DOJ-OGR-00020459.jpg
1.32 MB
Extraction Summary
13
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
4
Events
3
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court docket / litigation log
File Size:
1.32 MB
Summary
This document is a court docket sheet from the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering entries from December 12 to December 16, 2021. It details various legal filings including letters regarding witness lists, privilege stipulations, and expert testimony, as well as orders from Judge Alison J. Nathan denying defense motions for witness anonymity and setting deadlines for responses regarding witnesses Dr. Loftus and Alexander Hamilton. The document also references the placement of sealed documents in a vault.
People (13)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant |
Subject of the court orders and letters.
|
| Alison J. Nathan | Judge |
Presiding judge issuing orders and receiving letters.
|
| Bobbi C. Sternheim | Defense Attorney |
Author of letters on behalf of Maxwell regarding witnesses and expert testimony.
|
| Maurene Comey | AUSA (Prosecutor) |
Author of letters on behalf of USA.
|
| Alison Moe | AUSA (Prosecutor) |
Author of letters on behalf of USA.
|
| Lara Pomerantz | AUSA (Prosecutor) |
Author of letters on behalf of USA.
|
| Andrew Rohrbach | AUSA (Prosecutor) |
Author of letters on behalf of USA.
|
| Jeffrey S. Pagliuca | Defense Attorney |
Author of letter regarding Scarola, Edwards, and Glassman.
|
| Jack Scarola | Mentioned individual |
Subject of a letter from Jeffrey Pagliuca.
|
| Brad Edwards | Mentioned individual |
Subject of a letter from Jeffrey Pagliuca.
|
| Robert Glassman | Mentioned individual |
Subject of a letter from Jeffrey Pagliuca.
|
| Dr. Loftus | Witness |
Subject of a motion to preclude testimony; deadline set for response.
|
| Alexander Hamilton | Witness |
Subject of a motion to preclude testimony; deadline set for response.
|
Timeline (4 events)
12/14/2021
ORDER regarding anticipated witnesses. Deadlines set for Government response and Defense witness list.
Court
Judge Alison J. Nathan
Government
Defense
12/15/2021
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER denying Defense motion to permit three anticipated witnesses to testify under pseudonym.
Court
Judge Alison J. Nathan
Ghislaine Maxwell
12/15/2021
ORDER regarding Government's motion to preclude certain testimony. Deadlines set for responses regarding Dr. Loftus and Alexander Hamilton.
Court
Relationships (3)
Letter by Ghislaine Maxwell... from Bobbi C. Sternheim
Letter by Ghislaine Maxwell... from Jeffrey S. Pagliuca
ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell... Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan
Key Quotes (4)
"The Defense's primary contention is that some form of anonymity for its witnesses is justified by the same reasons that the Court permitted three alleged victims and two related government witnesses to testify under pseudonyms. The Court disagrees with this basic premise and denies the Defense's motion."Source
DOJ-OGR-00020459.jpg
Quote #1
"See, e.g., Smith v. Illinois, 390 U.S. 129, 133 (1968) (emphasizing that even when anonymity is not warranted, the court has a duty to protect a witness 'from questions which go beyond the bounds of proper cross-examination merely to harass, annoy or humiliate him')."Source
DOJ-OGR-00020459.jpg
Quote #2
"A response to the motion with respect to Dr. Loftus by today, December 15, 2021, at 7:45 p.m."Source
DOJ-OGR-00020459.jpg
Quote #3
"A response to the motion with respect to Alexander Hamilton by tomorrow, December 16, 2021, at 7:00 a.m."Source
DOJ-OGR-00020459.jpg
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (4,389 characters)
Case 22-1426, Document 1-2, 07/08/2022, 3344417, Page73 of 91
(Rohrbach, Andrew) (Entered: 12/12/2021)
12/12/2021 | 540 | LETTER by Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Bobbi C. Sternheim dated 12/12/2021 re: Order of Defense Witnesses (Sternheim, Bobbi) (Entered: 12/12/2021)
12/13/2021 | 541 | LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated December 13, 2021 re: Privilege stipulation Document filed by USA. (Rohrbach, Andrew) (Entered: 12/13/2021)
12/14/2021 | 542 | ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell. The Court is in receipt of the Defense's letter dated December 13, 2021, regarding anticipated witnesses. The Government is ORDERED to submit a response no later than today, December 14, 2021, at 10:00 p.m. The Defense is FURTHER ORDERED to provide a copy of its anticipated witness order to the Court no later than today, December 14, 2021, at 12:00 p.m. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 12/14/2021)(bw) (Entered: 12/14/2021)
12/14/2021 | 543 | SEALED DOCUMENT placed in vault. (jus) (Entered: 12/14/2021)
12/14/2021 | 544 | LETTER by Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Jeffrey S. Pagliuca dated December 13, 2021 re: Jack Scarola, Brad Edwards and Robert Glassman (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 (Filed Under Seal))(Pagliuca, Jeffrey) (Entered: 12/15/2021)
12/15/2021 | 545 | LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated December 14, 2021 re: Testimony from Victim Counsel Document filed by USA. (Rohrbach, Andrew) (Entered: 12/15/2021)
12/15/2021 | 546 | LETTER MOTION addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated December 15, 2021 re: Proposed redactions to Privilege Letters. Document filed by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell. (Rohrbach, Andrew) (Entered: 12/15/2021)
12/15/2021 | 547 | LETTER by Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Bobbi C. Sternheim dated 12/15/2021 re: Opposition to restriction on expert testimony (Sternheim, Bobbi) (Entered: 12/15/2021)
12/15/2021 | 548 | MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell. The Defense on December 12, 2021, moved to permit three anticipated witnesses to testify under a pseudonym or their first names only. The Government filed a letter opposing this request on December 14, 2021. The Defense's primary contention is that some form of anonymity for its witnesses is justified by the same reasons that the Court permitted three alleged victims and two related government witnesses to testify under pseudonyms. The Court disagrees with this basic premise and denies the Defense's motion....[*** See this Memorandum Opinion & Order ***]... Last, the Court emphasizes that while it currently denies the Defense's motion, the Defense may of course raise, and the Court will consider, objections that particular lines of questioning into witnesses' backgrounds or lives are irrelevant, cumulative, intended to harass, or otherwise inappropriate. See, e.g., Smith v. Illinois, 390 U.S. 129, 133 (1968) (emphasizing that even when anonymity is not warranted, the court has a duty to protect a witness "from questions which go beyond the bounds of proper cross-examination merely to harass, annoy or humiliate him"). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 12/15/2021)(bw) (Entered: 12/16/2021)
12/15/2021 | 694 | ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell. The Court is in receipt of the Government's motion to preclude certain testimony of defense witnesses, dated December 15, 2021. The Defense is ORDERED to submit a response as follows: - A response to the motion with respect to Dr. Loftus by today, December 15, 2021, at 7:45 p.m. - A response to the motion with respect to Alexander Hamilton by tomorrow, December 16, 2021, at 7:00 a.m. - A response to the motion with respect to the other anticipated witnesses by tomorrow, December 16, 2021, at 5:00 p.m. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 12/15/2021)(bw) (Entered: 06/29/2022)
12/16/2021 | 551 | ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell: The Court is in receipt of the parties' joint letter regarding the admission of prior inconsistent statements. The parties' letter notes "that
DOJ-OGR-00020459
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document