United States District Court FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Murray
|
Professional court reporter |
6
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-06-29 | Legal proceeding | The district court issued a judgment of conviction against Ghislaine Maxwell. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-06-29 | Legal proceeding | Judgment of conviction for Ghislaine Maxwell. | Southern District of New York | View |
015.pdf
This document is a Notice of Appearance filed on June 22, 2023, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York (Case No. 23-cv-03903-JSR). Attorney Jacobus J. Schutte from Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP enters his appearance as counsel for a specific group of eighteen defendants, including Linda B. Bammann and James A. Bell, in a lawsuit involving JPMorgan Chase & Co. and its executives/board members (including James Dimon and James E. Staley). The plaintiff is the Operating Engineers Construction Industry and Miscellaneous Pension Fund.
014.pdf
This document is a Notice of Appearance filed on June 22, 2023, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Case No. 23-cv-03903-JSR). Attorney Jessica S. Carey of Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP is entering her appearance as counsel of record for a large group of individual defendants—primarily board members and executives—in a lawsuit brought by the Operating Engineers Construction Industry and Miscellaneous Pension Fund against JPMorgan Chase & Co. (nominal defendant) and its leadership.
013.pdf
This document is a Notice of Appearance filed on June 22, 2023, in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York (Case No. 23-cv-03903-JSR). Attorney Audra J. Soloway of Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP formally enters her appearance as counsel for a specific group of defendants, including Linda B. Bammann, James A. Bell, and others, in a lawsuit filed by the Operating Engineers Construction Industry and Miscellaneous Pension Fund against JPMorgan Chase & Co. directors and officers. The case appears to be a shareholder derivative suit involving JPMC leadership, including James Dimon and James E. Staley.
012.pdf
This document is a formal Appearance of Counsel filed on June 21, 2023, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Case No. 1:23-cv-03903-JSR). Attorney Timothy Perla of Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP submits this form to officially represent the defendants—JPMorgan Chase & Co., James Dimon, Ashley Bacon, Mary Callahan Erdoes, John Hogan, and Barry Zubrow—in a lawsuit brought by the Operating Engineers Construction Industry and Miscellaneous Pension Fund.
008.pdf
A court order from the Southern District of New York in the case of Operating Engineers Construction Industry v. James Dimon, et al. (Case 1:23-cv-03903-JSR). Judge Jed S. Rakoff granted the motion for attorney Michael J. Barry of Grant & Eisenhofer P.A. to appear *pro hac vice* as counsel for the plaintiff. The lawsuit names numerous JPMorgan executives, including James Dimon and James E. Staley, as defendants.
007.pdf
Order from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, dated June 9, 2023, granting Christine M. Mackintosh of Grant & Eisenhofer P.A. admission pro hac vice to represent the plaintiff, Operating Engineers Construction Industry and Miscellaneous Pension Fund. The lawsuit names JPMorgan Chase & Co. as a nominal defendant and numerous individual defendants, including James Dimon and James E. Staley.
006.pdf
This document is a Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice filed on June 6, 2023, in the Southern District of New York. Attorney Michael J. Barry of Grant & Eisenhofer P.A. seeks permission to represent the plaintiff, Operating Engineers Construction Industry and Miscellaneous Pension Fund, in a lawsuit against JPMorgan Chase & Co. and various individual defendants, including James Dimon and James E. Staley.
006-01.pdf
This document is a legal declaration filed on June 6, 2023, by attorney Michael J. Barry of Grant & Eisenhofer P.A. He is applying for admission pro hac vice (to practice in this specific case) in the Southern District of New York. The case (1:23-cv-03903) involves the Operating Engineers Construction Industry and Miscellaneous Pension Fund as plaintiff against numerous JPMorgan Chase & Co. executives and board members, including James Dimon and James 'Jes' Staley, likely regarding a shareholder derivative suit related to the bank's ties to Jeffrey Epstein.
005.pdf
This document is a Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice filed on June 6, 2023, in the Southern District of New York. Attorney Christine M. Mackintosh of Grant & Eisenhofer P.A. seeks permission to represent the plaintiff, Operating Engineers Construction Industry and Miscellaneous Pension Fund, in a lawsuit against JPMorgan Chase & Co. and its executives/board members (including James Dimon and James E. Staley). The motion confirms Mackintosh's good standing with the bars of Pennsylvania and Delaware.
005-01.pdf
This document is a declaration filed on June 6, 2023, by attorney Christine M. Mackintosh of Grant & Eisenhofer P.A. seeking admission pro hac vice in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York. The filing is part of a shareholder derivative lawsuit (Case 1:23-cv-03903-JSR) brought by the Operating Engineers Construction Industry and Miscellaneous Pension Fund against JPMorgan Chase executives, including James Dimon and James E. Staley, regarding the bank's oversight.
002.pdf
This document is a Civil Cover Sheet (Form JS 44) and an attached list of defendants filed on May 9, 2023, in the Southern District of New York. The filing initiates a derivative lawsuit by 'Operating Engineers Construction Industry and Miscellaneous Pension Fund' against the board and executives of JPMorgan Chase & Co., including Jamie Dimon and Jes Staley. The cover sheet notes the case is related to existing cases 22-10019 (USVI v. JPM) and 22-10904 (Doe v. JPM) presided over by Judge Jed S. Rakoff, which were high-profile lawsuits concerning JPMorgan's relationship with Jeffrey Epstein.
20250714161434468_24-1073_Maxwell_Opp.pdf
This document is a legal brief filed by the United States Solicitor General in July 2025 opposing Ghislaine Maxwell's petition for a writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court. The government argues that the 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) signed by Jeffrey Epstein in Florida does not bar the Southern District of New York from prosecuting Maxwell, as the agreement was contractually limited to the Florida district and Maxwell was not a party to it. The brief details the history of the Epstein investigation, the terms of the NPA, and relevant legal precedents regarding the scope of plea agreements binding different US Attorney's Offices.
20250117133905126_22-1426.pdf
This document is a formal legal opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirming the conviction and 240-month prison sentence of Ghislaine Maxwell for sex trafficking and related offenses. The court rejected Maxwell's appeal on five grounds, including arguments regarding a non-prosecution agreement, statute of limitations, juror misconduct, jury instructions, and sentencing reasonableness. The document also includes a subsequent order from November 2024 denying Maxwell's petition for panel rehearing or rehearing en banc.
2022.08.02%20Memorandum%20Of%20Law.pdf
This document is a Supplemental Brief filed on August 1, 2022, by the Co-Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein (Indyke and Kahn) in the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands. The brief supports a Motion to Dismiss Ghislaine Maxwell's complaint seeking indemnification from the Estate. The Co-Executors argue that because Maxwell was convicted of intentional criminal acts (sex trafficking and conspiracy) in the Southern District of New York on June 29, 2022, public policy prohibits enforcing any contract or equitable doctrine that would indemnify her for the financial consequences of her crimes.
2022.07.01%20Order%20Scheduling%20Hearing.pdf
Court order from the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands dated July 1, 2022, in the case of Ghislaine Maxwell v. Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein. Staff Master Joseph T. Gasper schedules a remote status conference for July 29, 2022, to discuss case management, including a pending motion to intervene by the VI Government and a motion to dismiss by the Estate. The document references delays requested by Maxwell's counsel due to her criminal case in the Southern District of New York.
063.pdf
A Joint Stipulation for Dismissal filed on October 15, 2020, in the Southern District of New York. Plaintiff Teresa Helm agrees to dismiss her lawsuit against the executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate with prejudice after accepting an offer from the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program. The document serves to formally close the case.
049.pdf
A court notice filed on June 3, 2020, in the case of Annie Farmer v. Darren K. Indyke (Case No. 19cv10476) in the Southern District of New York. The document announces that an official transcript of a conference held on May 22, 2020, has been filed by court reporter Kristen Carrar.
045.pdf
This document is a Stipulated Confidentiality Agreement and Protective Order filed on May 21, 2020, in the US District Court (SDNY) for the case Teresa Helm v. Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn (Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey Edward Epstein). It establishes legal protocols for designating, handling, and protecting confidential discovery materials, including medical records, financial information, and the names of alleged minor victims. The order binds the parties, their attorneys, and third parties to specific non-disclosure requirements.
009.pdf
A Waiver of the Service of Summons filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York on November 27, 2019, in the case of Teresa Helm v. Darren K. Indyke et al. Attorney Bennet Moskowitz of Troutman Sanders LLP signed the waiver on November 25, 2019, on behalf of defendants Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn, acknowledging receipt of the complaint from plaintiff's attorney David Boies.
001.pdf
This document is a legal complaint filed by Teresa Helm against the executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate, Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn, alleging sexual abuse and trafficking by Epstein and his co-conspirators. The complaint details Epstein's extensive sex trafficking network, previous legal proceedings, and his personal statements regarding his actions, seeking damages for battery and intentional infliction of emotional distress.
033.pdf
This document is a Joint Stipulation for Dismissal filed on April 1, 2021, in the case of Maria Farmer v. the Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. The legal action was dismissed with prejudice following Maria Farmer's acceptance of an offer of compensation from the Epstein Victims’ Compensation Program. The order was signed by U.S. District Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald.
032.pdf
A legal stipulation filed on April 1, 2021, in the Southern District of New York, dismissing Maria Farmer's lawsuit against the executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate (Indyke and Kahn). The dismissal is with prejudice and results from Farmer accepting an offer of compensation from the Epstein Victims’ Compensation Program.
008.pdf
This document is a Waiver of the Service of Summons filed on November 27, 2019, in the case of Maria Farmer v. Darren K. Indyke et al (Case No. 1:19-cv-10474-NRB) in the Southern District of New York. Attorney Bennet Moskowitz of Troutman Sanders LLP signed the waiver on November 25, 2019, on behalf of defendants Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn, agreeing to waive formal service and respond to the complaint within 60 days. The waiver is addressed to plaintiff's attorney David Boies.
046.pdf
This is a Notice of Filing of Official Transcript from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in the case of Jane Doe v. Darren K Indyke et al (Case No. 1:20-cv-02365-LJL-DCF). Court Reporter Carole Ludwig notifies the parties that a transcript of a Telephone Conference held on August 26, 2021, has been filed on September 3, 2021. The document outlines the standard legal procedures and timelines for the parties to request redactions of personal data identifiers from the transcript.
003.pdf
This document is a civil summons filed on March 17, 2020, in the Southern District of New York (Case 1:20-cv-02365). Plaintiff Jane Doe is suing Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn in their capacities as executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein. The summons is specifically addressed to Richard D. Kahn.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity