SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
LocationRelationship Network
DOJ-OGR-00018748.jpg
This document is page 150 of 264 from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, related to Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The page captures the very end of a session where the judge dismisses the jury for a one-hour lunch break. The header indicates the witness 'Carolyn' was under cross-examination.
DOJ-OGR-00018730.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed 08/10/22) detailing a sidebar conference during the direct examination of a witness named Carolyn. Defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca argues that reading only two lines of a prior statement removes necessary context. The Court rules that the witness can read the 'whole thing,' and prosecutor Ms. Comey agrees, coordinating specific line numbers (136, line 23 through line 6) with the defense.
DOJ-OGR-00018701.jpg
This is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) documenting the direct examination of a witness named Carolyn by Ms. Comey. The testimony covers the identification of Carolyn's mother (Dorothy) and describes phone calls from Ghislaine Maxwell to schedule appointments, during which Maxwell would mention she and Jeffrey Epstein were 'flying in' from out of town.
DOJ-OGR-00018676.jpg
This document is a page from the cross-examination of a witness named Flatley in the case United States v. Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on August 10, 2022. The testimony focuses on technical forensic details, specifically regarding computer clones, passwords, metadata, and the creation date of a specific Word document (Government Exhibit 418) which was established as January 29, 2002. The witness confirms they did not verify the physical location of any person on that specific date based on the metadata.
DOJ-OGR-00018664.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022. It details the direct examination of a witness named Mr. Flatley by Ms. Pomerantz regarding the metadata (creation, save, and print dates in September 2002) and titles of specific evidence documents. The documents discussed are titled 'PB New Shampoo and Massage Products' (Exhibit 420) and 'Palm Beach House Workers' (Exhibit 418R), linking the evidence to operations at a Palm Beach residence.
DOJ-OGR-00018658.jpg
This is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. The prosecution (Ms. Pomerantz) is questioning a witness named Mr. Flatley regarding Government Exhibit 418B, which contains the metadata properties for Exhibit 418. The court also admits Exhibit 418 under seal due to the presence of third-party telephone numbers.
DOJ-OGR-00018648.jpg
This document is page 50 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (the Ghislaine Maxwell trial), filed on August 10, 2022. It features the direct examination of a witness named Mr. Flatley by Ms. Pomerantz regarding forensic evidence. Flatley identifies Government Exhibit 54 as a hard drive he examined, noting its unique identifier 'NYC024350', and begins describing the forensic process involving a write blocker.
DOJ-OGR-00018642.jpg
This document is a page from a cross-examination transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely US v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. A witness named Meder is being questioned about their role in copying and reviewing large sets of photographs (approx. 18,000 to 20,000) from CDs and black binders. The questioning attorney establishes that Meder has no personal knowledge of who took the photos or how they were placed on the CDs, despite Meder noting that some binders contained initials.
DOJ-OGR-00018621.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022. It details the direct examination of a witness named Meder by prosecutor Ms. Comey, wherein the witness identifies Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell in photographs derived from a CD (logged as 1B75) seized during their investigation. Government Exhibit 321 is formally admitted into evidence during this exchange.
DOJ-OGR-00018615.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. The Judge sustains an objection to Exhibit 309 and grants a request by Ms. Moe for a sealed sidebar discussion regarding the cross-examination of an individual named Brian due to privacy concerns. Consequently, pages 1440 to 1443 of the transcript are noted as sealed.
DOJ-OGR-00018599.jpg
This document is the cover page for the court transcript of the jury trial in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The trial took place on December 7, 2021, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, with Judge Alison J. Nathan presiding. The document lists the appearances of the legal counsel for both the prosecution and the defense, as well as other individuals present.
DOJ-OGR-00018576.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) dated August 10, 2022. It features the direct examination of an FBI Staff Operations Specialist named Meder by Ms. Comey. Meder testifies to having 10 years of experience at the FBI, currently working on the child exploitation and human trafficking squad, and begins to explain how FBI case files and evidence are organized.
DOJ-OGR-00018535.jpg
This document is a page from the court transcript of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It details a discussion between the defense (Mr. Everdell), the prosecution (Ms. Moe), and the Court regarding Exhibit 913, which contains photos of children and other individuals found on a desk; the parties agree to file it under seal due to privacy interests. Following this discussion, the jury enters, and the government calls Special Agent Kelly Maguire as a witness.
DOJ-OGR-00018526.jpg
This document is page 189 of a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, related to Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It documents the conclusion of the redirect examination of a witness named McHugh, who is then excused. The presiding officer subsequently dismisses the jury for a 15-minute afternoon break.
DOJ-OGR-00018509.jpg
This document is page 172 of a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the cross-examination of a witness named McHugh. The questioning covers the specifics of 'power of attorney,' specifically regarding signatory authority and writing checks. The questioning then shifts to a company named 'Air Ghislaine,' referencing prior testimony about line items indicating a helicopter purchase involving that company.
DOJ-OGR-00018488.jpg
This document is page 151 of a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It details the direct examination of a witness named McHugh by an attorney named Ms. Moe. The testimony concerns an asset account statement from September 2002 held in the name of Jeffrey Epstein, care of Financial Trust Company.
DOJ-OGR-00018478.jpg
This document is a page from the court transcript of the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022. It captures the final cross-examination questions by defense attorney Ms. Sternheim to a witness named Kate regarding potential fraud in an application to a compensation fund. Following Kate's dismissal, prosecutor Ms. Moe calls the next government witness, Patrick McHugh, who is sworn in.
DOJ-OGR-00018475.jpg
This document is page 138 of a court transcript from the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on August 10, 2022. Defense attorney Ms. Sternheim cross-examines a witness named Kate regarding her memory of being asked to wear a uniform and an alleged conversation with Ghislaine about 'St. Trinian's,' which the witness does not recall. The prosecution (Ms. Pomerantz) successfully objects to questions about costumes as being 'beyond the scope' of redirect.
DOJ-OGR-00018463.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330) filed on August 10, 2022. It details a legal argument between defense attorney Ms. Sternheim and the Court regarding the admissibility of evidence—specifically an email—under the doctrine of 'past recollection recorded.' The Judge questions what specific details the witness failed to recall that would necessitate admitting the prior record.
DOJ-OGR-00018455.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed 08/10/22) documenting the cross-examination of a witness named Kate by Ms. Sternheim. The questioning focuses on Kate's immigration status, specifically her request to the government for a 'U visa' (often used for victims of crimes assisting law enforcement) and the renewability of her current 'exceptional' visa. Kate confirms she met with the government approximately 10 times to prepare for her testimony and requested an inquiry into the U visa.
DOJ-OGR-00018442.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) dated August 10, 2022. It details the cross-examination of a witness named 'Kate' by defense attorney Ms. Sternheim. The questioning focuses on establishing that the witness maintained email correspondence with Jeffrey Epstein in 2008 (regarding pictures) and in 2011, even after he had been in jail.
DOJ-OGR-00018428.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) featuring the cross-examination of a witness named Kate. The defense attorney questions Kate's memory reliability due to a ten-year period of substance abuse. Kate counters that her testimony relates to times she was sober, specifically stating she was required to not take drugs or be drunk when around Ghislaine and Jeffrey.
DOJ-OGR-00018409.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) filed on August 10, 2022. It details a sidebar discussion regarding '3500 material' where a prosecutor argues for the right to ask redirect questions about a witness's history as a domestic violence victim if defense attorney Ms. Sternheim raises the issue. The judge agrees, the witness is recalled, and the jury is brought back in.
DOJ-OGR-00018403.jpg
This document is page 66 of a court transcript from the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). A witness testifying under the pseudonym 'Kate' describes being interviewed by the government and the FBI in August 2019 regarding her experiences with Maxwell and Epstein. She explains that while she spoke publicly that same day, she withheld specific details due to feelings of humiliation and shame.
DOJ-OGR-00016900.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, in which an attorney, Mr. Rohrbach, argues for the admissibility of a deposition transcript of Mr. Epstein. The deposition, taken by the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York, concerns when Epstein moved from a property on East 69th Street to 9 East 71st Street, which he stated was around January 1996. Rohrbach compares this evidentiary issue to a separate matter involving '44 Kinnerton Street'.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity