RICHARD D. KAHN

Person
Mentions
542
Relationships
46
Events
73
Documents
271

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.
46 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN
Executor
78 Very Strong
74
View
person JEFFREY EDWARD EPSTEIN
Executor
49 Very Strong
49
View
person JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN
Executor of estate
22 Very Strong
22
View
person Bennet J. Moskowitz
Client
19 Very Strong
19
View
person Bennet J. Moskowitz
Legal representative
13 Very Strong
13
View
person JEFFREY EDWARD EPSTEIN
Executor of estate
8 Strong
8
View
person Jeffrey Epstein
Executor
8 Strong
8
View
person JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN
Executor representative
7
7
View
person Jeffrey Epstein
Executor of estate
6
2
View
person JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN
Executor deceased
5
5
View
person Darren K. Indyke
Co executors
5
5
View
person Mary S. Dirago
Client
4
4
View
person Darren K. Indyke
Co defendants
4
4
View
organization Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein
Executor
3
3
View
person Maria Farmer
Legal representative
3
3
View
person Mary "Molly" S. Dirago
Client
2
2
View
person Charles L. Glover
Client
2
2
View
person Mary S. Dirago
Legal representative
2
2
View
person Teresa Helm
Legal representative
2
2
View
person JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN
Estate executor
2
2
View
person Valerie Sirota
Client
2
2
View
person Darren K. Indyke
Professional
2
2
View
person Charles L. Glover
Legal representative
2
2
View
person JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN
Business associate
2
2
View
person JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN
Executor administrator
1
1
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
2023-09-19 N/A Dismissal of Complaint Superior Court of the Virgi... View
2022-12-20 N/A Filing of Motion to Withdraw Motion for Award of Attorneys' Fees. Superior Court of the Virgi... View
2022-12-20 N/A Order filed granting the withdrawal of the Motion for Award of Attorneys' Fees Superior Court of the Virgi... View
2022-08-01 N/A Filing of Co-Executors' Supplemental Brief. Superior Court of the Virgi... View
2021-11-09 N/A Proposed end date for the requested sixty-day stay of action. New York, NY View
2021-11-05 N/A Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal with Prejudice filed United States District Cour... View
2021-09-06 N/A Deadline for Defendants to move, answer, or respond to the Complaint. Court Filing View
2021-09-06 N/A Filing of Notice of Co-Executors' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint New York, New York View
2021-08-13 N/A Filing of Notice of Appearance by Bennet J. Moskowitz New York, New York View
2021-04-02 N/A Filing of Notice of Appearance by Gordon C. Rhea Superior Court of the Virgi... View
2021-04-01 N/A Joint Stipulation for Dismissal filed and ordered. New York, New York View
2021-04-01 N/A Joint Stipulation for Dismissal filed; Maria Farmer dismisses action against Epstein Estate execu... Southern District of New York View
2021-03-29 N/A Brief filed by Co-Executors (referenced in text). Superior Court of the Virgi... View
2021-03-29 N/A Filing of the Brief Pursuant to Court's March 17, 2021 Order. Superior Court of the Virgi... View
2020-12-08 N/A Case Dismissed with Prejudice SDNY Court View
2020-11-02 N/A Dismissal of lawsuit with prejudice following resolution via compensation program Southern District of New York View
2020-11-02 N/A Submission of Status Report New York View
2020-11-02 N/A Submission of Joint Status Report via ECF New York, NY View
2020-10-15 N/A Joint Stipulation for Dismissal filed Southern District of New York View
2020-10-01 N/A Submission of Joint Status Report requesting a stay of the case. New York, NY View
2020-06-12 N/A Filing of Joint Stipulation and Proposed Order Staying Action New York, New York View
2020-06-12 N/A Joint Stipulation and Proposed Order Staying Action filed Southern District of New York View
2020-06-12 N/A Filing of Joint Stipulation to stay the action for 60 days. New York, New York View
2020-05-21 N/A Filing of Stipulated Confidentiality Agreement and Protective Order New York, New York View
2020-05-13 N/A Defendants served Supplemental Responses to Interrogatories New York, NY View

018.pdf

This document is a Notice of Appearance filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York on March 6, 2020. Attorney Andrew Villacastin of Boies Schiller Flexner LLP formally enters his appearance as counsel for the plaintiff, Juliette Bryant, in her lawsuit against the executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate, Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn.

Legal document (notice of appearance)
2025-12-26

016.pdf

This document is a Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice filed on February 13, 2020, in the case of Juliette Bryant v. The Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. Attorney Mary 'Molly' S. DiRago of Troutman Sanders LLP requests permission to represent the Estate's executors, Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn. The filing includes her affidavit and certificates of good standing from the Illinois Bar and the Northern District of Illinois.

Legal motion (pro hac vice admission)
2025-12-26

012.pdf

This document is a letter from Bennet J. Moskowitz of Troutman Sanders LLP to Judge Andrew L. Carter Jr., dated January 24, 2020. It serves as a pre-motion letter outlining the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein's intent to move for dismissal of a lawsuit filed by Juliette Bryant. The Estate argues that Bryant's claims regarding alleged sexual abuse between 2002 and 2004 are time-barred by the statutes of limitations in New York, USVI, Florida, and New Mexico, and that she cannot rely on the Child Victims Act or tolling because she was an adult (age 20-22) at the time of the alleged incidents. Additionally, the letter argues that punitive damages cannot be recovered from a decedent's estate under the relevant laws.

Legal correspondence (pre-motion letter)
2025-12-26

010.pdf

A joint letter dated January 10, 2020, from legal counsel representing plaintiffs (victims) and defendants (Epstein Estate executors) to Judge Debra Freeman. The letter provides a status update on discovery schedules and settlement discussions, specifically noting the development of a Victims' Compensation Program awaiting approval in the US Virgin Islands. The parties request a court conference in early February 2020.

Legal correspondence / court filing
2025-12-26

006.pdf

This document is a Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice filed on November 21, 2019, in the Southern District of New York. Attorney Sigrid S. McCawley of Boies Schiller Flexner LLP requests permission to represent plaintiff Juliette Bryant in her lawsuit against the executors of the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein (Indyke and Kahn). The filing includes a declaration of good standing and a certificate from the Supreme Court of Florida confirming McCawley's bar admission since 1997.

Legal motion, declaration, and proposed order (pro hac vice admission)
2025-12-26

005.pdf

This document is a Notice of Appearance filed on November 20, 2019, in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York. Attorney David Boies of Boies Schiller Flexner LLP formally enters his appearance as counsel for the plaintiff, Juliette Bryant, in her lawsuit against the executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate, Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn.

Legal filing (notice of appearance)
2025-12-26

003.pdf

This document is a civil summons filed on November 14, 2019, in the Southern District of New York for Case 1:19-cv-10479. Plaintiff Juliette Bryant is suing Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn in their capacities as executors of the Estate of Jeffrey Edward Epstein. The defendants are instructed to respond within 21 days to plaintiff's attorney Joshua Schiller.

Summons in a civil action (ao 440)
2025-12-26

002.pdf

Civil Cover Sheet (Form JS 44) filed on November 14, 2019, in the Southern District of New York. Plaintiff Juliette Bryant, a resident of South Africa, is suing Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn in their capacities as executors of the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. The nature of the suit is classified as 'Other Personal Injury' tort, with jurisdiction based on diversity (foreign citizen vs citizens of another state/USVI).

Civil cover sheet (form js 44)
2025-12-26

001.pdf

This document is a legal complaint filed by Juliette Bryant against the executors of Jeffrey Edward Epstein's estate. It details allegations of sexual abuse and trafficking by Epstein, beginning when Bryant was 20 years old, and describes Epstein's extensive sex trafficking network and his previous legal actions and statements regarding his conduct.

Complaint
2025-12-26

EFTA00030306.pdf

This document is a Notice of Deposition filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York on March 24, 2020. The plaintiff (name redacted) notifies the defendants that the oral deposition of Ghislaine Maxwell is scheduled for April 29, 2020, at the offices of Boies Schiller Flexner LLP. The document lists the legal counsel representing the plaintiff, Ghislaine Maxwell, and the executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate.

Legal notice (notice of deposition)
2025-12-25

EFTA00027979.pdf

This document contains the Petition for Probate and Letters Testamentary filed in the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands for the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein, stating the value of his personal property at over $577 million. It includes his Death Certificate issued by the City of New York, listing the cause of death as pending further study, and his Last Will and Testament, signed on August 8, 2019, two days before his death. The Will appoints Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn as executors and leaves the residuary estate to the trustees of The 1953 Trust.

Legal filings (petition for probate, death certificate, last will and testament)
2025-12-25

EFTA00023488.pdf

Opinion and Order from the Southern District of New York regarding a Plaintiff's motion to dismiss her case against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell after accepting a settlement from the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program. Maxwell opposed the dismissal, demanding the compensation amount be disclosed for use in her criminal trial and 'court of public opinion,' and seeking to preserve her right to pursue legal fees. The Court rejected Maxwell's demand for the unredacted settlement amount but agreed to modify the dismissal order to allow future litigation regarding attorneys' fees and costs.

Court order / opinion
2025-12-25

EFTA00023292.pdf

This document is a civil complaint filed on November 14, 2019, by Jane Doe 1000 against the executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate, seeking damages for battery and intentional infliction of emotional distress. The plaintiff alleges she was recruited in late 1999 under the guise of modeling opportunities for Victoria's Secret, then subjected to years of sexual abuse, manipulation, and trafficking by Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell in New York and Palm Beach. The complaint details Epstein's wealth, his specific properties in NY and NM, his 2008 plea deal, his 2019 arrest and death, and specific instances of abuse involving Maxwell.

Legal complaint (civil lawsuit)
2025-12-25

EFTA00023140.pdf

This document is a civil complaint filed on March 17, 2020, in the Southern District of New York by 'Jane Doe' against the executors of the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein (Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn). The plaintiff alleges she was recruited 19 years prior (around age 22) by Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell and subjected to years of sexual abuse, trafficking, and psychological control across Epstein's properties in New York, Florida, New Mexico, Paris, and the USVI. The complaint seeks damages for violations of the Trafficking Victims Protection Act (TVPRA) and lists specific assets, including high-value real estate and two aircraft (N908JE and N909JE), as subject to forfeiture.

Legal complaint (civil lawsuit)
2025-12-25

EFTA00018778.pdf

This document is the First Amended Complaint filed by the Government of the United States Virgin Islands against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein and associated entities and individuals. It details Epstein's residency in the Virgin Islands, his status as a registered sex offender, his death, and the complex web of corporations and trusts he used to conceal assets and facilitate criminal activities, including the trafficking and sexual abuse of women and underage girls on Little St. James and Great St. James. The complaint outlines the substantial value of Epstein's estate and assets located globally, as well as the roles of his co-executors, Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn.

First amended complaint (legal document)
2025-12-25

DOJ-OGR-00015263.jpg

This document is page 16 of a Plaintiff's response to interrogatories in a civil case against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein (represented by executors Indyke and Kahn), dated June 3, 2020. The text alleges that Jeffrey Epstein took photographs of the Plaintiff as a minor without her knowledge, and claims these photos are currently held by the federal government. It is signed by attorney Robert S. Glassman of Panish Shea & Boyle LLP.

Legal pleading (plaintiff's response to interrogatories)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00015261.jpg

This document is a Plaintiff's response to interrogatories in a civil case against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. It lists specific interactions Jane Doe had with Epstein's associates between 1994 and 1999, identifying Ghislaine Maxwell, Juan Alessi, Darren Indyke, Adam Perry Lang, Lesley Groff, Mark Epstein, and Sarah Kellen. The response details roles these individuals played, ranging from facilitating abuse and meetings to providing transportation and making threatening financial demands.

Legal filing (plaintiff's response to interrogatories)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00015260.jpg

This document is a Plaintiff's response to interrogatories in litigation against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. It itemizes evidence establishing the relationship between Jane Doe and Epstein, including flight logs, phone records from Darren Indyke, and financial records covering rent, tuition, acting classes, and intimate items like underwear. It also alleges that Epstein took photographs of the Plaintiff as a minor without her knowledge, which are currently held by the federal government.

Legal filing (plaintiff's response to interrogatories)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00015259.jpg

This document is the first page of a legal filing in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York (Case 1:20-cv-00484-JKG). It details Plaintiff 'Jane Doe's' response to the first set of interrogatories sent by the defendants, Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn, who are the executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate. The page contains standard legal preliminary statements regarding non-admission of facts and is marked as a Defendant's Exhibit (J-15-R) in a related criminal case (S2 20 Cr. 330).

Legal court filing (response to interrogatories)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00019445.jpg

This document is a Memorandum and Order from the U.S. District Court (SDNY) dated September 14, 2020, in the civil case of Jane Doe v. Darren K. Indyke, et al. Magistrate Judge Debra Freeman grants a motion filed by defendant Ghislaine Maxwell to stay the civil proceedings entirely pending the resolution of Maxwell's parallel criminal case (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The document notes that Maxwell is currently in custody at the MDC awaiting a criminal trial scheduled for July 12, 2021.

Legal court order (memorandum and order)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00019317.jpg

This is a legal letter from attorney David Boies representing plaintiff Annie Farmer, addressed to Judge Debra C. Freeman on May 18, 2020. The letter argues against Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell's request to stay discovery in the civil case pending a criminal investigation, citing case law that characterizes such stays as extraordinary remedies when no indictment has yet been issued. Boies asserts that Maxwell's motion is an unjustified attempt to delay litigation.

Legal correspondence (response to pre-motion conference request)
2025-11-20
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
0
As Recipient
0
Total
0
No communications found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity