SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
LocationRelationship Network
DOJ-OGR-00004735.jpg
This is a court order issued by District Judge Alison J. Nathan on June 2, 2021, for the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell in the Southern District of New York. The order establishes a detailed disclosure and filing schedule for the prosecution and defense, setting deadlines from September to November 2021 for key pre-trial activities such as disclosing victim identities, witness lists, expert reports, and filing various motions.
DOJ-OGR-00004712.jpg
This document is a preliminary statement from a legal memorandum filed by the U.S. Government on May 25, 2021, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The Government argues that Maxwell's supplemental pre-trial motions should be denied, presenting five key reasons. These include the assertion that a non-prosecution agreement with Jeffrey Epstein is irrelevant to this case, the Double Jeopardy Clause does not apply, the charges are timely under the statute of limitations, and claims of prosecutorial delay are unfounded.
DOJ-OGR-00014747.jpg
This document is a 'Notice of Filing of Official Transcript' filed on August 10, 2022, in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case No. 20-cr-330) in the Southern District of New York. It notifies parties that a transcript for a conference held on December 29, 2021, has been filed and outlines the procedures and deadlines for requesting redactions. The document is signed by court reporter 'Speer'.
DOJ-OGR-00014746.jpg
This document is the final page (13 of 13) of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 10, 2022. The dialogue involves Ms. Sternheim (Defense) noting rising COVID rates at the MDC facility, and the Court acknowledging availability (presumably of vaccines or testing) at the MDC before adjourning the session. Ms. Moe represents the government.
DOJ-OGR-00014743.jpg
This document is page 10 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330 (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 10, 2022. It records the reading of the verdict, where the defendant is found 'Not guilty' on Count Two and 'Guilty' on Counts Three through Six. Following the reading, the court polls individual jurors (identified by number) to confirm that this is indeed their verdict.
DOJ-OGR-00014733.jpg
This legal document is a 'Notice of Filing of Official Transcript' for the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case No. 20-cr-330) in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. Filed on August 10, 2022, it announces that the court reporter, Speer, has filed the official transcript for a conference held on December 28, 2021. The notice informs the parties that they have seven days to request redactions of personal information before the transcript is made publicly available.
DOJ-OGR-00014717.jpg
This document is the cover page for a court transcript from the jury trial of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 20 CR 330), dated December 28, 2021. It lists Judge Alison J. Nathan as presiding, along with the appearances of the prosecution team (led by US Attorney Damian Williams) and the defense team (including attorneys from Haddon Morgan and Foreman and Cohen & Gresser). Also noted as present are representatives from the FBI and NYPD.
DOJ-OGR-00014716.jpg
This is a legal notice filed on August 10, 2022, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York for the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case No. 20-cr-330). The document, submitted by court reporter 'speer', announces the filing of the official transcript for a conference that occurred on December 27, 2021. It also outlines the procedure and seven-day deadline for the case parties to request redactions of sensitive personal information before the transcript is made publicly available.
DOJ-OGR-00014710.jpg
This document is page 24 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The Judge, Prosecutor Ms. Moe, and Defense Attorney Mr. Everdell are discussing a response to a note received from the jury. The Judge decides to refer the jury back to Instruction Number 21 on page 28. Additionally, the parties discuss extending the schedule for jury deliberations for the following day.
DOJ-OGR-00014691.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, USA v. Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. It depicts a discussion between the Judge (The Court), Defense (Mr. Everdell), and Prosecution (Ms. Moe) regarding a response to a jury note during deliberations. The court is preparing to send the jury a transcript of testimony from a witness named 'Matt' and is clarifying jury instructions regarding the definition of 'enticement' found on pages 21 and 33 of the charge.
DOJ-OGR-00014690.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It details a discussion between the Judge ('The Court'), defense attorney Mr. Everdell, and prosecutor Ms. Moe regarding jury instructions and the legal definition of the word 'entice,' citing cases such as Almonte, Dupigny, and Broxmeyer. Mr. Everdell notes a technical difficulty with internet access during the proceeding.
DOJ-OGR-00014686.jpg
This is a legal notice filed on August 10, 2022, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York regarding the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case No. 20-cr-330). The document announces the filing of an official transcript of a conference held on December 22, 2021. It also outlines the procedure for the parties involved to request redactions of personal information from the transcript within seven days.
DOJ-OGR-00014685.jpg
This is the final page (page 7) of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The proceedings are adjourned for the holidays until December 27, 2021. The Judge (The Court) discusses upcoming masking rules due to COVID-19 concerns and ensures supplies will be available, while Ms. Comey and Ms. Sternheim confirm they have no further matters to address.
DOJ-OGR-00014682.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely US v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. It details a discussion between the Judge ('The Court'), prosecutor Ms. Comey, and defense attorney Ms. Sternheim regarding jury deliberations, specifically addressing a jury note declining an offer because they had plans, and confirming that a 'limiting instruction' was included with the transcript of witness 'Annie's' testimony provided to the jury. The court prepares to dismiss the jury for the day at 4:25 PM.
DOJ-OGR-00014680.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. It details a discussion between Judge Nathan and counsel (Ms. Comey and Ms. Sternheim) regarding a scheduling note to be sent to the deliberating jury about December 23rd. Subsequently, the jury sends a note requesting testimony transcripts for witnesses identified as Jane, Wong, and Kate.
DOJ-OGR-00014679.jpg
This document is the cover page of a court transcript for the jury trial of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated December 22, 2021. It lists Judge Alison J. Nathan as presiding, details the legal teams for both the prosecution (SDNY) and the defense (Haddon Morgan and Foreman, Cohen & Gresser), and notes the presence of FBI agent Amanda Young and NYPD officer Paul Byrne. The document was filed on August 10, 2022, bearing the Bates stamp DOJ-OGR-00014679.
DOJ-OGR-00014678.jpg
This document is a 'Notice of Filing of Official Transcript' filed on August 10, 2022, in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case No. 20-cr-330). It notifies parties that a transcript for a conference held on December 21, 2021, has been filed and outlines the seven-day deadline for requesting redactions of sensitive personal information before public release.
DOJ-OGR-00014659.jpg
Cover page for the official court transcript of the Jury Trial in United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 20 CR 330) held on December 21, 2021, before Judge Alison J. Nathan. The document lists appearances by the prosecution (US Attorney's Office) and the defense (Haddon Morgan and Foreman, Bobbi Sternheim, Cohen & Gresser), as well as the presence of FBI and NYPD representatives.
DOJ-OGR-00014653.jpg
This document is page 253 of a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. The text records the court instructing the jury to begin deliberations and identifying five alternate jurors (numbers 125, 149, 151, 152, and 170). The Judge provides strict instructions to the alternates to refrain from discussing the case or consuming media until they are either recalled by Ms. Williams or released.
DOJ-OGR-00014651.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330) recording a sidebar conference between the Judge and legal counsel (Moe, Menninger, Sternheim, Pagliuca). The discussion focuses on instructions for alternate jurors (specifically identifying jurors 125, 149, 151, 152, and 170), confirming they should remain 'on call' rather than stay in the building due to pandemic concerns, and setting parameters for evening deliberations.
DOJ-OGR-00014647.jpg
This document is page 247 of a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022, containing the judge's concluding instructions (Charge) to the jury in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. The text outlines protocols for juror notes, requesting transcripts, and the jury's duty to determine if the government has proven Ms. Maxwell's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
DOJ-OGR-00014640.jpg
This document is a page from the court transcript of the United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It contains jury instructions regarding the admissibility and limited use of 'similar acts' evidence. The judge instructs the jury that such evidence cannot be used to prove bad character, but may be used to determine intent, lack of mistake, or the existence of a common scheme or plan.
DOJ-OGR-00014627.jpg
This document is page 227 of the jury instructions (Charge) from the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330), filed on August 10, 2022. The text outlines legal standards for considering co-conspirator statements made in the defendant's absence and introduces Instruction No. 39 regarding 'Conscious Avoidance.' The judge explains that the jury may consider whether the defendant 'deliberately closed her eyes to what otherwise would have been obvious' when determining if she acted knowingly.
DOJ-OGR-00014624.jpg
This legal document outlines specific actions taken between 2001 and 2004 as part of a conspiracy charge. It details how Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, and other employees sent gifts (including lingerie) to a woman named Carolyn and repeatedly called her to schedule massages for Epstein. The document concludes with a legal clarification that for a conspiracy conviction, it is sufficient to prove that any member of the conspiracy committed an overt act, not necessarily the defendant (Ms. Maxwell) herself.
DOJ-OGR-00014621.jpg
This document is page 221 of a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, from the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It contains jury instructions (Charge) specifically explaining the legal definition of conspiracy, withdrawal from a conspiracy, and 'Instruction No. 36' regarding the 'Third Element' of Conspiracy to Violate Federal Law (Counts One, Three, and Five). The text defines the requirement of an 'overt act' beyond mere agreement.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity