| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
French Ministry of Justice
|
Professional |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
Andrew FINKELMAN
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
UN
|
Cooperation |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
ALISON J. NATHAN
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Investigation subject |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Defendant vs prosecution |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
EST
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
Drug Enforcement Administration
|
Subordinate agency |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jona A. Noel
|
Employment |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
D. JOHN SAUER
|
Employee |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
United Kingdom
|
International cooperation |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
ING
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Clients received correspondence from the U.S. Department of Justice regarding their rights as vic... | N/A | View |
| 2025-07-14 | N/A | Requested new due date for government's response. | Supreme Court of the United... | View |
| 2025-06-13 | N/A | Requested new deadline for government's response. | Supreme Court of the United... | View |
| 2025-05-14 | N/A | Original due date for government's response. | Supreme Court of the United... | View |
| 2025-05-08 | Communication | The Task Force sent another letter to the Department requesting the public release of the Epstein... | N/A | View |
| 2025-02-11 | Communication | The Committee and the Task Force on the Declassification of Federal Secrets sent a letter to the ... | N/A | View |
| 2022-04-01 | Legal filing | The U.S. Government submitted a letter to the Court requesting an exclusion of time under the Spe... | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2021-03-29 | Legal filing | The Government filed a letter with the Court to clarify a statement made in a prior letter regard... | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2020-12-11 | Legal correspondence | The French Ministry of Justice sent a letter to the U.S. Department of Justice to clarify its leg... | Paris, France | View |
| 2020-12-11 | Legal communication | The French Ministry of Justice sent a letter to the US Department of Justice explaining its legal... | Paris, France | View |
| 2020-10-01 | N/A | Production of discovery materials (financial records) to the defense. | New York, NY | View |
| 2020-08-13 | Court filing | The U.S. Government filed a letter in opposition to the defendant's requests. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2018-12-12 | N/A | Issuance of a preservation letter by the DOJ SDNY regarding an ongoing investigation. | New York, New York | View |
This legal document is a letter from the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York to Judge Alison J. Nathan, dated February 4, 2021. The letter provides an update on the conditions of confinement for the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell, at the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC). The Government reports that Maxwell has more time to review discovery materials than any other inmate (13 hours daily via computer) and has regular, private communication with her attorneys through video and phone calls, despite the suspension of in-person visits due to COVID-19.
A letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office to Judge Alison J. Nathan dated February 1, 2021, regarding the conditions of Ghislaine Maxwell's confinement at the MDC. The Government addresses a dispute over Maxwell's access to a laptop for reviewing over two million pages of discovery materials on weekends and holidays. While the Government does not object to the access, they defer to MDC management protocols, noting that Maxwell already receives more review time (13 hours/day, 7 days/week) than any other inmate.
This legal document is a letter dated January 25, 2021, from the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) in Brooklyn to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The MDC requests the court to vacate a January 15, 2021 order concerning inmate Ghislaine Maxwell, arguing that her access to discovery materials and legal counsel is already extensive and sufficient. A stamped court order dated February 2, 2021, shows that Judge Nathan considered the request and responses from the Government and Defendant, and ultimately denied the MDC's request.
This document is a letter dated December 4, 2020, from the Federal Bureau of Prisons (MDC Brooklyn) to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the confinement conditions of Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter addresses the judge's concerns about Maxwell's safety, detailing her housing assignment, daily access to common areas and legal materials, and her ability to use the commissary. It notes that staff use flashlights for overnight checks and that Maxwell has been instructed on how to use the Administrative Remedy Program for complaints.
This legal document is a joint letter dated December 1, 2020, from the prosecution and defense to Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter details a disagreement between the two parties regarding how to address the defendant's concerns about her conditions of confinement at the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC). The Government proposes a written response from MDC's legal counsel, while the defense insists on a personal court appearance by the warden, Heriberto Tellez.
This letter, dated November 23, 2020, is from the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York to Judge Alison J. Nathan. It provides an update on the confinement conditions of defendant Ghislaine Maxwell at the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC). The letter details that Maxwell was placed in quarantine after a potential COVID-19 exposure from a staff member, outlines the quarantine protocols, and confirms that she has been provided with a laptop to review discovery materials and can still make private legal calls.
This document is a letter from the U.S. Department of Justice to Judge Alison J. Nathan dated March 9, 2021, opposing Ghislaine Maxwell's third motion for release on bail. The Government argues that the Court lacks jurisdiction due to a pending appeal with the Second Circuit and reiterates that Maxwell poses an extreme flight risk that no conditions can mitigate. The letter references previous denials of bail on July 14, 2020, and December 28, 2020.
This is a letter dated August 4, 2025, from the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York to Judges Richard M. Berman and Paul A. Engelmayer. The Government is responding to the Court's July 31, 2025 order, which required it to provide specific information about grand jury materials in the cases against Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter outlines the history of motions to unseal these materials and lists the specific information the Court has requested, such as presentation dates, exhibits, and the Government's position on unsealing them.
This document is a Notice of Appearance filed on July 21, 2025, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York for the criminal case *United States of America v. Jeffrey Epstein* (Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB). Assistant U.S. Attorney Jeffrey Oestericher formally notifies the court of his role as counsel for the government and requests to be added to the electronic filing system for the case. The filing is submitted under the authority of U.S. Attorney Jay Clayton.
In a letter dated August 12, 2019, Lamine N'Diaye, the Warden of the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC), responds to an inquiry from Judge Richard M. Berman. The Warden confirms that the ongoing FBI and OIG investigations into the August 10, 2019 incident involving inmate Jeffrey Epstein will also encompass a prior incident that occurred on July 23, 2019. Due to the active investigations, the Warden states he is unable to release any information about the internal investigation that had already been completed regarding the July incident.
This letter, dated August 10, 2019, is a formal notification from the Warden's Office at the Metropolitan Correctional Center to Chief Judge Colleen McMahon and Judge Richard M. Berman. It reports the death of inmate Jeffrey Epstein, who was found unresponsive in his cell that morning from an apparent suicide and later pronounced dead at a local hospital. The letter states that investigations by the FBI and the Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General are underway.
This document is a letter dated July 25, 2019, from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (specifically Assistant US Attorney Alison Moe) to Judge Richard M. Berman. The prosecution requests the Court to endorse a proposed protective order in the case of United States v. Jeffrey Epstein, noting that defense counsel (Martin Weinberg and Reid Weingarten) have consented to the order.
This legal document is a letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York to Judge Richard M. Berman, filed on July 17, 2019, in the case against Jeffrey Epstein. The prosecution refutes the defendant's claim that an expired Austrian passport was never used, presenting evidence of travel stamps to France, Spain, the UK, and Saudi Arabia from the 1980s. The government also highlights that Epstein has not clarified how he obtained the passport or if he holds citizenship or residency in any other country.
This is a letter dated July 16, 2019, from the U.S. Attorney's Office to Judge Richard M. Berman in the case against Jeffrey Epstein. The prosecution details two suspicious wire transfers made by Epstein in late 2018, totaling $350,000, to two redacted individuals shortly after the Miami Herald began publishing an exposé on him. One of the recipients is described as a 'potential co-conspirator' from Epstein's 2007 non-prosecution agreement, raising concerns of witness tampering.
This legal document is a letter dated July 15, 2019, from the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York to Judge Richard M. Berman regarding the case *United States v. Jeffrey Epstein*. The prosecution requests the exclusion of speedy trial time for the period of July 15-18, 2019, noting that Epstein's defense counsel consents to the request. The document is endorsed by Judge Berman, who granted the application on July 16, 2019.
This legal document is a letter dated July 15, 2019, from the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York, Geoffrey S. Berman, to Judge Richard M. Berman. The letter formally requests the exclusion of speedy trial time in the criminal case against Jeffrey Epstein for the period between July 15 and July 18, 2019. The filing notes that Epstein's defense counsel, Martin Weinberg and Reid Weingarten, have been consulted and consent to the request.
This document is a formal letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Judge Henry Pitman, dated July 8, 2019, arguing for the pretrial detention of Jeffrey Epstein. The government asserts Epstein poses an extraordinary flight risk due to his wealth and private planes, and a danger to the community due to a history of witness intimidation. It references his recent arrest upon returning from abroad and characterizes him as a serial sexual predator facing a massive sentence.
This legal document is a letter from the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York to Judge Richard M. Berman, dated July 12, 2019, arguing against Jeffrey Epstein's motion for pretrial release. The government portrays Epstein as an unrepentant serial sexual predator who poses a significant flight risk due to his vast wealth and the likelihood of a life sentence. The letter cites substantial evidence, including photographs found in his mansion and a history of witness manipulation, to support its request for continued detention.
A letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Judge Richard Berman regarding the case United States v. Jeffrey Epstein. The Government requests an extension of the deadline to respond to Epstein's bail motion because the defense has failed to provide necessary financial disclosures on time. The document is stamped as filed on July 12, 2019.
This is a letter from the U.S. Department of Justice to Judge Richard M. Berman regarding the case United States v. Jeffrey Epstein. The Government requests an extension to respond to the defendant's Bail Motion because the defense has failed to provide necessary financial disclosures.
This document is the signature page of a legal filing submitted on July 9, 2010, by the office of the United States Attorney. It lists Wifredo A. Ferrer as the U.S. Attorney and Dexter A. Lee, Eduardo I. Sánchez, and A. Marie Villafaña as Assistant U.S. Attorneys representing the respondent, providing their contact information and Florida Bar numbers.
This document is a Certificate of Service from Case 22-1426, dated July 15, 2022, and signed by Bobbi C. Sternheim. It attests that a legal motion was served to several parties, including AUSAs Maurene Comey and Andrew Rohrbach, Defendant-Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell, and retired Judge John M. Leventhal. The service was conducted via email and U.S. mail to their respective addresses.
This document is a photograph presented as Government Exhibit 335 in the legal case S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN), identified by the Department of Justice with the number DOJ-OGR-00015653. The image depicts Ghislaine Maxwell and Sarah Ransome posing together, serving as evidence of their association.
This document is a Certificate of Service filed on February 4, 2021, for the court case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. It attests that on January 25, 2021, Christian R. Everdell served a legal motion on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell to four individuals at the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York via their official email addresses.
This document is a letter dated January 25, 2021, from the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) in Brooklyn to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The MDC argues that inmate Ghislaine Maxwell has been provided ample resources and time to review discovery materials and communicate with her lawyers, contrary to her defense counsel's claims, and requests the court vacate a prior order from January 15, 2021. A stamped order on the document, dated February 2, 2021, shows that Judge Nathan considered the request and ultimately denied it.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity