| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Unnamed individual
|
Representative |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Brig. Gen. Salim Idriss
|
Requester of aid |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Edward Snowden
|
Employment |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Entry of Nonprosecution Agreement (NPA) | Unknown | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | This photograph was entered as Government Exhibit 327 in the criminal case S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN). | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Entry of Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) granting immunity. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | A criminal prosecution is mentioned, after which it was allegedly promised that 'girls' would rec... | Unknown | View |
| 2018-09-23 | N/A | The U.S. is scheduled to resume trade talks with the E.U., and the Federal Reserve is expected to... | N/A | View |
| 2013-06-14 | N/A | An arrest warrant was issued for Snowden. | USA | View |
| 2012-07-09 | N/A | Food and Drug Administration Safety and Innovation Act (FDASIA) signed into law. | U.S. | View |
| 2008-01-01 | N/A | U.S. government made Tor software open source and freely available. | Global | View |
| 2001-01-01 | N/A | Passing of the 'No Child Left Behind Act of 2001' | USA | View |
| 2000-01-01 | Legal case | The U.S. v. Zarger case presided over by Judge Gleeson. | Courtroom (unspecified) | View |
| 1968-01-01 | N/A | USS Pueblo incident, during which President LBJ considered using nuclear weapons against North Ko... | North Korea | View |
| 1968-01-01 | N/A | USS Pueblo incident, during which President LBJ considered using nuclear weapons. | Off the coast of North Korea | View |
This document contains a series of internal Department of Justice emails from March to July 2019, detailing travel requests by an Assistant U.S. Attorney from the Southern District of New York. The requests seek approval for travel to Florida (Palm Beach, West Palm Beach, Fort Lauderdale) and Los Angeles to conduct victim interviews and meetings for the investigation 'United States v. Epstein' (Case ID 2018R01618). The emails confirm active investigation and victim outreach months prior to Epstein's July 2019 arrest.
This document is a photograph of a building, presented as Government Exhibit 932 in the legal case S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN). The document is marked with the identifier DOJ-OGR-00016108, indicating it is a record from the Department of Justice.
This document is a photograph presented as 'Government Exhibit 903-R' for the court case S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN). The image shows an interior room with a massage table, suggesting it is evidence related to a specific location or event. The document is marked with the identifier DOJ-OGR-00016097.
This document is a photograph submitted as 'Government Exhibit 327' in the legal case S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN). The image depicts an unidentified woman in a green top holding a laptop computer. The document is marked with a Department of Justice control number, DOJ-OGR-00015649.
This document is a photograph from a legal proceeding, labeled 'GOVERNMENT EXHIBIT 284' for case 'S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)'. The image, marked with the Department of Justice control number 'DOJ-OGR-00015614', depicts a dimly lit interior space, possibly a hallway or dressing room with marble walls, where an unidentified person in a suit is partially visible.
This document is a photograph of a bedroom, marked as 'Government Exhibit 271' for use in the legal case S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN). The Bates number 'DOJ-OGR-00015605' indicates it is a record from the Department of Justice. The image itself depicts a dimly lit bedroom with a bed, nightstand, and television, presumably serving as evidence.
This document is a photograph from the Department of Justice, labeled 'Government Exhibit 238' for case S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN). The image shows a home office setup with a desk, multiple computers, a printer, and other electronic equipment, likely documented as evidence in a legal investigation.
This document is a photograph of the exterior of a two-story white residence, presented as evidence in a legal case. A yellow label identifies it as 'GOVERNMENT EXHIBIT 221' for case 'S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)'. The document is also marked with the Bates number 'DOJ-OGR-00015562', indicating it is part of a Department of Justice file.
This document is a photograph marked as 'GOVERNMENT EXHIBIT 205' for a legal case, 'S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)'. The image, which is bates-stamped 'DOJ-OGR-00015546', shows the exterior patio of a modern residence with several unidentified individuals in the background, suggesting it is evidence collected by the Department of Justice.
This document appears to be page 255 of a book or report included in a House Oversight investigation file (Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019743). The text details Edward Snowden's time in Moscow, explaining that his rumored travel to Ecuador was a cover story orchestrated by Julian Assange because Snowden feared CIA rendition in Latin America. It describes the media frenzy surrounding Aeroflot Flight SU150 to Cuba and quotes a July 1, 2013, statement from Snowden criticizing the Obama administration.
This document is page 100 from the book 'How America Lost Its Secrets', marked as a House Oversight exhibit. It details Julian Assange's legal troubles starting in 2010, his time on bail at Ellingham Hall with Sarah Harrison, his flight to the Ecuador embassy in 2012, and his relationship with RT television. It also describes a 2013 phone call between Edward Snowden and Assange regarding Snowden's escape from Hong Kong and his motivation stemming from Bradley Manning's mistreatment.
This document appears to be page 68 from the book 'How America Lost Its Secrets' (likely by Edward Jay Epstein, based on the filename 'Epst_...'). It details the initial communications between Edward Snowden and filmmaker Laura Poitras regarding the leak of NSA surveillance documents. The text describes Snowden's disclosure of 'Presidential Policy 20' and the intense psychological stress Poitras experienced fearing government raids. The document includes a House Oversight Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a congressional inquiry.
This document appears to be page 64 from the book 'How America Lost Its Secrets' (Edward Jay Epstein is the author of this book, explaining the 'Epst' filename, though the content is about Snowden, not Jeffrey Epstein). It details Edward Snowden's initial encrypted communications with filmmaker Laura Poitras in January 2013 under the alias 'Citizen Four,' noting that Snowden falsely claimed to be a senior government official while actually working as a Dell contractor. It also discusses Poitras's history of surveillance by U.S. authorities following her 2006 filming in Iraq.
This document appears to be a page (page 62) from the book 'How America Lost Its Secrets' by Edward Jay Epstein (indicated by the footer ISBN and title). It details the timeline of Edward Snowden's attempts to communicate with journalist Glenn Greenwald, his frustration with Greenwald's lack of encryption, and his subsequent decision to use filmmaker Laura Poitras as an intermediary. The text also provides background on Poitras, including her wealthy upbringing, her work exposing NSA surveillance in Bluffdale, Utah, and her collaboration with activists like William Binney and Jacob Appelbaum.
This document is page 12 from the book 'How America Lost Its Secrets' (likely by Edward Jay Epstein, indicated by the filename), produced as part of a House Oversight Committee investigation (Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019500). The text details the author's investigation into Edward Snowden, specifically focusing on the timeline of his theft of classified materials beginning in the summer of 2012, contrary to the narrative that it began immediately prior to his June 2013 meeting with journalists in Hong Kong. The author expresses an intent to uncover Snowden's background, motivation, and activities prior to his flight to Hong Kong.
This document is a scanned page from a House Oversight file (031932) containing a 'Foreign Policy' article dated August 23, 2011, by Leonard Spector. The article discusses the geopolitical risks associated with Syria's massive chemical weapons arsenal amidst the 2011 unrest and President Obama's call for Assad to step down. It analyzes the history of Syria's chemical capabilities as a deterrent against Israel and addresses concerns about potential transfers to Hezbollah.
This document appears to be a page from a political commentary or op-ed authored by Bill Siegel for FamilySecurityMatters.org. The text heavily critiques a 'McDonough' (likely Denis McDonough) and the Obama administration for stating the U.S. is not at war with Islam, labeling this stance as 'Dhimmitude' and 'unconditional surrender.' The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, suggesting it was collected as part of a congressional investigation.
The text argues that political bias among FBI officials tainted the Russia investigation and the subsequent appointment of Special Counsel Robert Mueller, likening the situation to the "fruit of a poisonous tree" legal doctrine. It cites several Supreme Court precedents regarding due process to suggest that such governmental bias creates an unfair process that should invalidate legal proceedings.
This document is a page from a 2005 court opinion regarding the September 11 terrorist attacks litigation. It discusses the dismissal of claims against the Saudi High Commission (SHC) and Prince Salman and Prince Naif based on the discretionary function exception to sovereign immunity, ruling that their funding decisions were policy-based and thus immune from suit.
This document appears to be page 34 of a larger report or policy paper, bearing the Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018118. The text discusses U.S. military strategy, specifically the need for better government organization and unity-of-command based on lessons learned in Iraq and Afghanistan. It concludes with a biographical note for Jeffrey White, a defense fellow at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy. Note: Despite the prompt context, there is no mention of Jeffrey Epstein on this specific page; the only 'Jeffrey' mentioned is Jeffrey White.
This document page analyzes potential U.S. military strategies regarding Iran, weighing the risks of a "social war," regime change, and limited military operations. It warns that limited attacks could escalate unpredictably if the Iranian regime perceives them as an existential threat, and notes the difficulties of a "decapitation strategy" similar to the 2003 Iraq war.
This document analyzes the complexities of a potential conflict between the U.S. and Iran, suggesting that such a war would likely escalate beyond initial military strikes into a prolonged struggle across diplomatic, economic, and social domains. It warns that Iran could broaden the conflict through asymmetric means like terrorism, requiring the U.S. to plan for a multi-faceted war rather than a limited military engagement.
This document page discusses the complexities of modern warfare, specifically in the context of a potential conflict with Iran, highlighting issues of enemy disinformation and uncertainty. It redefines war in the 21st century as a multi-domain conflict (military, diplomatic, economic, social) and poses rhetorical questions about the political and strategic context under which a U.S.-Iran war might occur.
This document is a reprint of a 2015 article from The American Lawyer featuring an interview with Alan Dershowitz. In the interview, Dershowitz defends his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, explaining he was introduced by Lady de Rothschild and that Epstein was a major donor to Harvard ($50 million). The text outlines the legal context, including the 2008 plea deal and lawsuits filed by lawyers Bradley Edwards and Paul Cassell alleging Dershowitz's involvement in sexual misconduct.
This document is page 10 of a House Oversight Committee production (Bates HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023716). It contains a transcript and screenshot from a CNN broadcast of 'Quest Means Business' featuring Richard Quest interviewing a guest identified as 'RLK' about a pause in the U.S.-China trade war. The discussion focuses on a shift in perspective regarding trade relations following a specific dinner.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity