| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
V/W legal adviser (EOUSA)
|
Professional positive |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Unknown Recipient (Top Email)
|
Subordinate superior |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Redacted Sender (Bottom Email)
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Unknown Recipient (Top Email) / Sender (Bottom Email)
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Redacted Advisor
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Redacted Recipient (Top Email)
|
Friend |
1
|
1 |
This document is an email chain from November 2019 involving personnel from the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) and redacted recipients. The subject is 'Epstein catch up,' and the discussion focuses on scheduling a meeting to discuss a recent interview. The participants attempt to coordinate schedules between Monday evening and Wednesday morning, with one participant noting they will be in White Plains on Wednesday.
This document is an email chain dated July 25, 2019, between officials at the US Attorney's Office (USANYS) and a Supervisory Staff Attorney at the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) in New York. The correspondence concerns the transfer of evidence, specifically 'staff memos and photos,' related to an 'incident involving Jeffrey Epstein earlier this week' (likely the July 23 suicide attempt). The MCC attorney requests a written email request in lieu of a subpoena to release the documents, and the USANYS official subsequently forwards the materials for a 'walled off AUSA review'.
An email thread from July 2019 discussing an upcoming NBC 4 news story reporting that Jeffrey Epstein had either been attacked or attempted to hurt himself while in custody. The correspondents discuss the media report and note that they declined to comment to the press.
This document is a December 2019 email chain involving the law firm Edwards Pottinger LLC. The emails discuss managing a digital 'Epstein share drive' and contain numerous PDF attachments representing historical communications (emails, calls, meetings) with Jeffrey Epstein dating from 2008 to 2012. The attachments reference specific interactions, including a 'spot of bother' conversation in 2008 and meetings in 2010.
An email chain from November 2021 between personnel at the Southern District of New York regarding the opening of the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. An Assistant U.S. Attorney sends a motivational message distinguishing the SDNY from Florida prosecutors who handled previous Epstein cases, asserting the office's commitment to justice for historical crimes, and providing logistical details for staff wishing to attend the opening statements.
An email exchange dated October 10, 2021, between unidentified parties (likely legal counsel) discussing the formatting and sharing of the 'Maxwell Jury Questionnaire' and a 'Joint Proposed Voir Dire' document. The sender expresses concern about accurately applying color-coded formatting changes (red to green, blue to purple) likely representing edits from the Defense and Government teams.
An email thread from March 30, 2021, among DOJ officials discussing a Westlaw alert for a 'supposedly sealed order' related to Jeffrey Epstein and Boies Schiller. The thread clarifies that the document is actually a 2019 order recently unsealed in which Judge Netburn denied an application to modify a protective order in a civil case. The participants express confusion initially about why a sealed order appeared public.
This document contains an email thread between USANYS officials discussing the Epstein probate proceedings in the U.S. Virgin Islands. The emails detail the filing of a petition for a victim claims fund, the lack of a complete online docket for the case, and internal discussions about obtaining a 'sharing order' and a '6(e) order' (likely referring to Grand Jury secrecy rules).
This document is an email chain from March 2021 between prosecutors at the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York. They are discussing the draft of the government's opposition to Ghislaine Maxwell's (GM) third bail application. The emails highlight coordination with the Office of International Affairs (OIA) regarding issues related to France and Maxwell's offer of citizenship renunciation.
Internal email thread from the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York dated July 29, 2019. An attorney responds to a request for placing NYU Law interns, stating they are interested but warning that their workload for the fall will be 'mostly Epstein-related,' indicating the heavy resource allocation to the Epstein case just prior to his death.
An email exchange from October 27, 2021, between an Assistant United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York and a staff member (likely a law student or intern). The AUSA requested a citation check on a government brief. The staff member replied with a partial completion (attachment 'Govt_Reply_v2_MH.docx'), noting they had to stop to attend a class and would resume the following morning. The document contains a Bates stamp EFTA00017887.
An internal email thread between Assistant United States Attorneys in the Southern District of New York dated February 6, 2020. The emails discuss news articles (NY Post and NY Daily News) reporting on an attorney named Foy (representing an Epstein guard) who had a shouting match with a judge over vacation plans. One prosecutor comments that the attorney's situation is 'WAY less sympathetic' because he had not yet booked the vacation.
An email thread from November 24, 2021, between the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) and likely defense counsel regarding the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. The discussion concerns the admissibility of mental health evidence, specifically referencing 'Sasso' and a motion to preclude 'Hall et al', and includes the exchange of a brief and an opinion by Judge Nathan. The sender notes they have litigated nine experts at that point.
This document contains an email chain between FBI personnel regarding an analysis of Ghislaine Maxwell's credit cards. A forensic accountant provided a draft analysis, and a subsequent email questions a discrepancy regarding an American Express card number starting with '34' instead of the standard '37', referencing a statement closing date of December 18, 2019.
An email thread from April 2020 involving USANYS personnel discussing the Epstein case. A contractor asks on behalf of another individual if Ghislaine Maxwell answered any interrogatories in a specific, redacted lawsuit. The respondent replies that they are not aware of any such answers.
This document is an email chain from July 1, 2019, involving the United States Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY). A redacted official discusses a scheduling conflict involving a cardiologist appointment, a 'GSA meeting,' and an 'Epstein meeting.' This correspondence occurred just days before Jeffrey Epstein was arrested by federal agents on July 6, 2019.
An email chain from April 2020 involving an Assistant U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York. The attorney asks colleagues if they are facing pressure from leadership ('the chiefs'), specifically citing 'near-daily prodding' regarding the Epstein case deadlines, which the attorney feels are unreasonable given the 'circumstances of the world' (likely referring to the COVID-19 pandemic). A colleague replies comparing the situation to their own work on cases involving AMI.
This document is an email chain from October 2021 between an FBI Forensic Accountant and likely a prosecutor from the US Attorney's Office (USANYS). The correspondence concerns the compilation and review of documents related to Jeffrey Epstein's financial accounts, specifically noting that Ghislaine Maxwell was a signer on these accounts. The requestor asks for subsequent account statements to analyze balances.
An internal email chain from the Southern District of New York (SDNY) regarding the commencement of the trial *United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell*. An Assistant US Attorney writes a motivational message to colleagues, contrasting the SDNY's willingness to prosecute historical crimes with prosecutors in Florida, and asserts that Maxwell sexually exploited underage girls. The email provides logistical details for the trial opening at 40 Foley Square.
This document is an internal email thread from the US Attorney's Office (USANYS) dated November 23, 2021. It details the receipt of a voicemail tip from an individual claiming to have information about Ghislaine Maxwell and asserting they are a friend of George Soros. The correspondence confirms that the office's protocol is to forward such tips to the FBI for logging by case agents.
This document is an internal email thread between officials at the USAFLS (US Attorney's Office, Southern District of Florida) dated November 21, 2008. The correspondence discusses the upcoming expiration of a grand jury related to the Epstein case at the end of January and arranges an immediate in-person meeting to discuss new information found by a redacted individual.
An email exchange between personnel at the US Attorney's Office (USAFLS) dated June 30, 2008. An Assistant U.S. Attorney reports informing attorney Ted Leopold about the news regarding Jeffrey Epstein (likely the plea deal/jail sentence). Leopold indicated he represented three victims and was happy with the news. A colleague replies with congratulations on the case, referring to Epstein as a 'filthy rich bad guy going to jail' due to their dedication.
This document is an internal email thread from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida dated September 17, 2009. The emails discuss media strategy in anticipation of a Palm Beach Post article about the Epstein deal. An Assistant U.S. Attorney clarifies that U.S. Attorney 'Alex' (likely Alexander Acosta) intended the prosecution to remain a state case to allow State Attorney Barry Krischer to 'save face,' while establishing minimum penalties as a 'floor' rather than a ceiling.
This document is an email chain from December 2007 involving Assistant U.S. Attorneys in West Palm Beach discussing the finalization of paperwork for Jeffrey Epstein's plea conference. The correspondents discuss drafting a factual basis for the 'procuring statute' that is 'short and sweet with no names,' with a date set for December 21. One prosecutor expresses frustration, stating they find the situation regarding information requests 'very demoralizing.'
An email chain from November 7, 2007, involving an Assistant U.S. Attorney in West Palm Beach. The attorney asks a colleague if there is news from the defense, State Attorney, or Judge Davis, and reports a concerning development where private investigators have approached girls who were not part of the state's case against Epstein. The recipient replies simply with 'No.'
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity