HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017755.jpg

2.78 MB

Extraction Summary

4
People
3
Organizations
7
Locations
0
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document / law review article excerpt
File Size: 2.78 MB
Summary

This document is an excerpt from a 2005 BYU Law Review article discussing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), specifically focusing on a victim's right to attend court proceedings and be heard. The text analyzes the rationale behind allowing victims to be present during trials and cites various state constitutions and federal rules (Rule 615). The document bears the name of attorney David Schoen in the footer and a House Oversight Bates stamp, suggesting it was used as legal research or an exhibit in proceedings related to the investigation of the handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case, likely concerning the violation of victims' rights.

People (4)

Name Role Context
David Schoen Attorney
Name appears in the footer, indicating this document was likely part of his files or submissions. Schoen was an attor...
Sen. Kyl Senator
Cited in footnote 279 regarding a statement in the Congressional Record.
Douglas E. Beloof Author
Cited in footnote 278 as co-author of a legal review article.
Paul G. Cassell Author
Cited in footnote 278 as co-author of a legal review article.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
BYU Law Review
Source of the text (2005 B.Y.U.L. Rev. 835).
President's Task Force on Victims of Crime
Cited in footnote 278.
House Oversight Committee
Implied by the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017755'.

Locations (7)

Location Context
Cited in footnotes regarding state constitution.
Cited in footnotes regarding state constitution.
Cited in footnotes regarding state constitution.
Cited in footnotes regarding state constitution (La. Const.).
Cited in footnotes regarding state constitution.
Cited in footnotes regarding state constitution.
Cited in footnotes regarding state constitution.

Relationships (1)

David Schoen Legal Counsel Jeffrey Epstein
David Schoen's name appears on the footer of this document, which is part of a House Oversight production (likely related to the Epstein investigation). Schoen represented Epstein.

Key Quotes (3)

"The CVRA guarantees victims the right to attend a proceeding 'unless the court, after receiving clear and convincing evidence, determines that testimony by the victim would be materially altered if the victim heard other testimony at that proceeding.'"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017755.jpg
Quote #1
"Victims deserve to see in person whether justice is being done and should be exempted from the rule requiring trial witnesses to sit outside the courtroom."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017755.jpg
Quote #2
"Federal Rule of Evidence 615 - the so-called 'rule on witnesses' - requires exclusion of witnesses with certain exceptions, including the fourth exception for 'a person authorized by statute to be present.'"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017755.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (5,016 characters)

2005 B.Y.U.L. Rev. 835, *904
Page 41 of 52
[*905] without proper notice to a victim only if doing so is in the interest of justice, the court provides prompt notice to that victim of the court's action and of the victim's right to seek reconsideration of the action if a victim's right is affected, and the court ensures that notice will be properly provided to that victim for all subsequent public proceedings.
(c) Numerous Victims. If the court finds that the number of victims makes it impracticable to accord all of the victims the right to be present, the court shall fashion a reasonable procedure to facilitate victims' attendance.
(d) Right To Be Heard on Victims' Issues. In addition to rights to be heard established elsewhere in these rules, at any public proceeding at which a victim has the right to attend, the victim has the right to be heard on any matter directly affecting a victim's right.
The Rationale:
The rules should reflect the CVRA's command that victims have the right to attend public proceedings in all but the most unusual circumstances. The CVRA guarantees victims the right to attend a proceeding "unless the court, after receiving clear and convincing evidence, determines that testimony by the victim would be materially altered if the victim heard other testimony at that proceeding." 277 This is a fundamental right for victims. A crime is often a very significant event in the life of a victim, and the trial, too, may be extremely important. Victims deserve to see in person whether justice is being done and should be exempted from the rule requiring trial witnesses to sit outside the courtroom. 278 The CVRA adopts this approach by
allowing crime victims, in the vast majority of cases, to attend the hearings and trial of the case involving their victimization. This is so important because crime victims share an interest with the [*906] government in seeing that justice is done in a criminal case and this interest supports the idea that victims should not be excluded from public criminal proceedings, whether these are pretrial, trial, or post-trial proceedings. 279
Most states have also adopted language affirming a victim's right to attend court proceedings, including the trial. 280
One way of addressing the victim's right to attend would be to leave the matter to the Federal Rules of Evidence. Federal Rule of Evidence 615 - the so-called "rule on witnesses" - requires exclusion of witnesses with certain exceptions, including the fourth exception for "a person authorized by statute to be present." 281 This exception was added to cover crime victims, 282
____________________
277 18 U.S.C.A. 3771(a)(3) (West 2004 & Supp. 2005).
278 See generally President's Task Force on Victims of Crime, Final Report 80 (1982) (urging that victims be able to attend trial); Douglas E. Beloof & Paul G. Cassell, The Victim's Right To Attend the Trial: The Reascendant National Consensus, 9 Lewis & Clark L. Rev. 481 (2005) (developing this argument at length).
279 150 Cong. Rec. S4268 (daily ed. Apr. 22, 2004) (statement of Sen. Kyl).
280 See, e.g., Ariz. Const. art. II, 2.1(A) ("To preserve and protect victims' rights to justice and due process, a victim of crime has a right: ... to be present at and, upon request, to be informed of all criminal proceedings where the defendant has the right to be present."); Colo. Const. art. II, 16a ("Any person who is a victim of a criminal act, or such person's designee, legal guardian, or surviving immediate family members if such person is deceased, shall have the right to be heard when relevant, informed, and present at all critical stages of the criminal justice process." (emphasis added)); Idaho Const. art. I, 22 ("A crime victim, as defined by statute, has the following rights: ... (4) to be present at all criminal justice proceedings ... .") (emphasis added); La. Const. art. I, 25 ("As defined by law, a victim of crime shall have the right to ... be present ... during all critical stages of preconviction ... proceedings ... ." (emphasis added)); Mich. Const. art. I, 24 ("Crime victims ... shall have the following rights ... The right to attend trial and all other court proceedings the accused has the right to attend." (emphasis added)); Miss. Const. Ann. art. III, 26A (2000) ("Victims of crime ... shall have the right ... to be present ... when authorized by law, during public hearings." (emphasis added)); Mo. Const. art. I, 32 ("Crime victims, as defined by law, shall have the following rights ... (1) the right to be present at all criminal justice proceedings at which the defendant has such right ... ." (emphasis added)); Miss. Code Ann. 99-43-21 (2000) ("The victim has the right to be present throughout all criminal proceedings as defined in Section 99-43-1." (emphasis added)). See generally Beloof & Cassell, supra note 278, (collecting all state statutes and rules pertaining to the victim's right to attend).
281 Fed. R. Evid. 615(4).
DAVID SCHOEN
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017755

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document