Jeffrey S. Pagliuca
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Client |
48
Very Strong
|
120 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
21
Very Strong
|
26 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
73 | |
|
person
Laura A. Menninger
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Client |
9
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
ALISON J. NATHAN
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Laura A. Menninger
|
Business associate |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Professional |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
ALISON J. NATHAN
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
organization
HADDON, MORGAN & FOREMAN P.C.
|
Professional employment |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Counsel of record
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Haddon, Morgan & Foreman, P.C.
|
Professional employment membership |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MS. MENNINGER
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Nicole Simmons
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Nicole Simmons
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Nicole Simmons
|
Professional |
2
|
2 | |
|
organization
Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C.
|
Employment affiliation |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Potentially defense counsel |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-08-07 | N/A | Order Granting Motion to Withdraw | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2025-08-06 | Legal proceeding | A proposed order was filed granting the motion for attorneys Jeffrey S. Pagliuca and Laura A. Men... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2025-08-06 | Legal filing | The declaration regarding the change of counsel and withdrawal of HMF was dated and submitted. | N/A | View |
| 2025-08-05 | N/A | Attorneys Pagliuca and Menninger sign motion to withdraw as counsel. | Denver, CO (implied by sign... | View |
| 2022-06-15 | Legal filing | Document 662 was filed in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | N/A | View |
| 2022-06-15 | N/A | Filing of Sentencing Memorandum on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-03-11 | N/A | Filing of Reply Memorandum | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2022-03-11 | Court filing | Filing of "GHISLAINE MAXWELL’S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF HER MOTION FOR A NEW TRIAL". | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2022-03-11 | Legal filing | Filing of 'GHISLAINE MAXWELL’S MOTION FOR A NEW TRIAL' with the court. | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2022-03-11 | Legal filing | Filing of Document 642 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | N/A | View |
| 2022-03-02 | Legal filing | A document was filed with the court requesting a continuance. | N/A | View |
| 2022-02-24 | Legal filing | Document 616 was officially filed with the court in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | N/A | View |
| 2022-02-24 | Legal filing | Ghislaine Maxwell's attorneys filed a reply in support of her motion for a new trial. | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2022-02-24 | Legal filing | Document 612 was filed in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | Court associated with Case ... | View |
| 2022-02-24 | Legal filing | A motion for a new trial was filed on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell. | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2022-02-24 | Legal filing | Document 613-1 was filed in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | N/A | View |
| 2022-02-11 | N/A | Filing of legal motion seeking to vacate conviction and enter judgment of acquittal | New York, New York | View |
| 2022-02-11 | Legal filing | Filing of an Omnibus Memorandum in Support of Her Post-Trial Motions by Ghislaine Maxwell's attor... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2022-02-09 | Legal filing submission | A legal document was dated and submitted, requesting a new trial or an evidentiary hearing to exa... | N/A | View |
| 2022-02-09 | N/A | Submission of legal motion requesting a new trial or an evidentiary hearing to examine jurors. | New York (Southern District... | View |
| 2022-01-05 | Legal filing | Filing of a letter by Jeffrey S. Pagliuca to Judge Nathan in the case of United States v. Ghislai... | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2021-12-29 | Jury trial | Jury Trial for the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell, Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE,... | New York, N.Y. | View |
| 2021-12-28 | Jury trial | Court proceedings for the jury trial in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2021-12-27 | Jury trial | Jury Trial for the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell, Case 20 CR 330 (AJN). | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2021-12-22 | N/A | Jury Trial proceedings in USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell | New York, N.Y. | View |
EFTA00015303.pdf
This document is a legal memorandum filed on January 25, 2021, by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team in the Southern District of New York. The motion seeks to suppress evidence obtained via a grand jury subpoena issued to a third party (name redacted) and to dismiss Counts Five and Six of the indictment. The defense argues that the subpoena violated the Fourth Amendment due to overbreadth and lack of a warrant, violated the 'Martindell' doctrine regarding the sanctity of protective orders in civil litigation, and infringed upon Maxwell's Fifth Amendment rights against self-incrimination regarding her 2016 civil deposition testimony.
EFTA00014982.pdf
Legal correspondence from Ghislaine Maxwell's defense attorney, Jeffrey Pagliuca, to the US Attorney's Office regarding objections to hearsay statements. The defense objects to statements made by Epstein to employees (specifically CC-1) about Maxwell 'finding girls' and instructions regarding computer removal, arguing these occurred post-conspiracy and constitute 'idle chatter' rather than furtherance of a conspiracy. The letter also addresses the scope of 'minor victims' referenced in the indictment versus those in Florida investigations.
EFTA00011115.pdf
This document is a legal memorandum filed on October 13, 2021, by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team in the Southern District of New York. The defense argues that due to 'tsunami' of negative pretrial publicity surrounding Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein (including books, podcasts, and documentaries), standard jury selection is insufficient. They request the Court allow individual sequestered voir dire and limited attorney-conducted questioning to identify and remove biased jurors.
EFTA00011096.pdf
This document is a legal memorandum filed on October 13, 2021, by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team in the Southern District of New York. The defense argues for individual sequestered voir dire (jury selection questioning) and permission for attorneys to conduct limited questioning of jurors, citing 'tsunami' levels of negative pretrial publicity and the inflammatory nature of the sexual abuse charges. The motion lists numerous documentaries, podcasts, and books as evidence of prejudicial media coverage that allegedly demonizes Maxwell and links her inextricably to Jeffrey Epstein's crimes.
EFTA00010224.pdf
This document is a subpoena issued by the defense team of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case No. 20CR330) to an undisclosed recipient (likely an administrator of the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program). The subpoena demands the production of materials submitted by accusers to the EVCP, including claim forms, communications, payment records, and releases. Attached to the subpoena is the 'Independent Epstein Victims' Compensation Program Protocol' (dated May 29, 2020), which details the rules, eligibility requirements, and procedures for victims seeking compensation from the Epstein Estate, noting that the program is voluntary, independent, and confidential.
EFTA00010045.pdf
This document is a subpoena issued by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team in November 2021, commanding the production of records from the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program (EVCP). The subpoena seeks all materials submitted by accusers, communications between the EVCP and accusers, records of payments, and executed releases. Attached to the subpoena is the 'Protocol' for the EVCP dated May 29, 2020, which outlines the independent program's purpose, eligibility requirements, claims administration process, and confidentiality rules for compensating victims of Jeffrey Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00018338.jpg
This document is the cover page for a court transcript from the jury trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, held on December 6, 2021, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. It identifies the case number (20 CR 330), the presiding judge (Hon. Alison J. Nathan), and lists the legal counsel for both the prosecution (United States of America) and the defense. The document also notes other individuals present, including representatives from the FBI and NYPD.
DOJ-OGR-00018102.jpg
This document is the cover page of the official court transcript for the jury trial of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated December 3, 2021. It lists the presiding judge, Hon. Alison J. Nathan, and details the appearances of the legal teams for both the prosecution (led by Damian Williams) and the defense (including Haddon Morgan and Foreman attorneys), as well as the presence of FBI and NYPD representatives.
DOJ-OGR-00017874.jpg
This document is the cover page for the court transcript of the jury trial in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell, case number 20 CR 330 (AJN). The proceedings took place on December 2, 2021, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, with Judge Alison J. Nathan presiding. The document lists the appearances of the legal counsel for both the prosecution and the defense, as well as other individuals present.
DOJ-OGR-00017610.jpg
This document is the first page of a court record for the jury trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on August 10, 2022. It details the appearances for the trial held on December 1, 2021, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, listing the presiding judge, legal teams for both the prosecution and defense, and other law enforcement and paralegal personnel present.
DOJ-OGR-00015130.jpg
Court order from the Southern District of New York (Case 20-CR-330) signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer. The order grants the motion for attorneys Jeffrey S. Pagliuca and Laura A. Menninger of Haddon, Morgan & Foreman, P.C. to withdraw as co-counsel for defendant Ghislaine Maxwell. The document is dated August 7, 2025.
DOJ-OGR-00015126.jpg
This document is a proposed court order from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, filed on August 6, 2025, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order, to be signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer, grants the motion for attorneys Jeffrey S. Pagliuca and Laura A. Menninger of the law firm Haddon, Morgan & Foreman, P.C. to withdraw as co-counsel for the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00015125.jpg
This legal document, dated August 6, 2025, is a declaration from the law firm HMF (represented by attorneys Jeffrey S. Pagliuca and Laura A. Menninger) regarding their withdrawal as counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell. The document confirms that Maxwell has retained new counsel, David Markus and Melissa Madrigal of Markus Moss PLLC, to handle a government motion to unseal grand jury transcripts. It also states that Maxwell consents to HMF's withdrawal and that HMF will share its case files with the new firm.
DOJ-OGR-00015123.jpg
This document is a Notice of Motion filed on August 6, 2025, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York (Case 20 Cr. 330). Attorneys Jeffrey S. Pagliuca and Laura A. Menninger of the firm Haddon, Morgan & Foreman, P.C. are formally requesting a court order to withdraw as co-counsel for the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00014877.jpg
This document is the title page of a court transcript for a hearing held on November 10, 2021, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 20-cr-330) in the Southern District of New York. It lists Judge Alison J. Nathan as presiding and details the legal appearances for both the prosecution (U.S. Attorney's Office) and the defense (Haddon Morgan and Foreman).
DOJ-OGR-00008435.jpg
This document is the signature page (page 5 of 5) of a legal filing dated December 15, 2021, addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case regarding Ghislaine Maxwell. It lists the contact information and signatures of Maxwell's defense attorneys: Jeffrey S. Pagliuca, Laura A. Menninger, Christian R. Everdell, and Bobbi C. Sternheim.
DOJ-OGR-00008431.jpg
This legal document is a letter dated December 15, 2021, from defense attorney Jeffrey S. Pagliuca to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter is a response to the government's motion to prevent a witness, Alexander Hamilton, from testifying about four specific topics related to an individual named 'Kate'. The defense argues that providing Hamilton's declaration to the government under Rule 26.2 does not obligate them to introduce all of its contents as evidence.
DOJ-OGR-00008427.jpg
This document is the third and final page of a legal filing (Document 553) in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, dated December 15, 2021, and filed on December 17, 2021. It serves as the signature page for a letter or motion addressed to The Honorable Alison J. Nathan from the legal team representing Ghislaine Maxwell, including attorneys Jeffrey S. Pagliuca, Laura A. Menninger, Christian R. Everdell, and Bobbi C. Sternheim. The document also indicates that a copy was sent via email to the counsel of record.
DOJ-OGR-00008425.jpg
This is a legal letter dated December 16, 2021, from attorney Jeffrey S. Pagliuca to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter presents legal arguments concerning the impeachment of witnesses using inconsistent statements and '3500 material' (Jencks Act disclosures), citing specific case law to support the defense's procedural approach.
DOJ-OGR-00008372.jpg
This document is the final page of a legal filing (Document 544) from December 13, 2021, addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan. Attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell assert her constitutional right to call Mr. Scarola, Mr. Edwards, and Mr. Glassman as witnesses. The page includes the contact information for her legal counsel from three different law firms.
DOJ-OGR-00008364.jpg
A letter dated December 13, 2021, from defense attorney Jeffrey S. Pagliuca to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter informs the court of the defense's intention to question attorneys Jack Scarola, Brad Edwards, and Robert Glassman and argues that these questions do not violate attorney-client privilege. The document cites legal precedents regarding the burden of proof for privilege claims.
DOJ-OGR-00008311.jpg
This document is the cover page for a court hearing transcript from the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell in the Southern District of New York. The hearing took place on November 23, 2021, before District Judge Alison J. Nathan. The page lists the appearances of the legal counsel for both the prosecution, led by U.S. Attorney Damian Williams, and the defense team for Ms. Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00008284.jpg
This document is an appearances page from a legal filing in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on December 9, 2021. It lists the names, roles, and affiliations of the attorneys and a paralegal representing the Plaintiff, and the attorneys representing the Defendant. A videographer is also noted as being present for the proceedings.
DOJ-OGR-00008245.jpg
This document is the cover page of a court transcript for a conference in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, held on November 15, 2021, in the Southern District of New York. It lists the presiding judge, Hon. Alison J. Nathan, and the legal counsel appearing for both the prosecution and the defense.
DOJ-OGR-00008225.jpg
This document is a legal letter dated December 5, 2021, from defense attorney Jeffrey S. Pagliuca to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The defense objects to the government's attempt to introduce the '900 series' of photographs of Jeffrey Epstein's New York apartment taken in 2019, arguing they have not been authenticated as accurately representing the apartment during the relevant timeframe of 1994-1996. The letter urges the court to reaffirm its previous ruling from December 3 excluding the photos based on Rules 401 and 403.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-06-29 | Paid | Jeffrey S. Pagliuca | United States Dis... | $75.00 | Admission fee for pro hac vice appearance | View |
Contact Information
Email: jpagliuca@hmflaw.com, Phone: 303.831.7364, Fax: 303.832.2628
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN
Email address jpagliuca@hmflaw.com provided for Jeffrey S. Pagliuca, lead attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Maxw...
A request from Ghislaine Maxwell's counsel to postpone a court hearing because her legal team is unavailable due to scheduling conflicts with other trials.
Request for adjournment
Maxwell's Request for adjournment of hearing on Motion for New Trial.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
A letter arguing against the government's request for a hearing regarding a juror's statements, asserting that the court can and should order a new trial based on existing information.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Legal argument regarding witness impeachment, inconsistent statements, and the '3500 material' (Jencks Act material).
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
A letter from Ghislaine Maxwell's defense attorney to the presiding judge, responding to the government's motion to preclude certain testimony by a potential witness, Alexander Hamilton, concerning an individual named Kate.
Jack Scarola, Brad Edwards and Robert Glassman
Letter with attachments filed under seal.
Jack Scarola, Brad Edwards and Robert Glassman
Letter regarding Scarola, Edwards, and Glassman with attachments filed under seal.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Defense counsel alerting the court regarding questions to be asked of attorneys Scarola, Edwards, and Glassman, arguing these questions do not violate attorney-client privilege.
Exhibit 52
Letter regarding Exhibit 52.
Exhibit 52
Letter regarding Exhibit 52.
Exhibit 52
Letter regarding Exhibit 52 filed by Ghislaine Maxwell
Response to the Government's Letter Regarding 900 Series ...
Letter filed by defense regarding exhibits.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Defense response to government's letter regarding the admissibility of the '900 series photos'.
Response to the Government's Letter Regarding 900 Series ...
Letter regarding exhibits filed by defense.
Witness Jane's Testimony
Filed Under Seal
Fed. R. Crim. P. 16(b)(1)(A)
Regarding Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.
Pseudonyms
Regarding Pseudonyms.
Pseudonyms
Letter by Ghislaine Maxwell regarding Pseudonyms
Fed. R. Crim. P. 16(b)(1)(A)
Letter regarding Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure
Court's Proposed Preliminary Instructions to the Jury
Letter regarding jury instructions
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell - Objections to Proffe...
Defense counsel objects to the admission of certain hearsay statements by Epstein and co-conspirators, arguing they are outside the scope or timeframe of the alleged conspiracy.
Fed. R. Evid. 412 and 702 Motions Hearing Date
Joint letter regarding scheduling of motions hearing.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity