LAW OFFICES OF BOBBI C. STERNHEIM
OrganizationRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Bobbi C. Sternheim
|
Professional employment |
6
|
1 |
DOJ-OGR-00001866.jpg
This legal letter, sent by attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim on behalf of her client Ghislaine Maxwell to Judge Alison J. Nathan, formally complains about Maxwell's harsh and restrictive conditions at the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC). The letter refutes a previous communication from MDC staff, detailing issues such as significant weight loss, isolation, constant surveillance, and a recent quarantine that hindered her defense preparation. Sternheim renews the request for the MDC Warden, Heriberto Tellez, to respond directly to the Court and justify these conditions.
DOJ-OGR-00001778.jpg
This document is a Notice of Appearance filed on October 5, 2020, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York for the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim formally notifies the court that she will be serving as legal counsel for the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00001439.jpg
This document is page 2 of a legal filing by attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim regarding the confinement conditions of Ghislaine Maxwell at the MDC. The text alleges severe mistreatment by prison staff, including physical abuse, withholding of food, destruction of legal documents, and excessive surveillance (including filming her showers). It also argues against flight risk allegations by citing monitored calls that demonstrate Maxwell's strong ties to the United States and desire to clear her name.
DOJ-OGR-00001438.jpg
This legal letter, sent from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to Judge Alison J. Nathan, protests the detention conditions of her client, Ghislaine Maxwell, at the MDC. The letter argues that the 15-minute flashlight checks are disruptive and based on spurious justifications, such as 'enhanced security'. Sternheim refutes the government's claim that Maxwell possesses a contraband eye mask and provides evidence from an intake form showing Maxwell did not express safety concerns about being in the general population, contradicting the MDC's assertions.
DOJ-OGR-00001431.jpg
This legal document, filed on April 29, 2021, is a letter from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to the Court regarding the confinement conditions of her client, Ms. Maxwell, at the MDC. Sternheim requests the Court to order the MDC to stop the disruptive 15-minute flashlight surveillance of Ms. Maxwell and argues that the threat of placing her in the Special Housing Unit (SHU) is ironic and unwarranted, as her only contact is with staff.
DOJ-OGR-00001402.jpg
This legal document is a letter from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to the Court, filed on February 7, 2021, concerning her client, Ms. Maxwell. Sternheim argues that the Court's request for public updates on Maxwell's confinement is harmful, fueling negative media attention and jeopardizing her right to a fair trial. The letter criticizes the government's actions and requests that any future updates on Maxwell's condition be filed under seal to protect her privacy and legal rights.
DOJ-OGR-00001401.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing by attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim regarding the confinement conditions of Ghislaine Maxwell. It details grievances including the persistence of mail delays (specifically a FedEx package with a discovery disc), the serving of moldy food, sleep deprivation due to constant lighting and flashlight checks, and the deletion of legal emails via CorrLinks. The filing argues that Maxwell is in 'de facto solitary confinement' and lacks adequate computer resources to review discovery for her trial.
DOJ-OGR-00001399.jpg
This document is page 2 of a legal filing by attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim regarding the confinement conditions of Ghislaine Maxwell at the MDC. The letter details severe sanitary issues including mold, vermin, and undrinkable tap water, as well as restrictive legal visitation conditions that impede attorney-client privilege. It also notes Maxwell's deteriorating health and lack of access to fresh air for eight months.
DOJ-OGR-00001398.jpg
This is a legal letter dated April 7, 2021, from defense attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter responds to a government filing from the previous day and complains about unsanitary conditions at the MDC, specifically detailing a 'pervasive stench of sewage' in Maxwell's isolation unit caused by unused drains and overflowing toilets from the cellblock above.
DOJ-OGR-00001395.jpg
This legal document, filed on April 19, 2021, by the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim, argues for a continuance (delay) of the trial for their client, Ms. Maxwell. The defense contends that the government's proposed trial schedule is unrealistic, especially given a recent second superseding indictment, and that proceeding would violate Ms. Maxwell's constitutional rights. The filing also notes the prejudicial impact of Ms. Maxwell's continued detention and ongoing media coverage, and mentions an upcoming bail appeal hearing in the Second Circuit.
DOJ-OGR-00001394.jpg
This legal document, filed by the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim on behalf of Ms. Maxwell, requests a 90-day continuance for her trial, originally set for July 12, 2021. The defense argues that the government's recent disclosure of 226 witnesses necessitates more time for investigation and preparation. The request is made reluctantly, acknowledging it will prolong Ms. Maxwell's 'miserable and punishing detention'.
DOJ-OGR-00001393.jpg
A legal filing from the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim arguing for a continuance of Ghislaine Maxwell's trial. The defense cites the difficulties of preparing during the COVID-19 pandemic, the need to investigate new charges and 'quarter-century-old allegations,' and the review of voluminous discovery produced in November 2020. The document criticizes the government's timeline estimates and their opposition to the delay.
DOJ-OGR-00001392.jpg
This legal document, filed by the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim on behalf of their client Ms. Maxwell, details the significant challenges the defense faces in reviewing a massive amount of discovery evidence. The defense argues that new charges, the addition of 'Accuser-4', and the sheer volume of materials (including 214,000 photos and 250,000 non-searchable documents) necessitate a lengthy re-review process. The document also mentions technical difficulties with an FBI-supplied laptop, further complicating and delaying their review of 'Highly Confidential' photographs.
DOJ-OGR-00001391.jpg
This page from a legal filing by the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim argues that recent voluminous discovery materials, including witness interviews, contain exculpatory information for Ms. Maxwell that requires significant time to investigate. The defense disputes the government's claim that no additional time is needed, asserting that millions of pages from Epstein's devices, previously irrelevant, are now pertinent due to the expanded scope of the superseding indictment.
DOJ-OGR-00001390.jpg
This page is from a legal motion filed by the defense team of Ghislaine Maxwell (specifically Bobbi C. Sternheim's office) on April 19, 2021. The defense argues that the government's opposition to a trial continuance is unreasonable because the prosecution has significantly expanded the case, including increasing the conspiracy timeline from 4 to 11 years and adding new charges related to 'Accuser-4'. The document highlights a massive discovery dump on April 13, 2021, involving 20,000 pages of documents related to 226 non-testifying witnesses, which the defense claims they need more time to review before the scheduled July 12 trial.
DOJ-OGR-00001288.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing by the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim regarding the confinement conditions of Ms. Maxwell. It details complaints about sleep deprivation due to flashlight checks, physical abuse during searches, retaliation by guards, restricted movement within her cell, poor food quality involving melted plastic, and contaminated water.
DOJ-OGR-00001287.jpg
A legal letter from defense attorney Bobbi Sternheim to Judge Alison Nathan regarding United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter disputes government claims about Maxwell's confinement conditions at the MDC, highlighting excessive physical searches (approx. 1400 times), lack of legal access, and intense surveillance measures. Sternheim explicitly links these harsh conditions to BOP negligence surrounding the death of Jeffrey Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00001265.jpg
This document is the conclusion page of a legal motion filed on March 16, 2021, requesting bail for Ghislaine Maxwell. It lists her defense team (Sternheim, Everdell, Pagliuca, Menninger) and includes a significant footnote detailing complaints about her confinement at the MDC. Specifically, the footnote alleges violations of attorney-client privilege during video conferences due to guard proximity and audio recording, as well as a denial of legal calls regarding pretrial motions.
DOJ-OGR-00001255.jpg
This is the cover page for a legal filing in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 20 Cr. 330). The document is a Reply Memorandum supporting Maxwell's third motion for bail, filed on March 22, 2021. It lists the defense legal team, including attorneys from firms in New York and Denver.
DOJ-OGR-00001241.jpg
This document is the conclusion of a legal filing, dated February 23, 2021, submitted by the legal team of Ghislaine Maxwell. The attorneys argue that proposed restrictive bail conditions, including renunciation of foreign citizenship and asset monitoring, are sufficient to ensure her appearance at trial. They conclude that denying bail under these circumstances would constitute a miscarriage of justice.
DOJ-OGR-00001233.jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal memorandum filed on February 23, 2021, in the Southern District of New York (Case 20 Cr. 330). It supports Ghislaine Maxwell's third motion for release on bail. The document lists the defense legal team, including Bobbi C. Sternheim, Christian R. Everdell, Jeffrey S. Pagliuca, and Laura A. Menninger.
DOJ-OGR-00001200.jpg
This document is the signature page of a legal filing dated December 18, 2020. It lists the attorneys and their respective law firms representing Ghislaine Maxwell, including Mark S. Cohen of COHEN & GRESSER LLP, who signed the document.
DOJ-OGR-00001186.jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal filing in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, dated June 23, 2020. It is a 'Reply Memorandum of Ghislaine Maxwell in Support of Her Renewed Motion for Bail' for the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The document lists the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell, and her legal counsel from three different law firms.
DOJ-OGR-00001141.jpg
This document is the final signature page (page 39 of the brief, page 45 of the PDF filing) of a legal motion filed on December 4, 2020, in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The text concludes an argument requesting the Court order Maxwell's release on bail based on proposed conditions. It lists the defense counsel team from three different law firms: Cohen & Gresser LLP, Haddon, Morgan & Foreman P.C., and the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim.
DOJ-OGR-00001097.jpg
This document is the cover page of a legal filing in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell, case number 20 Cr. 330 (AJN), in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. Filed on June 23, 2021, it is a memorandum submitted by Maxwell's legal team in support of her renewed motion for bail. The document lists her attorneys from three different law firms.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity