U.S. Department of Justice

Organization
Mentions
1208
Relationships
13
Events
13
Documents
600

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.
13 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
organization French Ministry of Justice
Professional
8 Strong
3
View
person Andrew FINKELMAN
Professional
6
1
View
organization UN
Cooperation
5
1
View
person ALISON J. NATHAN
Professional
5
1
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Adversarial
5
1
View
person Jeffrey Epstein
Investigation subject
1
1
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Defendant vs prosecution
1
1
View
organization EST
Legal representative
1
1
View
organization Drug Enforcement Administration
Subordinate agency
1
1
View
person Jona A. Noel
Employment
1
1
View
person D. JOHN SAUER
Employee
1
1
View
organization United Kingdom
International cooperation
1
1
View
organization ING
Legal representative
1
1
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
N/A N/A Clients received correspondence from the U.S. Department of Justice regarding their rights as vic... N/A View
2025-07-14 N/A Requested new due date for government's response. Supreme Court of the United... View
2025-06-13 N/A Requested new deadline for government's response. Supreme Court of the United... View
2025-05-14 N/A Original due date for government's response. Supreme Court of the United... View
2025-05-08 Communication The Task Force sent another letter to the Department requesting the public release of the Epstein... N/A View
2025-02-11 Communication The Committee and the Task Force on the Declassification of Federal Secrets sent a letter to the ... N/A View
2022-04-01 Legal filing The U.S. Government submitted a letter to the Court requesting an exclusion of time under the Spe... United States District Cour... View
2021-03-29 Legal filing The Government filed a letter with the Court to clarify a statement made in a prior letter regard... Southern District of New York View
2020-12-11 Legal correspondence The French Ministry of Justice sent a letter to the U.S. Department of Justice to clarify its leg... Paris, France View
2020-12-11 Legal communication The French Ministry of Justice sent a letter to the US Department of Justice explaining its legal... Paris, France View
2020-10-01 N/A Production of discovery materials (financial records) to the defense. New York, NY View
2020-08-13 Court filing The U.S. Government filed a letter in opposition to the defendant's requests. United States District Cour... View
2018-12-12 N/A Issuance of a preservation letter by the DOJ SDNY regarding an ongoing investigation. New York, New York View

DOJ-OGR-00008361.jpg

A letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. The Government informs the court that, after conferring with the defense, they will not agree to a stipulation regarding the testimony of Robert Glassman. The Government argues that a specific statement in an email is inadmissible and requires context to be understood by the jury.

Legal correspondence / court filing
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00008357.jpg

This legal document is a letter dated December 12, 2021, from the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The prosecution requests that the court order the defense in the Ghislaine Maxwell case to provide a list of their witnesses for the upcoming week by 10:00 a.m. the next day. The letter also notes that the defense recently made an untimely production of other materials, and the Government intends to file a motion to preclude them.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00008355.jpg

This legal document is a letter dated December 9, 2021, from the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The letter is a filing in the criminal case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It presents a jointly proposed limiting instruction for the jury regarding Government Exhibit 52, specifying that the exhibit is only to be considered for showing a potential link between Maxwell and listed contacts, not for the truth of the information itself.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00008301.jpg

This is a letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Judge Alison J. Nathan dated December 9, 2021, regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The Government is requesting permission to redact a letter motion concerning the admission of Government Exhibit 52 and to seal or redact Exhibits A and B to protect the privacy of minor victims, witnesses, and third parties.

Legal correspondence / court filing
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00008223.jpg

This is a letter from the U.S. Department of Justice to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, dated December 5, 2021. The prosecution outlines its plan to question 'Witness-3' about sexual activity with Epstein, adhering to the court's order to avoid explicit details. The government expresses concern that this limited questioning could be misinterpreted by the jury as a lack of witness credibility, especially in light of the defense's opening argument.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00008214.jpg

This is a legal filing from the U.S. Department of Justice to Judge Alison J. Nathan, dated December 4, 2021, in the criminal case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The prosecution is moving to admit photographs from inside Jeffrey Epstein's New York residence as evidence. The government argues that these photographs are relevant to the case because they serve to corroborate the testimony of a witness identified by the pseudonym 'Jane'.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00008212.jpg

A formal letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, dated December 3, 2021. The prosecution and defense have agreed to a testimonial stipulation concerning witness Michael Dawson, and jointly request that the Court release him from the obligation to return to court on the following Monday.

Legal correspondence / court filing
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00001846.jpg

A legal letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Judge Alison Nathan regarding United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The Government consents to defense requests to redact the identities of proposed bail cosigners to protect their privacy but objects to holding a sealed 'in camera' hearing for the bail application, citing the public's and victims' right to observe proceedings.

Legal correspondence (government letter to court)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00001842.jpg

This is a joint letter from the prosecution and defense in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The parties inform the court they have been unable to reach an agreement regarding the defense's request for information on Maxwell's detention conditions at the MDC. The Government proposes that MDC legal counsel submit a written response, while the defense insists that Warden Heriberto Tellez appear personally before the Court to address concerns about confinement conditions.

Legal correspondence / letter to district judge
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00001832.jpg

This legal document is a letter from the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York to Judge Alison J. Nathan, dated October 6, 2020, regarding the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The prosecution requests permission to delay the disclosure of sensitive evidence, specifically photographs and documents related to victims of Jeffrey Epstein, to the defense until eight weeks before trial. The government argues this delay is necessary to protect an ongoing investigation and prevent the premature release of sensitive victim information, citing Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 16(d)(1) as legal justification.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00001812.jpg

This is a letter from the U.S. Department of Justice to Judge Alison Nathan regarding the case *United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell*. The Government refutes defense accusations of abandoning discovery deadlines, noting they have already produced 350,000 pages and are preparing to release 1.2 million documents from devices seized from Jeffrey Epstein's residences. The letter also addresses complaints regarding the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) and asserts compliance with the Court's July 15, 2020 scheduling order.

Legal correspondence (government letter to court)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00001779.jpg

This is a letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding 'United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell'. The Government requests permission to delay the disclosure of sensitive photographs and documents related to victims of Jeffrey Epstein to the defense until eight weeks before trial, citing risks to an ongoing investigation and victim privacy. The defense counsel has objected to this request.

Legal letter / court filing (government motion to delay disclosure)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00001737.jpg

This is a legal letter from the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York to Judge Alison J. Nathan, dated August 21, 2020, concerning the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The government requests permission to file the defendant's recent letter with redactions and to file all associated exhibits under seal. The justification for this request is an ongoing grand jury investigation, with the government citing the need to protect confidential materials.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00001732.jpg

This document is a letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Judge Alison J. Nathan dated August 21, 2020, regarding United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The Government opposes the defendant's request to use confidential discovery materials from this criminal case in unrelated civil litigation. The letter notes that over 165,000 pages of discovery have been produced and argues that the materials in question relate to an ongoing criminal investigation and grand jury proceedings.

Legal correspondence / government opposition letter
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00001719.jpg

This legal document is a letter dated August 13, 2020, from the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The prosecution is opposing recent requests from the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell, for an early disclosure of government witnesses and for the court to intervene with the Bureau of Prisons. The government argues these requests are premature and meritless, citing the early stage of discovery and previous denials of similar applications by the court.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00001664.jpg

This is a letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The government requests the court enter its proposed protective order and objects to two specific inclusions sought by the defendant, particularly regarding the public naming of victims.

Legal correspondence / letter motion
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00001663.jpg

This document is a letter filed on July 27, 2020, by the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The Government requests time to respond to a defense motion for a protective order, noting that discussions on the matter were ongoing as of the previous evening. At the bottom of the document, Judge Nathan orders a schedule for the response (due July 28) and reply (due July 29), and mandates the parties meet and confer by phone.

Legal correspondence / court order
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00001662.jpg

This legal document is a letter dated July 27, 2020, from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The prosecution requests an opportunity to respond to a motion for a protective order filed that morning by the defense counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter notes that the defense's filing was a surprise, as the Government believed discussions to jointly propose a protective order were still ongoing.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00001550.jpg

This document is a Certificate of Service filed in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN on July 8, 2020. In it, Nicole Simmons certifies that she electronically served a 'Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice' to Alex Rossmiller, Alison Moe, and Maurene Comey at the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY).

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00001538.jpg

This legal document is a letter dated July 7, 2020, from the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the criminal case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The prosecution proposes a briefing schedule for Maxwell's detention hearing following her arrest on July 2, 2020, and renews its request to exclude time under the Speedy Trial Act. The letter confirms the parties are available for a remote hearing on July 14, 2020.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00001529.jpg

This document is a Notice of Electronic Filing from the U.S. District Court for the District of New Hampshire, dated July 2, 2020. It announces a removal hearing for Ghislaine Maxwell, scheduled to take place via video conference on the same day before Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone. The notice was electronically distributed to various case participants and non-case participants, including individuals from the Department of Justice, the US Marshal's office, and US Probation.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00001497.jpg

A letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The government requests the scheduling of an arraignment and bail hearing for July 10, 2020, following the defendant's arrest in New Hampshire, and discusses Speedy Trial Act time exclusions.

Legal correspondence / court filing
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00001435.jpg

This document is a status letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Judge Alison J. Nathan, dated May 5, 2021, regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It details the protocols for flashlight security checks at the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC), explaining that checks are generally conducted every 30 minutes in the SHU and hourly in the general population. However, the letter specifies that Ghislaine Maxwell is subject to checks every 15 minutes because she is on an 'enhanced security schedule,' though not on suicide watch.

Legal correspondence / government letter to court
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00001370.jpg

This document is a Certificate of Service filed on April 15, 2021, in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit for the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case No. 21-770/21-58). It certifies that a 'Notice of Motion and Affirmation' was electronically served to four Assistant United States Attorneys: Maurene Comey, Lara Pomerantz, Thomas McKay, and Won Shin.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00001359.jpg

This document is a letter from the U.S. Attorney to Judge Alison J. Nathan providing an update on Ghislaine Maxwell's confinement conditions at the MDC. The Government asserts that Maxwell receives exceptional access to discovery materials (13 hours/day, 7 days/week) via both a laptop and desktop. A footnote addresses complaints regarding missing emails, stating that an investigation revealed Maxwell deleted or archived them herself, with no evidence of MDC staff misconduct.

Legal correspondence / court filing
2025-11-20
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
0
As Recipient
0
Total
0
No communications found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity