RICHARD D. KAHN
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN
|
Executor |
78
Very Strong
|
74 | |
|
person
JEFFREY EDWARD EPSTEIN
|
Executor |
49
Very Strong
|
49 | |
|
person
JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN
|
Executor of estate |
22
Very Strong
|
22 | |
|
person
Bennet J. Moskowitz
|
Client |
19
Very Strong
|
19 | |
|
person
Bennet J. Moskowitz
|
Legal representative |
13
Very Strong
|
13 | |
|
person
JEFFREY EDWARD EPSTEIN
|
Executor of estate |
8
Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Executor |
8
Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN
|
Executor representative |
7
|
7 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Executor of estate |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN
|
Executor deceased |
5
|
5 | |
|
person
Darren K. Indyke
|
Co executors |
5
|
5 | |
|
person
Mary S. Dirago
|
Client |
4
|
4 | |
|
person
Darren K. Indyke
|
Co defendants |
4
|
4 | |
|
organization
Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein
|
Executor |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
Maria Farmer
|
Legal representative |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
Mary "Molly" S. Dirago
|
Client |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Charles L. Glover
|
Client |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Mary S. Dirago
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Teresa Helm
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN
|
Estate executor |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Valerie Sirota
|
Client |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Darren K. Indyke
|
Professional |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Charles L. Glover
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN
|
Business associate |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN
|
Executor administrator |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-05-12 | N/A | Notice of Appearance filed by Charles L. Glover | New York, New York | View |
| 2020-05-08 | N/A | Notice of Appearance filed by Matthew J. Aaronson | New York, New York | View |
| 2020-05-08 | N/A | Filing of Notice of Appearance by Valerie Sirota | New York, New York | View |
| 2020-04-30 | N/A | Entry of Opinion & Order by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer in Jane Doe 15 case. | New York, NY | View |
| 2020-04-30 | N/A | Filing of Opinion & Order dismissing punitive damages claim in Jane Doe 15 v. Indyke. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2020-04-28 | N/A | Entry of Opinion & Order by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer in Mary Doe v. Indyke et al. | New York, NY | View |
| 2020-04-28 | N/A | Opinion issued in related case Mary Doe v. Indyke and Kahn. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2020-04-16 | N/A | Defendants served responses and objections to Plaintiff's discovery requests. | N/A | View |
| 2020-04-14 | N/A | Filing of Defendants' Notice of Motion to Dismiss | New York, New York | View |
| 2020-04-13 | N/A | Deadline for Defendants to file reply | USDC SDNY | View |
| 2020-03-27 | N/A | Filing of Answer and Affirmative Defenses | New York, NY | View |
| 2020-03-17 | N/A | Summons filed in Civil Action Case 1:20-cv-02365-LJL-DCF | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2020-03-17 | N/A | Summons filed in the US District Court Southern District of New York. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2020-03-16 | N/A | Deadline for Defendants' reply | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2020-03-10 | N/A | Plaintiff served 68 Requests for Production and 14 Interrogatories on Defendants. | N/A | View |
| 2020-02-28 | N/A | Deadline for Defendants to file motion to dismiss | USDC SDNY | View |
| 2020-02-28 | N/A | Filing of Notice of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss | New York, New York | View |
| 2020-02-24 | N/A | New deadline for Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (extended from Feb 21). | New York, NY | View |
| 2020-02-24 | N/A | Proposed new deadline for Defendant's motion to dismiss. | Court | View |
| 2020-02-24 | N/A | Order issued granting plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint within two weeks. | New York, New York | View |
| 2020-02-21 | N/A | Deadline for Defendants' motion to dismiss | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2020-02-19 | N/A | Proposed new deadline for Defendants to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. | N/A | View |
| 2020-02-17 | N/A | Proposed extended deadline for Defendants to answer or respond to the complaint. | Court | View |
| 2020-01-28 | N/A | Filing of Joint Stipulation and Order on Plaintiff's Anonymity | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2020-01-23 | N/A | Parties exchanged initial Rule 26 disclosures. | N/A | View |
027.pdf
This document is a legal letter filed on July 21, 2021, in the case of Jane Doe v. the Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein. Plaintiff's attorney, Daniel J. Kaiser, requests a one-week extension from Judge Debra C. Freeman to submit a motion for the Plaintiff to proceed anonymously, citing a scheduling conflict with an arbitration. The letter notes that the Defendants consent to this extension request.
026.pdf
A letter dated June 30, 2021, from attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz of Troutman Pepper to Judge Debra C. Freeman regarding the case Jane Doe v. Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn (Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein). The letter informs the court that the Plaintiff wishes to lift the stay on the action and outlines agreed-upon deadlines for the Defendants to respond to the complaint and for the Plaintiff to file a motion regarding anonymity.
025.pdf
A status report filed on June 1, 2021, by attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz on behalf of the Co-Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein (Indyke and Kahn) in the case brought by Jane Doe. The letter informs Judge Freeman that the Plaintiff has submitted a claim to the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program. The parties jointly request that the civil case remain stayed while the compensation claim is considered, noting that a resolution via the Program would lead to the discontinuation of the lawsuit.
024.pdf
This document is a status report filed on May 3, 2021, by attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz on behalf of the executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein. It informs Judge Debra C. Freeman that the Plaintiff has submitted a claim to the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program and requests that the case remain stayed pending the resolution of that claim.
023.pdf
A status report filed on April 1, 2021, by attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz representing the Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein (Indyke and Kahn) in a civil suit brought by a Jane Doe. The letter informs Judge Freeman that the Plaintiff has submitted a claim to the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program. The parties request that the civil case remain stayed while the compensation claim is considered, noting that a resolution through the Program would lead to the discontinuation of the lawsuit.
019.pdf
A status report filed on January 4, 2021, by attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz on behalf of the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein executors (Indyke and Kahn) in the case of Jane Doe v. Indyke et al. The letter informs Judge Freeman that the Plaintiff intends to participate in the Epstein Victims’ Compensation Program and requests that the current litigation remain stayed pending the outcome of that claims process.
018.pdf
This document is a legal status report filed on December 1, 2020, by attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz regarding the civil case of Jane Doe v. the Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein. The letter informs Judge Debra C. Freeman that the Plaintiff intends to submit a claim to the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program and requests that the current litigation remain stayed to preserve resources pending the outcome of that administrative claim.
017.pdf
A legal status report filed on November 2, 2020, by attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz on behalf of the Co-Executors of the Jeffrey Epstein Estate (Indyke and Kahn). The letter informs Judge Freeman that the Plaintiff (Jane Doe) intends to submit a claim to the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program. Consequently, both parties request that the lawsuit remain stayed to allow for potential resolution through the Program outside of court.
016.pdf
This document is a status report filed on October 1, 2020, by attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz on behalf of the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein's executors (Indyke and Kahn) in the case of Jane Doe v. Indyke et al. The letter informs Judge Freeman that the Plaintiff intends to submit a claim to the Epstein Victims’ Compensation Program. Consequently, both parties request that the court case remain stayed to save resources while the claim is processed through the Program.
014.pdf
A status report filed on August 14, 2020, by attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz regarding the case of Jane Doe v. The Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. The document informs Judge Freeman that the Plaintiff is submitting claims to the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program and requests that the legal action remain stayed.
010.pdf
This document is a letter filed on May 28, 2020, from attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz to Judge Lewis J. Liman in the case of Jane Doe v. the Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein. The letter outlines an agreement between the parties wherein the defendants accept service of the complaint and are granted an extension until July 21, 2020, to respond. The document includes an endorsement by Magistrate Judge Debra Freeman dated June 15, 2020, ordering approval of this agreement.
005.pdf
This document is a Summons in a Civil Action issued by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York on March 18, 2020. It notifies Darren K. Indyke, as an executor of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein, that a lawsuit has been filed against him and co-executor Richard D. Kahn by a plaintiff identified as Jane Doe. The document instructs Indyke to respond to the complaint within 21 days or face a default judgment.
003.pdf
This document is a civil summons filed on March 17, 2020, in the Southern District of New York (Case 1:20-cv-02365). Plaintiff Jane Doe is suing Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn in their capacities as executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein. The summons is specifically addressed to Richard D. Kahn.
002.pdf
This document is a civil summons filed on March 17, 2020, in the Southern District of New York. It notifies Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn, as executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate, that they are being sued by a plaintiff identified as Jane Doe. The document instructs the defendants to respond to the complaint within 21 days to the plaintiff's attorney, Daniel J. Kaiser.
042.pdf
This document is a 'Joint Stipulation for Dismissal' filed on November 9, 2020, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York (Case 1:19-cv-11869). Plaintiff 'Anastasia Doe' agrees to dismiss her case against the Co-Executors of the Jeffrey Epstein Estate (Indyke and Kahn) with prejudice because her claims were resolved through the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program. The order is signed by Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil.
040.pdf
A court filing from the Southern District of New York dated November 2, 2020, stipulating the dismissal of a case brought by 'Anastasia Doe' against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. The dismissal is with prejudice and results from the plaintiff resolving her claims through the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program. The document is signed by attorneys Bradley J. Edwards (Plaintiff) and Bennet J. Moskowitz (Defendants).
036.pdf
This document is a Notice of Change of Address filed on July 8, 2020, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, for Case No. 19-CV-11869-MKV-DCF (Anastasia Doe v. Indyke & Kahn). Attorney Charles L. Glover notifies the court that his firm, formerly Troutman Sanders LLP, is now named Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders LLP, though the physical address in New York remains the same. Glover confirms he remains counsel of record for the case.
034.pdf
A court document filed on July 8, 2020, in the Southern District of New York for Case No. 19-CV-11869-MKV-DCF (Anastasia Doe v. Indyke et al.). Attorney Mary 'Molly' S. Dirago filed a Notice of Change of Address to reflect a change in her firm's name from Troutman Sanders LLP to Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders LLP, while retaining the same Chicago address.
022.pdf
Legal correspondence dated February 17, 2020, from attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz of Troutman Sanders LLP to Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil in the case of Anastasia Doe v. The Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. The letter requests a two-day extension for the defendants (Executors Indyke and Kahn) to respond to the complaint. The document includes an endorsement by Judge Vyskocil granting the request on February 18, 2020.
019.pdf
A legal letter dated February 17, 2020, from attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz of Troutman Sanders LLP to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The letter requests a consensual two-day extension for the Co-Executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate (Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn) to respond to a complaint filed by Anastasia Doe.
018-01.pdf
This document is an Affidavit filed on February 14, 2020, in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York. Attorney Mary "Molly" S. DiRago of Troutman Sanders LLP submits this sworn statement to support her motion for admission Pro Hac Vice to represent the Co-Executors of the Jeffrey Epstein Estate (Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn) in a civil suit brought by Anastasia Doe. The affidavit confirms her good standing with the Illinois Bar and lack of criminal or disciplinary history.
016.pdf
This document is a Joint Proposed Discovery Schedule filed on February 6, 2020, in the Southern District of New York case 'Anastasia Doe v. Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn'. It outlines the timeline and procedural rules for the discovery phase of the lawsuit against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein, including deadlines for initial disclosures, document requests, and expert discovery.
014.pdf
This document is a Court Order and Joint Stipulation filed on January 28, 2020, in the Southern District of New York regarding the case of Anastasia Doe v. The Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. The order, signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan, establishes strict protocols to maintain the plaintiff's anonymity, including requirements for sealing documents and executing non-disclosure agreements for any parties privy to her identity. It also documents the agreement between the Plaintiff's counsel (Bradley J. Edwards) and the Defendants (Executors Indyke and Kahn) to adhere to these anonymity protections.
007.pdf
This document is a letter motion dated January 7, 2020, from attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz (Troutman Sanders LLP) to Judge Alison J. Nathan. It requests approval for an agreement where the Co-Executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate (Indyke and Kahn) accept service of a complaint by Anastasia Doe and receive an extension until February 17, 2020, to respond. The document includes a handwritten 'SO ORDERED' endorsement by Judge Nathan dated January 8, 2020.
006.pdf
Legal correspondence dated January 7, 2020, from attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The letter requests court approval for an agreement wherein the executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate accept service of a complaint by 'Anastasia Doe' and receive an extension until February 17, 2020, to respond.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity