| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Redacted Recipient
|
Business associate |
69
Very Strong
|
65 | |
|
person
jeevacation@gmail.com; other redacted recipients
|
Business associate |
17
Very Strong
|
17 | |
|
person
Redacted Recipient
|
Legal representative |
14
Very Strong
|
14 | |
|
person
jeeitunes@gmail.com
|
Correspondents |
11
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
jeeitunes@gmail.com
|
Business associate |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Business associate |
11
Very Strong
|
14 | |
|
person
e:jeeitunes@gmail.com
|
Friend |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Correspondent |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
e:jeeitunes@gmail.com
|
Business associate |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
jeeitunes@gmail.com
|
Correspondent |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
James Petrucci
|
Professional |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
Sonya Thompson
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Donald Trump
|
Connection |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Redacted Recipient
|
Professional |
6
|
6 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Advisor confidant |
6
|
2 | |
|
organization
Charisma Edge
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
jeevacation@gmail.com
|
Correspondence |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Shirley V. Skipper-Scott
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein (addressee)
|
Acquaintance |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Bolsonaro
|
Political observer |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Collaborators |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
e:jeeitunes@gmail.com
|
Travel companions professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Dan
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jim Watson
|
Professional meeting |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Laura Lauder
|
Professional meeting |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Testimony of defense witness (sender's partner) and setup of massage table in courtroom. | Federal Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Interview at DARPA where a female head (Arathi) allegedly made inappropriate comments about a can... | DARPA | View |
| N/A | N/A | Learning trip on TECHNOLOGIES emerging from the region | Middle East (Israel, Emirat... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Potential filming session mentioned by redacted sender ('I can film in 10 days'). | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Appearance on Fox and Friends to release information about a wall in New Mexico. | Fox and Friends (Media) | View |
| 2022-02-09 | N/A | Email exchange regarding the purchase of courtroom sketches. | View | |
| 2021-11-23 | N/A | Discussion regarding witness order for the upcoming trial (Ghislaine Maxwell trial). | Unknown | View |
| 2021-09-03 | N/A | End of out-of-office period for the sender | Office | View |
| 2021-07-29 | N/A | Meeting with redacted individual | Unknown (likely SDNY offices) | View |
| 2021-06-11 | N/A | Discovery of a photo of Trump and Ghislaine Maxwell on Steve Bannon's phone during a legal review. | N/A | View |
| 2021-04-26 | N/A | Discussion regarding filing a Speedy Trial Act (STA) exclusion letter | Unknown | View |
| 2021-04-02 | N/A | Review of physical evidence from the Epstein file | Unknown | View |
| 2021-04-01 | N/A | Court Hearing | Court (Southern District) | View |
| 2021-03-29 | N/A | Scheduling of a potential interview between a witness/subject and the NYPD/FBI Task Force. | Texas (Remote/Phone likely) | View |
| 2021-03-25 | N/A | Read receipt generated for email concerning a call about Epstein | N/A | View |
| 2021-03-19 | N/A | Call re: Epstein FOIA | Teleconference / Call | View |
| 2021-03-12 | N/A | Sender out of office | Office | View |
| 2021-03-10 | N/A | Accepted: Epstein/Maxwell FOIA | Unknown | View |
| 2021-03-10 | N/A | Acceptance of a meeting or task related to Epstein/Maxwell FOIA | N/A | View |
| 2021-02-18 | N/A | Recipient office coordinates manual retrieval of document due to remote work schedule (25% capaci... | Office (implied SDFL) | View |
| 2020-11-03 | N/A | Phone call between sender and recipient referenced in the later email ('Per our call'). | N/A | View |
| 2020-10-30 | N/A | Call with DOJ regarding alternative locations/ways for victims to participate. | Teleconference | View |
| 2020-10-23 | N/A | Request for a conference call/meeting to discuss papers regarding the Epstein case. | N/A | View |
| 2020-10-11 | N/A | Internal discussion regarding the need to interview a female subject again based on an attached PDF. | Unknown | View |
| 2020-08-04 | N/A | Attempted physical handoff of thumb drive at office; drive left on bookshelf. | Office | View |
An automated 'Out of Office' email reply dated August 13, 2020. The subject line references a 'Ghislaine Maxwell defense motion,' indicating the correspondence relates to legal proceedings involving Maxwell. The sender and contact details are redacted.
This document is an email notification dated January 7, 2020, confirming the acceptance of a meeting titled 'FBI / SDNY Epstein update mtg'. The sender and recipient are redacted, but the subject line indicates ongoing coordination between the FBI and the Southern District of New York regarding the Epstein investigation several months after his death.
An email chain between USANYS officials dated July 12-13, 2019, discussing the Epstein case. One official reports a chance encounter with attorney Reid Weingarten at the Odeon restaurant, where Weingarten stated he had just met with his client (implied to be Epstein) and planned to reach out for an 'interesting conversation' regarding the breadth of sex trafficking statutes.
An email dated May 3, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York to Mark Manley. The email forwards a court order related to a 'Third Party Letter' in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (20 Cr. 330).
This document is an email dated August 30, 2019, from an FBI Special Agent in the New York Field Office's Violent Crimes Task Force to officials at the OIG and USANYS. The email transmits a 'Finalized 302' (an FBI interview report) attached as a PDF. The body of the email discusses specific subjects of the report, noting that the recipients might already have information on some individuals but potentially not others; however, all names are redacted.
This document is a heavily redacted email header dated January 26, 2021, exchanged between personnel at the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). It appears to be an internal communication or archiving record ('USAJournal111') containing metadata for an embedded message, with no visible body text.
An email dated April 30, 2021, sent to the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The sender attaches a '302' document (FBI interview report) dated April 10, 2020. The email discusses scheduling a future interview and notes scheduling difficulties because 'C-20' wants a specific redacted individual to attend who is currently 'swamped'.
This document is an email sent on March 19, 2021, between employees and a contractor of the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The email circulates a link to a 'Law & Crime' news article about a judge's ruling concerning redactions in the Ghislaine Maxwell case, specifically noting that some details were deemed too sensational to be public. The identities of the sender and recipients are redacted.
This document is an automatic email reply dated March 12, 2021, from a USANYS contractor. The subject line references a 'Question re Epstein Relativity,' suggesting an inquiry related to the Relativity e-discovery database used in the Epstein investigation. The sender provides out-of-office dates and alternative contacts.
Internal US Attorney's Office email chain dated December 21, 2020, discussing a legal challenge in the case U.S. v. Rivera. Judge Engelmayer demanded an explanation from the Bureau of Prisons regarding why Ghislaine Maxwell (at MDC) received significantly better accommodations (91 hours/week laptop access vs. 21 hours) than defendant Justin Rivera (at MCC). The email outlines the disparities and prepares for a required declaration due by December 31.
This document is an internal email from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York dated June 17, 2020. The email subject is 'pros memo examples' and it contains two attachments: a prosecution memo for 'GM' (likely Ghislaine Maxwell) dated April 10, 2020, and a prosecution memo for 'JE' (likely Jeffrey Epstein) dated June 17, 2019.
This document is an email dated April 14, 2021, from a Paralegal Specialist at the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to defense counsel regarding 'Discovery Production 7' in the case U.S. v. Thomas (No. 19 Cr 830). The email confirms the upload of discovery materials to USAfx and notes the attachment of a specific document marked 'attorney's eyes only'.
An internal email dated April 12, 2021, from a Victim Witness Assistant at the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to colleagues. The email provides two Excel spreadsheets ('Epstein.xlsx' and 'maxwell.xlsx') containing lists of victims recorded in the Victim Notification System (VNS).
An email chain between Assistant United States Attorneys at the SDNY dated October 22, 2019. The discussion revolves around a civil case opinion where Judge Pauley commented on Epstein's death at the MCC. The sender inquires if the office ever investigated guards involved in a 'serious' 2015 incident at the facility, noting it is still within the statute of limitations.
An email dated September 6, 2019, from an Assistant U.S. Attorney in the Southern District of New York to a colleague. The sender requests coverage for three meetings with 'Berman' (likely U.S. Attorney Geoffrey Berman) because they must travel to California from September 17-19 regarding the 'Epstein case'.
This document is an email notification dated January 9, 2019, indicating that an individual from the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) accepted a calendar invitation for an event titled 'Epstein Oral Argument-- Second Circuit'. The identities of the sender and recipient are redacted.
An email from March 6, 2019, covering a draft status memo regarding 'JE' (likely Jeffrey Epstein) intended for the ODAG (Office of the Deputy Attorney General). The sender seeks feedback on the document, noting its length exceeds the 'chiefs' recommendation due to necessary legal analysis.
This document is an automatic email reply dated August 30, 2019, regarding the legal case 'United States v. Epstein'. The sender notifies the recipient that they will be out of the office until September 16 and provides a redacted contact for immediate assistance.
An internal email from an Assistant United States Attorney at the Southern District of New York (SDNY) sent on November 28, 2021, the day before the opening statements in the trial of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The email serves as a morale booster for the prosecution team, explicitly contrasting the SDNY's willingness to prosecute 1994 crimes with prosecutors in Florida (a reference to the Epstein plea deal). It provides logistical details for staff wishing to attend the opening at the courthouse at 40 Foley Square.
An email chain from November 28, 2021, involving an Assistant United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York. The email outlines the prosecution's resolve to try Ghislaine Maxwell for sex crimes dating back to 1994, contrasting SDNY's approach with prosecutors in Florida. It provides logistical details for the trial opening, including courtroom numbers (40 Foley, Room 318) and start times for peremptory challenges and opening statements.
An email dated July 28, 2020, with a redacted sender and recipient. The subject is 'draft' and it includes an attachment titled '2020-07-27,_GM_letter_to_Judge_Nathan_re_protective_order.docx', likely referring to a legal filing for Ghislaine Maxwell (GM) addressed to Judge Alison Nathan. The body text is an apology for a delay in editing the document and a request for feedback.
An email dated July 25, 2020, sent between redacted parties regarding an 'updated protective order'. The sender asks the recipients for a quick review of an attached document titled '2020-07-25,_GM,_protective_order,_clean_version.docx', which likely pertains to Ghislaine Maxwell ('GM').
An internal email from a Paralegal Specialist at the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) dated December 1, 2021, regarding the US v. Maxwell trial. The sender asks colleagues about releasing '3500' material (witness statements) and discusses providing a list of admitted government and defense exhibits to 'Khalilah' (likely a court clerk).
An internal email chain from July 2, 2020, involving an Assistant U.S. Attorney from the Southern District of New York (SDNY). The email discusses the media breaking the story of Ghislaine Maxwell's arrest, specifically noting that reporter Tom Winter 'per usual' has a 'great source at FBI'. A link to an NBC New York article confirming the arrest is included.
An email sent on July 2, 2020 (the date of Ghislaine Maxwell's arrest), from an Assistant US Attorney in the SDNY regarding the filing of a 'bail memo' (detention memorandum). The email discusses coordination with the District of New Hampshire (DNH), noting that the memo will be filed in SDNY but a copy sent to the DNH magistrate judge. The attachment is titled '2020-07-02,_GM_detention_memorandum.docx'.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-02-09 | Paid | Redacted Sender | Elizabeth Williams | $0.00 | Potential purchase of original courtroom sketch... | View |
| 2019-06-06 | Paid | Redacted Sender | jeeitunes@gmail.com | $0.00 | Discussion of a 'deal for the entire training' | View |
| 2017-08-24 | Paid | Redacted Sender | Unknown Buyer | $0.00 | Sender sold shares in a startup for a '10x' ret... | View |
| 2004-02-07 | Received | Ghislaine Maxwell... | Redacted Sender | $0.00 | Sender requests a 'financial arrangement' or pa... | View |
Status report indicating no inmates on Suicide Watch and Epstein on Psych Observation.
Two DVDs containing video content. One is labeled 'original', the other 'THE ADVENTURES OF [REDACTED]'.
Notification that Inmate Epstein is being taken off Psych Observation and needs an appropriate cellmate. Confirms no Suicide Watch or Psych Observation status.
Congratulating Brad on the Deutsche Bank win and asking about the settlement figure and the JP Morgan lawsuit.
Sender states they will not talk to reporters because it doesn't feel right. Mentions a friend was contacted by reporters claiming to write about 'notable people from the east' to get information about the sender. Notes Slovakian press is 'going crazy'.
Maintained close touch primarily by phone and email.
Expresses preference for originals; asks to confirm if attached images are her work.
Confirmation of work; asks if prints or originals are desired; mentions availability Thursday.
Inquiry about purchasing sketches of sender and partner (defense witness/massage table setup).
Forwarding the explanation regarding prisoner issues raised in court.
Forwarding the press inquiry with the comment 'Passing this on.'
Forwarding original request for comment.
Provided attachments of versions planned to file by 5. Noted paragraph on trial team's availability.
Acknowledged resolution of the issue.
Discussed agreement on a sealed letter and sending final language as FYI.
Stated availability generally around until 3.
Clarification that the document is a 2019 order recently unsealed where Judge Netburn denied an application to modify a protective order.
Sender states they want to hear what lawyers say before agreeing to an interview and wants to ask questions. Offers availability Thursday 6am TX time, tomorrow 11am TX time, or Wednesday morning.
This is an automated read receipt indicating that a previous email with the subject 'Call with PAE re Epstein' was opened.
Asking for date and time that works for the recipient.
Forwarding previous email with 'FYI'.
FYI
Request to coordinate handoff of two drives (smaller one loaded that day, bigger one with full discovery copy) and password cover letter.
Confirmation of recipient joining the 'Maxwell team' as the 'law guy', scheduling an onboarding call, and sharing prosecution memos.
Character reference supporting bail.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity