SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
LocationRelationship Network
DOJ-OGR-00000401.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB) dated July 16, 2019. The text details a discussion between the Judge (The Court), defense attorneys (Weingarten and Weinberg), and the prosecutor (Rossmiller) regarding the scheduling of a bail application hearing, moving it from Thursday to the following Monday at 10:00 AM. The prosecutor, Mr. Rossmiller, requests a moment to confer with the defense and subsequently states that the government will rely on its initial submission.
DOJ-OGR-00000400.jpg
This is page 14 of a court transcript from July 16, 2019, in the case of USA v. Epstein. The judge asks the prosecution (Mr. Rossmiller) if other defendants are anticipated; Rossmiller replies that no superseding indictments are imminent but are possible. Defense attorney Mr. Weingarten then argues against current obstruction allegations by citing historical negotiations from 2007-2008, where federal and defense lawyers settled on a state statute plea deal rather than federal charges.
DOJ-OGR-00000399.jpg
This document is a transcript from a court hearing on July 16, 2019, in the Southern District of New York. The discussion centers on pretrial matters for a Mr. Epstein, including clarification that he has one effective passport and a debate over whether a pretrial report indicates he refused to provide financial information or was simply incomplete. The judge also questions another attorney, Mr. Rossmiller, about allegations of witness tampering by Mr. Epstein, confirming these will be part of the government's bail submission.
DOJ-OGR-00000398.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated July 16, 2019, from case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB. An attorney, Mr. Rossmiller, argues before a judge that a nonprosecution agreement made in the Southern District of Florida was understood by that district to be limited in scope, and therefore does not impede a separate prosecution in the Southern District of New York. This argument is intended to counter the defense's position and validate the ongoing investigation.
DOJ-OGR-00000395.jpg
This document is page 9 of a court transcript from July 16, 2019, in the case United States v. Epstein (SDNY). The prosecution argues that the Southern District of New York is not bound by the 2008 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). Defense attorney Mr. Weinberg counters that the NPA provided Epstein with immunity for the conduct currently being prosecuted, including interstate travel and communications, and asserts that Epstein fulfilled the terms of that agreement.
DOJ-OGR-00000387.jpg
This document is the cover page of a court transcript for a conference held on July 8, 2019, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The case is United States of America v. Jeffrey Epstein, with Judge Richard M. Berman presiding. The document lists the appearances of the legal counsel for both the prosecution and the defense, as well as other officials present, including an FBI agent, an NYPD officer, and two probation officers.
DOJ-OGR-00000386.jpg
This is a court order from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, dated July 16, 2019, in the case of United States v. Jeffrey Epstein. The order, signed by Judge Richard M. Berman, grants the motion for attorney Martin G. Weinberg of Boston, MA, to be admitted Pro Hac Vice, allowing him to serve as co-counsel for the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00000385.jpg
This legal document is a letter dated July 15, 2019, from the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York to Judge Richard M. Berman regarding the case *United States v. Jeffrey Epstein*. The prosecution requests the exclusion of speedy trial time for the period of July 15-18, 2019, noting that Epstein's defense counsel consents to the request. The document is endorsed by Judge Berman, who granted the application on July 16, 2019.
DOJ-OGR-00000384.jpg
This legal document is a letter dated July 15, 2019, from the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York, Geoffrey S. Berman, to Judge Richard M. Berman. The letter formally requests the exclusion of speedy trial time in the criminal case against Jeffrey Epstein for the period between July 15 and July 18, 2019. The filing notes that Epstein's defense counsel, Martin Weinberg and Reid Weingarten, have been consulted and consent to the request.
DOJ-OGR-00000383.jpg
This document is an asset summary for Jeffrey Epstein as of June 30, 2019, filed in a federal court case. It lists total assets valued at $559,120,954, comprising cash, various investments, and six high-value properties in New York, New Mexico, Florida, Paris, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Footnotes highlight significant discrepancies between the listed property values and other assessments, including a conflicting valuation from the U.S. Attorney's office for his New York home.
DOJ-OGR-00000366.jpg
This is a court order from Judge Richard M. Berman of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, filed on July 15, 2019, in the case of United States v. Jeffrey Epstein. The order directs the Clerk of Court to docket unspecified enclosed documents that were discussed during Epstein's bail hearing held on the same day.
DOJ-OGR-00000364.jpg
This is a court order from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, filed on July 15, 2019, in the case of United States v. Jeffrey Epstein. The order, signed by Judge Richard M. Berman, grants the motion for attorney Martin G. Weinberg to be admitted "Pro Hac Vice," allowing him to practice in this specific case as co-counsel for the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00000361.jpg
This document is a legal motion filed on July 15, 2019, in the Southern District of New York (Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB). Attorney Martin G. Weinberg requests admission Pro Hac Vice (permission to practice in this specific jurisdiction for this case) to serve as co-counsel for the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein. Weinberg confirms his good standing with the Massachusetts Bar and provides his contact information in Boston.
DOJ-OGR-00000360.jpg
This is a court order from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, filed on July 15, 2019, in the case of United States v. Jeffrey Epstein. The order, issued by Judge Richard M. Berman, grants attorney Martin G. Weinberg's motion for admission *pro hac vice*. This allows Weinberg, a member of the Massachusetts bar, to officially act as co-counsel for the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, in this specific criminal case.
DOJ-OGR-00000352.jpg
This document is the conclusion page (Page 10) of a legal filing by the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York, dated July 8, 2019, in the case against Jeffrey Epstein (Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB). The Government argues that the defendant should be denied bail because he poses an 'extraordinarily real' flight risk due to his vast wealth, private planes, and foreign contacts, and is a danger to the community due to his alleged abuse of dozens of underage girls and history of witness tampering. The document is signed by Assistant US Attorneys Alex Rossmiller, Alison Moe, and Maurene Comey on behalf of US Attorney Geoffrey Berman.
DOJ-OGR-00000348.jpg
This document is Page 6 of a legal filing (likely a bail/detention memorandum) submitted to Magistrate Judge Henry Pitman on July 8, 2019, in the case against Jeffrey Epstein. The prosecution argues for detention based on overwhelming evidence, including an 'extraordinary volume' of nude photographs of minors found at Epstein's New York residence and call records linking him and his agents to victims. The document also argues that the previous Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) with the Southern District of Florida does not prevent the Southern District of New York from prosecuting this case.
DOJ-OGR-00000342.jpg
This document is the final page (14) of a government filing dated July 12, 2019, addressed to Judge Richard M. Berman, arguing against bail for Jeffrey Epstein. The text provides legal precedents establishing that sex trafficking laws (Section 1591) apply to consumers/buyers, not just suppliers, refuting the defense's legal arguments. The conclusion explicitly requests pretrial detention based on Epstein's wealth, flight risk, possession of lewd photos of minors, and history of witness interference.
DOJ-OGR-00000340.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing, argues that a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) made with the defendant (Epstein) in the Southern District of Florida (SDFL) does not prevent his current prosecution in the Southern District of New York. The prosecution asserts that the language of the NPA explicitly limits its scope to the SDFL and does not cover the alleged conduct or victims in New York. The filing cites specific text from the NPA and legal precedent from the Second Circuit to support its position that one U.S. Attorney's office agreement does not bind another.
DOJ-OGR-00000328.jpg
This document is a letter dated July 11, 2019, from the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Judge Richard M. Berman in the Epstein case (1:19-cr-00490), requesting an adjournment of a bail hearing. The document includes a handwritten order by Judge Berman dated July 12, 2019, denying the application and noting it is 'Hard to imagine it would take the Govt extra time to review submission.' The letter is signed by AUSAs Rossmiller, Moe, and Comey, and copies defense counsel Weinberg and Weingarten.
DOJ-OGR-00000316.jpg
This legal document, filed on July 9, 2019, argues that a Non-Prosecution Agreement with Epstein does not prevent the United States from bringing federal criminal charges against him in other districts. It cites legal precedent and the U.S. Attorney's Manual to assert that the original agreement made by the USAO-SDFL was not binding on other jurisdictions like the Southern District of New York or the District of New Jersey. The document also addresses the rights of petitioners (victims) under the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), stating they have not been denied the ability to confer with the government about potential charges against Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00000280.jpg
This legal document, filed on July 11, 2019, details the legal proceedings and agreements surrounding Jeffrey Epstein. It discusses the jurisdictional complexities of his alleged crimes, the government's efforts to prosecute him despite a nonprosecution agreement (NPA) entered into with the USAO-SDFL in 2007, and the defense's arguments against the notion of flight risk, citing Epstein's history of international travel with returns to the U.S. and his intent to contest charges.
DOJ-OGR-00000272.jpg
This is an Unsealing Order from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, dated and filed on July 8, 2019. The order, signed by Magistrate Judge Henry Pitman, grants the application by the U.S. Attorney's Office to unseal the indictment in the criminal case of the United States of America v. Jeffrey Epstein. This legal action officially made the federal charges against Epstein public.
DOJ-OGR-00000268.jpg
This document is Page 11 of a 2019 federal indictment (Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB) against Jeffrey Epstein. It details overt acts committed by 'Employee-2' and 'Employee-3' in 2004 and 2005, specifically phone calls made to 'Minor Victim-3' to schedule paid sex acts with Epstein. The page also introduces 'Count Two: Sex Trafficking,' charging Epstein with recruiting and enticing minors for commercial sex acts between 2002 and 2005.
DOJ-OGR-00000266.jpg
This document, a page from a legal filing dated July 2, 2019, details "Overt Acts" committed in furtherance of a conspiracy involving commercial sex acts. It describes how JEFFREY EPSTEIN, the defendant, enticed and recruited multiple minor victims (Minor Victim-1, Minor Victim-2, Minor Victim-3) for sex acts at his residences in New York and Florida, paying them hundreds of dollars. The document also notes that EPSTEIN encouraged Minor Victim-1 to recruit other girls, and mentions an "Employee-1" acting on EPSTEIN's behalf.
DOJ-OGR-00000265.jpg
This document is page 8 of a federal indictment filed on July 2, 2019, against Jeffrey Epstein. It outlines statutory allegations of sex trafficking conspiracy occurring between 2002 and 2005 in the Southern District of New York and elsewhere. The text details how Epstein paid 'victim-recruiters' hundreds of dollars to bring other minor girls to his Palm Beach residence.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity