of a court transcript from Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB (United States v. Jeffrey Epstein), filed on August 6, 2019. The Judge (The Court) rules to exclude time from the Speedy Trial Act calculations to allow for extensive pretrial preparation and tentatively schedules a trial for June 8, 2020. Defense attorney Mr. Weinberg requests oral arguments for motions, which the court schedules for October 28, 2019.
DOJ-OGR-00000619.jpg
This document is page 8 of a court transcript filed on August 6, 2019, in the case against Jeffrey Epstein. Defense attorney Mr. Weinberg argues for a 13-month timeline to prepare for trial, citing the need to litigate a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), unseal files for potential witnesses, and difficulties working with Epstein under current jail conditions. The Court responds by setting a monitoring period and excluding time through June 8.
DOJ-OGR-00000618.jpg
This document is page 7 of a court transcript from August 6, 2019, in the case United States v. Jeffrey Epstein (Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB). Defense attorney Mr. Weinberg agrees the case meets complexity criteria for an extension. Prosecutor Ms. Moe argues against a delay until September, advocating for a trial in May or June due to the 'public interest' in a swift resolution and the significant time passed since the charged conduct.
DOJ-OGR-00000612.jpg
This document is the cover page for a court transcript from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, filed on August 6, 2019. It pertains to a conference held on July 31, 2019, in the criminal case of United States of America v. Jeffrey Epstein (Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB). The document lists the presiding judge, Hon. Richard M. Berman, and the attorneys appearing for both the prosecution and the defense.
DOJ-OGR-00000611.jpg
This is a court order from Judge Richard M. Berman in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, dated July 29, 2019, in the criminal case against Jeffrey Epstein. The order directs the prosecution and defense counsel to meet before a conference scheduled for that Wednesday to create a mutually agreed-upon schedule for the remainder of the case, including discovery, motions, and the trial.
DOJ-OGR-00000605.jpg
This document is the cover page of a court transcript for a Bail Decision hearing held on July 18, 2019, in the case of United States of America v. Jeffrey Epstein (Case 19 CR 490). Presided over by Judge Richard M. Berman, the document lists the appearances of the prosecution team (led by Geoffrey S. Berman) and Epstein's defense team (including Martin Weinberg and Michael Miller). Also noted as present are FBI Special Agent Amanda Young, NYPD Detective Paul Byrne, and Pretrial Services Officer John Moscato.
DOJ-OGR-00000604.jpg
This document is a "NOTICE OF FILING OF OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT" from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, filed on July 26, 2019, in the case of United States of America v. Jeffrey Epstein (Case No. 19CR490). It announces the filing of an official transcript for a hearing held on July 18, 2019, and details the procedures and deadlines for parties to request redactions of personal data identifiers from the transcript.
DOJ-OGR-00000603.jpg
This document is the signature page of a court order from the case United States v. Jeffrey Epstein (1:19-cr-00490-RMB), filed on July 25, 2019. The order was signed by Judge Richard M. Berman of the Southern District of New York. It shows consent from both the prosecution, represented by U.S. Attorney Geoffrey S. Berman, and the defense, represented by attorneys Martin Weinberg and Reid Weingarten on behalf of Jeffrey Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00000595.jpg
This document is a Protective Order filed on July 25, 2019, in the criminal case of the United States of America v. Jeffrey Epstein in the Southern District of New York. The order, issued by Judge Richard M. Berman, is intended to protect sensitive, confidential, and personal information contained in the discovery materials that the Government will provide to the defense. The purpose is to safeguard the privacy of individuals, prevent impediment to ongoing investigations, and avoid prejudicial pretrial publicity.
DOJ-OGR-00000594.jpg
This document is the signature page of a court order from Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB, filed on July 25, 2019. It shows the agreement and consent of both the U.S. Government, represented by U.S. Attorney Geoffrey S. Berman's office, and the defense, represented by counsel for Jeffrey Epstein. The order was issued by Judge Richard M. Berman of the Southern District of New York.
DOJ-OGR-00000586.jpg
This document is the first page of a Protective Order filed on July 25, 2019, in the case of United States v. Jeffrey Epstein (19 Cr. 490). Judge Richard M. Berman outlines the necessity of restricting the dissemination of discovery materials to protect the privacy of individuals, prevent interference with ongoing investigations of uncharged individuals, and avoid prejudicial pretrial publicity.
DOJ-OGR-00000584.jpg
This document is a transcript page from a court hearing dated July 24, 2019, regarding Case 1:19-cr-00490 (United States v. Jeffrey Epstein). Courtney Wild addresses the court, identifying herself as a victim abused by Epstein starting at age 14 in Palm Beach, Florida. She urges the judge to deny Epstein bond and keep him in detention, citing public safety concerns.
DOJ-OGR-00000577.jpg
This is page 67 of a court transcript from July 24, 2019, in the case United States v. Jeffrey Epstein. The proceedings involve a discussion regarding victims wishing to be heard, with Mr. Boies present to represent them. Defense attorney Mr. Weinberg clarifies that Epstein does not concede the government's evidence and intends to mount a defense.
DOJ-OGR-00000574.jpg
This document is page 64 of a court transcript from July 24, 2019, related to Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB. A prosecutor is arguing before the judge ('Your Honor') regarding the legal presumption (likely for detention) and rebutting defense arguments that a lack of recent convictions or charges (specifically regarding obstruction or witness tampering) should work in the defendant's favor. The speaker emphasizes that Congress intended for sex crimes against children to carry lifelong liability.
DOJ-OGR-00000572.jpg
This document is page 62 of a court transcript from July 24, 2019, appearing to be a bail hearing for Jeffrey Epstein (Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB). A prosecutor argues against the defendant's request for home detention, describing it as a 'gilded cage' and 'private jail' that necessitates actual detention. The prosecutor also clarifies that the SDNY case was independently investigated by the FBI, CBP, and NYPD, explicitly stating there was no coordination with the Southern District of Florida regarding the initiation of this specific case.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity