DAMIAN WILLIAMS
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Prosecutor defendant |
24
Very Strong
|
20 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Adversarial |
12
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
12
Very Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Business associate |
12
Very Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Professional |
11
Very Strong
|
16 | |
|
person
Alison Moe
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
17 | |
|
person
ANDREW ROHRBACH
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
17 | |
|
person
Lara Pomerantz
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
19 | |
|
location
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Professional hierarchical |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
location
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
Alison Moe
|
Business associate |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
ANDREW A. ROHRBACH
|
Professional |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
Alison Moe
|
Subordinate superior |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Subordinate superior |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Superior subordinate |
6
|
2 | |
|
organization
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Andrew A. Rohrbach
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
United States Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
J. A. H. Hodge
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
ANDREW ROHRBACH
|
Professional subordinate superior |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Lara Pomerantz
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Lara Pomerantz
|
Professional subordinate superior |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
TOVA NOEL
|
Prosecutor defendant |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Catherine O’Hagan Wolfe
|
Professional |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Legal stipulation | The prosecution and defense formally agreed that Government Exhibits 52A, 52D, 52E, 52F, 52G, and... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2023-06-29 | N/A | Submission of legal filing concluding that the judgment of conviction should be affirmed. | New York, New York | View |
| 2023-06-29 | N/A | Filing of Document 79 (Certificate of Compliance). | Court | View |
| 2023-04-26 | Legal filing | Filing of a Certificate of Compliance for a motion in Case 22-1426, certifying that the motion co... | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-06-28 | Sentencing | Sentencing hearing for the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2022-06-26 | Court filing | The Government submitted a motion filed by Kate's attorney. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2022-06-22 | N/A | Filing of Government's sentencing recommendation conclusion. | New York, New York | View |
| 2022-06-22 | Legal filing | The U.S. Government filed its sentencing memorandum in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2022-05-11 | N/A | Filing of Document 661 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-05-11 | N/A | Filing of Document 660 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-04-01 | N/A | Filing of Document 652 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-04-01 | Legal filing | Document 650 was filed in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-03-15 | N/A | Filing of Government's opposition to defendant's motion for a new trial. | New York, New York | View |
| 2022-03-08 | Court proceeding/appearance | A court proceeding in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell, with a list of a... | New York, N.Y., Southern Di... | View |
| 2022-03-07 | Legal filing | The United States Attorney's office filed an Application for Immunity Order to compel a witness t... | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2022-03-07 | Legal authorization | Approval was granted for the U.S. Attorney's office to seek a court order to compel testimony fro... | N/A | View |
| 2022-03-07 | N/A | Filing of Document 632 | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2022-03-01 | N/A | Filing of Document 635 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-02-25 | N/A | Filing of Government's response to defendant's post-trial motions | New York, New York | View |
| 2022-02-24 | N/A | Filing of Document 617 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-02-16 | Court filing | Document 603 was filed in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-02-11 | Legal filing | Filing of Document 598 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, stating no redactions are sought for juror ques... | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-02-02 | N/A | Submission of Government's conclusion regarding defendant's motion for a new trial | New York, New York | View |
| 2022-02-02 | Legal filing | The United States Attorney's office submitted a document requesting the Court to deny a defendant... | New York, New York | View |
| 2022-01-10 | Court filing | A document was filed in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE stating the defense's agreement with the governmen... | Southern District of New York | View |
DOJ-OGR-00020856.jpg
This document is the cover page of a court transcript for the jury trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, held on December 28, 2021, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. It identifies the case as United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell, lists the presiding judge, Hon. Alison J. Nathan, and details the legal counsel appearing for both the prosecution and the defense.
DOJ-OGR-00018863.jpg
This document is the cover page of a court transcript for the jury trial of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell, held on December 8, 2021, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. It lists the presiding judge, Hon. Alison J. Nathan, and identifies the legal counsel for both the prosecution and the defense, as well as other individuals present from agencies like the FBI and NYPD.
DOJ-OGR-00018599.jpg
This document is the cover page for the court transcript of the jury trial in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The trial took place on December 7, 2021, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, with Judge Alison J. Nathan presiding. The document lists the appearances of the legal counsel for both the prosecution and the defense, as well as other individuals present.
DOJ-OGR-00016217.jpg
Cover page for a court transcript of the jury trial United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated December 10, 2021. It lists Judge Alison J. Nathan as presiding and details the appearances of the prosecution team (U.S. Attorney's Office) and the defense team (Haddon Morgan and Foreman, Cohen & Gresser). Law enforcement representatives from the FBI and NYPD were also noted as present.
DOJ-OGR-00016111.jpg
This document is the cover page of a court transcript for the jury trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, held on November 29, 2021, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. It identifies the case number, the presiding judge (Hon. Alison J. Nathan), and lists the legal counsel for both the prosecution (United States of America) and the defense, as well as other individuals present from the FBI and NYPD.
DOJ-OGR-00015541.jpg
This legal document is a stipulation dated December 10, 2021, from a case in the Southern District of New York. It is an agreement between the U.S. Attorney's office, represented by Damian Williams, and the attorneys for defendant Ghislaine Maxwell. The parties agree that 'Government Exhibit 1009' can be admitted as evidence at trial.
DOJ-OGR-00015540.jpg
This document is a legal stipulation from the case of the United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell in the Southern District of New York. In it, both the prosecution, led by U.S. Attorney Damian Williams, and the defense team for Ghislaine Maxwell agree that certain government exhibits are authentic photocopies of pages from a larger exhibit. This agreement is intended to streamline the admission of evidence in court.
DOJ-OGR-00015539.jpg
This document is the signature page (page 3) of a legal stipulation from the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, dated November 28, 2021. It confirms an agreement between the prosecution (Southern District of New York) and the defense team to admit specific Government Exhibits (1004, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, and 16) into evidence. The document bears the signatures of Assistant US Attorneys and Maxwell's defense counsel.
DOJ-OGR-00015537.jpg
This document is a legal stipulation filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York for the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (S2 20 CR 330 AJN). In it, both the prosecution and the defense agree to the authenticity of three government exhibits (11, 12, and 13), which are certified copies of birth certificates from the states of New York, Rhode Island, and Missouri. This agreement serves to enter these documents into evidence without the need for further authentication in court.
DOJ-OGR-00015211.jpg
This document is a signature page from a legal filing dated December 17, 2021, in New York, New York. It identifies the legal teams for a case in the Southern District of New York, listing Damian Williams as the U.S. Attorney for the prosecution and several attorneys, including Christian Everdell and Laura Menninger, as counsel for the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00015210.jpg
This document is a legal stipulation in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, agreeing to the admissibility of Palm Beach County School records. It confirms that witness Dominique Hyppolite would verify the records' authenticity and identifies specific exhibits (DH-1, DH-2, DH-3, J-2) related to a redacted individual and a witness identified as 'Jane'. The document itself is marked as Defense Exhibit DH-4.
DOJ-OGR-00015186.jpg
This document is a signature page from a legal stipulation dated December 6, 2021, in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. It confirms that 'Defendant's Trial Exhibit B' is agreed to be received in evidence. The document is signed by Maxwell's defense team (Everdell, Menninger, Pagliuca, Sternheim) and the prosecution team from the Southern District of New York (Comey, Moe, Pomerantz, Rohrbach).
DOJ-OGR-00015170.jpg
This is a legal stipulation dated December 17, 2021, from a case in the Southern District of New York. The document is an agreement between the U.S. Attorney's office, representing the prosecution, and the attorneys for the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell, allowing a specific piece of evidence (Government Exhibit 1010) to be admitted at trial.
DOJ-OGR-00015169.jpg
This is a legal stipulation in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (S2 20 CR 330). Both the prosecution and defense agree that on August 17, 2021, attorney Robert Glassman told a prosecutor that he had previously advised his client, a witness known as 'Jane', to cooperate because it was 'morally right' and would 'help her case.' This document is marked as Defendant's Exhibit A-6.
DOJ-OGR-00015168.jpg
This document is a legal stipulation from the trial of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated December 17, 2021. It records an agreement between the prosecution (SDNY) and the defense to admit specific exhibits (MG-12, MG-1, 610-A, and A-5) into evidence. The document bears signatures from both the Assistant United States Attorneys and Maxwell's defense counsel.
DOJ-OGR-00015166.jpg
This document is a legal stipulation from the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (S2 20 CR 330). It represents an agreement between the prosecution and defense regarding the authenticity of UK land registry records. Specifically, it validates records retrieved in 2021 concerning properties at 69 Stanhope Mews East and 44 Kinnerton Street in London, with one record dating back to ownership confirmation in January 1994.
DOJ-OGR-00015165.jpg
This legal document is a stipulation dated December 17, 2021, between the attorneys for defendant Ghislaine Maxwell and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York. The parties agree that a document marked as "Defense Exhibit A1" may be received as evidence at trial. The agreement is signed by representatives from both the defense and the prosecution.
DOJ-OGR-00015164.jpg
This document is a legal stipulation in the case of the United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, filed in the Southern District of New York. It states as an agreed-upon fact that a witness, referred to as "Kate," and her counsel met with government prosecutors on September 3, 2021. During this meeting, Kate's counsel provided a partially completed U-Visa application and discussed her visa status with the prosecutors.
DOJ-OGR-00022149.jpg
This legal document, filed on January 3, 2022, is a court order from the Southern District of New York for case 1:19-cr-00830-AT. It contains a directive from U.S. Attorney Damian Williams, dated December 13, 2021, to file a "nolle prosequi," effectively dropping the prosecution against defendants Tova Noel and Michael Thomas. The order is officially approved and signed by U.S. District Judge Analisa Torres on January 3, 2022.
DOJ-OGR-00022146.jpg
This is a legal document filed on December 30, 2021, in the Southern District of New York (Case 1:19-cr-00830-AT). United States Attorney Damian Williams directs that an order of 'nolle prosequi' (abandonment of prosecution) be filed regarding defendants Tova Noel and Michael Thomas, effectively dropping the charges related to Indictment 19 Cr. 830. The document includes a space for Judge Analisa Torres to order the action.
DOJ-OGR-00021880.jpg
This legal document is a court filing dated December 2, 2024, concerning the appeal of Ghislaine Maxwell's conviction. It identifies the legal counsel for both the appellant, Maxwell, and the appellee, the United States, and states that Maxwell is appealing her June 29, 2022, conviction and sentence from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York for charges including conspiracy and sex trafficking of a minor.
DOJ-OGR-00021850.jpg
This document is page 3 of a court filing (Case 22-1426) dated September 17, 2024, detailing the appeal of Ghislaine Maxwell's conviction. Written by Circuit Judge José A. Cabranes, it lists the legal counsel for both sides and summarizes Maxwell's June 29, 2022, conviction for sex trafficking and conspiracy, including her sentencing of concurrent prison terms totaling 240 months (20 years).
DOJ-OGR-00021797.jpg
This document is Page 3 of a legal filing (Case 22-1426) dated September 17, 2024. It lists the legal counsel for both the United States (Appellee) and Ghislaine Maxwell (Appellant) and begins the written opinion by Circuit Judge José A. Cabranes regarding Maxwell's appeal of her 2022 conviction for sex trafficking and conspiracy involving minors. The text details her conviction statutes and sentences of 60, 120, and 240 months imprisonment.
DOJ-OGR-00021740.jpg
This document is a Certificate of Compliance filed on June 29, 2023, for Case 22-1426. Assistant U.S. Attorney Won S. Shin certifies on behalf of U.S. Attorney Damian Williams that the associated legal brief complies with a court order from April 28, 2023, and contains 19,291 words.
DOJ-OGR-00021739.jpg
This document is the conclusion page (Page 92 of 93) of a legal filing (Case 22-1426) dated June 29, 2023. It is submitted by US Attorney Damian Williams and Assistant US Attorneys Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Won S. Shin of the Southern District of New York, formally requesting that a judgment of conviction be affirmed.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity