Jeffrey S. Pagliuca

Person

Mentions

647

Relationships

Events

128

Documents

317

Also known as:

Jeffrey S. Pagliuca, Esq.

Relationship Network

Network Depth

Loading... nodes

Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.

19 total relationships

Sort by:

Connected Entity	Relationship Type	Strength (mentions)	Documents	Actions
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL	Client	48 Very Strong	120	View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL	Legal representative	21 Very Strong	26	View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL	Professional	10 Very Strong	73	View
person Laura A. Menninger	Professional	10 Very Strong	8	View
person Ms. Maxwell	Client	9 Strong	3	View
person ALISON J. NATHAN	Legal representative	7	3	View
person Laura A. Menninger	Business associate	7	3	View
person Ms. Maxwell	Professional	7	2	View
person ALISON J. NATHAN	Professional	6	2	View
organization HADDON, MORGAN & FOREMAN P.C.	Professional employment	6	1	View
person MAXWELL	Professional	5	1	View
person Counsel of record	Professional	5	1	View
organization Haddon, Morgan & Foreman, P.C.	Professional employment membership	5	1	View
person MS. MENNINGER	Professional	5	1	View
person Nicole Simmons	Business associate	5	1	View
person Nicole Simmons	Legal representative	5	1	View
person Nicole Simmons	Professional	2	2	View
organization Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C.	Employment affiliation	1	1	View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL	Potentially defense counsel	1	1	View

Date	Event Type	Description	Location	Actions
2025-08-07	N/A	Order Granting Motion to Withdraw	Southern District of New York	View
2025-08-06	Legal proceeding	A proposed order was filed granting the motion for attorneys Jeffrey S. Pagliuca and Laura A. Men...	UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR...	View
2025-08-06	Legal filing	The declaration regarding the change of counsel and withdrawal of HMF was dated and submitted.	N/A	View
2025-08-05	N/A	Attorneys Pagliuca and Menninger sign motion to withdraw as counsel.	Denver, CO (implied by sign...	View
2022-06-15	Legal filing	Document 662 was filed in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE.	N/A	View
2022-06-15	N/A	Filing of Sentencing Memorandum on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell	Southern District of New York	View
2022-03-11	N/A	Filing of Reply Memorandum	United States District Cour...	View
2022-03-11	Court filing	Filing of "GHISLAINE MAXWELL’S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF HER MOTION FOR A NEW TRIAL".	UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR...	View
2022-03-11	Legal filing	Filing of 'GHISLAINE MAXWELL’S MOTION FOR A NEW TRIAL' with the court.	UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR...	View
2022-03-11	Legal filing	Filing of Document 642 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE.	N/A	View
2022-03-02	Legal filing	A document was filed with the court requesting a continuance.	N/A	View
2022-02-24	Legal filing	Document 616 was officially filed with the court in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE.	N/A	View
2022-02-24	Legal filing	Ghislaine Maxwell's attorneys filed a reply in support of her motion for a new trial.	UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR...	View
2022-02-24	Legal filing	Document 612 was filed in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE.	Court associated with Case ...	View
2022-02-24	Legal filing	A motion for a new trial was filed on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell.	UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR...	View
2022-02-24	Legal filing	Document 613-1 was filed in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE.	N/A	View
2022-02-11	N/A	Filing of legal motion seeking to vacate conviction and enter judgment of acquittal	New York, New York	View
2022-02-11	Legal filing	Filing of an Omnibus Memorandum in Support of Her Post-Trial Motions by Ghislaine Maxwell's attor...	UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR...	View
2022-02-09	Legal filing submission	A legal document was dated and submitted, requesting a new trial or an evidentiary hearing to exa...	N/A	View
2022-02-09	N/A	Submission of legal motion requesting a new trial or an evidentiary hearing to examine jurors.	New York (Southern District...	View
2022-01-05	Legal filing	Filing of a letter by Jeffrey S. Pagliuca to Judge Nathan in the case of United States v. Ghislai...	United States District Cour...	View
2021-12-29	Jury trial	Jury Trial for the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell, Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE,...	New York, N.Y.	View
2021-12-28	Jury trial	Court proceedings for the jury trial in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell.	United States District Cour...	View
2021-12-27	Jury trial	Jury Trial for the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell, Case 20 CR 330 (AJN).	United States District Cour...	View
2021-12-22	N/A	Jury Trial proceedings in USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell	New York, N.Y.	View

DOJ-OGR-00002331.jpg

This is the conclusion page of a legal motion filed by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team on January 25, 2021, arguing for the dismissal of her indictment. The defense claims a Sixth Amendment violation due to the systematic underrepresentation of Black and Hispanic jurors in the selection pool and alleges the government rushed her arrest for publicity reasons to coincide with the anniversary of the Epstein indictment.

Legal filing (motion to dismiss conclusion)

2025-11-20

Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00002321.jpg

This document is the cover page for a legal memorandum filed on January 25, 2021, in the Southern District of New York (Case 20 Cr. 330). It is a filing by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team supporting a motion to dismiss a superseding indictment based on alleged Sixth Amendment violations. The page lists the defense attorneys from three different law firms representing Maxwell.

Legal memorandum (cover page)

2025-11-20

Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00002321(1).jpg

This document is the cover page for a legal memorandum filed on January 25, 2021, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The filing is made by the attorneys for defendant Ghislaine Maxwell in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The memorandum supports a motion to dismiss the superseding indictment against Maxwell, arguing it was obtained in violation of the Sixth Amendment.

Legal document

2025-11-20

Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00002319.jpg

This document is a legal filing from January 25, 2021, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell in the Southern District of New York. It is a 'Notice of Motion' submitted by Maxwell's defense attorneys from the firm Cohen & Gresser LLP. The motion seeks to dismiss the superseding indictment against her, arguing that it was obtained in violation of her Sixth Amendment rights.

Legal document

2025-11-20

Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00002319(1).jpg

This document is a legal filing from January 25, 2021, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell in the Southern District of New York. It is a Notice of Motion submitted by Maxwell's attorneys at Cohen & Gresser LLP to dismiss the superseding indictment against her. The motion argues that the indictment was obtained in violation of her Sixth Amendment rights and requests an oral argument on the matter.

Legal document

2025-11-20

Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00002317.jpg

This document is the conclusion of a legal filing dated January 25, 2021, submitted by the attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell. The attorneys argue that the indictment lacks the necessary specificity for Maxwell to prepare an adequate defense for Counts One through Four, violating her Fifth and Sixth Amendment rights. They request that the court either dismiss these counts or compel the government to provide a Bill of Particulars and further discovery.

Legal document

2025-11-20

Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00002317(1).jpg

This legal document, dated January 25, 2021, is a memorandum filed in support of a motion for a Bill of Particulars and Pretrial Disclosures in the case against Ms. Maxwell. It argues that the indictment lacks specificity regarding alleged 'grooming' acts, violating her constitutional rights, and requests either the dismissal of certain counts or that the government provide more detailed information for her defense. The document is signed by several attorneys representing Ghislaine Maxwell.

Legal document

2025-11-20

Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00002311(1).jpg

This document is the cover page for a legal memorandum filed on January 25, 2021, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York for the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The memorandum, submitted by Maxwell's legal team, supports a motion to dismiss four counts of the superseding indictment against her, arguing a lack of specificity. The document identifies Maxwell as the defendant and lists her attorneys from three different law firms.

Legal document

2025-11-20

Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00002310.jpg

This document is the signature page of a legal filing in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, dated January 25, 2021. It lists the legal counsel representing Ghislaine Maxwell, including attorneys from three different law firms: HADDON, MORGAN & FOREMAN P.C. in Denver, and COHEN & GRESSER LLP and the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim in New York. The document is signed by Jeffrey S. Pagliuca on behalf of the legal team.

Legal document

2025-11-20

Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00002310(1).jpg

This document is the signature page (page 2 of 2) of a court filing, Document 123, in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, filed on January 25, 2021. It lists the legal counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell, including attorneys Jeffrey S. Pagliuca, Laura A. Menninger, Mark S. Cohen, Christian R. Everdell, and Bobbi C. Sternheim, along with their respective law firms and contact information in Denver and New York.

Legal document

2025-11-20

Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00002307.jpg

This document is the signature page of a legal filing from January 25, 2021, in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. It lists the names, law firms, and contact information for the legal counsel representing Ghislaine Maxwell. The attorneys listed are Jeffrey S. Pagliuca, Laura A. Menninger, Mark S. Cohen, Christian R. Everdell, and Bobbi C. Sternheim.

Legal document

2025-11-20

Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00002307(1).jpg

This document is the signature page for a legal filing (Document 122) in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, dated January 25, 2021. It identifies the legal team representing Ghislaine Maxwell, including attorneys from three separate law firms: HADDON, MORGAN & FOREMAN P.C. in Denver, and COHEN & GRESSER LLP and the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim in New York.

Legal document

2025-11-20

Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00002300.jpg

This document is the cover page for a legal filing in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on January 25, 2021, in the Southern District of New York. It is a memorandum in support of Maxwell's motion to dismiss either Count One or Count Three of the superseding indictment on the grounds that they are multiplicitous. The document identifies Ghislaine Maxwell as the defendant and lists her legal counsel from three different law firms.

Legal document

2025-11-20

Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00002300(1).jpg

This is the cover page for a legal memorandum filed on January 25, 2021, in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The document is a motion filed by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team to dismiss either Count One or Count Three of the superseding indictment on the grounds that they are multiplicitous. The page lists the defendant's legal representation from three different law firms.

Legal memorandum (court filing cover page)

2025-11-20

Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00002299.jpg

This document is the signature page from a court filing (Document 121 in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN), dated January 25, 2021. It lists the legal counsel representing Ghislaine Maxwell, including attorneys from three law firms: HADDON, MORGAN & FOREMAN P.C. in Denver, CO, and COHEN & GRESSER LLP and the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim, both in New York, NY.

Legal document

2025-11-20

Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00002299(1).jpg

This document is the signature page (page 2 of 2) for a legal filing submitted on January 25, 2021, in the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). It lists the legal defense team representing Ghislaine Maxwell, including attorneys from Haddon, Morgan & Foreman P.C., Cohen & Gresser LLP, and the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim. The document includes contact information for the attorneys and bears the Bates stamp DOJ-OGR-00002299.

Legal filing (signature page)

2025-11-20

Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00002296(1).jpg

This document is the signature page for a legal filing (Document 120) in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, filed on January 25, 2021. It lists the names and contact information for the attorneys from three different law firms representing Ghislaine Maxwell in this case.

Legal document

2025-11-20

Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00002279(1).jpg

This document is the title page of a legal memorandum filed on January 25, 2021, in the Southern District of New York (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). It represents Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for a severance and separate trial regarding Counts Five and Six of the superseding indictment. The document lists the legal defense teams representing Maxwell, including attorneys from Haddon, Morgan & Foreman P.C., Cohen & Gresser LLP, and the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim.

Legal memorandum / court filing

2025-11-20

Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00002278.jpg

This document is the signature page (page 2 of 2) of a legal filing (Document 119) from case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, filed on January 25, 2021. It lists the legal defense team representing Ghislaine Maxwell, including attorneys from Haddon, Morgan & Foreman P.C., Cohen & Gresser LLP, and the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim.

Legal filing (signature page)

2025-11-20

Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00002221.jpg

This document is the signature page (page 15 of 15) of a court filing in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, dated December 18, 2020, and filed on December 23, 2020. It lists the legal defense team representing Ghislaine Maxwell, including attorneys from Cohen & Gresser LLP, Haddon, Morgan & Foreman P.C., and the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim, along with their contact information.

Court filing signature page

2025-11-20

Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00002207.jpg

This document is the cover page for a legal filing in the criminal case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on December 23, 2020, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The document is a reply memorandum submitted by Maxwell's legal team in support of her renewed motion for bail. It lists her attorneys from three different law firms located in New York and Denver.

Legal document

2025-11-20

Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00002207(1).jpg

This document is the cover page for a 'Reply Memorandum' filed on December 23, 2020, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The filing is in support of defendant Ghislaine Maxwell's renewed motion for bail. It lists her legal defense team, including attorneys from Cohen & Gresser LLP, Haddon, Morgan & Foreman P.C., and the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim.

Legal filing (court document - reply memorandum)

2025-11-20

Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00002017.jpg

This document is the signature page of a legal filing from December 4, 2020, in which attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell formally request her release on bail. The document lists her legal counsel from three different law firms: COHEN & GRESSER LLP, HADDON, MORGAN & FOREMAN P.C., and the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim. The filing is part of case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN and was officially filed with the court on December 14, 2020.

Legal document

2025-11-20

Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00001973.jpg

This document is the cover page of a legal filing, specifically a memorandum in support of a renewed motion for bail for the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell. Filed on December 14, 2020, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, it lists the case name as United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell and identifies her legal counsel from three different law firms.

Legal document

2025-11-20

Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00001811.jpg

This legal document is a letter from defense counsel Jeffrey S. Pagliuca to Judge Alison J. Nathan, dated October 23, 2020, concerning Ghislaine Maxwell's case. The letter complains that the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) and the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) are severely hindering Ms. Maxwell's ability to prepare her defense by preventing counsel from reviewing documents with her effectively during legal visits. The defense requests the Court to order the BOP to allow them to pass legal papers to Ms. Maxwell for review and suggests a status conference to address these ongoing issues.

Legal document

2025-11-20

Analysis Source

Total Received

$0.00

0 transactions

Total Paid

$75.00

1 transactions

Net Flow

-$75.00

1 total transactions

Date	Type	From	To	Amount	Description	Actions
2016-06-29	Paid	Jeffrey S. Pagliuca	United States Dis...	$75.00	Admission fee for pro hac vice appearance	View

As Sender

As Recipient

Total

Contact Info

From: N/A

To: Jeffrey S. Pagliuca

jpagliuca@hmflaw.com

N/A

Communication Source

Contact Information

From: Jeffrey S. Pagliuca

To: Public Record

Email: jpagliuca@hmflaw.com, Phone: 303.831.7364, Fax: 303.832.2628

Contact info listing

N/A

Communication Source

Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN

From: Jeffrey S. Pagliuca

To: U.S. District Court fo...

Email address jpagliuca@hmflaw.com provided for Jeffrey S. Pagliuca, lead attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell.

N/A

Communication Source

United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Maxw...

From: Jeffrey S. Pagliuca

To: The Honorable Alison J...

A request from Ghislaine Maxwell's counsel to postpone a court hearing because her legal team is unavailable due to scheduling conflicts with other trials.

2022-03-02

Communication Source

Request for adjournment

From: Jeffrey S. Pagliuca

To: Judge Alison J. Nathan

Maxwell's Request for adjournment of hearing on Motion for New Trial.

Letter

2022-03-02

Communication Source

United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)

From: Jeffrey S. Pagliuca

To: The Honorable Alison J...

A letter arguing against the government's request for a hearing regarding a juror's statements, asserting that the court can and should order a new trial based on existing information.

Letter

2022-01-05

Communication Source

United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)

From: Jeffrey S. Pagliuca

To: The Honorable Alison J...

Legal argument regarding witness impeachment, inconsistent statements, and the '3500 material' (Jencks Act material).

Letter (via email)

2021-12-16

Communication Source

United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)

From: Jeffrey S. Pagliuca

To: ["The Honorable Alison...

A letter from Ghislaine Maxwell's defense attorney to the presiding judge, responding to the government's motion to preclude certain testimony by a potential witness, Alexander Hamilton, concerning an individual named Kate.

Letter

2021-12-15

Communication Source

Jack Scarola, Brad Edwards and Robert Glassman

From: Jeffrey S. Pagliuca

To: Judge Alison J. Nathan

Letter with attachments filed under seal.

Letter

2021-12-14

Communication Source

Jack Scarola, Brad Edwards and Robert Glassman

From: Jeffrey S. Pagliuca

To: Judge Alison J. Nathan

Letter regarding Scarola, Edwards, and Glassman with attachments filed under seal.

Letter

2021-12-13

Communication Source

United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)

From: Jeffrey S. Pagliuca

To: The Honorable Alison J...

Defense counsel alerting the court regarding questions to be asked of attorneys Scarola, Edwards, and Glassman, arguing these questions do not violate attorney-client privilege.

Letter (via email)

2021-12-13

Communication Source

Exhibit 52

From: Jeffrey S. Pagliuca

To: Judge Alison J. Nathan

Letter regarding Exhibit 52.

Letter

2021-12-09

Communication Source

Exhibit 52

From: Jeffrey S. Pagliuca

To: Judge Alison J. Nathan

Letter regarding Exhibit 52.

Letter

2021-12-09

Communication Source

Exhibit 52

From: Jeffrey S. Pagliuca

To: Judge Alison J. Nathan

Letter regarding Exhibit 52 filed by Ghislaine Maxwell

Letter

2021-12-08

Communication Source

Response to the Government's Letter Regarding 900 Series ...

From: Jeffrey S. Pagliuca

To: Judge Alison J. Nathan

Letter filed by defense regarding exhibits.

Letter

2021-12-05

Communication Source

United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)

From: Jeffrey S. Pagliuca

To: The Honorable Alison J...

Defense response to government's letter regarding the admissibility of the '900 series photos'.

Letter

2021-12-05

Communication Source

Response to the Government's Letter Regarding 900 Series ...

From: Jeffrey S. Pagliuca

To: Judge Alison J. Nathan

Letter regarding exhibits filed by defense.

Letter

2021-12-05

Communication Source

Witness Jane's Testimony

From: Jeffrey S. Pagliuca

To: Judge Alison J. Nathan

Filed Under Seal

Letter

2021-12-03

Communication Source

Fed. R. Crim. P. 16(b)(1)(A)

From: Jeffrey S. Pagliuca

To: Judge Alison J. Nathan

Regarding Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.

Letter

2021-11-30

Communication Source

Pseudonyms

From: Jeffrey S. Pagliuca

To: Judge Alison J. Nathan

Regarding Pseudonyms.

Letter

2021-11-30

Communication Source

Pseudonyms

From: Jeffrey S. Pagliuca

To: Judge Alison J. Nathan

Letter by Ghislaine Maxwell regarding Pseudonyms

Letter

2021-11-30

Communication Source

Fed. R. Crim. P. 16(b)(1)(A)

From: Jeffrey S. Pagliuca

To: Judge Alison J. Nathan

Letter regarding Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure

Letter

2021-11-30

Communication Source

Court's Proposed Preliminary Instructions to the Jury

From: Jeffrey S. Pagliuca

To: Judge Alison J. Nathan

Letter regarding jury instructions

Letter

2021-11-27

Communication Source

United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell - Objections to Proffe...

From: Jeffrey S. Pagliuca

To: United States Attorney...

Defense counsel objects to the admission of certain hearsay statements by Epstein and co-conspirators, arguing they are outside the scope or timeframe of the alleged conspiracy.

Letter (email)

2021-11-08

Communication Source