Jeffrey S. Pagliuca
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Client |
48
Very Strong
|
120 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
21
Very Strong
|
26 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
73 | |
|
person
Laura A. Menninger
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Client |
9
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
ALISON J. NATHAN
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Laura A. Menninger
|
Business associate |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Professional |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
ALISON J. NATHAN
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
organization
HADDON, MORGAN & FOREMAN P.C.
|
Professional employment |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Counsel of record
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Haddon, Morgan & Foreman, P.C.
|
Professional employment membership |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MS. MENNINGER
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Nicole Simmons
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Nicole Simmons
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Nicole Simmons
|
Professional |
2
|
2 | |
|
organization
Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C.
|
Employment affiliation |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Potentially defense counsel |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-08-07 | N/A | Order Granting Motion to Withdraw | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2025-08-06 | Legal proceeding | A proposed order was filed granting the motion for attorneys Jeffrey S. Pagliuca and Laura A. Men... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2025-08-06 | Legal filing | The declaration regarding the change of counsel and withdrawal of HMF was dated and submitted. | N/A | View |
| 2025-08-05 | N/A | Attorneys Pagliuca and Menninger sign motion to withdraw as counsel. | Denver, CO (implied by sign... | View |
| 2022-06-15 | Legal filing | Document 662 was filed in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | N/A | View |
| 2022-06-15 | N/A | Filing of Sentencing Memorandum on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-03-11 | N/A | Filing of Reply Memorandum | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2022-03-11 | Court filing | Filing of "GHISLAINE MAXWELL’S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF HER MOTION FOR A NEW TRIAL". | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2022-03-11 | Legal filing | Filing of 'GHISLAINE MAXWELL’S MOTION FOR A NEW TRIAL' with the court. | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2022-03-11 | Legal filing | Filing of Document 642 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | N/A | View |
| 2022-03-02 | Legal filing | A document was filed with the court requesting a continuance. | N/A | View |
| 2022-02-24 | Legal filing | Document 616 was officially filed with the court in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | N/A | View |
| 2022-02-24 | Legal filing | Ghislaine Maxwell's attorneys filed a reply in support of her motion for a new trial. | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2022-02-24 | Legal filing | Document 612 was filed in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | Court associated with Case ... | View |
| 2022-02-24 | Legal filing | A motion for a new trial was filed on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell. | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2022-02-24 | Legal filing | Document 613-1 was filed in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | N/A | View |
| 2022-02-11 | N/A | Filing of legal motion seeking to vacate conviction and enter judgment of acquittal | New York, New York | View |
| 2022-02-11 | Legal filing | Filing of an Omnibus Memorandum in Support of Her Post-Trial Motions by Ghislaine Maxwell's attor... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2022-02-09 | Legal filing submission | A legal document was dated and submitted, requesting a new trial or an evidentiary hearing to exa... | N/A | View |
| 2022-02-09 | N/A | Submission of legal motion requesting a new trial or an evidentiary hearing to examine jurors. | New York (Southern District... | View |
| 2022-01-05 | Legal filing | Filing of a letter by Jeffrey S. Pagliuca to Judge Nathan in the case of United States v. Ghislai... | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2021-12-29 | Jury trial | Jury Trial for the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell, Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE,... | New York, N.Y. | View |
| 2021-12-28 | Jury trial | Court proceedings for the jury trial in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2021-12-27 | Jury trial | Jury Trial for the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell, Case 20 CR 330 (AJN). | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2021-12-22 | N/A | Jury Trial proceedings in USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell | New York, N.Y. | View |
DOJ-OGR-00008210.jpg
This document is the signature page (page 5 of 5) of a legal filing, Document 521, in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, dated December 3, 2021. It is respectfully submitted to The Honorable Alison J. Nathan by the legal team representing Ghislaine Maxwell, which includes attorneys Jeffrey S. Pagliuca, Laura A. Menninger, Christian R. Everdell, and Bobbi C. Sternheim from three different law firms.
DOJ-OGR-00001878.jpg
This document is the cover page for the court transcript of an arraignment and bail hearing for Ghislaine Maxwell, held via teleconference on July 14, 2020. The case, United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell, was heard in the Southern District of New York before District Judge Alison J. Nathan. The page lists the legal counsel appearing for both the prosecution, led by U.S. Attorney Audrey Strauss, and the defense, represented by attorneys from the law firms Cohen & Gresser, LLP and Haddon Morgan & Foreman, P.C.
DOJ-OGR-00001770.jpg
This document is the signature page from a legal filing in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, dated September 4, 2020. It identifies Laura A. Menninger and Jeffrey S. Pagliuca of the law firm Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C. as the attorneys representing Ghislaine Maxwell. The document includes the law firm's address in Denver, CO, and contact information for the attorneys.
DOJ-OGR-00001768.jpg
This legal document is a letter dated August 24, 2020, from Jeffrey S. Pagliuca to Judge Alison J. Nathan. Pagliuca argues on behalf of his client, Ms. Maxwell, for a limited request to present sealed materials to other judicial officers, asserting that the materials are judicial documents and that disclosure would not compromise grand jury secrecy. The letter contends that the government has failed to provide a sufficient reason to prevent this limited disclosure.
DOJ-OGR-00001762.jpg
This is the signature page (page 3 of 3) of a legal document submitted by Jeffrey S. Pagliuca to The Honorable Alison J. Nathan on August 24, 2020. The document is part of case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN and was officially filed on September 8, 2020. A copy was also sent via email to the Counsel of Record.
DOJ-OGR-00001759.jpg
This document is the final page of a letter motion dated August 17, 2020, from Jeffrey S. Pagliuca to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The motion, filed on September 2, 2020, formally requests on behalf of Ms. Maxwell that the court modify an existing Protective Order. The modification would permit Ms. Maxwell to refer to and file specific, redacted material under seal.
DOJ-OGR-00001641.jpg
This document is the final signature page (page 7 of 7) of a legal filing dated July 21, 2020, for Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It is submitted by attorney Jeffrey S. Pagliuca to Judge Alison J. Nathan, with copies sent to prosecutors at the SDNY (Moe, Rossmiller, Comey) and other defense counsel (Cohen, Everdell, Menninger).
DOJ-OGR-00001581.jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal filing, specifically a memorandum submitted on behalf of defendant Ghislaine Maxwell. Filed on July 10, 2020, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, the document outlines Maxwell's opposition to the government's motion for her detention. The filing lists her legal counsel from the law firms COHEN & GRESSER LLP and HADDON, MORGAN & FORMAN P.C.
DOJ-OGR-00001559.jpg
This is a court order from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, filed on July 8, 2020, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (20-CR-330-AJN). The order grants the motion for attorney Jeffrey S. Pagliuca of Colorado to be admitted 'pro hac vice', allowing him to represent the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell, in this specific case.
DOJ-OGR-00001557.jpg
This document is a Certificate of Service filed on July 8, 2020, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. Nicole Simmons certifies the electronic service of the 'Declaration of Jeffrey S. Pagliuca in Support of Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice' to three attorneys at the U.S. Attorney's Office in the Southern District of New York: Alex Rossmiller, Alison Moe, and Maurene Comey.
DOJ-OGR-00001554.jpg
This document is a court order from the Southern District of New York, filed on July 8, 2020, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 20-CR-330-AJN). The order grants the motion for Jeffrey S. Pagliuca of the Colorado law firm Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C. to appear and practice pro hac vice as counsel for the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell. The document lists Pagliuca's contact information and confirms his good standing with the Colorado bar.
DOJ-OGR-00001552.jpg
This document is a Certificate of Service filed on July 8, 2020, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (related to Ghislaine Maxwell). Nicole Simmons certifies that she electronically served a Declaration by attorney Jeffrey S. Pagliuca, regarding his admission Pro Hac Vice, to Assistant US Attorneys Alex Rossmiller, Alison Moe, and Maurene Comey at the SDNY.
DOJ-OGR-00001551.jpg
This document is a legal declaration filed on July 8, 2020, by attorney Jeffrey S. Pagliuca in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell in the Southern District of New York. Pagliuca, licensed in Colorado and a member of Haddon, Morgan & Foreman, P.C., submits this declaration to support his motion for admission Pro Hac Vice. He affirms under penalty of perjury that he has no felony convictions, disciplinary actions, or denials of admission by any court.
DOJ-OGR-00001265.jpg
This document is the conclusion page of a legal motion filed on March 16, 2021, requesting bail for Ghislaine Maxwell. It lists her defense team (Sternheim, Everdell, Pagliuca, Menninger) and includes a significant footnote detailing complaints about her confinement at the MDC. Specifically, the footnote alleges violations of attorney-client privilege during video conferences due to guard proximity and audio recording, as well as a denial of legal calls regarding pretrial motions.
DOJ-OGR-00001255.jpg
This is the cover page for a legal filing in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 20 Cr. 330). The document is a Reply Memorandum supporting Maxwell's third motion for bail, filed on March 22, 2021. It lists the defense legal team, including attorneys from firms in New York and Denver.
DOJ-OGR-00001241.jpg
This document is the conclusion of a legal filing, dated February 23, 2021, submitted by the legal team of Ghislaine Maxwell. The attorneys argue that proposed restrictive bail conditions, including renunciation of foreign citizenship and asset monitoring, are sufficient to ensure her appearance at trial. They conclude that denying bail under these circumstances would constitute a miscarriage of justice.
DOJ-OGR-00001233.jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal memorandum filed on February 23, 2021, in the Southern District of New York (Case 20 Cr. 330). It supports Ghislaine Maxwell's third motion for release on bail. The document lists the defense legal team, including Bobbi C. Sternheim, Christian R. Everdell, Jeffrey S. Pagliuca, and Laura A. Menninger.
DOJ-OGR-00001200.jpg
This document is the signature page of a legal filing dated December 18, 2020. It lists the attorneys and their respective law firms representing Ghislaine Maxwell, including Mark S. Cohen of COHEN & GRESSER LLP, who signed the document.
DOJ-OGR-00001186.jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal filing in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, dated June 23, 2020. It is a 'Reply Memorandum of Ghislaine Maxwell in Support of Her Renewed Motion for Bail' for the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The document lists the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell, and her legal counsel from three different law firms.
DOJ-OGR-00001141.jpg
This document is the final signature page (page 39 of the brief, page 45 of the PDF filing) of a legal motion filed on December 4, 2020, in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The text concludes an argument requesting the Court order Maxwell's release on bail based on proposed conditions. It lists the defense counsel team from three different law firms: Cohen & Gresser LLP, Haddon, Morgan & Foreman P.C., and the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim.
DOJ-OGR-00001097.jpg
This document is the cover page of a legal filing in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell, case number 20 Cr. 330 (AJN), in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. Filed on June 23, 2021, it is a memorandum submitted by Maxwell's legal team in support of her renewed motion for bail. The document lists her attorneys from three different law firms.
DOJ-OGR-00000889.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet for the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, detailing legal filings from September to November 2020. It chronicles a series of letters, motions, and orders between the prosecution (USA, represented by AUSAs Comey, Moe, and Pomerantz) and the defense (Ghislaine Maxwell, represented by attorneys including Sternheim, Everdell, and Pagliuca), all overseen by Judge Alison J. Nathan. The filings primarily concern procedural matters such as requests to delay disclosure of evidence, modify protective orders, and confirm the government's disclosure obligations.
DOJ-OGR-00000888.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket (Case 21-770) listing filings and orders between August 18, 2020, and September 8, 2020, in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It records legal maneuvers including attorney appearances, sealed documents, letter motions regarding redactions and protective orders, and a Memorandum Opinion denying defense requests for victim identities and changes to confinement conditions. The page concludes with a notice of appeal filed by Maxwell regarding a previous memorandum and opinion.
DOJ-OGR-00000887.jpg
This document is a page from the court docket in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering a period in August 2020. It details a judicial order denying a broad defense request regarding witness privacy and discovery materials, followed by a log of subsequent legal filings (motions, affidavits, and endorsements) between the defense team (Everdell, Pagliuca) and the prosecution (Rossmiller) regarding discovery disclosure and protective orders.
DOJ-OGR-00000879.jpg
This document is a criminal docket sheet from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York for the case USA v. Maxwell (1:20-cr-00330-AJN), filed on June 29, 2020. It identifies Ghislaine Maxwell as the defendant and lists her legal counsel, including five attorneys from various law firms in New York and Denver. The case was assigned to Judge Alison J. Nathan.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-06-29 | Paid | Jeffrey S. Pagliuca | United States Dis... | $75.00 | Admission fee for pro hac vice appearance | View |
Contact Information
Email: jpagliuca@hmflaw.com, Phone: 303.831.7364, Fax: 303.832.2628
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN
Email address jpagliuca@hmflaw.com provided for Jeffrey S. Pagliuca, lead attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Maxw...
A request from Ghislaine Maxwell's counsel to postpone a court hearing because her legal team is unavailable due to scheduling conflicts with other trials.
Request for adjournment
Maxwell's Request for adjournment of hearing on Motion for New Trial.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
A letter arguing against the government's request for a hearing regarding a juror's statements, asserting that the court can and should order a new trial based on existing information.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Legal argument regarding witness impeachment, inconsistent statements, and the '3500 material' (Jencks Act material).
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
A letter from Ghislaine Maxwell's defense attorney to the presiding judge, responding to the government's motion to preclude certain testimony by a potential witness, Alexander Hamilton, concerning an individual named Kate.
Jack Scarola, Brad Edwards and Robert Glassman
Letter with attachments filed under seal.
Jack Scarola, Brad Edwards and Robert Glassman
Letter regarding Scarola, Edwards, and Glassman with attachments filed under seal.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Defense counsel alerting the court regarding questions to be asked of attorneys Scarola, Edwards, and Glassman, arguing these questions do not violate attorney-client privilege.
Exhibit 52
Letter regarding Exhibit 52.
Exhibit 52
Letter regarding Exhibit 52.
Exhibit 52
Letter regarding Exhibit 52 filed by Ghislaine Maxwell
Response to the Government's Letter Regarding 900 Series ...
Letter filed by defense regarding exhibits.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Defense response to government's letter regarding the admissibility of the '900 series photos'.
Response to the Government's Letter Regarding 900 Series ...
Letter regarding exhibits filed by defense.
Witness Jane's Testimony
Filed Under Seal
Fed. R. Crim. P. 16(b)(1)(A)
Regarding Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.
Pseudonyms
Regarding Pseudonyms.
Pseudonyms
Letter by Ghislaine Maxwell regarding Pseudonyms
Fed. R. Crim. P. 16(b)(1)(A)
Letter regarding Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure
Court's Proposed Preliminary Instructions to the Jury
Letter regarding jury instructions
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell - Objections to Proffe...
Defense counsel objects to the admission of certain hearsay statements by Epstein and co-conspirators, arguing they are outside the scope or timeframe of the alleged conspiracy.
Fed. R. Evid. 412 and 702 Motions Hearing Date
Joint letter regarding scheduling of motions hearing.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity