U.S. Department of Justice
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
French Ministry of Justice
|
Professional |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
Andrew FINKELMAN
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
UN
|
Cooperation |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
ALISON J. NATHAN
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Investigation subject |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Defendant vs prosecution |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
EST
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
Drug Enforcement Administration
|
Subordinate agency |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jona A. Noel
|
Employment |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
D. JOHN SAUER
|
Employee |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
United Kingdom
|
International cooperation |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
ING
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Clients received correspondence from the U.S. Department of Justice regarding their rights as vic... | N/A | View |
| 2025-07-14 | N/A | Requested new due date for government's response. | Supreme Court of the United... | View |
| 2025-06-13 | N/A | Requested new deadline for government's response. | Supreme Court of the United... | View |
| 2025-05-14 | N/A | Original due date for government's response. | Supreme Court of the United... | View |
| 2025-05-08 | Communication | The Task Force sent another letter to the Department requesting the public release of the Epstein... | N/A | View |
| 2025-02-11 | Communication | The Committee and the Task Force on the Declassification of Federal Secrets sent a letter to the ... | N/A | View |
| 2022-04-01 | Legal filing | The U.S. Government submitted a letter to the Court requesting an exclusion of time under the Spe... | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2021-03-29 | Legal filing | The Government filed a letter with the Court to clarify a statement made in a prior letter regard... | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2020-12-11 | Legal correspondence | The French Ministry of Justice sent a letter to the U.S. Department of Justice to clarify its leg... | Paris, France | View |
| 2020-12-11 | Legal communication | The French Ministry of Justice sent a letter to the US Department of Justice explaining its legal... | Paris, France | View |
| 2020-10-01 | N/A | Production of discovery materials (financial records) to the defense. | New York, NY | View |
| 2020-08-13 | Court filing | The U.S. Government filed a letter in opposition to the defendant's requests. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2018-12-12 | N/A | Issuance of a preservation letter by the DOJ SDNY regarding an ongoing investigation. | New York, New York | View |
EFTA00009927.pdf
This document is a letter dated November 18, 2020, from Acting U.S. Attorney Audrey Strauss to the Legal Counsel of the Federal Bureau of Prisons. It details the provision of a specifically modified laptop to inmate Ghislaine Maxwell at the Metropolitan Detention Center to allow her to review discovery materials for her case (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The letter certifies that the laptop's recording (mic/camera) and communication (Wi-Fi/Bluetooth/Ethernet) capabilities have been disabled.
EFTA00008480.pdf
A photograph showing a cardboard box labeled 'Assorted Stuff' and a stack of four FBI case file folders lying on a speckled floor. The top visible folder is marked as Volume 4, with File No. 294-3159227 and '1A - Supp', containing standard FBI file tracking checklists and marked with the classification '90A'.
EFTA00005718.pdf
This document contains a file folder cover and a Grand Jury Subpoena issued by US Attorney Geoffrey S. Berman (SDNY) on July 5, 2019. The subpoena commands an individual residing in Astoria, NY (name redacted) to testify before a Grand Jury on July 24, 2019, regarding violations of federal sex trafficking and conspiracy laws (18 U.S.C. §§ 1591, 2421, 2422, 2423, 371). The document includes an advice of rights and a heavily redacted page containing a NY DMV photo service URL.
DOJ-OGR-00000256.tif
This document is an Affidavit of Service from Wilson-Epes Printing Co., Inc., certifying that on July 28, 2025, three copies of the 'REPLY IN SUPPORT OF PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI' in the case of Ghislaine Maxwell (AKA Sealed Defendant 1) vs. United States of America were served. The service was made to D. John Sauer, Solicitor General for the U.S. Department of Justice, and electronically to two email addresses. The affidavit was sworn to and subscribed before Notary Public Aza Salinder Donner.
DOJ-OGR-00000217.tif
This document is a letter from D. John Sauer, Solicitor General for the U.S. Department of Justice, dated June 6, 2025, to Honorable Scott S. Harris, Clerk of the Supreme Court. It requests an extension until July 14, 2025, for the government to file its response in the case 'Ghislaine Maxwell v. United States, No. 24-1073,' citing attorney unavailability due to other pressing matters, and notes that the petitioner does not oppose this extension.
DOJ-OGR-00030266.tif
This document is an FBI subpoena, case number 31E-MM-108062, issued on April 1, 2008, requesting telephone toll billing records and subscriber information. Compliance is due by April 8, 2008, at 10:00 AM at 505 S. Flagler Drive, #500, West Palm Beach, Florida, and the recipient is explicitly warned against disclosing the subpoena's existence due to an ongoing federal criminal investigation.
DOJ-OGR-00030162.tif
This document is a subpoena issued by the U.S. Department of Justice/FBI West Palm Beach RA on December 22, 2006, requesting subscriber and billing information related to specific phone numbers and time periods as part of a federal criminal investigation. Compliance is required by January 8, 2007, at 10:00 AM, at 505 S. Flagler Drive, #500, West Palm Beach, FL, and the recipient is explicitly warned against disclosing the subpoena's existence due to an ongoing investigation.
DOJ-OGR-00030143.tif
This document is an FBI subpoena issued on August 1, 2006, as part of a federal criminal investigation (case number 31E-MM-108062). It demands the disclosure of subscriber and billing information, as well as incoming and outgoing call records, including cell tower and location data, for specified phone numbers. The recipient is explicitly warned not to disclose the existence of the subpoena to avoid interfering with the ongoing investigation.
DOJ-OGR-00030115.tif
This document is an FBI Form FD-340, used for acquiring evidence. It records a file number 31E-MM-108062-1A 92, with evidence acquired by 'mm/PBCRA' and received on 'Various' dates. The form indicates that it contains 'Original notes re interview of Biographical file for' a redacted individual, and specifies handling instructions for grand jury material and federal taxpayer information.
DOJ-OGR-00023235.tif
This document is a letter from the FBI's West Palm Beach office dated August 28, 2006, informing a recipient named 'Пенг' that they have been identified as a possible victim of a federal crime. The letter outlines the FBI's Victim Assistance Program, explains the criminal justice process, details the recipient's rights under federal law (18 U.S. Code § 3771), and provides instructions for using the Victim Notification System (VNS) to stay updated on the ongoing investigation. Redactions are present for the case number, recipient's full name, and specific identification numbers (VIN and PIN).
DOJ-OGR-00028568.jpg
This document is a U.S. government record of a secondary inspection conducted on Jeffrey Epstein at JFK Airport in New York on April 1, 2000. Epstein arrived on carrier 'AF' from 'CDG' and underwent a bag examination. Key details, including the reason for the referral and any remarks, have been redacted.
DOJ-OGR-00015647.jpg
This document is a photograph presented as Government Exhibit 325 in a legal case (S2 20 Cr. 330), identified with a U.S. Department of Justice number. The image depicts Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein sitting closely together with a dog in an outdoor, grassy setting. The photograph serves as evidence illustrating the personal relationship between Maxwell and Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00015118.jpg
This is a legal letter from Neil S. Binder of Binder & Schwartz LLP to Judge Paul A. Engelmayer regarding the case United States v. Maxwell. The letter, submitted under seal, addresses the DOJ's motion to unseal grand jury materials that reference the firm's client (whose name is redacted), arguing for the continued maintenance of grand jury secrecy based on established precedent and the lack of justification for special circumstances.
DOJ-OGR-00015098.jpg
This document is a letter dated August 6, 2025, from the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York to Judge Paul A. Engelmayer regarding the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter serves as a cover sheet for five enclosed submissions from various counsel (John Scarola, Sigrid McCawley, Bradley Edwards, and Neil S. Binder). The Government outlines the filing status of each submission, indicating whether it can be filed publicly without redactions, with redactions, or under seal.
DOJ-OGR-00015079.jpg
This is a letter from the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York to Judges Richard M. Berman and Paul A. Engelmayer, dated August 4, 2025. The Government is responding to a court order to provide more information about grand jury materials it has moved to unseal in the criminal cases against Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter outlines the specific information requested by the court, which includes dates of grand jury presentations, exhibits shown, and the government's position on unsealing these materials.
DOJ-OGR-00015065.jpg
This legal document, filed on July 29, 2025, is part of a discussion regarding the disclosure of grand jury materials under the 'In re Craig' factors. The Government, as the party seeking disclosure, argues that its request is supported by significant public interest and formal requests from Congress. Specifically, it cites letters from the House Committee on Oversight and Accountability and a Task Force demanding information and the release of files related to the investigation and prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein, whose case is linked with Ghislaine Maxwell's.
DOJ-OGR-00008448.jpg
A letter filed on December 19, 2021, by the parties in the U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell case to Judge Alison J. Nathan proposing logistics for public access to closing argument visuals. Judge Nathan endorsed the letter with a handwritten order approving the proposal, requiring redacted versions of closing argument slides to be made public within two hours of the arguments' completion to protect witness anonymity.
DOJ-OGR-00008444.jpg
This is a legal filing from the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York to Judge Alison J. Nathan, dated December 19, 2021. The letter concerns the ongoing trial of Ghislaine Maxwell and states that the prosecution ("The Government") and Maxwell's defense team have mutually agreed to allow a specific list of government exhibits, which were admitted during the trial, to be released to the public.
DOJ-OGR-00008439.jpg
This is a letter filed on December 19, 2021, from the parties (Prosecution and Defense) to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter proposes a method for providing public access to closing argument materials, specifically suggesting that public versions of slides be released after the trial day concludes, ensuring sealed materials remain protected. The document emphasizes balancing public interest with the protection of victims and the efficiency of the trial.
DOJ-OGR-00008436.jpg
This legal document is a letter from the U.S. Department of Justice to Judge Alison J. Nathan, dated December 19, 2021, concerning the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The Government identifies a significant ambiguity in Jury Instruction No. 19, where the pronoun "she" could be interpreted as referring to either the defendant or the victim. To resolve this, the Government proposes that the court replace "she" with "the individual" to ensure clarity for the jury.
DOJ-OGR-00008428.jpg
A letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Judge Alison J. Nathan dated December 18, 2021, regarding the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. The Government is writing to oppose the addition of a specific jury instruction (Sand instruction 7-12) concerning the impeachment of witnesses by prior felony convictions, arguing it is not necessary in this context. The letter mentions a witness named 'Carolyn' whose prior convictions were elicited.
DOJ-OGR-00008419.jpg
This is a letter from the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter argues that under Rule 613(b), the court has discretion to require that an alleged inconsistent statement be shown to a witness before extrinsic evidence is admitted, citing United States v. Marks.
DOJ-OGR-00008393.jpg
This is a letter filed by the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York to Judge Alison J. Nathan on December 17, 2021, regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The Government is writing to limit the scope of cross-examination by the defense of law enforcement agents, specifically stating they will object to questions regarding the agents' 'failure to utilize some particular technique,' citing a prior ruling from November 1, 2021.
DOJ-OGR-00008383.jpg
This document is a letter from the U.S. Government to Judge Alison J. Nathan dated December 15, 2021, regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The Government is requesting permission to redact portions of the defendant's motion seeking testimony from Jack Scarola, Brad Edwards, and Robert Glassman to protect the privacy of a Minor Victim.
DOJ-OGR-00008374.jpg
This legal letter from the U.S. Department of Justice to Judge Alison J. Nathan, dated December 14, 2021, opposes defendant Ghislaine Maxwell's request to call three attorneys for victims (Jack Scarola, Brad Edwards, and Robert Glassman) to testify. The Government argues that their testimony about privileged client conversations or discussions with the Government would be irrelevant and an improper attempt to circumvent privilege, as the victims themselves have already testified.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity