DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
Federal Bureau of Investigation
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Loftus
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Dr. Loftus
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Attorney General
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
BOP
|
Organizational |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeff Sessions
|
Leadership |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
OLC
|
Advisory |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Andrew FINKELMAN
|
Liaison |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Cassell (Author)
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Attorney General
|
Authority |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
[Redacted Traveler]
|
Employee |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler P.A.
|
Investigator |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
D. JOHN SAUER
|
Employee |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
SSA [Redacted]
|
Liaison |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
United States Attorney's office
|
Limits plea agreements to |
1
|
1 | |
|
location
USANYS
|
Professional investigative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
John Ashcroft
|
Leadership |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
Southern District of Florida
|
Collaboration |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
NPA (Non-Prosecution Agreement)
|
Non involvement |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Andrew FINKELMAN
|
Professional liaison |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Lyeson Daniel
|
Employment alleged |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
William Barr
|
Professional |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
Southern District of New York
|
Institutional independence |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Redacted Traveler
|
Employee |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012-05-01 | N/A | Publication of the latest edition of Attorney General Guidelines for Victim and Witness Assistance. | US | View |
| 2011-01-01 | N/A | Department of Justice revised the 2005 Guidelines. | Department of Justice | View |
| 2011-01-01 | Guideline revision | The Department of Justice revised the 2005 Guidelines, adding language about victim consultation ... | N/A | View |
| 2010-01-01 | Guideline update process | The Department of Justice began an effort to update its 2005 Guidelines for the CVRA, which invol... | N/A | View |
| 2008-01-01 | Legal review | The Department of Justice reviewed the NPA on several occasions and confirmed the appropriateness... | Florida | View |
| 2007-09-24 | N/A | Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) between DOJ and Epstein. | Southern District of Florida | View |
| 2007-09-24 | N/A | Execution of the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). | Unknown | View |
| 2007-09-24 | N/A | Signing of Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement. | Unknown | View |
| 2007-09-24 | N/A | Department of Justice, through the USAO-SDFL, entered into a Nonprosecution Agreement (NPA) with ... | N/A | View |
| 2007-09-01 | N/A | Nonprosecution agreement concluded with Epstein (referenced as 'more than three months' after Jun... | US | View |
| 2007-01-01 | Negotiation | Start of negotiations for the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), which lasted for eight months. | N/A | View |
| 2006-05-01 | N/A | Launch of Project Safe Childhood. | Nationwide | View |
| 2005-01-01 | N/A | Department updated its Attorney General Guidelines for Victim and Witness Assistance to include t... | USA | View |
DOJ-OGR-00001610.jpg
This document is a legal waiver filed on July 10, 2020, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). In the document, Maxwell waives her right to be physically present at an upcoming court conference due to the COVID-19 pandemic, authorizing her attorney, Christian R. Everdell, to participate on her behalf. Everdell signs the document on Maxwell's behalf and affirms that he has discussed the waiver and her rights with her.
DOJ-OGR-00001603.jpg
This page from a defense filing (dated July 10, 2020) argues for Ghislaine Maxwell's release on bail. Her legal team contends that the government overstates her potential prison sentence (estimating 10 years rather than decades) and asserts the prosecution is legally flawed due to Epstein's 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement, statute of limitations issues regarding conduct from 1994-1997, and weak evidence based on decades-old testimony.
DOJ-OGR-00001575.jpg
This is page 13 of a federal indictment (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) filed on July 8, 2020, charging Ghislaine Maxwell. It details Count 16 regarding the conspiracy to transport minors for illegal sexual activity and lists 'Overt Acts' including Maxwell's participation in group sexual encounters with Jeffrey Epstein and 'Minor Victim-1' between 1994 and 1997 in New York and Florida.
DOJ-OGR-00001541.jpg
This document is page 2 of a court order filed on July 7, 2020, in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). It outlines strict COVID-19 entry protocols for the courthouse, instructions for defense counsel regarding the 'Waiver of Right to be Present' form, and mandates that the Government ensure crime victims are notified of proceedings and their rights under 18 U.S.C. § 3771.
DOJ-OGR-00001539.jpg
Page 2 of a court filing (Document 9) dated July 7, 2020, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The Assistant United States Attorneys (Rossmiller, Moe, Comey) inform Judge Nathan that they have conferred with defense counsel (Everdell and Cohen), who consent to a request regarding the timeline for discovery production.
DOJ-OGR-00001519.jpg
This document is the signature page of the Indictment filed against Ghislaine Maxwell on July 6, 2020, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. It lists the specific U.S. Code violations (conspiracy, perjury, coercion/enticement, transportation of minors) and bears the name of Acting U.S. Attorney Audrey Strauss.
DOJ-OGR-00001507.jpg
This document is page 6 (filed as page 9 of 13) of a court filing related to case 1:20-mj-03332-AJN. It lists and provides photographic exhibits of two real estate properties owned by Epstein: an estate in Palm Beach, Florida, and a ranch in Santa Fe, New Mexico.
DOJ-OGR-00001498.jpg
This document is the second page of a legal letter filed on July 5, 2020, in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330). The US Attorney's office requests Judge Nathan exclude time under the Speedy Trial Act to allow for the transportation of the defendant from another district and to facilitate discussions regarding a protective order to shield the identities of victims and third parties during discovery. Defense counsel consented to this request.
DOJ-OGR-00001472.jpg
This document appears to be page 6 of a court filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, filed June 29, 2020) related to the prosecution of Ghislaine Maxwell or associates. It formally identifies and provides photographic evidence of two properties owned by Jeffrey Epstein: an estate in Palm Beach, Florida, and a ranch in Santa Fe, New Mexico, labeling them as defined terms for the legal proceedings.
DOJ-OGR-00001465.jpg
This is a court order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit dated June 2, 2021. The court denied Ghislaine Maxwell's renewed motion for pretrial release and her alternative request for an evidentiary hearing regarding the conditions of her confinement. The order was issued by Judges Leval, Lohier, and Sullivan.
DOJ-OGR-00001342.jpg
This document is a Certificate of Compliance filed on April 12, 2021, as page 25 of a larger filing (Case 21-770). Assistant United States Attorney Lara Pomerantz certifies that the associated opposition brief complies with the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and contains 5,200 words. The document bears a Department of Justice footer stamp.
DOJ-OGR-00001267.jpg
This document is a legal memorandum written by French attorney William Julié on March 14, 2021, filed in the US v. Maxwell case. It argues against a French Ministry of Justice assertion, stating that France could legally extradite Ghislaine Maxwell if she renounces her French citizenship, which she stated she is prepared to do to secure bail. The memo aims to counter the argument that her French nationality creates an insurmountable flight risk due to non-extradition policies.
DOJ-OGR-00001234.jpg
This document is the introduction to Ghislaine Maxwell's memorandum supporting her third motion for bail, filed on February 23, 2021. In it, she proposes two new conditions to secure her release: renouncing her French and British citizenships to prevent extradition issues, and placing her and her spouse's assets into a monitored account overseen by a retired federal judge. She argues these measures address the Court's previous concerns about flight risk and extradition.
DOJ-OGR-00001153.jpg
This document is page 16 of a legal filing (Government's opposition) filed on December 18, 2020, in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The text argues against the defendant's 'Renewed Bail Application,' stating that the defense is reiterating arguments already rejected by the Court. The prosecution asserts the defendant remains a 'substantial actual risk of flight' and highlights the 'horrendous conduct' involving the sexual abuse of minors charged in the indictment.
DOJ-OGR-00001113.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing (Defense Motion) dated December 14, 2020, arguing that Ghislaine Maxwell is not a flight risk. It cites a letter from her spouse (whose name is redacted) describing their quiet domestic life in the U.S. and her character as 'wonderful and loving.' The text argues against the government's claim that she lived a 'transient' lifestyle and notes the impact of Jeffrey Epstein's 2019 arrest and death on her family.
DOJ-OGR-00000998.jpg
This document is page 14 of a government filing (Document 220) from July 13, 2020, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The text argues against granting bail, citing the defendant's vast financial resources, lack of ties to the US, and motivation to flee to a non-extradition country. It also specifically argues that the COVID-19 pandemic does not justify her release, citing precedent from other cases in the district.
DOJ-OGR-00000988.jpg
This page is from a government filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell) dated July 2, 2020, arguing for the defendant's detention pending trial. The government argues that despite COVID-19 concerns, the defendant should remain at the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) like other inmates, citing her significant assets, foreign ties, and history of evading detection as flight risks. The document also introduces an argument based on the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), noting that victims and their counsel have been contacted and seek her detention.
DOJ-OGR-00000985.jpg
This document is the cover page for the Government's Reply Memorandum in Support of Detention in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 20 Cr. 330). It was filed on July 13, 2020, in the Southern District of New York. The filing lists Acting US Attorney Audrey Strauss and Assistant US Attorneys Alison Moe, Alex Rossmiller, and Maurene Comey as counsel for the prosecution.
DOJ-OGR-00000984.jpg
This document serves as a cover sheet or separator page for Exhibit C within a legal filing for Case 21-770. It identifies the attached document as 'Doc. 22', titled 'The Government's Reply Memorandum in Support of Detention,' filed on April 1, 2021.
DOJ-OGR-00000980.jpg
This document is a legal defense filing arguing that Ms. Maxwell is not a flight risk because her potential prison sentence is likely only 10 years, contrary to the government's claims of "decades." It outlines significant legal challenges the defense intends to raise, including a prior non-prosecution agreement involving Epstein, statute of limitations issues, and the difficulty of prosecuting decades-old conduct.
DOJ-OGR-00000979.jpg
This document is page 18 of a defense motion (filed July 10, 2020) arguing for Ghislaine Maxwell's release on bail. The defense contends that Maxwell is not a flight risk, citing her decision to stay in the U.S. after Epstein's arrest, and argues that the government overstates the risk posed by the potential length of her sentence. The text cites various legal precedents (Friedman, Sabhnani) to support the claim that a long potential sentence alone is insufficient grounds for detention.
DOJ-OGR-00000955.jpg
This document is the conclusion page of a legal memorandum submitted by the United States Government on July 2, 2020, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The filing argues that the defendant poses an 'extreme risk of flight' and requests that any application for bail be denied, asserting that no conditions would assure the defendant's presence in court. It is signed by Assistant US Attorney Alison Moe on behalf of Acting US Attorney Audrey Strauss.
DOJ-OGR-00000937.jpg
This page is an excerpt from a legal filing dated April 1, 2021, arguing for Ghislaine Maxwell's release on bail. The defense contends that wealthy male defendants with foreign ties (listing specific examples like Madoff and Weinstein) were granted bail to prepare for trial, and Maxwell deserves the same treatment. It cites legal precedents stating that pretrial detention is an 'extraordinary remedy' reserved for limited cases.
DOJ-OGR-00000928.jpg
This page from a legal filing (dated April 1, 2021) argues for the temporary release of a defendant (likely Ghislaine Maxwell, based on the case number context) by citing legal precedents established during the COVID-19 pandemic. It references *United States v. Clark* and *United States v. Robertson* to establish that courts have granted release under 18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) when incarceration impedes the defendant's ability to prepare their defense. A footnote notes that the 10th Circuit stayed the release order in the *Robertson* case pending appeal.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity