SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
LocationRelationship Network
DOJ-OGR-00014614.jpg
This document is page 214 of a court transcript (Document 767) from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It contains the judge's charge to the jury regarding the legal definition of a 'conspiracy.' The text explains that a conspiracy consists of a mutual understanding, express or implied, to violate the law, and notes that direct evidence of an explicit agreement is not required, as circumstantial evidence and conduct can prove the existence of such an agreement.
DOJ-OGR-00014613.jpg
This document is page 213 of 257 from the court transcript (Document 767) filed on August 10, 2022, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It contains Jury Instruction No. 33 regarding Counts One, Three, and Five, specifically defining the legal elements of 'Conspiracy to violate federal law.' The text explains that a conspiracy requires an agreement between two or more persons to commit an unlawful act and at least one overt act, regardless of the conspiracy's ultimate success.
DOJ-OGR-00014610.jpg
This document is page 210 of a court transcript (Document 767) filed on August 10, 2022, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It contains the judge's charge to the jury specifically defining the legal standards for 'aiding and abetting' regarding Counts Two, Four, and Six. The text explains that mere presence at a crime scene is insufficient for conviction; the government must prove the defendant willfully sought to help the crime succeed.
DOJ-OGR-00014589.jpg
This document is page 189 of a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, containing jury instructions (Instruction No. 5: Improper considerations) for the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. The text instructs the jury to base their verdict solely on evidence and explicitly prohibits discrimination or bias based on race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, or economic circumstances regarding Ms. Maxwell or any witnesses. It also defines and warns against the influence of unconscious bias and public opinion.
DOJ-OGR-00014584.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, USA v. Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. It captures the final sentences of prosecutor Ms. Comey's closing argument, urging the jury to find the defendant guilty of sexual abuse of underage girls. Following this, the Court (Judge Nathan) begins reading the jury instructions (The Charge), specifically starting with Instruction No. 1 regarding the Role of the Court.
DOJ-OGR-00011772.jpg
This document is a Notice of Filing of Official Transcript filed on August 10, 2022, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case No. 20-cr-330) in the Southern District of New York. The notice confirms that a transcript for a conference held on November 29, 2021, has been filed by court reporter 'speer'. It outlines the deadlines and procedures for requesting redactions of personal data identifiers from the transcript.
DOJ-OGR-00011764.jpg
This document is page 99 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 10, 2022. The page captures the end of a session where the judge is dismissing the jury or attendees for the day, emphasizing the importance of following instructions and noting that Ms. Williams will escort them out. The header indicates the witness during this session was Visoski (likely pilot David Visoski) on direct examination.
DOJ-OGR-00011740.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It details the beginning of testimony by Lawrence 'Larry' Visoski, a pilot, who is called as the government's first witness by prosecutor Ms. Comey. The text covers the swearing-in process and the initial questions establishing his identity and profession.
DOJ-OGR-00011736.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It captures the conclusion of an address by defense attorney Ms. Sternheim, who argues that Ghislaine Maxwell should be found not guilty and distinguishes her from Jeffrey Epstein. The page concludes with the Judge (The Court) ordering a 10-minute break before the government calls its first witness, indicating this is likely the end of opening statements.
DOJ-OGR-00002855.jpg
This document is page 13 of a legal indictment against Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on March 29, 2021. It details specific allegations of Maxwell facilitating the sexual abuse of three unnamed minors (Victim-2, Victim-3, and Victim-4) for Jeffrey Epstein between 1994 and 2002. The alleged incidents occurred in various locations, including New Mexico, London, and Florida, and form the basis for Count Two of the indictment, 'Enticement of a Minor to Travel to Engage in Illegal Sex Acts'.
DOJ-OGR-00002842.jpg
This is a court order from the Southern District of New York in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated March 26, 2021. Judge Alison J. Nathan orders that redactions on a letter from Boies Schiller Flexner LLP be removed unless the Government objects by March 29, 2021. The document bears a DOJ Bates stamp indicating it was processed as part of a Department of Justice release.
DOJ-OGR-00002767.jpg
This document is the first page of a court order filed on March 22, 2021, by District Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of the United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It outlines the charges against Maxwell, including conspiracy to entice minors and perjury, and summarizes the procedural history of her previous bail denials due to flight risk. The order sets up a discussion regarding Maxwell's third motion for release on bail, filed in February 2021.
DOJ-OGR-00002728.jpg
This legal document, filed by the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York, details the security and search procedures for a specific defendant at the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC). It outlines daily pat-down and cell searches, weekly body scans, and frequent nightly wellness checks, justifying them as necessary for the safety of the institution and the defendant. The document also notes a recent change to reduce searches by relocating the defendant's video conferences with her counsel to within her unit.
DOJ-OGR-00002726.jpg
This legal document is an affidavit filed by Bobbi C. Sternheim, counsel for defendant Ghislaine Maxwell, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. Dated January 25, 2020, the affidavit certifies that the defense attempted in good faith to resolve issues with government counsel regarding a Motion for a Bill of Particulars and Pretrial Disclosures, but no agreement was reached. This filing is a procedural requirement under Local Criminal Rule 16.1.
DOJ-OGR-00025180.jpg
This document is an email chain from November 5, 2019, initiated by a U.S. Marshal's request for reports on the investigation into Jeffrey Epstein's death. The request is forwarded by MCC New York Associate Warden Charisma Edge to other Bureau of Prisons (BOP) staff, including James Petrucci. The response from Petrucci and a drafted official reply both state that no report can be released because the investigation is active and ongoing, directing any inquiries to the BOP's Office of General Counsel, the OIG, or the FBI.
DOJ-OGR-00025172.jpg
This document is an email chain from November 5, 2019, originating from a Supervisory Deputy U.S. Marshal in the Southern District of New York. The Marshal, on behalf of the Prisoner Operations Division, requests any reports from the investigation into Jeffrey Epstein's death. The request is sent to Charisma Edge, who then forwards it to James Petrucci to determine if they can fulfill the request.
DOJ-OGR-00020104.jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal filing in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell, case number 20 Cr. 330 (AJN), in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. Filed on December 23, 2020, it is a reply memorandum in support of Maxwell's renewed motion for bail. The document lists the names and contact information for her legal team from three different law firms.
DOJ-OGR-00020090.jpg
This document is page 27 of a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) filed on December 18, 2020. The text argues against the defense's motion for reconsideration of bail, stating the Court has already rejected comparisons to other high-profile cases (Esposito, Dreier, Madoff). The prosecution highlights the defendant's 'significant foreign connections' and 'sophistication in hiding those resources and herself' as reasons for continued detention.
DOJ-OGR-00020064.jpg
This legal document is a memorandum filed by the U.S. Government on December 18, 2020, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The Government argues against Maxwell's renewed motion for bail, stating that the court's previous decision to deny bail was correct because she remains a serious flight risk. The memorandum asserts that her new bail proposal is just a repackaging of old arguments and does not mitigate the risks posed by her extensive financial resources and foreign ties.
DOJ-OGR-00020061.jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal filing in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, dated June 28, 2020. It is the U.S. Government's memorandum opposing defendant Ghislaine Maxwell's renewed motion for release in criminal case 20 Cr. 330 (AJN). The filing lists the prosecuting attorneys, including Acting U.S. Attorney Audrey Strauss and Assistant U.S. Attorneys Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, and Lara Pomerantz.
DOJ-OGR-00020015.jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal memorandum filed on December 14, 2020, in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York (Case 20 Cr. 330). It represents Ghislaine Maxwell's renewed motion for bail and lists her legal defense team, including attorneys from Cohen & Gresser LLP, Haddon, Morgan & Foreman P.C., and the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim.
DOJ-OGR-00017413.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) dated August 10, 2022. Witness Visoski is questioned by Ms. Comey about a 'female singer' identified on a document, whom the court refers to by the pseudonym 'Jane.' Visoski confirms this person was a passenger on Jeffrey Epstein's plane and recalls meeting her in the mid-to-late 1990s.
DOJ-OGR-00017364.jpg
This document is page 121 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 10, 2022. The text records a discussion between the Judge ('The Court'), prosecutor Ms. Comey, and defense attorney Mr. Everdell while the jury is not present. They discuss the placement of folders containing documents under chairs and the Judge's intention to interview a juror regarding a planned trip to ensure it does not conflict with the trial.
DOJ-OGR-00017363.jpg
This document is the title page of a court transcript for the jury trial of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 20 CR 330), dated November 30, 2021. It lists the presiding judge, Hon. Alison J. Nathan, and details the appearances of the prosecution team (U.S. Attorney's Office) and the defense team (Haddon Morgan and Foreman, plus others). It also notes the presence of FBI and NYPD representatives.
DOJ-OGR-00017361.jpg
This document is a transcript page from the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on August 10, 2022. It depicts the moment the judge thanks and discharges the jury following the verdict. Defense counsel Ms. Sternheim requests the court wait on the presentence report and explicitly asks for a court order to ensure Ms. Maxwell receives a COVID-19 booster shot.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity