SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
LocationRelationship Network
DOJ-OGR-00002674.jpg
This is a legal document filed on February 4, 2021, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York for the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Dated January 25, 2021, the document is a 'Notice of Motion' from Maxwell's legal team at Cohen & Gresser LLP, stating their intent to file a motion to strike 'surplusage' from the superseding indictment against her. This is identified as Pretrial Motion #6.
DOJ-OGR-00020382.jpg
This document is a Certificate of Compliance filed on May 27, 2021, for Case 21-58. Assistant United States Attorney Maurene Comey certifies that a related opposition filing adheres to the word count limitations set by the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, stating the document contains 5,164 words.
DOJ-OGR-00020381.jpg
This is the conclusion page of a legal document filed on May 27, 2021, in the Southern District of New York. Assistant United States Attorneys Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach argue that a motion filed by an individual named Maxwell should be denied. The document is electronically signed by Maurene Comey.
DOJ-OGR-00020326.jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal filing dated May 17, 2021, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It is a 'Renewed Motion for Pretrial Release' filed by Maxwell's attorneys, Leah S. Saffian and David Oscar Markus, to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The motion is an appeal of a decision from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.
DOJ-OGR-00020325.jpg
This document is a Motion Information Statement filed on May 17, 2021, in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit for the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Attorney David Oscar Markus, on behalf of his client Ghislaine Maxwell, is submitting a 'Renewed Motion for Pretrial Release' or alternatively requesting a remand for an evidentiary hearing. The motion is opposed by the U.S. government, represented by AUSA Lara Pomerantz.
DOJ-OGR-00005784.jpg
This is the cover page for a legal document filed on October 29, 2021, in the case of the United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell in the Southern District of New York. The document is the government's omnibus memorandum opposing motions in limine filed by the defendant. It lists the prosecution team, led by U.S. Attorney Damian Williams.
DOJ-OGR-00005775.jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal motion filed on October 29, 2021, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The motion, submitted by Maxwell's legal team, seeks to preclude the introduction of specific government exhibits (251, 288, 294, 313, and 606) in her trial. The document lists the names and contact information for her attorneys from three different law firms.
DOJ-OGR-00005747.jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal motion filed on October 29, 2021, in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The motion, submitted by Maxwell's legal team, seeks to preclude law enforcement witnesses from offering expert opinion testimony. The document lists the names and contact information for the four attorneys and their respective law firms representing the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00005738.jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal motion filed on October 29, 2021, in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The filing, titled 'GHISLAINE MAXWELL’S MOTION TO SUPPRESS IDENTIFICATION', lists the defendant's legal counsel from three different law firms. It serves as the formal introduction to a request for the court to exclude certain identification evidence from the trial.
DOJ-OGR-00002906.jpg
This document is the final page of a court filing (Document 196) in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on April 6, 2021. Submitted by the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York, it concludes a submission to the court by stating the Government's willingness to provide further information and is signed by Assistant U.S. Attorneys on behalf of U.S. Attorney Audrey Strauss.
DOJ-OGR-00002874.jpg
This is a letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York to Judge Alison J. Nathan, dated March 29, 2021, regarding the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The government seeks to clarify a previous statement from October 2020 where it claimed no involvement by its prosecution team in an earlier 'Florida Investigation'. The letter now states that new information suggests the FBI's New York Office may have participated in that Florida investigation between 2005 and 2010, and the government is reviewing files to determine the extent of the interaction.
DOJ-OGR-00002867.jpg
This legal document is a letter dated March 29, 2021, from the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The letter serves to notify the court that a Grand Jury has returned a superseding indictment against the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell. The Government outlines its intent to explain the differences between the new and prior indictments and address the impact on discovery and pending motions, while also stating it does not intend to seek further indictments if the trial proceeds as scheduled on July 12, 2021.
DOJ-OGR-00002866.jpg
This document is the final signature page (page 24) of a Superseding Indictment filed on March 29, 2021, in the Southern District of New York against Ghislaine Maxwell. It lists the specific US Codes violated (conspiracy, sex trafficking, perjury, transportation of minors) and bears the name of US Attorney Audrey Strauss and the signature of the Grand Jury Foreperson.
DOJ-OGR-00002863.jpg
This document is page 21 of a legal indictment (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on March 29, 2021. It details 'Count Eight' against Ghislaine Maxwell for Perjury regarding a deposition she gave on July 22, 2016, in a civil case (15 Civ. 7433). The indictment alleges she knowingly gave false testimony when she denied knowledge of sex toys or devices at Jeffrey Epstein's Palm Beach house.
DOJ-OGR-00002862.jpg
This document is page 20 of a legal indictment (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on March 29, 2021. It details Count Seven, a perjury charge against Ghislaine Maxwell, alleging she gave false testimony during a deposition on April 22, 2016. The indictment specifically quotes her denial of any knowledge regarding Jeffrey Epstein's alleged scheme to recruit underage girls for sexual massages.
DOJ-OGR-00002861.jpg
This document is page 19 of a court filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated March 29, 2021. It details overt acts including Epstein sending a package via FedEx to Minor Victim-4 in Florida in 2002, and Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, or employees calling the victim between 2001 and 2004 to schedule massages. The page also introduces Count Six, charging Maxwell with Sex Trafficking of a Minor between 2001 and 2004.
DOJ-OGR-00002859.jpg
This is page 17 of a court filing (Indictment) filed on March 29, 2021, detailing 'Count Five: Sex Trafficking Conspiracy' against Ghislaine Maxwell. It alleges that between 2001 and 2004, Maxwell conspired with Jeffrey Epstein to recruit, entice, and transport minors for sex trafficking. It specifically mentions Maxwell arranging the transport of 'Minor Victim-1' from Florida to New York for sexual acts with Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00002858.jpg
This document is page 16 of a legal indictment against Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on March 29, 2021. It details specific allegations, including Maxwell encouraging 'Minor Victim-3' to massage Epstein in London (1994-1995) and inviting 'Minor Victim-4' to travel from Florida with Epstein (2001-2002). The page formally lays out 'COUNT FOUR,' charging Maxwell with the transportation of a minor with intent to engage in criminal sexual activity between 1994 and 1997.
DOJ-OGR-00002856.jpg
This is page 14 of a legal indictment (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on March 29, 2021. It details Count Three, charging Ghislaine Maxwell with conspiracy to transport minors for criminal sexual activity between 1994 and 2004. The document alleges Maxwell coerced 'Minor Victim-1' to travel from Florida to New York to engage in sex acts with Jeffrey Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00002854.jpg
This page from a legal filing outlines conspiracy charges against Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein involving the enticement of minors for sexual activity in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 2422. It specifically details 'Overt Acts' committed between 1994 and 1997 involving a 'Minor Victim-1' in New York and Florida.
DOJ-OGR-00002853.jpg
This document is page 11 of a criminal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) against Ghislaine Maxwell, filed in March 2021. It details allegations that between 2001 and 2004, Maxwell and Epstein groomed 'Minor Victim-4' by sending gifts (including lingerie) and encouraged her to recruit other underage girls for sexualized massages at the Palm Beach residence in exchange for cash. Additionally, it alleges that in 2016, Maxwell committed perjury during a civil deposition regarding her role in these abuses.
DOJ-OGR-00002843.jpg
This is the first page of a Superseding Indictment filed on March 29, 2021, in the SDNY against Ghislaine Maxwell. Count One charges her with Conspiracy to Entice Minors to Travel to Engage in Illegal Sex Acts. The overview alleges that between 1994 and 2004, Maxwell recruited and groomed victims as young as 14 for Jeffrey Epstein, knowing they were minors.
DOJ-OGR-00002824.jpg
This document is page 3 of a court filing (likely an opinion or order) in the case of United States v. Schulte (Case 1:17-cr-00548). It discusses Schulte's motion to dismiss his indictment regarding the alleged transmission of national defense information to WikiLeaks. Schulte argues that the White Plains grand jury venire violated his constitutional rights by failing to represent a fair cross-section of African American and Hispanic American populations. Note: While the prompt identifies this as 'Epstein-related,' the text exclusively concerns Joshua Schulte; however, this document may be part of a larger FOIA production covering SDNY cases or MCC New York issues.
DOJ-OGR-00002823.jpg
This legal document details the procedural history of the criminal case against Schulte, a former CIA employee. It covers his August 2017 arrest for leaking national defense information, subsequent indictments, and a trial in early 2020 which resulted in a guilty verdict on two counts and a mistrial on eight others. The document concludes by noting that the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in New York City immediately after the trial caused a suspension of court proceedings.
DOJ-OGR-00002822.jpg
This legal document is an "Opinion & Order" from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, dated March 24, 2021, in the case of United States v. Joshua Adam Schulte. The court denies a motion by Schulte, a former CIA employee accused of leaking information to Wikileaks, to dismiss a superseding indictment. Schulte argued the grand jury was unconstitutional due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, but the court rejected this claim, allowing the prosecution to proceed towards a second trial.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity