SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
LocationRelationship Network
DOJ-OGR-00016898.jpg
This document is a court transcript from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) dated August 10, 2022. Attorney Ms. Menninger requests the court take judicial notice of a 1996 case (96 CV 8307) involving Jeffrey Epstein and Ivan Fisher to establish facts regarding Epstein's residences. The text reveals that Epstein's residence at East 69th Street was leased from the U.S. Government (who seized it from the government of Iran) starting in 1992, a detail used to challenge the timeline of a witness named 'Jane' regarding which property she visited between 1994 and 1996.
DOJ-OGR-00016881.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) dated August 10, 2022. The text details a procedural argument between the prosecution (Ms. Moe) and the defense (Mr. Everdell) regarding the late disclosure of defense witnesses. Specifically, there is confusion distinguishing between a plainclothes police officer from the UK seeking anonymity and another 'short witness' the defense planned to call on Monday.
DOJ-OGR-00016877.jpg
This is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. Ms. Menninger (defense) explains the delay in reviewing materials due to the volume of '3500 material,' mentioning approximately 500 nontestifying witnesses. The Court questions why an application to enforce a subpoena for a potential defense witness was filed late at night (11:54) despite the witness being disclosed for months.
DOJ-OGR-00016874.jpg
This is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, US v. Ghislaine Maxwell) where defense attorney Ms. Menninger discusses efforts to subpoena a witness. The defense argues that a victim referred to as 'Jane' previously told the government that a woman named 'Kelly' could corroborate her story. The Judge requests specific details regarding the defense team's attempts to contact this witness.
DOJ-OGR-00016371.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022, documenting the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer by Ms. Menninger. The questioning focuses on a prior statement Farmer made to government agents on May 9, 2020, regarding a massage involving Epstein; the defense attempts to establish that Farmer previously characterized the event as 'awkward and uncomfortable' but 'not explicitly sexual,' which the witness disputes as being the agents' notes rather than her exact words. The witness confirms she felt Epstein could see her during the massage.
DOJ-OGR-00016342.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It records an afternoon session where Ms. Pomerantz (Government) addresses the Court regarding the scheduling of the next witness and raises an objection to Ms. Menninger asking the current witness (A. Farmer, a psychologist testifying as a lay witness) questions about 'hindsight bias,' which Pomerantz argues is the domain of expert testimony.
DOJ-OGR-00016341.jpg
This document is page 125 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 10, 2022. It records a brief procedural exchange immediately before a luncheon recess where the Judge (The Court) confirms with Ms. Pomerantz (Government) and Ms. Menninger (Defense) that there are no matters to discuss while the jury is not present. The header indicates that a witness named 'A. Farmer' (Annie Farmer) was previously under cross-examination.
DOJ-OGR-00016326.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022, featuring the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer by Ms. Menninger. The testimony centers on verifying a specific page of a journal (Exhibit 604/AF-1) that the witness provided to the government as evidence.
DOJ-OGR-00016311.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330) filed on August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer (Annie Farmer). Defense attorney Ms. Menninger introduces defense exhibit 'AF1'—identified as a page from a journal—which the government prosecutor, Ms. Pomerantz, does not object to. The Court admits the exhibit temporarily under seal while the attorneys discuss potential redactions.
DOJ-OGR-00016302.jpg
This document is page 86 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 10, 2022. It details a brief recess during the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer (Annie Farmer). Attorneys Ms. Pomerantz (Government) and Ms. Menninger confirm they have no procedural matters to discuss during the break before the witness returns to the stand.
DOJ-OGR-00016301.jpg
This document is a single page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It captures the end of a session during the cross-examination of a witness named A. Farmer, where Ms. Menninger speaks briefly before the Judge (The Court) announces a 15-minute morning break for the jury. The page is largely blank space following the announcement of the break.
DOJ-OGR-00016251.jpg
This document is page 35 of 267 from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The page details the direct examination of witness 'Annie' Farmer by prosecutor Ms. Pomerantz, where Government Exhibit 601 is admitted into evidence and Government Exhibit 603 is identified by the witness as an entry from her journal. The defense attorney, Ms. Menninger, raises objections based on Rule 106 (Rule of Completeness).
DOJ-OGR-00016235.jpg
This document is a page from the transcript of the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It features the direct examination of Supervisory Investigator Brown by Mr. Rohrbach regarding Government Exhibit 21. The testimony establishes that a photo was taken and a nondriver ID was issued on April 28, 2004, for an unnamed individual born in 1985, highlighting that this person would have been 11 years old in 1996.
DOJ-OGR-00016217.jpg
Cover page for a court transcript of the jury trial United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated December 10, 2021. It lists Judge Alison J. Nathan as presiding and details the appearances of the prosecution team (U.S. Attorney's Office) and the defense team (Haddon Morgan and Foreman, Cohen & Gresser). Law enforcement representatives from the FBI and NYPD were also noted as present.
DOJ-OGR-00016216.jpg
This document is an 'Index of Examination' page from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, related to Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It lists the direct examination of Lawrence Visoski (Jeffrey Epstein's longtime pilot) by Ms. Comey starting on page 88. It also logs the receipt of several Government Exhibits (Nos. 112, 115, 111, 202, 212, 932, and 704) into evidence.
DOJ-OGR-00016209.jpg
This document is page 99 of a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, from Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The text captures the end of a session where a witness named Visoski (likely David Visoski) is being dismissed for the day with instructions to return the following morning. Ms. Williams is identified as the person who will escort the witness out.
DOJ-OGR-00016183.jpg
This is a page from the court transcript of the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The dialogue involves defense attorney Mr. Everdell, prosecutor Ms. Comey, and the Judge discussing procedural matters, including jury instructions for binders and the display of exhibits. The Judge also sets the upcoming trial schedule for the weeks of Christmas and New Year's, establishing daily start times (9:30 AM) and counsel meetings (8:45 AM).
DOJ-OGR-00016164.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, likely US v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. Defense attorney Ms. Sternheim argues that lawyers representing witnesses should be callable as witnesses themselves because they attended 'proffer sessions' and coordinated with the government to build civil cases and settlements. The Judge prohibits Sternheim from mentioning this potential testimony in her opening statement because the defense failed to file a specific brief requesting permission to call these lawyers as witnesses.
DOJ-OGR-00016156.jpg
This document is a single page (page 46 of 106) from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, related to Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The text captures a brief procedural exchange where Ms. Comey assures the Court she will clarify she is referring to witnesses, followed by the Judge's acknowledgment. The page ends abruptly with a 'Continued on next page' marker.
DOJ-OGR-00016155.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) detailing a sidebar conference. Prosecutor Ms. Comey objects to Defense Attorney Ms. Sternheim's opening statement, arguing it violates a pretrial ruling by suggesting the government is targeting the defendant. The Court rules that while the defense cannot question the prosecution's motives, they are permitted to argue that witnesses are treating the defendant as a 'scapegoat' or 'stand-in' (likely for Jeffrey Epstein, referred to as the 'empty chair').
DOJ-OGR-00016125.jpg
This page is a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It depicts the beginning of the trial proceedings where the Judge welcomes the jury, Ms. Williams swears in a jury of 12 and six alternates, and the Judge begins explaining the trial process, specifically noting that opening statements by the government and defense will follow.
DOJ-OGR-00016114.jpg
This document is page 4 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 10, 2022. The presiding judge outlines the procedure for finalizing jury selection, swearing in the jury, and commencing opening statements, with specific attention paid to social distancing rules for unvaccinated jurors. Attorneys Ms. Comey (Government) and Ms. Sternheim (Defense) are present, with Ms. Sternheim raising a protocol question regarding sidebars.
DOJ-OGR-00016111.jpg
This document is the cover page of a court transcript for the jury trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, held on November 29, 2021, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. It identifies the case number, the presiding judge (Hon. Alison J. Nathan), and lists the legal counsel for both the prosecution (United States of America) and the defense, as well as other individuals present from the FBI and NYPD.
DOJ-OGR-00015541.jpg
This legal document is a stipulation dated December 10, 2021, from a case in the Southern District of New York. It is an agreement between the U.S. Attorney's office, represented by Damian Williams, and the attorneys for defendant Ghislaine Maxwell. The parties agree that 'Government Exhibit 1009' can be admitted as evidence at trial.
DOJ-OGR-00015540.jpg
This document is a legal stipulation from the case of the United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell in the Southern District of New York. In it, both the prosecution, led by U.S. Attorney Damian Williams, and the defense team for Ghislaine Maxwell agree that certain government exhibits are authentic photocopies of pages from a larger exhibit. This agreement is intended to streamline the admission of evidence in court.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity