LAW OFFICES OF BOBBI C. STERNHEIM
OrganizationRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Bobbi C. Sternheim
|
Professional employment |
6
|
1 |
DOJ-OGR-00000879.jpg
This document is a criminal docket sheet from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York for the case USA v. Maxwell (1:20-cr-00330-AJN), filed on June 29, 2020. It identifies Ghislaine Maxwell as the defendant and lists her legal counsel, including five attorneys from various law firms in New York and Denver. The case was assigned to Judge Alison J. Nathan.
DOJ-OGR-00000841.jpg
This document is a criminal docket sheet from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York for the case USA v. Maxwell, filed on June 29, 2020. It identifies Ghislaine Maxwell as the defendant, Judge Alison J. Nathan as the presiding judge, and lists the five attorneys and their respective law firms representing Maxwell. The document provides contact information for the legal counsel involved in the case.
DOJ-OGR-00021046.jpg
This document is a formal Notice of Appeal filed on July 7, 2022, on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell. The notice, submitted by her counsel Bobbi C. Sternheim, indicates Maxwell's intent to appeal her conviction and sentence, which were officially entered on June 29, 2022, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The appeal is directed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
DOJ-OGR-00020930.jpg
This document is page 16 of a juror questionnaire (Juror ID: 50) filed on March 9, 2022, for Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (the Ghislaine Maxwell trial). The juror confirms they have no personal or familial relationships with the defense attorneys (Everdell, Pagliuca, Menninger, Sternheim) or the presiding judge, Alison J. Nathan. The document contains handwritten 'X' marks indicating negative responses to questions regarding potential conflicts of interest.
DOJ-OGR-00020587.jpg
This is a Criminal Notice of Appeal (Form A) filed on July 7, 2022, in the Southern District of New York for the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330). Maxwell is appealing her conviction and sentence (judgment entered June 29, 2022) to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals following a guilty verdict at trial. The document identifies Bobbi C. Sternheim as her counsel for the filing of this notice only, noting she is not retained for the appeal itself, and identifies Maurene Comey as the Assistant U.S. Attorney.
DOJ-OGR-00020582.jpg
This is a Motion Information Statement filed on July 15, 2022, in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit for the case USA v. Maxwell (Docket No. 22-1426). Attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim, on behalf of her client Ghislaine Maxwell, is formally requesting to be relieved from her duties as continued counsel for the appeal. The opposing party is the United States, represented by AUSAs from the Southern District of New York.
DOJ-OGR-00020387.jpg
This document is a formal Notice of Appeal filed on July 7, 2022, on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell. Filed by her attorney, Bobbi C. Sternheim, it declares Maxwell's intent to appeal the judgment, conviction, and sentence entered on June 29, 2022, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The appeal is directed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
DOJ-OGR-00002410.jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal motion filed on February 4, 2021, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York for the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The motion, submitted by Maxwell's legal team, seeks to dismiss counts five and six of the superseding indictment. The grounds for dismissal are that the alleged misstatements are not perjurious as a matter of law.
DOJ-OGR-00002409.jpg
This document is the signature page of a legal filing (Document 135) from case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, filed on February 4, 2021. It lists the names, law firms, and contact information for the legal counsel representing Ghislaine Maxwell. The attorneys are from three separate law firms located in Denver, Colorado and New York, New York.
DOJ-OGR-00002369(1).jpg
This document is a signature page (page 22 of 23) from a court filing in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, filed on February 4, 2021. It lists the legal defense team representing Ghislaine Maxwell, including attorneys from Haddon, Morgan & Foreman P.C., Cohen & Gresser LLP, and the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim.
DOJ-OGR-00002347(1).jpg
This document is the signature page from a court filing (Document 133) in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, filed on February 4, 2021. It lists the legal counsel representing Ghislaine Maxwell, including attorneys from the law firms HADDON, MORGAN & FOREMAN P.C.; COHEN & GRESSER LLP; and the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim.
DOJ-OGR-00002341.jpg
This legal document, filed on February 1, 2021, is a letter from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim regarding her client, pretrial detainee Ms. Maxwell. Sternheim argues that allowing Maxwell to use a laptop on weekends and holidays is a necessary and reasonable accommodation for reviewing extensive electronic discovery for her trial. The letter asserts this poses no burden to the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) or the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) and requests the court's existing order for access remain in effect.
DOJ-OGR-00002341(1).jpg
This legal document, filed on February 1, 2021, is a letter from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim arguing that her client, pretrial detainee Ms. Maxwell, should continue to be allowed laptop access on weekends and holidays. Sternheim contends this is a reasonable accommodation necessary for reviewing extensive electronic discovery for trial preparation and that it imposes no burden or security risk on the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) or the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC).
DOJ-OGR-00002340.jpg
This document is page 2 of a legal filing by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense counsel, Bobbi C. Sternheim, filed on February 1, 2021. It details severe technical difficulties Maxwell faces in reviewing terabytes of discovery material at the MDC, including frequent computer crashes, slow processing, and damaged hard drives allegedly mishandled by staff. The filing also alleges that Maxwell is subjected to stricter isolation than other inmates, physical and psychological abuse by guards, and reprisals for reporting mistreatment.
DOJ-OGR-00002339.jpg
This document is a letter dated February 1, 2021, from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Sternheim argues against the Metropolitan Detention Center's (MDC) objection to allowing Maxwell laptop access on weekends and holidays to review millions of pages of discovery documents. The letter asserts that the MDC's proposed alternative, a prison computer, is inadequate for the task and that the MDC has failed to provide a valid security or staffing reason for restricting laptop access, thereby impeding Maxwell's ability to prepare her defense.
DOJ-OGR-00002332(1).jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, filed on January 25, 2021. It identifies Bobbi C. Sternheim and her law firm as the attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell, providing contact addresses and phone numbers in Denver, Colorado, and New York, New York.
DOJ-OGR-00002321.jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal memorandum filed on January 25, 2021, in the Southern District of New York (Case 20 Cr. 330). It is a filing by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team supporting a motion to dismiss a superseding indictment based on alleged Sixth Amendment violations. The page lists the defense attorneys from three different law firms representing Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00002321(1).jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal memorandum filed on January 25, 2021, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The filing is made by the attorneys for defendant Ghislaine Maxwell in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The memorandum supports a motion to dismiss the superseding indictment against Maxwell, arguing it was obtained in violation of the Sixth Amendment.
DOJ-OGR-00002320.jpg
This document is the second page of a legal filing (Document 125) from the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN), filed on January 25, 2021. It serves as the signature or counsel identification page, listing Haddon, Morgan & Foreman P.C. and Bobbi C. Sternheim as the attorneys representing Ghislaine Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00002320(1).jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing, dated January 25, 2021, for Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. It lists contact information for two law firms, HADDON, MORGAN & FOREMAN P.C. and Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim, identifying them as attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00002317.jpg
This document is the conclusion of a legal filing dated January 25, 2021, submitted by the attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell. The attorneys argue that the indictment lacks the necessary specificity for Maxwell to prepare an adequate defense for Counts One through Four, violating her Fifth and Sixth Amendment rights. They request that the court either dismiss these counts or compel the government to provide a Bill of Particulars and further discovery.
DOJ-OGR-00002317(1).jpg
This legal document, dated January 25, 2021, is a memorandum filed in support of a motion for a Bill of Particulars and Pretrial Disclosures in the case against Ms. Maxwell. It argues that the indictment lacks specificity regarding alleged 'grooming' acts, violating her constitutional rights, and requests either the dismissal of certain counts or that the government provide more detailed information for her defense. The document is signed by several attorneys representing Ghislaine Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00002311(1).jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal memorandum filed on January 25, 2021, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York for the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The memorandum, submitted by Maxwell's legal team, supports a motion to dismiss four counts of the superseding indictment against her, arguing a lack of specificity. The document identifies Maxwell as the defendant and lists her attorneys from three different law firms.
DOJ-OGR-00002310.jpg
This document is the signature page of a legal filing in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, dated January 25, 2021. It lists the legal counsel representing Ghislaine Maxwell, including attorneys from three different law firms: HADDON, MORGAN & FOREMAN P.C. in Denver, and COHEN & GRESSER LLP and the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim in New York. The document is signed by Jeffrey S. Pagliuca on behalf of the legal team.
DOJ-OGR-00002310(1).jpg
This document is the signature page (page 2 of 2) of a court filing, Document 123, in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, filed on January 25, 2021. It lists the legal counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell, including attorneys Jeffrey S. Pagliuca, Laura A. Menninger, Mark S. Cohen, Christian R. Everdell, and Bobbi C. Sternheim, along with their respective law firms and contact information in Denver and New York.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity