LAW OFFICES OF BOBBI C. STERNHEIM
OrganizationRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Bobbi C. Sternheim
|
Professional employment |
6
|
1 |
DOJ-OGR-00002307.jpg
This document is the signature page of a legal filing from January 25, 2021, in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. It lists the names, law firms, and contact information for the legal counsel representing Ghislaine Maxwell. The attorneys listed are Jeffrey S. Pagliuca, Laura A. Menninger, Mark S. Cohen, Christian R. Everdell, and Bobbi C. Sternheim.
DOJ-OGR-00002307(1).jpg
This document is the signature page for a legal filing (Document 122) in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, dated January 25, 2021. It identifies the legal team representing Ghislaine Maxwell, including attorneys from three separate law firms: HADDON, MORGAN & FOREMAN P.C. in Denver, and COHEN & GRESSER LLP and the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim in New York.
DOJ-OGR-00002300.jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal filing in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on January 25, 2021, in the Southern District of New York. It is a memorandum in support of Maxwell's motion to dismiss either Count One or Count Three of the superseding indictment on the grounds that they are multiplicitous. The document identifies Ghislaine Maxwell as the defendant and lists her legal counsel from three different law firms.
DOJ-OGR-00002300(1).jpg
This is the cover page for a legal memorandum filed on January 25, 2021, in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The document is a motion filed by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team to dismiss either Count One or Count Three of the superseding indictment on the grounds that they are multiplicitous. The page lists the defendant's legal representation from three different law firms.
DOJ-OGR-00002299.jpg
This document is the signature page from a court filing (Document 121 in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN), dated January 25, 2021. It lists the legal counsel representing Ghislaine Maxwell, including attorneys from three law firms: HADDON, MORGAN & FOREMAN P.C. in Denver, CO, and COHEN & GRESSER LLP and the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim, both in New York, NY.
DOJ-OGR-00002299(1).jpg
This document is the signature page (page 2 of 2) for a legal filing submitted on January 25, 2021, in the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). It lists the legal defense team representing Ghislaine Maxwell, including attorneys from Haddon, Morgan & Foreman P.C., Cohen & Gresser LLP, and the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim. The document includes contact information for the attorneys and bears the Bates stamp DOJ-OGR-00002299.
DOJ-OGR-00002296(1).jpg
This document is the signature page for a legal filing (Document 120) in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, filed on January 25, 2021. It lists the names and contact information for the attorneys from three different law firms representing Ghislaine Maxwell in this case.
DOJ-OGR-00002279(1).jpg
This document is the title page of a legal memorandum filed on January 25, 2021, in the Southern District of New York (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). It represents Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for a severance and separate trial regarding Counts Five and Six of the superseding indictment. The document lists the legal defense teams representing Maxwell, including attorneys from Haddon, Morgan & Foreman P.C., Cohen & Gresser LLP, and the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim.
DOJ-OGR-00002278.jpg
This document is the signature page (page 2 of 2) of a legal filing (Document 119) from case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, filed on January 25, 2021. It lists the legal defense team representing Ghislaine Maxwell, including attorneys from Haddon, Morgan & Foreman P.C., Cohen & Gresser LLP, and the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim.
DOJ-OGR-00002221.jpg
This document is the signature page (page 15 of 15) of a court filing in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, dated December 18, 2020, and filed on December 23, 2020. It lists the legal defense team representing Ghislaine Maxwell, including attorneys from Cohen & Gresser LLP, Haddon, Morgan & Foreman P.C., and the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim, along with their contact information.
DOJ-OGR-00002207.jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal filing in the criminal case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on December 23, 2020, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The document is a reply memorandum submitted by Maxwell's legal team in support of her renewed motion for bail. It lists her attorneys from three different law firms located in New York and Denver.
DOJ-OGR-00002207(1).jpg
This document is the cover page for a 'Reply Memorandum' filed on December 23, 2020, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The filing is in support of defendant Ghislaine Maxwell's renewed motion for bail. It lists her legal defense team, including attorneys from Cohen & Gresser LLP, Haddon, Morgan & Foreman P.C., and the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim.
DOJ-OGR-00002017.jpg
This document is the signature page of a legal filing from December 4, 2020, in which attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell formally request her release on bail. The document lists her legal counsel from three different law firms: COHEN & GRESSER LLP, HADDON, MORGAN & FOREMAN P.C., and the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim. The filing is part of case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN and was officially filed with the court on December 14, 2020.
DOJ-OGR-00001973.jpg
This document is the cover page of a legal filing, specifically a memorandum in support of a renewed motion for bail for the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell. Filed on December 14, 2020, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, it lists the case name as United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell and identifies her legal counsel from three different law firms.
DOJ-OGR-00001874.jpg
This legal filing from December 2020 outlines complaints regarding the conditions of Ghislaine Maxwell's confinement at the MDC. The defense argues she is being deprived of communication with family and legal counsel, citing specific issues such as deleted legal emails, physical barriers during visits, denial of basic needs during meetings, and the intentional damaging of a hard drive by an officer. The document concludes that these restrictions are arbitrary and disproportionate, noting Maxwell's good behavior and certifications as a suicide counselor and teacher.
DOJ-OGR-00001872.jpg
This legal document, filed by counsel for Ms. Maxwell, argues that her pretrial detention conditions are excessively punitive and amount to de facto solitary confinement. The filing details sleep deprivation, constant surveillance, and frequent, invasive body scans and strip searches, asserting these measures are detrimental to her health and ability to prepare for trial. The counsel contrasts these conditions with those of other clients, including those charged with terrorism and murder, to highlight their unprecedented severity.
DOJ-OGR-00001870.jpg
This is a letter dated October 29, 2020, from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to Warden Heriberto Tellez of the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC). The attorney is writing on behalf of her client, Ghislaine Maxwell, to protest the 'extraordinarily restrictive conditions' of her detention, which are compared to solitary confinement and death row. The letter argues that these harsh measures are not a response to any threat Maxwell poses but are an overreaction by the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) to its failure to prevent the death of Jeffrey Epstein at a different facility.
DOJ-OGR-00001840.jpg
This document is a legal letter from defense attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to Judge Alison J. Nathan, filed on November 24, 2020, regarding the pretrial detention conditions of Ghislaine Maxwell at the MDC. The defense alleges excessive surveillance, sleep deprivation via flashlight checks every 15 minutes, and isolation, requesting that Warden Heriberto Tellez be summoned to address the court. The document includes a hand-signed order by Judge Nathan requiring the parties to meet and confer regarding the request for the Warden to address these concerns.
DOJ-OGR-00001839.jpg
A letter from defense attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to Judge Alison J. Nathan dated November 24, 2020, regarding United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter details harsh detention conditions at the MDC, including Maxwell being quarantined due to COVID-19 exposure from a staff member, deletion of attorney-client emails, lack of hygiene supplies (soap/toothbrush), unauthorized photography of her cell, and the cancellation of legal visits without notice.
DOJ-OGR-00001838.jpg
This is the second page of a legal filing by attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell, dated November 24, 2020. The letter complains to the Court about the harsh conditions of Maxwell's pretrial detention at the MDC, describing them as worse than those for terrorists at ADMAX, citing sleep deprivation via flashlight checks every 15 minutes, excessive surveillance, and isolation. Sternheim requests that Warden Heriberto Tellez be summoned to report directly to the Court regarding these conditions and notes the difficulty Maxwell faces in reviewing 1.2 million discovery documents under her current restrictions.
DOJ-OGR-00001837.jpg
A legal letter from defense attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the detention conditions of Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter disputes the government's portrayal of her confinement, alleging mistreatment including the deletion of legal emails, lack of hygiene supplies during quarantine, unauthorized photography of her cell, and lack of medical communication regarding COVID-19 exposure.
DOJ-OGR-00010484.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing dated June 15, 2022, in the case of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). Her attorneys argue that factors such as the pandemic and harsh solitary confinement conditions warrant a sentence 'well below the advisory guideline range'. The document is respectfully submitted by her legal team, including Bobbi C. Sternheim, Christian R. Everdell, Jeffrey S. Pagluica, and Laura A. Menninger from three different law firms.
DOJ-OGR-00009221.jpg
This is the signature page of a court filing (Document 616) in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on February 24, 2022. The document, submitted by legal counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell, requests a new trial or an evidentiary hearing to examine the jurors. It lists the names and contact information for her attorneys from three different law firms in Denver and New York.
DOJ-OGR-00009191.jpg
This document is the cover page of a legal filing in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on February 24, 2022, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. It is titled "Ghislaine Maxwell's Reply in Support of Her Motion for a New Trial" and lists her legal counsel from three different law firms. The case number is identified as 1:20-cr-00330-PAE and S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN).
DOJ-OGR-00009084.jpg
This document is a page from a juror questionnaire for Juror ID 50, filed on February 24, 2022, in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. The potential juror denies having any personal or familial connections or dealings with the defense attorneys (Christian Everdell, Jeffrey Pagliuca, Laura Menninger, Bobbi Sternheim) or the presiding judge, Alison J. Nathan. As the juror answered 'No' to all questions, the follow-up section for explanation is left blank.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity