SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
LocationRelationship Network
DOJ-OGR-00002338(1).jpg
This legal document, filed on February 1, 2021, is the U.S. Government's response regarding a defendant's access to a laptop for reviewing discovery materials. The U.S. Attorney's office argues that the current arrangement, where the MDC and BOP provide the defendant with 65 hours of laptop access per week plus optional weekend desktop access, is sufficient, noting that the trial is still approximately six months away.
DOJ-OGR-00002337.jpg
This legal document is a letter from the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case of Ghislaine Maxwell. The government states it does not object to Maxwell's request for weekend laptop access to review discovery materials but ultimately defers to the Metropolitan Detention Center's (MDC) policies. The letter emphasizes that Maxwell has already been provided with extensive access, including a dedicated laptop and desktop computer, for more hours than any other inmate.
DOJ-OGR-00002337(1).jpg
This legal document is a letter from the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York to Judge Alison J. Nathan, dated February 1, 2021, regarding the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The government responds to Maxwell's request for expanded laptop access to review discovery materials on weekends, stating it has no objection but ultimately defers to the Metropolitan Detention Center's (MDC) policies. The letter details the extensive access Maxwell has already been granted, including a dedicated laptop and desktop computer, arguing she has ample opportunity to review the evidence.
DOJ-OGR-00002336.jpg
This is page 2 of a legal filing in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN), dated January 28, 2021. The US Attorney's office is addressing Judge Nathan regarding proposed redactions to the defendant's motions (Motions 3, 10, and 11) to protect victim-witness privacy and the integrity of the ongoing investigation. The government agrees to most redactions but intends to submit limited additional redactions for Motion 3 via email under seal.
DOJ-OGR-00002336(1).jpg
This is page 2 of a legal filing in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN), dated January 28, 2021. The US Attorney's office is addressing Judge Nathan regarding proposed redactions to the defendant's motions (Motions 3, 10, and 11) to protect victim-witness privacy and the integrity of the ongoing investigation. The government agrees to most redactions but intends to submit limited additional redactions for Motion 3 via email under seal.
DOJ-OGR-00002335(1).jpg
This is a letter from the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Dated January 28, 2021, the letter responds to a court order about proposed redactions to the defendant's pre-trial motions. The Government states its agreement with the proposed redactions, arguing they are necessary to protect the integrity of an ongoing investigation, maintain grand jury secrecy, and protect the privacy of victim-witnesses.
DOJ-OGR-00002334.jpg
This is a court order from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated January 26, 2021. The order, issued by Judge Alison J. Nathan, addresses twelve pre-trial motions filed by the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell, on January 25, 2021. Because Maxwell requested redactions of sensitive information, the order grants the Government two days to respond to the proposed redactions.
DOJ-OGR-00002334(1).jpg
This represents a court order from the Southern District of New York in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, dated January 26, 2021. Judge Alison J. Nathan acknowledges the filing of twelve pre-trial motions by the defense, noting that several are under temporary seal due to requests for redaction of sensitive information. The order grants the Government two days to respond to these proposed redactions.
DOJ-OGR-00002329(1).jpg
This legal document, filed on January 25, 2021, presents an analysis by a 'Mr. Martin' concerning the underrepresentation of Black and Hispanic jurors. The analysis compares the demographic composition of the 'White Plains qualified wheel' (juror pool) to the eligible juror populations of the Manhattan Division and the entire Southern District of New York, finding significant disparities. This argument is being made in the context of a case involving 'Epstein's New York residence,' which is located in the Manhattan Division.
DOJ-OGR-00002321.jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal memorandum filed on January 25, 2021, in the Southern District of New York (Case 20 Cr. 330). It is a filing by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team supporting a motion to dismiss a superseding indictment based on alleged Sixth Amendment violations. The page lists the defense attorneys from three different law firms representing Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00002321(1).jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal memorandum filed on January 25, 2021, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The filing is made by the attorneys for defendant Ghislaine Maxwell in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The memorandum supports a motion to dismiss the superseding indictment against Maxwell, arguing it was obtained in violation of the Sixth Amendment.
DOJ-OGR-00002319.jpg
This document is a legal filing from January 25, 2021, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell in the Southern District of New York. It is a 'Notice of Motion' submitted by Maxwell's defense attorneys from the firm Cohen & Gresser LLP. The motion seeks to dismiss the superseding indictment against her, arguing that it was obtained in violation of her Sixth Amendment rights.
DOJ-OGR-00002319(1).jpg
This document is a legal filing from January 25, 2021, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell in the Southern District of New York. It is a Notice of Motion submitted by Maxwell's attorneys at Cohen & Gresser LLP to dismiss the superseding indictment against her. The motion argues that the indictment was obtained in violation of her Sixth Amendment rights and requests an oral argument on the matter.
DOJ-OGR-00002313(1).jpg
This document is a 'Table of Authorities' page from a legal filing dated January 25, 2021, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It lists legal precedents including Hamling v. United States, Russell v. United States, United States v. Jain, and United States v. Resendiz-Ponce, as well as Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 7(c)(1). The document bears a Department of Justice bates stamp DOJ-OGR-00002313.
DOJ-OGR-00002311(1).jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal memorandum filed on January 25, 2021, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York for the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The memorandum, submitted by Maxwell's legal team, supports a motion to dismiss four counts of the superseding indictment against her, arguing a lack of specificity. The document identifies Maxwell as the defendant and lists her attorneys from three different law firms.
DOJ-OGR-00002309.jpg
This document is a Notice of Motion filed on January 25, 2021, in the Southern District of New York (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell, through her counsel, is formally requesting the dismissal of Counts One through Four of the Superseding Indictment, citing a 'Lack of Specificity.' The defense also requests an oral argument regarding this motion (Pretrial Motion #12).
DOJ-OGR-00002309(1).jpg
This document is a Notice of Motion filed on January 25, 2021, in the Southern District of New York (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell, through her counsel, is formally requesting the dismissal of Counts One through Four of the Superseding Indictment, citing a 'Lack of Specificity.' The defense also requests an oral argument regarding this motion (Pretrial Motion #12).
DOJ-OGR-00002300.jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal filing in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on January 25, 2021, in the Southern District of New York. It is a memorandum in support of Maxwell's motion to dismiss either Count One or Count Three of the superseding indictment on the grounds that they are multiplicitous. The document identifies Ghislaine Maxwell as the defendant and lists her legal counsel from three different law firms.
DOJ-OGR-00002300(1).jpg
This is the cover page for a legal memorandum filed on January 25, 2021, in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The document is a motion filed by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team to dismiss either Count One or Count Three of the superseding indictment on the grounds that they are multiplicitous. The page lists the defendant's legal representation from three different law firms.
DOJ-OGR-00002298.jpg
This document is a Notice of Motion filed on January 25, 2021, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). In this filing (Pretrial Motion #8), Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell requests the dismissal of either Count One or Count Three of the Superseding Indictment on the grounds that they are multiplicitous.
DOJ-OGR-00002298(1).jpg
This document is a Notice of Motion (Pretrial Motion #8) filed on January 25, 2021, in the Southern District of New York. In this filing, defendant Ghislaine Maxwell requests the dismissal of either Count One or Count Three of the Superseding Indictment, arguing that they are multiplicitous. The defense also requests oral argument on the matter.
DOJ-OGR-00002279(1).jpg
This document is the title page of a legal memorandum filed on January 25, 2021, in the Southern District of New York (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). It represents Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for a severance and separate trial regarding Counts Five and Six of the superseding indictment. The document lists the legal defense teams representing Maxwell, including attorneys from Haddon, Morgan & Foreman P.C., Cohen & Gresser LLP, and the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim.
DOJ-OGR-00002277.jpg
This is a legal document filed on January 25, 2021, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The document is a notice of motion filed by the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell, requesting a separate trial for counts five and six of the superseding indictment against her. The filing also indicates that an oral argument is requested.
DOJ-OGR-00002272.jpg
A court order from Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated January 25, 2021. The order acknowledges receipt of a letter from the Bureau of Prisons requesting the court vacate a previous order (Dkt. No. 116) that granted Maxwell access to a laptop for discovery review on weekends and holidays. The judge allows the defense and government one week to respond to the BOP's request.
DOJ-OGR-00002272(1).jpg
This document is a court order from the Southern District of New York dated January 25, 2021, in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Judge Alison J. Nathan notes the receipt of a letter from the Bureau of Prisons requesting the court vacate a previous order that granted Maxwell access to a laptop for reviewing discovery on weekends and holidays. The Judge orders that both the Defendant and the Government may respond to the BOP's request within one week.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity