United Kingdom
LocationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Citizenship |
5
|
1 | |
|
location
Hong Kong
|
Historical diplomatic |
5
|
1 | |
|
location
France
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Germany
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
location
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
location
United States
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
location
United States
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
location
France
|
Diplomatic colonial |
5
|
1 | |
|
location
USA
|
Alliance |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Citizenship property owner |
5
|
1 | |
|
location
China
|
Diplomatic tense |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Citizenship |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
[Redacted Client]
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-01-01 | N/A | Official elevation of UK-China relations to Golden Era status | United Kingdom | View |
| 2003-03-31 | N/A | Signing of Extradition Treaty with United Kingdom (Pending) | United Kingdom | View |
| 2003-03-31 | N/A | Signing of Extradition Treaty (Pending status) | Unknown | View |
| 1993-10-15 | N/A | Conseil d’Etat decision no. 142578 | France | View |
| 1978-03-01 | N/A | UK petitions UNCHR for special rapporteur in Cambodia; blocked by Syria, USSR, Yugoslavia. | UN | View |
| 1922-01-01 | N/A | League of Nations issued the Mandate of Palestine | Palestine | View |
| 1916-01-01 | N/A | Sykes-Picot Agreement | Middle East | View |
DOJ-OGR-00002005.jpg
This page is from a legal filing (Document 97) dated December 14, 2020, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The defense argues that Maxwell should be granted bail conditions involving an extradition waiver, citing legal precedents (Salvagno, Karni, Chen, Khashoggi) where such waivers were accepted as assurances against flight. The document states Maxwell has obtained expert reports from French and UK experts (specifically David Perry regarding the UK) concluding that she would be unable to resist extradition back to the US if she fled to those countries after signing a waiver.
DOJ-OGR-00002004.jpg
This document is page 32 of a defense filing (Document 97) dated December 14, 2020, arguing for Ghislaine Maxwell's release on bail. The text argues that Maxwell is not a flight risk due to intense media scrutiny, the global pandemic, and her willingness to sign irrevocable extradition waivers for the UK and France. It cites legal precedent (US v. Cirillo) supporting the use of extradition waivers as a condition for release.
DOJ-OGR-00001993.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing (Motion for Bail) arguing that Ghislaine Maxwell has now provided a thorough review of her finances for the years 2015-2020, addressing previous court concerns. Defense counsel retained UK accounting firm Macalvins to analyze bank statements, tax returns, and FBAR filings for Maxwell and her spouse. This report was further validated by a redacted former IRS Special Agent with 40 years of experience in financial fraud.
DOJ-OGR-00001987.jpg
This legal document is part of a motion arguing for bail for Ms. Maxwell. It refutes the court's initial reasons for denying bail by listing the court's findings—such as lack of family ties, unclear finances, and being a flight risk due to her French citizenship—and claims that new evidence demonstrates these concerns are unfounded. The document asserts that this new evidence, which could not be presented at the initial hearing, proves that reasonable bail conditions can be set to ensure her appearance in court.
DOJ-OGR-00001983.jpg
This is page 5 (filed as page 11 of 45) of a defense motion arguing for Ghislaine Maxwell's release on restrictive bail. The defense argues that the government lacks corroborating documentary evidence, relying instead on old witness testimony, and asserts that Maxwell is suffering under oppressive confinement conditions at the MDC, including isolation and COVID-19 risks. The document also references extradition laws in the UK and France and complaints about discovery failures.
DOJ-OGR-00001980.jpg
This document serves as page 8 of a legal filing (Document 97) from December 14, 2020, outlining a $28.5 million bail package proposed by Ghislaine Maxwell. The package includes a $22.5 million bond co-signed by Maxwell and her spouse, secured by all their U.S. assets, and $5 million in additional bonds co-signed by seven redacted close friends and family members. Additionally, an unnamed security company offered to post a $1 million bond, which the filing notes is an unprecedented action for a security firm.
DOJ-OGR-00001979.jpg
This legal document is a preliminary statement from Ghislaine Maxwell's legal team, filed on December 14, 2020, in support of a renewed motion for her release on bail. The memorandum argues that new information, including evidence of US family ties, a detailed financial report, and irrevocable waivers of extradition from the UK and France, addresses the court's previous concerns about flight risk. It also attacks the weakness of the government's case and proposes an 'expansive set of bail conditions' to ensure her presence in court.
DOJ-OGR-00001974.jpg
This document is the table of contents for a legal filing in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, dated December 14, 2020. The filing argues for the reconsideration of a court's bail decision concerning Ms. Maxwell, proposing she be granted bail under strict conditions. The arguments outlined include her deep family ties, her devotion to her spouse, financial transparency, and claims that she was not hiding from authorities but rather protecting herself from media and physical threats.
DOJ-OGR-00001904.jpg
This document is page 27 of a court transcript from December 10, 2020, in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The prosecution argues that the defendant poses a significant flight risk because she holds citizenship in France (which does not extradite its citizens) and the UK, owns property abroad, and possesses 'significant and undetermined and undisclosed wealth.' The government expresses concern that she could live indefinitely beyond the reach of US extradition.
DOJ-OGR-00016917.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) dated August 10, 2022. It details the admission of several defense exhibits (DH1-DH4, J2) and a stipulation read by attorney Mr. Everdell regarding the HM Land Registry in the UK. The stipulation confirms the registry's authority and authenticates documents retrieved in 2021 regarding two London properties: 69 Stanhope Mews East and 44 Kinnerton Street.
DOJ-OGR-00010560.jpg
This document is a page from a Government sentencing filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) arguing for a 'Four-Point Leadership Enhancement' under sentencing guidelines. It asserts that the defendant (Ghislaine Maxwell) was a leader of an 'otherwise extensive' criminal conspiracy involving Jeffrey Epstein, spanning the UK, Virgin Islands, and three states. The text cites testimony from victims (Carolyn, Virginia) and staff (Juan Alessi, pilots) to demonstrate the scale of the operation and the defendant's role in recruiting victims and managing Epstein's properties.
DOJ-OGR-00019882.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing (Defense Motion) dated July 10, 2020, arguing for Ghislaine Maxwell's release on bail. The defense proposes a $5 million bond secured by UK property and co-signed by six individuals, along with strict home confinement in New York and GPS monitoring. The text argues that the alleged conduct is 25 years old and that Maxwell is entitled to the presumption of innocence.
DOJ-OGR-00019880.jpg
This is page 2 of a legal memorandum filed by the defense in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It outlines her background, emphasizing her ties to the US, family support, and citizenship status to argue against flight risk. It counters the government's position that she was 'hiding' and argues that detention is not warranted.
DOJ-OGR-00019870.jpg
This document is page 6 of a court filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) arguing for the detention of the defendant (Ghislaine Maxwell). The text outlines her flight risk due to her 'extensive international ties,' noting she holds citizenship and passports for the US, UK, and France. It cites CBP records showing frequent travel, including 15 international flights in the prior three years to locations like Japan and Qatar.
DOJ-OGR-00010569.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing, argues that a defendant's actions satisfy the requirements for a 'covered sex crime' under the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines. The prosecution asserts that the defendant engaged in a pattern of prohibited sexual conduct, including transporting victims (Jane) and non-consensual touching (Jane and Carolyn), justifying a sentencing enhancement. The document refutes the defendant's claim that the guideline is inapplicable, citing case law and the original congressional intent to ensure lengthy incarceration for such offenders.
DOJ-OGR-00010399.jpg
This legal document is a portion of a court filing, likely a response or motion, dated April 29, 2022. It defends the Court's decisions regarding jury instructions against objections from the Defendant (Maxwell). The Court rejected the Defendant's requests to limit the charges to specific travel routes (e.g., from Florida to New York) and to instruct the jury on the age of consent laws in New Mexico, the United Kingdom, and Florida, arguing these requests were unnecessary, inaccurate, and would confuse the jury.
DOJ-OGR-00003123.jpg
This legal document, part of case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE filed on April 16, 2021, argues that the indictment against the defendant is valid. The prosecution asserts that the defendant's alleged actions of recruiting and grooming 'Minor Victim-3' for 'Epstein' constitute sufficient evidence of participation in a conspiracy, even if the substantive crime of transporting a minor was not completed. A footnote addresses a defense objection to the term 'abuse,' noting that while Minor Victim-3 may have been over the age of consent in the United Kingdom for some acts, she will testify to the traumatic nature of the experience.
DOJ-OGR-00032444.jpg
This document contains four phone message slips, primarily addressed to 'JE' (Jeffrey Epstein). Notable messages include a call from John Barrow (UK area code) returning a voice message, and a significant message from 'Tony' on September 2, 2003, asking if Epstein 'would like anyone today.' The document carries a Department of Justice (DOJ) identifier code.
DOJ-OGR-00011730.jpg
This document is a court transcript of an opening statement by defense attorney Ms. Sternheim regarding a witness named 'Kate'. The text characterizes Kate as an ambitious former actress and model who maintained a decade-long relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, including sending him emails and photos while he was incarcerated. The defense argues Kate was above the age of consent in all relevant jurisdictions (UK, NY, FL) and implies her testimony may be unreliable due to admitted drug use.
DOJ-OGR-00020133.jpg
This document is page 6 of a court order filed on December 28, 2020, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330). The text details the Court's rejection of the Defendant's motion for release, despite her offers to pay for private security, waive extradition rights from the UK and France, and arguments regarding COVID-19 risks in confinement. The Court concludes that no combination of conditions can reasonably assure the Defendant's appearance.
DOJ-OGR-00020126.jpg
This legal document, dated December 17, 2020, analyzes the extradition case of Ms. Maxwell from the United Kingdom to the United States. It argues that legal bars to extradition are unlikely to apply to her case, highlighting that the UK Secretary of State's power to refuse extradition is exceptionally rare and that the 2003 Extradition Act is designed to facilitate, not hinder, such proceedings.
DOJ-OGR-00020121.jpg
This document is a page from a legal opinion by French lawyer William Julié, filed as an exhibit in the Ghislaine Maxwell case. It analyzes the extradition treaty between France and the USA, arguing that France has the discretion to extradite its own citizens. The text specifically rebuts a DOJ argument based on the 2007 'Hans Peterson' case (involving Senators Obama and Durbin), stating that the Peterson outcome was a discretionary ministerial decision rather than a binding judicial precedent.
DOJ-OGR-00020117.jpg
This document is page 14 of a defense motion filed on December 23, 2020, arguing for Ghislaine Maxwell's release on bail. The defense argues that flight risk concerns regarding the UK and France are overstated and that the recent arrest of associate Jean-Luc Brunel in France diminishes her incentive to flee there. Additionally, the motion highlights a COVID-19 surge at the MDC (113 cases) and restrictive prison conditions, including mouth inspections and potential suspension of legal calls, as further justification for bail.
DOJ-OGR-00020115.jpg
This page from a legal filing (Document 102) outlines arguments by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team refuting the government's claim that she is a flight risk. The defense argues that her use of a trust and pseudonym to buy a home was for protection against harassment, not to hide, and emphasizes her willingness to waive extradition rights to France and the UK. It also addresses conflicting expert opinions regarding whether France would extradite her, contrasting expert William Julié's report with a general letter from the French Ministry of Justice.
DOJ-OGR-00020105.jpg
This document is the table of contents for a legal filing on behalf of Ms. Maxwell, dated December 23, 2020, likely related to a bail application. The arguments outlined challenge the government's case by highlighting its reliance on limited witness testimony, asserting Ms. Maxwell's strong ties to the U.S. (including her spouse), her full financial disclosure for a bond, and the low probability of her being a flight risk. The filing also leverages a recent COVID surge at the MDC facility as an additional reason for granting bail.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity