Idaho
LocationRelationship Network
DOJ-OGR-00031290.jpg
This document is a printed page from the Albuquerque Tribune Online, dated March 7, 2006 (with a URL suggesting data from December 2002). It lists sixteen separate donations, each in the amount of $5,000, from various individuals and corporations including Phillips Petroleum, Albertsons, and the American Society of Anesthesiologists. The document bears a DOJ stamp (DOJ-OGR-00031290) and appears to be part of a larger discovery or FOIA release (Public Records Request No.: 17-295) likely related to political fundraising in New Mexico.
DOJ-OGR-00031239.jpg
This document is a page from the Albuquerque Tribune Online, printed on September 7, 2006, listing donors or financial contributors in the $15,000 to $24,999 range. The list includes various individuals, businesses, and organizations such as labor unions, energy companies, and Native American Pueblos. The document appears to be part of a larger Department of Justice Public Records Request (DOJ-OGR-00031239). The URL suggests the original content dates back to December 2002.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019381.jpg
An FBI file containing a newspaper clipping from the Palm Beach Post dated August 8, 2006. The article details the defense strategy of Jeffrey Epstein's legal team, led by Jack Goldberger and publicist Dan Klores, who publicly denied allegations of sex with minors and attacked the credibility of the accusers. The article also notes that Police Chief Michael Reiter referred the case to the FBI after a grand jury indicted Epstein on lesser charges than the police sought.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018935.jpg
This document is an FBI filing (FD-350) containing a newspaper clipping from the Palm Beach Post dated August 8, 2006. The article details the public defense strategy of Jeffrey Epstein's legal team, led by attorney Jack Goldberger and publicist Dan Klores, who labeled accusers as liars and denied any sex with minors occurred. The article notes that Palm Beach Police Chief Michael Reiter referred the case to the FBI after a grand jury indicted Epstein on solicitation rather than more serious charges, despite an 11-month investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017763.jpg
This document is a page from a 2005 BYU Law Review article discussing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), specifically the victim's right against unreasonable delay in proceedings. It cites Senators Feinstein and Kyl, along with various state statutes, to argue that delays should not occur merely for the convenience of the court or parties. The document bears the name of David Schoen (a known attorney for Epstein) and a House Oversight Committee stamp, suggesting it was submitted as part of a congressional investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017755.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a 2005 BYU Law Review article discussing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), specifically focusing on a victim's right to attend court proceedings and be heard. The text analyzes the rationale behind allowing victims to be present during trials and cites various state constitutions and federal rules (Rule 615). The document bears the name of attorney David Schoen in the footer and a House Oversight Bates stamp, suggesting it was used as legal research or an exhibit in proceedings related to the investigation of the handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case, likely concerning the violation of victims' rights.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017728.jpg
This document is a page from a 2005 BYU Law Review article (page 14 of 52 in the specific filing) discussing proposals to amend legal rules to incorporate the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). It argues for amending Rule 2 to ensure fairness to victims and adding a Rule 10.1 regarding notice of proceedings. The document bears the name of David Schoen (an attorney associated with Jeffrey Epstein) and a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp, indicating it was likely submitted as part of a legal argument or evidence file regarding victim rights and notification procedures in the Epstein investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017631.jpg
This document is a page from a legal publication (Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology) submitted to the House Oversight Committee by attorney David Schoen. It analyzes state laws (specifically Hawaii, Colorado, Missouri, New Jersey, Massachusetts, and Idaho) regarding crime victims' rights to notification and consultation prior to the filing of formal charges or plea agreements. The text serves as legal precedent or comparative analysis, likely relevant to arguments concerning the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) in the context of the Epstein case.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015291.jpg
The document, stamped with a House Oversight footer, contains two distinct sections. The first paragraph details a July 2017 lawsuit filed by the Human Rights Defense Center against the Kentucky Department of Corrections regarding book censorship. The second section, titled 'Welcome to Camp Mogul,' is a narrative account of the 2008 Allen & Company Sun Valley conference, describing the narrator accompanying 'Khan Manka' to spy on the 'summer camp for billionaires' hosted by Herbert Allen.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024699.jpg
This document is a page from an Ackrell Capital report (Chapter IV: U.S. Legal Landscape) featuring a map and list of U.S. state cannabis laws as of January 2018. It categorizes states by Recreational Law, Medical Cannabis Law, CBD/Limited Law, or No Law. While the document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, suggesting it was part of a document production to Congress (potentially related to financial investigations involving Epstein or related banks), the content itself is purely market research regarding the cannabis industry and contains no specific mention of Jeffrey Epstein or his associates.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024546.jpg
This document is a financial summary and projection for an organization identified as 'k12' (likely K12 Inc.), covering fiscal years 2002 through projected 2007. It details revenue growth from $6.7 million in 2002 to a projected $132.2 million in 2007, driven by expansion into new states and grades, though the company operated at a net loss for the recorded historical years (2002-2005). The text outlines the company's operational history, expansion into specific states (CO, PA, OH, ID, CA, AR, MN, AZ, FL, WI, DC, TX, WY, WA), future opportunities in Chicago and Sacramento, and its revenue recognition policies regarding virtual charter school management.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024541.jpg
This document appears to be a page from an investment report or business overview regarding 'k12' (K12 Inc.), a virtual education company. It details the company's business model, profitability (noting higher margins due to lack of physical infrastructure), and presence in various US states during the 2006 fiscal year. The document highlights financial projections, specifically a revenue increase in district-managed programs from $3 million in 2006 to a projected $11 million in 2008, and references a 2001 KPMG study validating their curriculum quality.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025304.jpg
This document is a political analysis report produced by Laffer Associates, dated July 6, 2016. It presents statistical tables comparing Republican and Democrat voter turnout in various state primaries and caucuses between 2008, 2012, and 2016. The analysis concludes that the data should be concerning for Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign. The document bears a House Oversight Committee stamp, suggesting it was part of a document production for a congressional investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014080.jpg
This document is page 101 of a 2014 legal text (likely a law review article) discussing 'Crime Victims' Rights.' It analyzes the nuances of state statutes (Indiana, Louisiana, Idaho, Delaware) regarding when victims' rights attach, specifically debating whether rights exist before formal charges are filed. The page includes extensive footnotes citing various state codes and legal precedents. It is marked with a House Oversight Committee stamp, suggesting it was included in discovery or research related to the Epstein case, likely regarding the federal Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) and the non-prosecution agreement.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014079.jpg
This document appears to be page 100 of a legal review article authored by Paul Cassell (a lawyer for Epstein's victims), submitted as evidence to the House Oversight Committee. The text analyzes state laws (CO, MO, NJ, MA, ID) that extend victims' rights to the pre-charge stage and require prosecutor consultation regarding plea agreements. This legal argument is central to the Epstein case controversy, specifically regarding the secret Non-Prosecution Agreement signed before federal charges were filed.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity