SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
LocationRelationship Network
DOJ-OGR-00002820.jpg
This legal document is a letter dated March 26, 2021, from the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York to Judge Alison J. Nathan, who is presiding over the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The prosecution informs the court of a recent ruling in a separate case, U.S. v. Schulte, where Judge Crotty denied a motion to dismiss the indictment that was 'virtually identical' to one filed by Maxwell. The government argues that this precedent supports their position that Maxwell's motion should also be denied.
DOJ-OGR-00002819.jpg
This is a legal letter dated March 26, 2021, from attorney Sigrid S. McCawley of Boies Schiller Flexner LLP to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case *United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell*. The letter informs the court that BSF, representing victims, has conferred with the defendant's counsel and agreed to redact a small piece of information from a recent filing out of caution. BSF states it will remove these redactions if the court orders it to do so.
DOJ-OGR-00002807.jpg
This document is a legal declaration filed by Sigrid S. McCawley on March 26, 2021, in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell. McCawley, an attorney for an intervenor, declares under penalty of perjury that she meets the requirements for admission pro hac vice, including having no felony convictions or disciplinary actions. She is associated with Boies Schiller Flexner LLP and is a member of the bars of Florida and Washington, D.C.
DOJ-OGR-00002806.jpg
This legal document is a Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice filed on March 26, 2021, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. Attorney Sigrid S. McCawley, from the law firm Boies Schiller Flexner LLP, is requesting permission to appear as counsel for her firm and the victims they represent in the criminal case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The motion affirms McCawley's good standing in the bars of Florida and Washington, D.C., and attests that she has no history of felonies or disciplinary actions.
DOJ-OGR-00002804.jpg
This is a Notice of Appearance filed on March 26, 2021, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York for the criminal case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Attorney David Boies of the law firm Boies Schiller Flexner LLP is formally notifying the court that he is appearing as counsel for his firm (as an Intervenor) and for the unnamed victims the firm represents in this matter.
DOJ-OGR-00002802.jpg
This document is a Criminal Notice of Appeal filed on March 24, 2021, in the Southern District of New York. Ghislaine Maxwell, represented by David Oscar Markus, is appealing the court's March 22, 2021 'Order on Third Motion for Release on Bail' to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals. The document confirms Maxwell's status as committed (incarcerated) and lists the Assistant U.S. Attorneys prosecuting the case.
DOJ-OGR-00002762.jpg
This is a court order issued by Judge Alison J. Nathan in the criminal case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell in the Southern District of New York, filed on March 18, 2021. The order addresses disputes between the Government and the Defendant regarding requests to redact and seal information in pre-trial motions. The Court outlines the three-part legal test from the Second Circuit it will use to rule on these requests, balancing the presumption of public access against factors like judicial efficiency and privacy interests.
DOJ-OGR-00002692.jpg
This document is a legal filing from the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell in the Southern District of New York, dated January 25, 2021. It serves as a notice of motion from Maxwell's defense team, led by the law firm Cohen & Gresser LLP, requesting a bill of particulars and other pretrial disclosures from the prosecution. The document also requests oral argument on the motion.
DOJ-OGR-00014478.jpg
This is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) dated August 10, 2022. Defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca objects to the prosecution's closing argument regarding 'grooming-by-proxy' for Jeffrey Epstein; the Judge overrules this, clarifying that while experts couldn't testify to it, lawyers could argue it based on evidence. Prosecutor Ms. Moe then discusses Government Exhibit 52, arguing it demonstrates knowledge and intent because the listed individuals were obviously not 'real masseuses.'
DOJ-OGR-00014466.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (summation) filed on August 10, 2022, in the case USA v. Maxwell. Prosecutor Ms. Moe argues that the case centers on manipulation, money, and memory, highlighting how Maxwell groomed victims for Epstein. The text contrasts the small payments made to victim Carolyn (approx. $100) against the $30 million Maxwell received from Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00014464.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript of a summation delivered by Ms. Moe. She argues that crimes occurred within the Southern District of New York, citing evidence related to several counts, including trips to Manhattan by individuals named Jane and Annie, and Maxwell calling Carolyn to schedule 'sexualized massages' in New York.
DOJ-OGR-00014407.jpg
This document is page 7 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 10, 2022. The text captures the beginning of the closing arguments phase, where the Judge outlines the schedule: Ms. Moe will present for the government, followed by a lunch break, and then Ms. Menninger will present for the defense. The page concludes with the Judge introducing Ms. Moe to the jury.
DOJ-OGR-00005277.jpg
This is a court order issued by District Judge Alison J. Nathan on October 22, 2021, in the case of the United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order announces the attachment of the court's draft jury questionnaire and voir dire, noting that it includes changes from a proceeding on the previous day. It also mentions an additional question has been proposed due to the District's COVID-19 protocols.
DOJ-OGR-00005274.jpg
A court order filed on October 22, 2021, by Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 20-CR-330). The document outlines procedures for jury selection, including the administration of screening questionnaires in early November and the anonymization of jurors using assigned numbers. It mandates that the prosecution and defense confer to categorize prospective jurors into four lists regarding their eligibility for voir dire or excusal.
DOJ-OGR-00005273.jpg
This document is an email dated October 21, 2021, from reporter Pete Brush of Law360 to Judge Nathan of the Southern District of New York. On behalf of a coalition of reporters from various news outlets, Brush expresses support for the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press's arguments against secret jury selection and vetting in the upcoming trial of USA v. Maxwell. The email underscores the press corps' interest in maintaining transparency in the judicial process.
DOJ-OGR-00005268.jpg
A court order issued by Judge Alison J. Nathan on October 20, 2021, in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order sets the agenda for a telephone conference scheduled for the following day to discuss jury selection logistics and an unopposed request to seal the joint proposed juror questionnaire. The Judge also notes that the Court's draft questionnaire will be emailed to the parties immediately for discussion during the conference.
DOJ-OGR-00005266.jpg
This is a court order filed on October 19, 2021, by Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order schedules a telephone conference for October 21, 2021, to discuss jury selection, providing public dial-in numbers while noting a separate line for involved parties (counsel, defendant, victims, family). It also explicitly warns against recording or rebroadcasting the proceedings.
DOJ-OGR-00005265.jpg
This document is the second page of a legal filing from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York, dated October 18, 2021. In it, the Government, represented by U.S. Attorney Damian Williams and his assistants, formally requests the Court's permission to publicly file motions *in limine* with proposed redactions. The document confirms it was submitted respectfully and copied to the defense counsel.
DOJ-OGR-00005254.jpg
This is the final signature page (page 5) of a legal filing from the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York, filed on October 18, 2021 (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, Document 355). The text concludes an argument regarding jury selection (voir dire), stating that group discussion is safe and efficient. It is signed by U.S. Attorney Damian Williams and Assistant U.S. Attorneys Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach.
DOJ-OGR-00005245.jpg
This document is Page 3 of a legal filing in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN), dated October 15, 2021. It contains a submission by the US Attorney's office followed by a 'SO ORDERED' endorsement from the Judge (Alison J. Nathan). The Judge denies a specific order requested by the defense but establishes a firm expectation that Maxwell should receive legal mail within approximately one business day to ensure she can prepare for trial.
DOJ-OGR-00005240.jpg
This is the final page (page 4) of a legal filing by the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The Government argues against the defense's schedule regarding 'sensitive issues' and requests the Court maintain the October 18, 2021, deadline for Rule 412 motions (regarding admissibility of victim sexual history), or set a final deadline of October 25, 2021. The document is signed by Assistant US Attorneys Moe, Pomerantz, and Rohrbach under US Attorney Damian Williams.
DOJ-OGR-00005236.jpg
This is the signature page (page 3 of 3) for Document 350 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on October 15, 2021. The document is submitted by U.S. Attorney Damian Williams and signed by Assistant U.S. Attorneys Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach of the Southern District of New York. It indicates that Defense Counsel was copied via ECF.
DOJ-OGR-00005234.jpg
This document is a letter from the U.S. Government to Judge Alison J. Nathan, filed on October 15, 2021, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter responds to a court order regarding the delivery of the defendant's legal mail at the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC). The Government explains the standard procedures at the MDC, noting that mail from counsel is delivered within a business day, while mail from the Government sent via FedEx undergoes a more complex warehouse processing and logging system before reaching the inmate.
DOJ-OGR-00005233.jpg
This document is a court order issued on October 15, 2021, by U.S. District Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order acknowledges the court's receipt of a letter from the defendant concerning the delivery of her legal mail at the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC). The judge orders the Government to respond to the defendant's letter by 5:00 p.m. on the same day.
DOJ-OGR-00005232.jpg
This is a court order dated October 14, 2021, from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Judge Alison J. Nathan acknowledges receipt of a letter from the defendant regarding a motion under Federal Rule of Evidence 412 and orders the Government to respond by 5:00 p.m. on October 15, 2021.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity