SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
LocationRelationship Network
DOJ-OGR-00015539.jpg
This document is the signature page (page 3) of a legal stipulation from the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, dated November 28, 2021. It confirms an agreement between the prosecution (Southern District of New York) and the defense team to admit specific Government Exhibits (1004, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, and 16) into evidence. The document bears the signatures of Assistant US Attorneys and Maxwell's defense counsel.
DOJ-OGR-00015537.jpg
This document is a legal stipulation filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York for the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (S2 20 CR 330 AJN). In it, both the prosecution and the defense agree to the authenticity of three government exhibits (11, 12, and 13), which are certified copies of birth certificates from the states of New York, Rhode Island, and Missouri. This agreement serves to enter these documents into evidence without the need for further authentication in court.
DOJ-OGR-00015211.jpg
This document is a signature page from a legal filing dated December 17, 2021, in New York, New York. It identifies the legal teams for a case in the Southern District of New York, listing Damian Williams as the U.S. Attorney for the prosecution and several attorneys, including Christian Everdell and Laura Menninger, as counsel for the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00015210.jpg
This document is a legal stipulation in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, agreeing to the admissibility of Palm Beach County School records. It confirms that witness Dominique Hyppolite would verify the records' authenticity and identifies specific exhibits (DH-1, DH-2, DH-3, J-2) related to a redacted individual and a witness identified as 'Jane'. The document itself is marked as Defense Exhibit DH-4.
DOJ-OGR-00015186.jpg
This document is a signature page from a legal stipulation dated December 6, 2021, in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. It confirms that 'Defendant's Trial Exhibit B' is agreed to be received in evidence. The document is signed by Maxwell's defense team (Everdell, Menninger, Pagliuca, Sternheim) and the prosecution team from the Southern District of New York (Comey, Moe, Pomerantz, Rohrbach).
DOJ-OGR-00015170.jpg
This is a legal stipulation dated December 17, 2021, from a case in the Southern District of New York. The document is an agreement between the U.S. Attorney's office, representing the prosecution, and the attorneys for the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell, allowing a specific piece of evidence (Government Exhibit 1010) to be admitted at trial.
DOJ-OGR-00015169.jpg
This is a legal stipulation in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (S2 20 CR 330). Both the prosecution and defense agree that on August 17, 2021, attorney Robert Glassman told a prosecutor that he had previously advised his client, a witness known as 'Jane', to cooperate because it was 'morally right' and would 'help her case.' This document is marked as Defendant's Exhibit A-6.
DOJ-OGR-00015168.jpg
This document is a legal stipulation from the trial of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated December 17, 2021. It records an agreement between the prosecution (SDNY) and the defense to admit specific exhibits (MG-12, MG-1, 610-A, and A-5) into evidence. The document bears signatures from both the Assistant United States Attorneys and Maxwell's defense counsel.
DOJ-OGR-00015165.jpg
This legal document is a stipulation dated December 17, 2021, between the attorneys for defendant Ghislaine Maxwell and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York. The parties agree that a document marked as "Defense Exhibit A1" may be received as evidence at trial. The agreement is signed by representatives from both the defense and the prosecution.
DOJ-OGR-00015164.jpg
This document is a legal stipulation in the case of the United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, filed in the Southern District of New York. It states as an agreed-upon fact that a witness, referred to as "Kate," and her counsel met with government prosecutors on September 3, 2021. During this meeting, Kate's counsel provided a partially completed U-Visa application and discussed her visa status with the prosecutors.
DOJ-OGR-00002414.jpg
This document is a Table of Exhibits from a court filing in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, filed on February 4, 2021. It lists several exhibits, most of which are redacted, but identifies two from a separate civil case (15-cv-7433): a 'Proposed Protective Order' involving Virginia Giuffre and a hearing transcript from January 19, 2021.
DOJ-OGR-00002410.jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal motion filed on February 4, 2021, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York for the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The motion, submitted by Maxwell's legal team, seeks to dismiss counts five and six of the superseding indictment. The grounds for dismissal are that the alleged misstatements are not perjurious as a matter of law.
DOJ-OGR-00002393.jpg
This document is the first page of a '[Proposed] Protective Order' filed on March 4, 2016, in the civil case of Virginia L. Giuffre v. Ghislaine Maxwell in the Southern District of New York. The order outlines protocols for handling confidential information during discovery, specifically citing the need to protect sensitive personal information relating to victims of sexual abuse. It emphasizes that confidentiality designations should be used sparingly and must be withdrawn if the material no longer qualifies for protection.
DOJ-OGR-00002388.jpg
This document is page 5 (electronic page 11 of 18) of a legal filing from Case 1:15-cv-07433-RWS (Giuffre v. Maxwell), filed on March 4, 2016. It outlines terms of a Protective Order, specifically regarding the sharing of deposition contents and the requirement to file a 'Motion to Seal' for confidential information. A significant portion of the text is struck through, indicating the removal of a clause that allowed parties to object to confidential designations and placed the burden on the designating party to justify the confidentiality in court.
DOJ-OGR-00002388(1).jpg
This document is page 5 (filed as page 11 of 23) of a legal filing, specifically a Protective Order from Case 1:15-cv-07433-RWS (Giuffre v. Maxwell). It outlines procedures for handling confidential information, specifically requiring a Motion to Seal when filing such documents. A significant portion of the text regarding the objection process for confidential designations has been struck through (redlined), indicating it was removed or edited during the drafting process.
DOJ-OGR-00002384.jpg
This document is a proposed protective order filed on March 4, 2016, in the civil lawsuit between Plaintiff Virginia L. Giuffre and Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell in the Southern District of New York. The order aims to protect confidential information disclosed during discovery, such as details related to sexual abuse, trade secrets, or other sensitive material. It explicitly states that the order does not grant blanket protection and that any designation of material as confidential must be done sparingly and in good faith.
DOJ-OGR-00002384(1).jpg
This is page 2 of a Proposed Protective Order filed on March 4, 2016, in the civil case Giuffre v. Maxwell (15-cv-07433-RWS) in the SDNY. The document outlines the limitations of confidentiality protections during discovery, specifically noting protections for sensitive personal information regarding sexual abuse victims. It includes visible track-changes/strikethroughs removing language about 'annoying' or 'embarrassing' parties, and contains formatting metadata on the right sidebar.
DOJ-OGR-00002379(1).jpg
This document is a legal declaration by Sigrid S. McCawley, an attorney for the plaintiff Virginia L. Giuffre, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The declaration is in support of the plaintiff's response to a motion for a protective order filed by the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell. McCawley attests to the authenticity of three attached exhibits: a notice and re-notice for Maxwell's deposition, and an email from Maxwell's counsel, Laura Menninger.
DOJ-OGR-00002375.jpg
Page 5 of 7 (or 45 of 67 in the larger filing) from a Protective Order in the civil case 1:15-cv-07433-RWS (Giuffre v. Maxwell). The text outlines legal procedures for designating deposition testimony as confidential, filing confidential materials under seal in the Southern District of New York, and the process for objecting to confidential designations.
DOJ-OGR-00002375(1).jpg
This document is page 4 (filed as Page 5 of 7 in Document 39-1) of a Protective Order from the civil case 1:15-cv-07433-RWS (Giuffre v. Maxwell). It outlines legal procedures for designating deposition testimony as confidential, filing confidential materials under seal with the Southern District of New York, and the process for objecting to confidentiality designations.
DOJ-OGR-00002372(1).jpg
This document is page 2 of a Protective Order filed on March 2, 2016 (stamped March 18, 2016) in the civil case Virginia L. Giuffre v. Ghislaine Maxwell in the Southern District of New York. The order outlines rules to protect confidential information during the discovery process to prevent annoyance, embarrassment, or oppression of parties or witnesses. It defines the scope of materials covered, including documents, interrogatories, and depositions.
DOJ-OGR-00002346.jpg
This is a Notice of Motion filed on February 4, 2021 (dated January 25, 2021) in the Southern District of New York regarding the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The defense is moving to suppress evidence obtained from a specific government subpoena (the target of which is redacted) and to dismiss Counts Five and Six of the indictment, citing Due Process violations. The defense also requested oral arguments for this motion.
DOJ-OGR-00002346(1).jpg
This is a Notice of Motion (Pretrial Motion #3) filed on February 4, 2021, in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell in the SDNY. Maxwell's defense is moving to suppress evidence obtained via a government subpoena to a redacted entity and to dismiss Counts Five and Six of the indictment based on the Due Process Clause.
DOJ-OGR-00002344.jpg
This is a court order from Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated February 4, 2021. The order approves the Defendant's and Government's requests to redact sensitive information from several pre-trial motions filed on January 25, 2021. The judge cites the 'Lugosch' test as the legal standard for balancing public access against the need for confidentiality.
DOJ-OGR-00002344(1).jpg
This is a court order issued by Judge Alison J. Nathan on February 4, 2021, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order rules on the defendant's pre-trial motions concerning the redaction of sensitive information, adopting most of the proposed redactions from both the defendant and the government. The Court's decision is based on a three-part legal test established by the Second Circuit for balancing the presumption of public access against competing considerations.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity