| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
sublimehottie
|
Identity |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Roberta Kaplan
|
Business associate |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Jenna Dabbs
|
Business associate |
2
|
2 | |
|
organization
PLA
|
Employment |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
FBI
|
Professional correspondence |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. [Redacted]
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Redacted Client
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. [Redacted]
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-23 | N/A | Scheduled meeting (implied 'Thursday' of the week of May 21) at Kaplan Hecker & Fink offices. | Kaplan Hecker & Fink LLP of... | View |
| 2019-05-21 | N/A | Email correspondence regarding scheduling interviews. | View | |
| 2019-05-21 | N/A | Proposed meeting at 4:30 PM at Kaplan Hecker & Fink LLP offices. | Kaplan Hecker & Fink LLP Of... | View |
| 2019-04-05 | N/A | Attorney Proffer Meeting | Government Offices (Redacted) | View |
| 2019-04-04 | N/A | Proposed proffer meeting (attorney proffer or with client) | In person or by phone | View |
An email thread from August 10-11, 2019, immediately following Jeffrey Epstein's death. Attorney Jenna Dabbs (Kaplan Hecker & Fink) corresponds with SDNY officials regarding the status of the investigation, civil forfeiture, and restitution for her client (a victim/witness). The government official confirms the investigation is ongoing despite the death and coordinates support resources for the client.
This document is an email chain from December 2019 between attorneys at Kaplan Hecker & Fink LLP (Roberta Kaplan, Alex Conlon, Kate Doniger) and a redacted party. They discuss legal proceedings involving the Epstein Estate, specifically criticizing a 'draft protocol' received from Feinberg as a 'disaster' and referencing filings in the USVI. Notable discussions include a court transcript where it was stated that Epstein's brother is the sole beneficiary of the estate, and Judge Failla's comment regarding claims potentially worth 'millions upon millions of dollars.'
An email thread from December 2019 between attorneys at Kaplan Hecker & Fink LLP and a redacted individual discussing a transcript from a legal conference. The discussion highlights Judge Failla's comments on potential damages being in the millions and specifically queries a statement made during the conference that identified Jeffrey Epstein's brother as the sole beneficiary of the estate.
This document is an email chain from April 2019 between attorneys at Kaplan Hecker & Fink LLP (Alex Conlon, Alexandra Elenowitz-Hess) and federal prosecutors/investigators regarding a 'proffer' meeting. The attorneys are arranging a meeting for their client (a female witness whose name is redacted) to provide information regarding Jeffrey Epstein. The government requests the client's current legal name and any phone numbers she used to communicate with Epstein. A meeting is scheduled for Friday, April 5, 2019, attended by the defense counsel, prosecutors, and an FBI Special Agent.
This document is an email chain from April 3, 2019, between attorneys at Kaplan Hecker & Fink LLP (Alex Conlon, Alex Hess, Jenna Dabbs) and federal prosecutors/FBI regarding the scheduling of an 'attorney proffer' for a client associated with Jeffrey Epstein. The correspondence establishes a meeting time for the following Friday, discusses a potential name change of the client, and includes a request from the government for any phone numbers the client used to communicate with Epstein to help corroborate her accounts.
This document contains an email thread from August 10, 2019, the day Jeffrey Epstein died. Attorneys Jenna Dabbs and Alex Conlon of Kaplan Hecker & Fink LLP correspond with redacted recipients (likely SDNY prosecutors). They inquire about the future of the investigation, specifically regarding civil forfeiture proceedings and potential prosecutions of other defendants, while offering professional condolences and support regarding the defendant's suicide.
This document is an email chain from November and December 2019 between the administrators of the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program (Jordy Feldman) and legal counsel for the victims (Roberta Kaplan's firm). The correspondence centers on the victims' counsel challenging the independence of the program, arguing that because the administrators were hired and paid by the Epstein Estate, they cannot be neutral. Kaplan's team proposes adding a fourth administrator selected by the plaintiffs to ensure fairness.
An email dated December 12, 2019, from attorney Alex Conlon of Kaplan Hecker & Fink LLP to a redacted recipient, copying Roberta Kaplan. The email attaches a legal transcript from a conference held the previous day (December 11, 2019) in the case of 'Doe v. Indyke et al.' (Case 19-cv-8673), which Roberta Kaplan ('Robbie') had discussed in a call earlier that day.
This document is an email chain from May 2019 between Alex Conlon of Kaplan Hecker & Fink LLP and an unnamed Assistant U.S. Attorney from the Southern District of New York (SDNY). The correspondence coordinates an interview/meeting with a female client (Ms. [Redacted]) regarding the SDNY investigation into Jeffrey Epstein. The prosecutor notes that upcoming meetings will cover 'difficult topics,' specifically 'Giglio subjects' and a review of Epstein's conduct with the client.
This document is an email chain from May 2019 between Alex Conlon (Kaplan Hecker & Fink LLP) and an Assistant U.S. Attorney from the SDNY regarding the investigation into Jeffrey Epstein. The emails discuss scheduling an interview with a redacted female witness ('Ms. [Redacted]') to discuss 'difficult topics,' including 'Giglio subjects' and Epstein's specific conduct with her. The correspondence also touches on the witness contacting other individuals the SDNY is interested in speaking with.
This document is an email chain from October 2019 involving Alex Conlon of Kaplan Hecker & Fink LLP and the FBI Victim Services Division. The correspondence concerns the coordination of two briefings for victims of Jeffrey Epstein, scheduled for October 15 in Miramar, FL, and October 23 in New York, NY. The FBI requests security information (including SSNs) for attorneys accompanying victims to these federal buildings.
Email exchange from April 2019 between Alex Conlon of Kaplan Hecker & Fink LLP and a likely federal prosecutor regarding scheduling a proffer session for a client. The prosecutor requests the client's current legal name (as it has changed) and asks for phone numbers the client used to communicate with Jeffrey Epstein to help corroborate her recollections.
This email chain from December 2019 between the Kaplan Hecker & Fink legal team and redacted recipients discusses court transcripts and the administration of the Epstein Estate. Key revelations include the confirmation that Mark Epstein (Jeffrey's brother) was identified by Estate lawyers (Bennet Moskowitz) as the sole beneficiary of the estate. The emails also mention that the 'Feinberg draft protocol' (likely regarding the victim compensation fund) was received and considered a 'disaster' by Kaplan's team.
This document is an email chain from November and December 2019 between Jordy Feldman (Administrator of the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program) and attorneys Roberta Kaplan and Kate Doniger (representing victims). The core conflict involves the independence of the Compensation Program; Kaplan's team argues that because the administrators were hired by the Estate, they lack independence, and proposes adding a fourth, plaintiff-selected administrator. Feldman rejects this proposal, citing the reputation and experience of his team (including Ken Feinberg and Camille Biros) and asserting the program's neutrality.
This document is a printout of a Myspace profile page for the user 'sublimehottie', who is also referred to as 'alex'. It displays a series of comments from friends and acquaintances posted in September 2005. The comments are informal, with one user suggesting they get together to use drugs ("burn one" and "get blizzy"), while others check in and express affection.
Attaching transcript from Nov 21 hearing; notes Robbie Kaplan mentions Mark Epstein is the beneficiary.
Sending transcript from yesterday's conference that Robbie described in a call earlier that day.
Sending the transcript from the previous day's conference.
Sends attached transcript from a conference described by Robbie.
Forwarding thread regarding FBI victim briefings.
Follow-up regarding the 'forfeiture issue' and requesting a time to talk.
Stating Ms. [Redacted] is available to meet 'this week at 4:30' at their office. Mentions she is making phone calls to two individuals.
Confirming a meeting time of 4:30 for the client; mentioning client will make phone calls to two individuals.
Confirming 'Thursday' as the meeting day.
Asking for the specific day of the week for the meeting.
Discussing note-taking protocols during witness conversations; requesting a meeting with Ms. [Redacted] to discuss 'Giglio subjects' and 'Epstein's conduct'.
Discussing protocols for taking notes during conversations; requesting a meeting with Ms. [Redacted] to cover 'difficult topics, including Giglio subjects and some review of Epstein's conduct'.
Proposing times for a proffer meeting; mentioning colleagues Jenna Dabbs and Alex Hess will attend.
Confirming attendance. Clarifying client name change status (husband's last name). Confirming will ask for phone numbers associated with Epstein.
Asking for clarification on client name change. Requesting phone numbers utilized with Epstein or his associates to corroborate recollections.
Requesting to schedule a proffer for Thursday or Friday. Mentions Robbie is out of town but Alex Hess and Jenna Dabbs can attend.
Confirming Friday at 11:00 at their offices. Mentions prosecutors and FBI Agent will attend. Attaching form proffer agreement.
Confirming attorney proffer. Discussing client's name change (husband's last name). Will ask client about phone numbers associated with Epstein.
Asking for clarification on attorney proffer vs client meeting. Asking for client's current last name. Asking for phone numbers utilized with Epstein.
Initial contact proposing meeting times. Mentions Robbie is out of town.
Discussing scheduling an attorney proffer or client meeting; asking for client's current name; requesting phone numbers used to communicate with Epstein for corroboration.
Confirming meeting for Friday at 11:00 at government offices with prosecutors and FBI agent. Attaching standard proffer agreement.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity